Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> writes:

> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
>
>> O?uz <oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> So, should I change this or is it good (except being a bit
>>> unreadable)?
>>
>> Two comments.
>>
>> One, don't listen to the advice of "experts" who say something
>> is or is not readable. Instead try writing the code several
>> different ways and pick the one that best expresses what it
>> is you want to say.
>
> Note that the OP himself described it as unreadable. I'd say any time
> the author of the code regards it as unreadable, we should take him at
> his word (for the record, I agree with him here).

Obviously the code was not unreadable, since many people here
were able to read it without too much difficulty. The author
too was, rather obviously, able to read it. Some people might
believe that some other, unspecified, people would have trouble
reading the code, but that doesn't make it unreadable. If you
were able to read the code then I don't know what you mean
when you say the code is unreadable, but certainly you don't
mean literally that.