Hello,

More of my philosophy about USA and its spirit and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the problematic of USA,
is that people of USA are interpreting that since USA is mostly about
egoism and competition , so it is about violence, and this can create
violence inside USA, but i think that it is a too simplistic view, since
when you read more about the Adam Smith philosophy you will understand
more and more USA, for example you have like the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith knows the processes by wich egoism and competition
creates prosperity and happiness of nations, so when you see it more
clearly, you have to know that this egoism also creates a better social
system and USA can be improved more and more by also the process of
egoism and competition, so don't be too simplistic.

More of my philosophy about USA and about competition and egoism..

I have just looked at the following video of a song of a black singer in
USA, i invite you to look at it:

Childish Gambino - This Is America

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYOjWnS4cMY

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the above video is not at
all realistic and pragmatic about USA, since you have to understand USA,
since i think that USA governments, like the economist and philosopher
Adam Smith, has known that "Human egoism is the engine of the prosperity
and happiness of nations", but the USA government has not said that
it is only about egoism and competition, so it has been falsely
interpreted by the black singer above that USA is about violence since
it is for egoism and competition, so i think that the above black singer
has to understand the basis of the philosophy of Adam Smith, since i am
also saying below the following:

More of my philosophy about the saying of the philosopher and economist
Adam Smith and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i will make you understand one more
important thing, so notice again the following saying of the economist
and philosopher Adam Smith:

"Human egoism is the engine of the prosperity and happiness of nations"

So i think i am highly smart, and i will say that the above saying
doesn't say
that it is only egoism that is the engine of the prosperity and
happiness of nations, since you can also be a well balance of this
egoism and a level of cooperation or solidarity too that makes the
prosperity and happiness of nations, but i think Adam Smith is smart by
saying so, since Adam Smith has noticed that humans are more egoistic as
i am presenting you the study below that shows it, so he has started to
analyse the prosperity and happiness of nations from this point of view,
and he has noticed that
egoism is the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations. Also we
have to be smart and notice that when i say that humans are egoistic,
that doesn't mean that they are completely 100% egoistic, but they can
be like 65% or so egoistic, so we have not to be pessimistic about
humans, since i think from the normal distribution we can say that the
large majority of humans are not genetically violent.

More of my philosophy about is it about how sex sells a lot and more of
thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and you will say that it is simply the fact
that sex sells a lot, but i don't think so, since what they are
trying to do is to standardize abnormal sexual behaviors, it is
why i don't think that it sells well to a large party of the population.
..
More of my philosophy about this abnormal too much sex behavior and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just looked at the following
video so that to discover a pattern with my fluid intelligence:

Daft Punk - Lose Yourself to Dance - Burning Man 2013

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-8rvk40qss

And i think i am smart, and i think that the pattern that i am
discovering with my fluid intelligence in the above video, is that the
abnormal and too much sex behavior comes from a kind of wanting like to
flee or escape from our world into an imaginary world or a dream, i
think that this abnormal and too much sex behavior of this really small
minority is like a rebellious behavior that considers its abnormal and
too much sex behavior like a kind of liberty from the constraints of the
reality, but i think that this rebellious behavior is not responsable
behavior and it is not the reality of the large majority of the population.

More of my philosophy about the not realistic sexual behavior and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i invite you to look for example at the
following people in the following video of a song:

Daft Punk - Lose Yourself to Dance - Burning Man 2013

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-8rvk40qss

So are you noticing how the above people on the above video of a song
are exhibiting an abnormal sexual behavior? so i think that they are
just part of a really small minority as i am saying below, since i think
that this kind of sexual behavior is not realistic, and it is just a
really small minority that is making such big noises about sex in a such
a way, so i don't think that white european people are behaving in such
a way, so i think that there is no sexual revolution in the West, since
we have to be realistic, and as i have just said that i think that
saying that we are in a sexual revolution with too much sex is not at
all realistic, since i think what is happening in the West is that it is
a really small minority of people in such the music industry or media
or porno industry that are exhibiting a not realistic and too much sex
and abnormal sexual behavior, so i think that there is no sexual
revolution in the West, but it is just a really small minority that is
making big noises with sex, so we have not to be pessimistic about
humans, and we have to be optimistic about morality and we have to be
proactive at being an efficient morality.

More of my philosophy about the white supremacists and neo-nazis and
more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the problematic with white
supremacists and neo-nazis, is that they present the blacks and other
ethnic groups as genetically too much violent, and after that they
dehumanize them and after that they hate them and want to hurt
and kill them, and it is the same way that has used nazism with
the jews, so i think by logical analogy there is another
mechanism that looks like it, and it is the fact that
you for example say that humans are naturally egoistic and selfish
as the following study is saying it:

Humans are naturally selfish, study finds

https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/

And this kind of ways of presenting the other as being this naturally
egoistic and selfish or by presenting it as genetically too much violent
is so problematic, and it is why i am talking about the economic
Liberalism of Adam Smith as i am talking below, and it is why i am
talking as i am talking about the MAOA that we call the “Warrior Gene”,
and read about it below, and it is why i have just invented a new poem
about it that says that it needs a kind of moderatism, and here it is
and read my below thoughts so that to understand:

Here is my new poem in english:

--

You say that egoism is our nature and our autism

So is it not what brings fascism ?

And is it not a kind of racism ?

So does it not requires political activism ?

So that to avoid a kind of societal barbarism ?

So does it needs bolshevism ?

No, since bolshevism is the reactionary against despotism

So is it not this human egoism the cause of the today populism ?

So does it needs skepticism or stalinism ?

No, since i think that human egoism has not to be seen as violent
cannibalism !

So i am optimistic since i think it needs not so much altruism !

So it is why i think it doesn't need nihilism

But it needs a kind of moderatism !

--

More of my philosophy about the normal distribution and about genetical
violence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have to clear something really
important, so as you have just noticed that i have just said
that from the normal distribution there is 16.4% of too genetically
violent humans, but we have to be pragmatic and realistic so that to
understand more, since i think that as in the IQ, when you say
that someone has 115 IQ, you have to feel it and understand it more
realistically, since i think that an IQ of 115 is not so smart,
and even an IQ of 120 is not so smart, so then it is as the genetical
violence that is i think distributed as the IQ, so then when i say
that there are 16.4% of genetically too violent humans, that doesn't
mean that they are so violent, so then the really problematic genetical
violence is much less than 16.4%, so we have not to be pessimistic.

Read more my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the MAOA the “Warrior Gene”..

I think i am highly smart and i am understanding rapidly the problematic
of the MAOA that we call the “Warrior Gene”, so you have to understand
that the MAOA that we call the “Warrior Gene” comes with two variants,
the low activity one and the high activity one, so the high activity one
is not so problematic, but the low activity one causes you to be
hypersensitive, so when you have this low activity MAOA you become
affected more by negative experiences, but here again you have to be
smart, since when you are this affected more by negative experiences,
you have to be genetically too violent to a certain degree so that to
become agressive towards others, so here again you have to take a look
at the normal distribution so that to know how many percentage of the
population are genetically too violent, so i think from the normal
distribution that 16.4% of the population are too genetically violent,
so then even if black americans or africans or chinese or such ethnic
groups have a higher percentage of low activity MAOA than white
europeans, you have to take a look at the factor of how many are
genetically too much violent so that to know about the Dangerousness of
it, since the being hypersensitive by having the low activity MAOA,
doesn't mean that you are too violent, so i think
that for example black americans have a higher percentage of
hypersensitive humans than white europeans. And you can read more
and more scientific papers so that you understand more about the low
activity MAOA.

More of my philosophy of how human egoism is a tendency and more of my
thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i will make you notice something on the
following study:

Humans are naturally selfish, study finds

https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/

So notice how the study above doesn't say that humans are 100% selfish,
but it says that they have a "tendency" to be selfish, and it is really
important to notice it, since i think that from the normal distribution
that humans are by far a large majority not genetically violent, so i
think that we can say that they can have the tendency to be selfish like
at 65% or so, so we have not to be pessimistic about humans, and it is
what i am saying below in my previous thoughts, so i invite you to
reread my previous thoughts below:

More of my philosophy about the saying of the philosopher and economist
Adam Smith and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i will make you understand one more
important thing, so notice again the following saying of the economist
and philosopher Adam Smith:

"Human egoism is the engine of the prosperity and happiness of nations"

So i think i am highly smart, and i will say that the above saying
doesn't say
that it is only egoism that is the engine of the prosperity and
happiness of nations, since you can also be a well balance of this
egoism and a level of cooperation or solidarity too that makes the
prosperity and happiness of nations, but i think Adam Smith is smart by
saying so, since Adam Smith has noticed that humans are more egoistic as
i am presenting you the study below that shows it, so he has started to
analyse the prosperity and happiness of nations from this point of view,
and he has noticed that
egoism is the engine of prosperity and happiness of nations. Also we
have to be smart and notice that when i say that humans are egoistic,
that doesn't mean that they are completely 100% egoistic, but they can
be like 65% or so egoistic, so we have not to be pessimistic about
humans, since i think from the normal distribution we can say that the
large majority of humans are not genetically violent.

More of my philosophy about the self-interest and egoism in economic
Liberalism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed that i have just
talked about how humans are egoistic, so you have to understand my
thoughts below, that the engine of the prosperity and happiness of
nations is "egoism", so then you have to understand that in economic
Liberalism of Adam Smith, the self-interest as egoism also creates
responsability towards the nation and towards our global world, so i
think that you have to know how to be the "interesting" for others so
that to create the good business and the good relations, so read my
following thoughts about Adam Smith so that to understand:

I say that in economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, self-interest is most
of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud,
price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the
engine of the prosperity and happiness of nations, and Adam Smith
described the opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and
competition as the invisible hand, it means that while producers and
consumers are not acting with the intent of serving the needs of others
or society, they do, since when you work, your goal is to earn money,
but in the process you provide a valuable good or service that benefits
others and society, so it is the basis of the following saying of Adam
Smith: "Human egoism is the engine of the prosperity and happiness of
nations"

More of my philosophy about how study finds Humans are naturally selfish
and more of my thoughts..

I have just said that i think humans are egoistic, and i invite you
to read the following article so that to notice it:

Humans are naturally selfish, study finds

https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/

More precision about more of my philosophy of is it about egoism and
more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i think that humans are egoistic,
so you have to be smart and understand that the being egoistic doesn't
mean to be bad, since i think that the philosopher and economist Adam
Smith has said the following:

"Human egoism is the engine of the prosperity and happiness of nations",

But i am highly smart and i am discovering a pattern with my fluid
intelligence in the above saying of Adam Smith, and this pattern
looks like the pattern of utilitarianism that i have also discovered
with my fluid intelligence, and read about it below, since egoism also
makes you responsability, i mean so that to be prosperity and happiness
of nations you have also to be individual responsability about it, and
it is also about egoism since the wanting to be be properity and
happiness of nations comes also from individual egoism, since it is the
wanting to be individual prosperity and happiness that makes this
responsability, and notice that there is what we call individual egoism
and societal egoism , but eventhough they are egoism, i think they are
also greatly regulated by the fact that we have to be the global world's
responsability so that to be prosperity and happiness of nations, so now
you are understanding that individual egoism or egoism doesn't mean that
it is bad, and here is also what i have said about utilitarianism and
more so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about smartness and about discovering patterns and
more of my thoughts..

I think i am really smart, i think that inventing sophisticated theorems
in mathematics is also discovering smart patterns with your fluid
intelligence, it is why i am inventing my thoughts by also discovering
patterns with my fluid intelligence , but notice that discovering
patterns in mathematics is like a low level way of doing like in
microeconomics, but discovering patterns can be in a high level way like
in macroeconomics, and here is an example of how i am doing it quickly,
read my following thoughts about Nikola Tesla and about Garry Tan that i
have invented quickly so that to notice how i am discovering smart
patterns with my fluid intelligence in a high level way:

More of my philosophy of how i am smart and about what is smartness..

I think i am smart, and i think that smartness is not doing
mathematics, i think being highly smart is discovering smart patterns
and composing smartly other patterns with those patterns etc. so i will
give you my examples of how i am genetically highly smart, so read
carefully my following thoughts and notice how i have quickly
read a saying of Nikola Tesla and how i have rapidly discovered
smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my
showing that Nikola Tesla is not correct thinking and by discovering
other patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my invention of
my new proverb below etc. so read carefully my following thoughts and
you will notice that being highly smart is also quickly discovering
smart patterns in the way i am doing it below(and notice below the other
smart patterns that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence when i
am rapidly showing that Garry Tan is not correct thinking):

More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..

I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola
Tesla, and you can read about him here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the
video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnQ-o6R2wac

And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also
an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i
don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person like me(and i think
it is also genetical in me), since for example he is saying the
following saying in the above video:

"Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
be alone, that is when ideas are born"

So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all,
since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent
thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so
that to be efficient, and i also think that creativity is the mother of
invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above
saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you
understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4

I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called
"The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing
one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is
saying that doing many things at the same time is not good for
productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is
not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time
and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be
like convergent thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like
between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking,
and here is my new proverb about my methodology:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance
divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of
efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent
thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary
algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that
is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he
attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a
bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be
the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame
basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly
discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is
trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can,
you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the
things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence
is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the
way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply
but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you
enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about
usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of
the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the
factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above
video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be
useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart
"redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the
reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a
thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more
efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right
precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich
depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can
be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

More of my philosophy about adaptation and survival and egoism and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed i have
just talked more about my philosophy, read it below, but now i will
discuss a very important subject , and i will start it by asking
a philosophical question of:

From where comes human egoism ?

I think human egoism comes from our instinct of wanting to survive,
so then it comes from the fact that we have to "compete" against
the dynamic process of life so that to adapt, but look again and notice
that this competition has the tendency of making us egoistic as
individuals, so then we have to learn much more the way of an efficient
philosophy so that to tune this process of competition so that
it be well balanced, i mean look for example at "science", so i will
ask if science has to be only private thing? i don't think so, since
science is also universal, so we have to know how to be a well balance
of also sharing it so that science be efficient, so then
you are noticing that competition is also the same, since we have to
tune it correctly so that to not being a destructive egoism, so now
you are understanding that we have to well balance by also efficiently
learning people the good philosophy that makes it possible.

More of my explanation of my philosophy about about Stoicism and more of
my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and notice that i am saying in my below
thoughts of my philosophy the following:

"..So you have then to be convinced that human life is not yet beautiful
and with this convinced about it , you then become convinced that
expressing aggression would not make you feel better as a society, and
this will eventually improve your mood"

And you have to understand that when i am saying in my above thoughts
the following:

"you then become convinced that expressing aggression"

I am talking about the expressing aggression in "general", as people of
a society, against the human life that is not yet beautiful. So reread
again my following thoughts of my philosophy so that you notice that i
am logical:

Stoicism teaches the development of self-control and fortitude,
but i am a philosopher that is not in accordance with Stoicism,
since i think that we can not ask all people to be fortitude,
since fortitude is "courage" in pain or adversity, but not everybody
have this level of courage, so then we have to find other philosophical
mechanisms that also play the role of a good engine, so i think in my
philosophy you can become self-control by being realistic and pragmatic,
since it is like Mood-freezing, since human life is not beautiful, and
it doesn't mean that human life has become not beautiful, but it means
that we are not so sophisticated we humans so that human life be
beautiful, so then we have to be more optimistic since our exponential
progress will make us soon much more sophisticated and much more
powerful as humans, so you have then to be convinced that human life is
not yet beautiful and with this convinced about it , you then become
convinced that expressing aggression would not make you feel better as a
society, and this will eventually improve your mood, this is also the
basis of my philosophy, and so that to understand more my philosophy, i
invite you to read my following part of my philosophy about how to be
self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and how to be
hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

Also read my following thoughts about what is the power of the idea:

What is the true power of the idea ?

This is a so important philosophical subject, since
i think i am smart and i will make you feel more the true
power of the idea by first talking about the technic in psychology that
we call "Mood freezing", since i think that the most important aspect of
Mood freezing is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and you
can read about it here:

https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Mood+Freezing

So as you are noticing that it says that when the respondents were
convinced that expressing aggression would not make them feel better,
they actually accepted their current situation which eventually improved
their moods, so this proves that the power of the idea is great, this is
why i am of the ones that believes that we can enhance much better
humans and construct a new type of man by using some intellectual
mechanisms, and i am talking about some of them above and here is my
poem about the true power of the idea, read it again:

"Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how they have built south Korea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we unite the people such as of Crimea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not just a pizza from the pizzeria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the simple prayer of Ave Maria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the stupid war between the sunnite and shiah
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we make north Korea looks like a beautiful Canada
So give me more of those beautiful and so smart ideas !"

Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.