Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

[Babe] Ruth made a big mistake when he gave up pitching. -- Tris Speaker, 1921


sport / rec.sport.rowing / Re: tragedy in Iowa.

SubjectAuthor
* Re: tragedy in Iowa.Robin Harries
`* Re: tragedy in Iowa.Henry Law
 `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.carl
  `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.don Vickers
   `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.carl
    `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.Peter
     +* Re: tragedy in Iowa.carl
     |`* Re: tragedy in Iowa.bnw...@gmail.com
     | +- Re: tragedy in Iowa.bnw...@gmail.com
     | `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.carl
     |  +- Re: tragedy in Iowa.bnw...@gmail.com
     |  `- Re: tragedy in Iowa.Marc Messing
     `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.Marc Messing
      `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.carl
       `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.Marc Messing
        `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.carl
         `* Re: tragedy in Iowa.don Vickers
          +* Re: tragedy in Iowa.don Vickers
          |+- Re: tragedy in Iowa.Marc Messing
          |`* USR safety meetingMarc Messing
          | `* Re: USR safety meetingdon Vickers
          |  `* Re: USR safety meetingMarc Messing
          |   `* Re: USR safety meetingMarc Messing
          |    `- Re: USR safety meetingcarl
          `- Re: tragedy in Iowa.Marc Messing

1
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=102&group=rec.sport.rowing#102

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6491:: with SMTP id y139mr8428015qkb.483.1617285908552;
Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:9b07:: with SMTP id y7mr11571494ybn.505.1617285908216;
Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.11.134.21; posting-account=7UXWugoAAAANRVNI7t7N4uEdfB20XKxp
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.11.134.21
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: robin.ha...@quietroom.co.uk (Robin Harries)
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 14:05:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Robin Harries - Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:05 UTC

This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify, but the poster claims to know one of the rowers who died. It seems that both were in a boat for the first time ever. Water temperature was 40 Fahrenheit, 25mph winds and no launch cover. Horrendous.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Rowing/comments/mglidh/isu_rowing_accident/

Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=103&group=rec.sport.rowing#103

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:44:52 -0500
From: new...@lawshouse.org (Henry Law)
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
git.gnome.org/pan2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:44:52 -0500
Lines: 20
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-dprou4k7OAT0YC4iqsP4GtWyCPFd2QPW01HAvsatLGO1Iu1vFOxywDuhj1RB2z2BbdGy/jzfwyuMmJY!aCvpCypQ07YBrwKn/1JGQaXUUCFMLJMsod5B503OL65UIMQWp6Mf/C9HzURuclhPlxffeD1Gm6F7!1Q==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2039
 by: Henry Law - Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:44 UTC

On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:

> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,

A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
even near one) have the ring of truth about them.

I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.

Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
nevertheless.

--
Henry Law n e w s @ l a w s h o u s e . o r g
Manchester, England

Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=105&group=rec.sport.rowing#105

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: car...@carldouglasrowing.com (carl)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 19:44:39 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 119
Message-ID: <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
<DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 18:44:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6e982280479e144953af5aac0de3cabb";
logging-data="28873"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19r3Sn2AEp9WoSzDwhvWKBAqg2JvczMN64="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uWnotsHM12AFa6R+I+e9B5hZPE8=
In-Reply-To: <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210401-2, 01/04/2021), Outbound message
 by: carl - Thu, 1 Apr 2021 18:44 UTC

On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
>
>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
>
> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
>
> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
>
> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> nevertheless.
>

Henry -
Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
ill-informed comments.

The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
"these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??

Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.

I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
better information - what do we know so far?

1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
country with very little natural shelter.
3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
& there had until recently been freezing conditions.

So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
- 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
variations, can create areas of increased wave height.

The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?

In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.

However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
end.

A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
wearing bulky clothing.

Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
& prior assessment of conditions.

Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.

One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
English Covid lock-down.

Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
inadvertent errors.

Our thoughts go to all affected -
Carl

--
Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
Email: carl@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=108&group=rec.sport.rowing#108

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:110c:: with SMTP id e12mr28654922qty.350.1617728563468;
Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:18b:: with SMTP id 133mr9529556ybb.505.1617728563055;
Tue, 06 Apr 2021 10:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.58.123.11; posting-account=L5gH8QoAAAB4LMI2VgEHVsX2VKo3Ci20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.58.123.11
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: lakega...@gmail.com (don Vickers)
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:02:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: don Vickers - Tue, 6 Apr 2021 17:02 UTC

On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
> >
> >> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
> >
> > A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> > incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> > other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> > even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
> >
> > I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> > novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false..
> > It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
> >
> > Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> > emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> > nevertheless.
> >
> Henry -
> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
> ill-informed comments.
>
> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
>
> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
>
> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
> better information - what do we know so far?
>
> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
> country with very little natural shelter.
> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier..
> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
>
> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
>
> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
>
> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
>
> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
> end.
>
> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
> wearing bulky clothing.
>
> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
> & prior assessment of conditions.
>
> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
>
> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
> English Covid lock-down.
>
> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
> inadvertent errors.
>
> Our thoughts go to all affected -
> Carl
>
> --
> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>

The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.

As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.

Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=109&group=rec.sport.rowing#109

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: car...@carldouglasrowing.com (carl)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 20:10:46 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 169
Message-ID: <s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
<DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
<13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 19:10:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="30f42d118f590b0b645c86c28a1a86c3";
logging-data="17330"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18U7rfZ+4BSlRitDWWNZ+0EsSO3389nOO8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:h4zvpmYF6qXNeXIvB2AJtJ0j78M=
In-Reply-To: <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210406-2, 06/04/2021), Outbound message
 by: carl - Tue, 6 Apr 2021 19:10 UTC

On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
>>>
>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
>>>
>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
>>>
>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
>>>
>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
>>> nevertheless.
>>>
>> Henry -
>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
>> ill-informed comments.
>>
>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
>>
>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
>>
>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
>> better information - what do we know so far?
>>
>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
>> country with very little natural shelter.
>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
>>
>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
>>
>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
>>
>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
>>
>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
>> end.
>>
>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
>> wearing bulky clothing.
>>
>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
>> & prior assessment of conditions.
>>
>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
>>
>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
>> English Covid lock-down.
>>
>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
>> inadvertent errors.
>>
>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
>> Carl
>>

> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
>
> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
>
> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
>

Thank you, Don.

So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
unduly exposed them those beam waves.

On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
(Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
boating in winds >14mph.

The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
temperatures fall below certain limits.

As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.

Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
the same old mistakes.


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=111&group=rec.sport.rowing#111

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:b85:: with SMTP id h5mr1909282qti.178.1617787740621;
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 02:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:c60e:: with SMTP id k14mr3146739ybf.154.1617787740391;
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 02:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 02:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.69.62.89; posting-account=BeP6PgkAAAAEmJv0M-ZLMbe9k9wk6CvJ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.69.62.89
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: pgke...@yahoo.com (Peter)
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 09:29:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 240
 by: Peter - Wed, 7 Apr 2021 09:29 UTC

On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
> > On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> >> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
> >>>
> >>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> >>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> >>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> >>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
> >>>
> >>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> >>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
> >>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
> >>>
> >>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> >>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> >>> nevertheless.
> >>>
> >> Henry -
> >> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
> >> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
> >> ill-informed comments.
> >>
> >> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
> >> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
> >> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
> >> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
> >> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
> >> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
> >>
> >> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
> >> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
> >>
> >> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
> >> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
> >> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
> >> better information - what do we know so far?
> >>
> >> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
> >> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
> >> country with very little natural shelter.
> >> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
> >> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
> >> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
> >> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
> >>
> >> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
> >> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
> >> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm..
> >> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
> >> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
> >> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
> >> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
> >> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
> >> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
> >>
> >> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
> >> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
> >>
> >> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
> >> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
> >>
> >> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
> >> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
> >> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
> >> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
> >> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
> >> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
> >> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
> >> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
> >> end.
> >>
> >> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
> >> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
> >> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
> >> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
> >> wearing bulky clothing.
> >>
> >> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
> >> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
> >> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
> >> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
> >> & prior assessment of conditions.
> >>
> >> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
> >> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
> >> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
> >> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes..
> >>
> >> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
> >> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
> >> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
> >> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
> >> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
> >> English Covid lock-down.
> >>
> >> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
> >> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
> >> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
> >> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
> >> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
> >> inadvertent errors.
> >>
> >> Our thoughts go to all affected -
> >> Carl
> >>
> > There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
> >
> > The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
> >
> > As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
> >
> Thank you, Don.
>
> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
>
> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
> boating in winds >14mph.
>
> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
> temperatures fall below certain limits.
>
> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
>
> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
> the same old mistakes.
> Carl
> --
> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<s4ka8j$m5b$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=113&group=rec.sport.rowing#113

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: car...@carldouglasrowing.com (carl)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:57:55 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 214
Message-ID: <s4ka8j$m5b$1@dont-email.me>
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
<DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
<13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>
<ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:57:55 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b8d279e65938c221c015cd2b5975e3e8";
logging-data="22699"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yJC0lRbC1VfEsapYR2U7dm/mKL1ixdJU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mSUMtze6ueTHyLtM9dcsT+zrKQU=
In-Reply-To: <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210407-0, 07/04/2021), Outbound message
 by: carl - Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:57 UTC

On 07/04/2021 10:29, Peter wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
>> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
>>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
>>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
>>>>>
>>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
>>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
>>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
>>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
>>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
>>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
>>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
>>>>> nevertheless.
>>>>>
>>>> Henry -
>>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
>>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
>>>> ill-informed comments.
>>>>
>>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
>>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
>>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
>>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
>>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
>>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
>>>>
>>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
>>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
>>>>
>>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
>>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
>>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
>>>> better information - what do we know so far?
>>>>
>>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
>>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
>>>> country with very little natural shelter.
>>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
>>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
>>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
>>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
>>>>
>>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
>>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
>>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
>>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
>>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
>>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
>>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
>>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
>>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
>>>>
>>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
>>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
>>>>
>>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
>>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
>>>>
>>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
>>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
>>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
>>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
>>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
>>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
>>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
>>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
>>>> end.
>>>>
>>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
>>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
>>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
>>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
>>>> wearing bulky clothing.
>>>>
>>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
>>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
>>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
>>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
>>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
>>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
>>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
>>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
>>>>
>>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
>>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
>>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
>>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
>>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
>>>> English Covid lock-down.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
>>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
>>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
>>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
>>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
>>>> inadvertent errors.
>>>>
>>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
>>>> Carl
>>>>
>>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
>>>
>>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
>>>
>>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
>>>
>> Thank you, Don.
>>
>> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
>> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
>> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
>> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
>> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
>> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
>>
>> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
>> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
>> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
>> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
>> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
>> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
>> boating in winds >14mph.
>>
>> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
>> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
>> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
>> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
>> temperatures fall below certain limits.
>>
>> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
>> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
>> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
>> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
>> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
>> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
>> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
>> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
>>
>> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
>> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
>> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
>> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
>> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
>> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
>> the same old mistakes.
>> Carl
>> --


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<0f14dae5-376e-4812-8fab-65edecc8319fn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=115&group=rec.sport.rowing#115

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:49a:: with SMTP id 26mr4633511qkr.436.1617822583853;
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 12:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4646:: with SMTP id t67mr6498588yba.495.1617822583621;
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 12:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!usenet.pasdenom.info!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s4ka8j$m5b$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.62.173.178; posting-account=Hy9LgAoAAACm8Em5GWkm4kj2b2_LzMVZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.62.173.178
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ka8j$m5b$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0f14dae5-376e-4812-8fab-65edecc8319fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: bnwe...@gmail.com (bnw...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 19:09:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: bnw...@gmail.com - Wed, 7 Apr 2021 19:09 UTC

On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 8:57:57 AM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> On 07/04/2021 10:29, Peter wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
> >> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> >>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> >>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> >>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> >>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> >>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
> >>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> >>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> >>>>> nevertheless.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Henry -
> >>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
> >>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
> >>>> ill-informed comments.
> >>>>
> >>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
> >>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
> >>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
> >>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
> >>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
> >>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
> >>>>
> >>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
> >>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
> >>>>
> >>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
> >>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
> >>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
> >>>> better information - what do we know so far?
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
> >>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
> >>>> country with very little natural shelter.
> >>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
> >>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
> >>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
> >>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
> >>>>
> >>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
> >>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
> >>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
> >>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
> >>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
> >>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
> >>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
> >>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
> >>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
> >>>>
> >>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
> >>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
> >>>>
> >>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
> >>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
> >>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
> >>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
> >>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
> >>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
> >>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
> >>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
> >>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
> >>>> end.
> >>>>
> >>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
> >>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
> >>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
> >>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
> >>>> wearing bulky clothing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
> >>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
> >>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
> >>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
> >>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
> >>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
> >>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
> >>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
> >>>>
> >>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
> >>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
> >>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
> >>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
> >>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
> >>>> English Covid lock-down.
> >>>>
> >>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
> >>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
> >>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
> >>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
> >>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
> >>>> inadvertent errors.
> >>>>
> >>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
> >>>> Carl
> >>>>
> >>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
> >>>
> >>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
> >>>
> >>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
> >>>
> >> Thank you, Don.
> >>
> >> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
> >> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
> >> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
> >> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
> >> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
> >> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
> >>
> >> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
> >> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
> >> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
> >> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
> >> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
> >> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
> >> boating in winds >14mph.
> >>
> >> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
> >> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
> >> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
> >> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
> >> temperatures fall below certain limits.
> >>
> >> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
> >> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
> >> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
> >> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
> >> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
> >> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
> >> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
> >> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
> >>
> >> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
> >> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
> >> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
> >> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
> >> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
> >> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
> >> the same old mistakes.
> >> Carl
> >> --
>
> >
> > I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
> > The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
> > A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
> >
> > pgk
> >
> Hi Peter -
>
> Good points, but may I clarify a couple of them?
>
> My understanding is that the boat was parallel with the advancing
> wave-fronts when rolled over? Certainly a more plausible scenario.
>
> A wooden boat is no more buoyant than a honeycomb/synthetic fibre
> composite. The buoyancy comes from volumetric displacement of water,
> and a ~2mm thick laminated wood hull is thinner, & thus displaces less
> water per unit of hull area, than a composite hull perhaps 5mm thick &
> of similar areal mass. But, in reality, the crucial element of the
> shell's buoyancy is provided by the sum of all enclosed volumes that lie
> below the existing waterline (whether in normal or swamped condition).
>
> When swamped, the hull skin's thickness x area contributes but a part of
> this displacement while major contributions come from the fully-enclosed
> bow & stern compartments &, most importantly, from the other enclosed
> volumes including, in particular, those easily enclosable (but still too
> often left open, due sadly to institutional ignorance & neglect) volumes
> of the spaces below the slide beds which can contribute ~40kg of added
> flotation capacity/uplift per person.
>
> An additional contribution to flotation for a swamped shell comes from
> the partial immersion of the legs and buttocks of the seated crew. Yes,
> that water may be cold, but it is far better to have cold legs than to
> chill the torso by quitting an otherwise floating shell and attempting
> to swim.
>
> Unfortunately, it seems the Iowa crew was thrown from the boat as it
> rolled over & thus had severely limited options. Which is where
> personal flotation devices (which really need not incommode rowers in
> modern designs) would have been so helpful.
> Carl
>
> --
> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
This whole event is so unfortunate, but seemingly avoidable, if only with less severe consequences.
Carl, you mention specific PFD's that do not negatively affect the rowers. Can you elaborate/recommend, if not for a specific make/model, but maybe key bullet points for which we should look when seeking these out for ourselves or crew members?
Thanks in advance as always...


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<90590366-0a30-4687-a3ef-5b1044acebb3n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=116&group=rec.sport.rowing#116

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:110c:: with SMTP id e12mr4138697qty.350.1617822653429;
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 12:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:be02:: with SMTP id h2mr4199200ybk.382.1617822653185;
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 12:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0f14dae5-376e-4812-8fab-65edecc8319fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.62.173.178; posting-account=Hy9LgAoAAACm8Em5GWkm4kj2b2_LzMVZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.62.173.178
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ka8j$m5b$1@dont-email.me> <0f14dae5-376e-4812-8fab-65edecc8319fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <90590366-0a30-4687-a3ef-5b1044acebb3n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: bnwe...@gmail.com (bnw...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 19:10:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: bnw...@gmail.com - Wed, 7 Apr 2021 19:10 UTC

On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 3:09:44 PM UTC-4, bnw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 8:57:57 AM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> > On 07/04/2021 10:29, Peter wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
> > >> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
> > >>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> > >>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> > >>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> > >>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> > >>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> > >>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> > >>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
> > >>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> > >>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> > >>>>> nevertheless.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Henry -
> > >>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
> > >>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
> > >>>> ill-informed comments.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
> > >>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
> > >>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
> > >>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
> > >>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
> > >>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
> > >>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
> > >>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
> > >>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
> > >>>> better information - what do we know so far?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
> > >>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
> > >>>> country with very little natural shelter.
> > >>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
> > >>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
> > >>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4..5C,
> > >>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
> > >>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
> > >>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
> > >>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
> > >>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
> > >>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
> > >>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
> > >>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
> > >>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
> > >>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
> > >>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
> > >>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
> > >>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
> > >>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
> > >>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
> > >>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
> > >>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
> > >>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
> > >>>> end.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
> > >>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
> > >>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
> > >>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
> > >>>> wearing bulky clothing.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
> > >>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
> > >>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
> > >>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
> > >>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
> > >>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
> > >>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
> > >>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
> > >>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
> > >>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
> > >>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
> > >>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
> > >>>> English Covid lock-down.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
> > >>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
> > >>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
> > >>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
> > >>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
> > >>>> inadvertent errors.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
> > >>>> Carl
> > >>>>
> > >>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
> > >>>
> > >>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
> > >>>
> > >>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
> > >>>
> > >> Thank you, Don.
> > >>
> > >> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
> > >> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
> > >> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
> > >> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
> > >> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
> > >> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
> > >>
> > >> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
> > >> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
> > >> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
> > >> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
> > >> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
> > >> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
> > >> boating in winds >14mph.
> > >>
> > >> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
> > >> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
> > >> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
> > >> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
> > >> temperatures fall below certain limits.
> > >>
> > >> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
> > >> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
> > >> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
> > >> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
> > >> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
> > >> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
> > >> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
> > >> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
> > >>
> > >> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
> > >> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
> > >> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
> > >> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
> > >> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
> > >> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
> > >> the same old mistakes.
> > >> Carl
> > >> --
> >
> > >
> > > I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
> > > The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
> > > A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
> > >
> > > pgk
> > >
> > Hi Peter -
> >
> > Good points, but may I clarify a couple of them?
> >
> > My understanding is that the boat was parallel with the advancing
> > wave-fronts when rolled over? Certainly a more plausible scenario.
> >
> > A wooden boat is no more buoyant than a honeycomb/synthetic fibre
> > composite. The buoyancy comes from volumetric displacement of water,
> > and a ~2mm thick laminated wood hull is thinner, & thus displaces less
> > water per unit of hull area, than a composite hull perhaps 5mm thick &
> > of similar areal mass. But, in reality, the crucial element of the
> > shell's buoyancy is provided by the sum of all enclosed volumes that lie
> > below the existing waterline (whether in normal or swamped condition).
> >
> > When swamped, the hull skin's thickness x area contributes but a part of
> > this displacement while major contributions come from the fully-enclosed
> > bow & stern compartments &, most importantly, from the other enclosed
> > volumes including, in particular, those easily enclosable (but still too
> > often left open, due sadly to institutional ignorance & neglect) volumes
> > of the spaces below the slide beds which can contribute ~40kg of added
> > flotation capacity/uplift per person.
> >
> > An additional contribution to flotation for a swamped shell comes from
> > the partial immersion of the legs and buttocks of the seated crew. Yes,
> > that water may be cold, but it is far better to have cold legs than to
> > chill the torso by quitting an otherwise floating shell and attempting
> > to swim.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it seems the Iowa crew was thrown from the boat as it
> > rolled over & thus had severely limited options. Which is where
> > personal flotation devices (which really need not incommode rowers in
> > modern designs) would have been so helpful.
> > Carl
> >
> > --
> > Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> > Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> > Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> > Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> > Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> > URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> > https://www.avg.com
> This whole event is so unfortunate, but seemingly avoidable, if only with less severe consequences.
> Carl, you mention specific PFD's that do not negatively affect the rowers.. Can you elaborate/recommend, if not for a specific make/model, but maybe key bullet points for which we should look when seeking these out for ourselves or crew members?
> Thanks in advance as always...
It should go without saying, but, anyone else with suggestions/recomendations would also be appreciated...
Thanks again...


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<s4l9tq$93c$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=117&group=rec.sport.rowing#117

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: car...@carldouglasrowing.com (carl)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 22:58:21 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 240
Message-ID: <s4l9tq$93c$1@dont-email.me>
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
<DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
<13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>
<ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ka8j$m5b$1@dont-email.me>
<0f14dae5-376e-4812-8fab-65edecc8319fn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:58:18 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b8d279e65938c221c015cd2b5975e3e8";
logging-data="9324"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18mWFrpUbCzTwvbjoCkttqXxNdIF+Ob934="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vADF75p+telhLmydho9b3cksqDk=
In-Reply-To: <0f14dae5-376e-4812-8fab-65edecc8319fn@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210407-6, 07/04/2021), Outbound message
 by: carl - Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:58 UTC

On 07/04/2021 20:09, bnw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 8:57:57 AM UTC-4, carl wrote:
>> On 07/04/2021 10:29, Peter wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
>>>> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
>>>>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
>>>>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
>>>>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
>>>>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
>>>>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
>>>>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
>>>>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
>>>>>>> nevertheless.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Henry -
>>>>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
>>>>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
>>>>>> ill-informed comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
>>>>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
>>>>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
>>>>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
>>>>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
>>>>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
>>>>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
>>>>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
>>>>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
>>>>>> better information - what do we know so far?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
>>>>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
>>>>>> country with very little natural shelter.
>>>>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
>>>>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
>>>>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
>>>>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
>>>>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
>>>>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
>>>>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
>>>>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
>>>>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
>>>>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
>>>>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
>>>>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
>>>>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
>>>>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
>>>>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
>>>>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
>>>>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
>>>>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
>>>>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
>>>>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
>>>>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
>>>>>> end.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
>>>>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
>>>>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
>>>>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
>>>>>> wearing bulky clothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
>>>>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
>>>>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
>>>>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
>>>>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
>>>>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
>>>>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
>>>>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
>>>>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
>>>>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
>>>>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
>>>>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
>>>>>> English Covid lock-down.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
>>>>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
>>>>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
>>>>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
>>>>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
>>>>>> inadvertent errors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
>>>>>> Carl
>>>>>>
>>>>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
>>>>>
>>>>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
>>>>>
>>>>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
>>>>>
>>>> Thank you, Don.
>>>>
>>>> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
>>>> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
>>>> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
>>>> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
>>>> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
>>>> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
>>>>
>>>> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
>>>> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
>>>> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
>>>> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
>>>> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
>>>> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
>>>> boating in winds >14mph.
>>>>
>>>> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
>>>> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
>>>> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
>>>> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
>>>> temperatures fall below certain limits.
>>>>
>>>> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
>>>> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
>>>> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
>>>> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
>>>> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
>>>> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
>>>> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
>>>> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
>>>>
>>>> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
>>>> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
>>>> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
>>>> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
>>>> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
>>>> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
>>>> the same old mistakes.
>>>> Carl
>>>> --
>>
>>>
>>> I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
>>> The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
>>> A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
>>>
>>> pgk
>>>
>> Hi Peter -
>>
>> Good points, but may I clarify a couple of them?
>>
>> My understanding is that the boat was parallel with the advancing
>> wave-fronts when rolled over? Certainly a more plausible scenario.
>>
>> A wooden boat is no more buoyant than a honeycomb/synthetic fibre
>> composite. The buoyancy comes from volumetric displacement of water,
>> and a ~2mm thick laminated wood hull is thinner, & thus displaces less
>> water per unit of hull area, than a composite hull perhaps 5mm thick &
>> of similar areal mass. But, in reality, the crucial element of the
>> shell's buoyancy is provided by the sum of all enclosed volumes that lie
>> below the existing waterline (whether in normal or swamped condition).
>>
>> When swamped, the hull skin's thickness x area contributes but a part of
>> this displacement while major contributions come from the fully-enclosed
>> bow & stern compartments &, most importantly, from the other enclosed
>> volumes including, in particular, those easily enclosable (but still too
>> often left open, due sadly to institutional ignorance & neglect) volumes
>> of the spaces below the slide beds which can contribute ~40kg of added
>> flotation capacity/uplift per person.
>>
>> An additional contribution to flotation for a swamped shell comes from
>> the partial immersion of the legs and buttocks of the seated crew. Yes,
>> that water may be cold, but it is far better to have cold legs than to
>> chill the torso by quitting an otherwise floating shell and attempting
>> to swim.
>>
>> Unfortunately, it seems the Iowa crew was thrown from the boat as it
>> rolled over & thus had severely limited options. Which is where
>> personal flotation devices (which really need not incommode rowers in
>> modern designs) would have been so helpful.
>> Carl
>>


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<3eb3b091-a029-4568-940b-a5dfe948d769n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=121&group=rec.sport.rowing#121

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7290:: with SMTP id v16mr8488549qto.133.1617902459447;
Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:1f82:: with SMTP id f124mr13188905ybf.198.1617902459003;
Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news-out.netnews.com!newsin.alt.net!fdcspool2.netnews.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc3.netnews.com!peer04.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s4l9tq$93c$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.62.173.178; posting-account=Hy9LgAoAAACm8Em5GWkm4kj2b2_LzMVZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.62.173.178
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ka8j$m5b$1@dont-email.me> <0f14dae5-376e-4812-8fab-65edecc8319fn@googlegroups.com>
<s4l9tq$93c$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3eb3b091-a029-4568-940b-a5dfe948d769n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: bnwe...@gmail.com (bnw...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:20:59 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 16805
 by: bnw...@gmail.com - Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:20 UTC

On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 5:58:20 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> On 07/04/2021 20:09, bnw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 8:57:57 AM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> >> On 07/04/2021 10:29, Peter wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
> >>>> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
> >>>>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> >>>>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> >>>>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> >>>>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> >>>>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> >>>>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
> >>>>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> >>>>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> >>>>>>> nevertheless.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Henry -
> >>>>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
> >>>>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
> >>>>>> ill-informed comments.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
> >>>>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
> >>>>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
> >>>>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
> >>>>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
> >>>>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
> >>>>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
> >>>>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
> >>>>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
> >>>>>> better information - what do we know so far?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
> >>>>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
> >>>>>> country with very little natural shelter.
> >>>>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
> >>>>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
> >>>>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4..5C,
> >>>>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
> >>>>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
> >>>>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
> >>>>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
> >>>>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
> >>>>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
> >>>>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
> >>>>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
> >>>>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
> >>>>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
> >>>>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
> >>>>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
> >>>>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
> >>>>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
> >>>>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
> >>>>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
> >>>>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
> >>>>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
> >>>>>> end.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
> >>>>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
> >>>>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
> >>>>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
> >>>>>> wearing bulky clothing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
> >>>>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
> >>>>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
> >>>>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
> >>>>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
> >>>>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
> >>>>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
> >>>>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
> >>>>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
> >>>>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
> >>>>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
> >>>>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
> >>>>>> English Covid lock-down.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
> >>>>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
> >>>>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
> >>>>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
> >>>>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
> >>>>>> inadvertent errors.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
> >>>>>> Carl
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Thank you, Don.
> >>>>
> >>>> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
> >>>> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
> >>>> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
> >>>> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
> >>>> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
> >>>> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
> >>>>
> >>>> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
> >>>> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
> >>>> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
> >>>> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
> >>>> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
> >>>> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
> >>>> boating in winds >14mph.
> >>>>
> >>>> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
> >>>> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
> >>>> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
> >>>> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
> >>>> temperatures fall below certain limits.
> >>>>
> >>>> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
> >>>> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
> >>>> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
> >>>> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
> >>>> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
> >>>> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
> >>>> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
> >>>> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
> >>>> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
> >>>> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
> >>>> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
> >>>> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
> >>>> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
> >>>> the same old mistakes.
> >>>> Carl
> >>>> --
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
> >>> The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
> >>> A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
> >>>
> >>> pgk
> >>>
> >> Hi Peter -
> >>
> >> Good points, but may I clarify a couple of them?
> >>
> >> My understanding is that the boat was parallel with the advancing
> >> wave-fronts when rolled over? Certainly a more plausible scenario.
> >>
> >> A wooden boat is no more buoyant than a honeycomb/synthetic fibre
> >> composite. The buoyancy comes from volumetric displacement of water,
> >> and a ~2mm thick laminated wood hull is thinner, & thus displaces less
> >> water per unit of hull area, than a composite hull perhaps 5mm thick &
> >> of similar areal mass. But, in reality, the crucial element of the
> >> shell's buoyancy is provided by the sum of all enclosed volumes that lie
> >> below the existing waterline (whether in normal or swamped condition).
> >>
> >> When swamped, the hull skin's thickness x area contributes but a part of
> >> this displacement while major contributions come from the fully-enclosed
> >> bow & stern compartments &, most importantly, from the other enclosed
> >> volumes including, in particular, those easily enclosable (but still too
> >> often left open, due sadly to institutional ignorance & neglect) volumes
> >> of the spaces below the slide beds which can contribute ~40kg of added
> >> flotation capacity/uplift per person.
> >>
> >> An additional contribution to flotation for a swamped shell comes from
> >> the partial immersion of the legs and buttocks of the seated crew. Yes,
> >> that water may be cold, but it is far better to have cold legs than to
> >> chill the torso by quitting an otherwise floating shell and attempting
> >> to swim.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, it seems the Iowa crew was thrown from the boat as it
> >> rolled over & thus had severely limited options. Which is where
> >> personal flotation devices (which really need not incommode rowers in
> >> modern designs) would have been so helpful.
> >> Carl
> >>
> > This whole event is so unfortunate, but seemingly avoidable, if only with less severe consequences.
> > Carl, you mention specific PFD's that do not negatively affect the rowers. Can you elaborate/recommend, if not for a specific make/model, but maybe key bullet points for which we should look when seeking these out for ourselves or crew members?
> > Thanks in advance as always...
> >
> You might want to look into this:
> https://rowsafeusa.org/pfds/
> and for comparison into this:
> https://www.britishrowing.org/sites/default/files/rowsafe/2-1-SafetyAids-v1.pdf
> this might give some helpful info:
> https://camprandallrc.org/faqs/tips-info/boathouse-rules/
>
> There has been interest in rowable PFDs in Germany. Maybe one of our
> German correspondents (e.g. Henning Lippke) may have something to
> contribute on that?
>
> Also:
> https://www.lifejackets.co.uk/Lifejackets-Rowing.htm
> https://www.rowperfect.co.uk/product/rowing-life-jacket/
>
> I hope that will be enough get started on?
>
> Cheers -
> Carl
>
> --
> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
Thanks Carl


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<351b48e9-0415-4581-b862-dff392320c67n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=132&group=rec.sport.rowing#132

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:205:: with SMTP id b5mr19250192qtx.186.1620583292433;
Sun, 09 May 2021 11:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:bb08:: with SMTP id z8mr27508698ybg.188.1620583292083;
Sun, 09 May 2021 11:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 11:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s4l9tq$93c$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:a400:cb41:d0cc:afca:db7a:fd1f;
posting-account=kRlXMQoAAAC90bJqqiT87VzgCC19W57_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:a400:cb41:d0cc:afca:db7a:fd1f
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ka8j$m5b$1@dont-email.me> <0f14dae5-376e-4812-8fab-65edecc8319fn@googlegroups.com>
<s4l9tq$93c$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <351b48e9-0415-4581-b862-dff392320c67n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: rowsafe...@gmail.com (Marc Messing)
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 18:01:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Marc Messing - Sun, 9 May 2021 18:01 UTC

On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 5:58:20 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> On 07/04/2021 20:09, bnw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 8:57:57 AM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> >> On 07/04/2021 10:29, Peter wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
> >>>> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
> >>>>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> >>>>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> >>>>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> >>>>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> >>>>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> >>>>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
> >>>>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> >>>>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> >>>>>>> nevertheless.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Henry -
> >>>>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
> >>>>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
> >>>>>> ill-informed comments.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
> >>>>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
> >>>>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
> >>>>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
> >>>>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
> >>>>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
> >>>>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
> >>>>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
> >>>>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
> >>>>>> better information - what do we know so far?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
> >>>>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
> >>>>>> country with very little natural shelter.
> >>>>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
> >>>>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
> >>>>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4..5C,
> >>>>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
> >>>>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
> >>>>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
> >>>>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
> >>>>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
> >>>>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
> >>>>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
> >>>>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
> >>>>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
> >>>>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
> >>>>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
> >>>>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
> >>>>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
> >>>>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
> >>>>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
> >>>>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
> >>>>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
> >>>>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
> >>>>>> end.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
> >>>>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
> >>>>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
> >>>>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
> >>>>>> wearing bulky clothing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
> >>>>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
> >>>>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
> >>>>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
> >>>>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
> >>>>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
> >>>>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
> >>>>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
> >>>>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
> >>>>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
> >>>>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
> >>>>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
> >>>>>> English Covid lock-down.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
> >>>>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
> >>>>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
> >>>>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
> >>>>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
> >>>>>> inadvertent errors.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
> >>>>>> Carl
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Thank you, Don.
> >>>>
> >>>> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
> >>>> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
> >>>> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
> >>>> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
> >>>> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
> >>>> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
> >>>>
> >>>> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
> >>>> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
> >>>> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
> >>>> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
> >>>> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
> >>>> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
> >>>> boating in winds >14mph.
> >>>>
> >>>> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
> >>>> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
> >>>> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
> >>>> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
> >>>> temperatures fall below certain limits.
> >>>>
> >>>> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
> >>>> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
> >>>> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
> >>>> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
> >>>> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
> >>>> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
> >>>> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
> >>>> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
> >>>> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
> >>>> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
> >>>> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
> >>>> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
> >>>> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
> >>>> the same old mistakes.
> >>>> Carl
> >>>> --
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
> >>> The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
> >>> A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
> >>>
> >>> pgk
> >>>
> >> Hi Peter -
> >>
> >> Good points, but may I clarify a couple of them?
> >>
> >> My understanding is that the boat was parallel with the advancing
> >> wave-fronts when rolled over? Certainly a more plausible scenario.
> >>
> >> A wooden boat is no more buoyant than a honeycomb/synthetic fibre
> >> composite. The buoyancy comes from volumetric displacement of water,
> >> and a ~2mm thick laminated wood hull is thinner, & thus displaces less
> >> water per unit of hull area, than a composite hull perhaps 5mm thick &
> >> of similar areal mass. But, in reality, the crucial element of the
> >> shell's buoyancy is provided by the sum of all enclosed volumes that lie
> >> below the existing waterline (whether in normal or swamped condition).
> >>
> >> When swamped, the hull skin's thickness x area contributes but a part of
> >> this displacement while major contributions come from the fully-enclosed
> >> bow & stern compartments &, most importantly, from the other enclosed
> >> volumes including, in particular, those easily enclosable (but still too
> >> often left open, due sadly to institutional ignorance & neglect) volumes
> >> of the spaces below the slide beds which can contribute ~40kg of added
> >> flotation capacity/uplift per person.
> >>
> >> An additional contribution to flotation for a swamped shell comes from
> >> the partial immersion of the legs and buttocks of the seated crew. Yes,
> >> that water may be cold, but it is far better to have cold legs than to
> >> chill the torso by quitting an otherwise floating shell and attempting
> >> to swim.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, it seems the Iowa crew was thrown from the boat as it
> >> rolled over & thus had severely limited options. Which is where
> >> personal flotation devices (which really need not incommode rowers in
> >> modern designs) would have been so helpful.
> >> Carl
> >>
> > This whole event is so unfortunate, but seemingly avoidable, if only with less severe consequences.
> > Carl, you mention specific PFD's that do not negatively affect the rowers. Can you elaborate/recommend, if not for a specific make/model, but maybe key bullet points for which we should look when seeking these out for ourselves or crew members?
> > Thanks in advance as always...
> >
> You might want to look into this:
> https://rowsafeusa.org/pfds/
> and for comparison into this:
> https://www.britishrowing.org/sites/default/files/rowsafe/2-1-SafetyAids-v1.pdf
> this might give some helpful info:
> https://camprandallrc.org/faqs/tips-info/boathouse-rules/
>
> There has been interest in rowable PFDs in Germany. Maybe one of our
> German correspondents (e.g. Henning Lippke) may have something to
> contribute on that?
>
> Also:
> https://www.lifejackets.co.uk/Lifejackets-Rowing.htm
> https://www.rowperfect.co.uk/product/rowing-life-jacket/
>
> I hope that will be enough get started on?
>
> Cheers -
> Carl
>
> --
> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @CarlDouglasRacingShells
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=133&group=rec.sport.rowing#133

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:413:: with SMTP id n19mr10609506qtx.238.1620585906427;
Sun, 09 May 2021 11:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6c85:: with SMTP id h127mr28021250ybc.460.1620585906193;
Sun, 09 May 2021 11:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 11:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:a400:cb41:d0cc:afca:db7a:fd1f;
posting-account=kRlXMQoAAAC90bJqqiT87VzgCC19W57_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:a400:cb41:d0cc:afca:db7a:fd1f
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: rowsafe...@gmail.com (Marc Messing)
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 18:45:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Marc Messing - Sun, 9 May 2021 18:45 UTC

On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 5:29:01 AM UTC-4, Peter wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
> > On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
> > > On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> > >> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
> > >>>
> > >>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> > >>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> > >>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> > >>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
> > >>>
> > >>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> > >>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
> > >>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
> > >>>
> > >>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> > >>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> > >>> nevertheless.
> > >>>
> > >> Henry -
> > >> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
> > >> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
> > >> ill-informed comments.
> > >>
> > >> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
> > >> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
> > >> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
> > >> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
> > >> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
> > >> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
> > >>
> > >> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
> > >> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
> > >>
> > >> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
> > >> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
> > >> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
> > >> better information - what do we know so far?
> > >>
> > >> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
> > >> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
> > >> country with very little natural shelter.
> > >> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
> > >> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
> > >> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
> > >> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
> > >>
> > >> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
> > >> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
> > >> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
> > >> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
> > >> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
> > >> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
> > >> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
> > >> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
> > >> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
> > >>
> > >> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
> > >> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
> > >>
> > >> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
> > >> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
> > >>
> > >> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
> > >> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
> > >> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
> > >> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
> > >> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
> > >> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
> > >> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
> > >> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
> > >> end.
> > >>
> > >> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
> > >> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
> > >> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
> > >> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
> > >> wearing bulky clothing.
> > >>
> > >> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
> > >> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
> > >> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
> > >> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
> > >> & prior assessment of conditions.
> > >>
> > >> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
> > >> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
> > >> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
> > >> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
> > >>
> > >> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
> > >> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
> > >> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
> > >> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
> > >> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
> > >> English Covid lock-down.
> > >>
> > >> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
> > >> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
> > >> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
> > >> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
> > >> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
> > >> inadvertent errors.
> > >>
> > >> Our thoughts go to all affected -
> > >> Carl
> > >>
> > > There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
> > >
> > > The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
> > >
> > > As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
> > >
> > Thank you, Don.
> >
> > So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
> > capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
> > keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
> > calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
> > would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
> > unduly exposed them those beam waves.
> >
> > On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
> > precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
> > forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
> > (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
> > corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
> > often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
> > boating in winds >14mph.
> >
> > The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
> > mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
> > carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
> > incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
> > temperatures fall below certain limits.
> >
> > As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
> > don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
> > suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
> > then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
> > drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
> > buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
> > to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
> > suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
> >
> > Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
> > this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
> > might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
> > to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
> > without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
> > seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
> > the same old mistakes.
> > Carl
> > --
> > Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> > Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> > Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> > Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> > Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> > URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> > https://www.avg.com
> I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
> The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
> A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
>
> pgk


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=134&group=rec.sport.rowing#134

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: car...@carldouglasrowing.com (carl)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 23:09:32 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 258
Message-ID: <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
<DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
<13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>
<ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 22:09:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="802c4fe0ba48788eaac8e5354d57b88b";
logging-data="27386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX183jbYSEk2KRhqlUXjggy0dvq66GwV1YNA="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ajCqVj0wJArxET1ivXrD6Fbx7fs=
In-Reply-To: <c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210509-12, 09/05/2021), Outbound message
 by: carl - Sun, 9 May 2021 22:09 UTC

On 09/05/2021 19:45, Marc Messing wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 5:29:01 AM UTC-4, Peter wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
>>> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
>>>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
>>>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
>>>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
>>>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
>>>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
>>>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
>>>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
>>>>>> nevertheless.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Henry -
>>>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
>>>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
>>>>> ill-informed comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
>>>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
>>>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
>>>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
>>>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
>>>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
>>>>>
>>>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
>>>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
>>>>>
>>>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
>>>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
>>>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
>>>>> better information - what do we know so far?
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
>>>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
>>>>> country with very little natural shelter.
>>>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
>>>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
>>>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
>>>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
>>>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
>>>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
>>>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
>>>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
>>>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
>>>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
>>>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
>>>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
>>>>>
>>>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
>>>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
>>>>>
>>>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
>>>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
>>>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
>>>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
>>>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
>>>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
>>>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
>>>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
>>>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
>>>>> end.
>>>>>
>>>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
>>>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
>>>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
>>>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
>>>>> wearing bulky clothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
>>>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
>>>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
>>>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
>>>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
>>>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
>>>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
>>>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
>>>>>
>>>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
>>>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
>>>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
>>>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
>>>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
>>>>> English Covid lock-down.
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
>>>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
>>>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
>>>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
>>>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
>>>>> inadvertent errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
>>>>> Carl
>>>>>
>>>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
>>>>
>>>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
>>>>
>>>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
>>>>
>>> Thank you, Don.
>>>
>>> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
>>> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
>>> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
>>> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
>>> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
>>> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
>>>
>>> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
>>> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
>>> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
>>> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
>>> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
>>> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
>>> boating in winds >14mph.
>>>
>>> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
>>> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
>>> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
>>> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
>>> temperatures fall below certain limits.
>>>
>>> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
>>> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
>>> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
>>> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
>>> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
>>> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
>>> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
>>> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
>>>
>>> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
>>> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
>>> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
>>> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
>>> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
>>> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
>>> the same old mistakes.
>>> Carl
>>> --
>>> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
>>> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
>>> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
>>> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
>>> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
>>> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>> https://www.avg.com
>> I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
>> The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
>> A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
>>
>> pgk
>
>
> Little Wall Lake, where the ISU accident occurred, is about 250 acres (100 hectares) with a maximum depth of about 13 ft (4 m). Because it's round and flat, water temperatures vary but have been reported at 40f +/- f (1.7 - 7.2 c). The issue of wind speeds is less well known, as the cox reported the lake calm when they set out but videos of the rescue efforts clearly showed whitecaps with relatively strong winds. Beyond this, I can add a little more information, some of which I believe has appeared in news reports: 1) at least one of the two young men who drowned had been a competitive swimmer in high school, 2) apparently two of the women who survived were rescued by residents who launched personal kayaks to help when they heard the cries of distress, 3) the crew apparently capsized as the winds picked up and they attempted to return to the boathouse. This last point would explain them being broadside to the waves.
>
> I will add three points without feigning IMHO. The first is that I see no good reason why rowers aren't advised to wear PFDs on cold water, i.e., below 50f/10c. Especially novices! USRowing has historically taken the position that they don't have the authority to set safety standards -- something that is untrue -- and has continually failed to recommend that PFDs be worn on cold water. If young rowers took the recommendation to put on a PFD on cold water as seriously as they take the "requirement" to take a simple swim test in a well-heated pool, those ISU novices probably would have put on PFDs before setting out.
>
> Secondly, too much attention is being given to the absence of a launch in this instance. USRowing recommends that a launch be within 100 yards on cold water. That's better than being a mile away or still at the dock, but a launch was right alongside Mohammed Ramzan when he drowned at Northwestern University in 2017, launches were nearby when John Steve Catilo drowned on the Potomac River, and Dzmitry Ryshkevich was surrounded by professional personnel when he drowned at the World Championships. We also have a growing number of accounts of launches overturning when they try to get rowers out of the water. Wearing a PFD keeps people afloat until help arrives. Coaching launches sometimes help and sometimes fail.
>
> Finally, it is worth noting that the emergency response time in this instance was pretty good. Very few emergency response teams (fire/ems) maintain personnel on station and fewer still maintain any professional response teams on the water. Under the best of circumstances, after a 911 call is received the dispatcher still has to tone out (alert) the appropriate agencies and then response teams (boat and trailer drivers, EMS, etc) have to be assembled. Only once those teams have been assembled can they be dispatched to the site of accidents.
>
> It should go without saying that a person in cold water without a PFD usually can't survive until professional help arrives.
>
> Marc Messing
> RowSafeUSA.Org
> RowSafeUSA@Gmail.com
>


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=136&group=rec.sport.rowing#136

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e518:: with SMTP id w24mr8653023qkf.490.1620668503356; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:360b:: with SMTP id d11mr29674268yba.61.1620668503099; Mon, 10 May 2021 10:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:a400:cb41:905b:7e0e:2eed:647; posting-account=kRlXMQoAAAC90bJqqiT87VzgCC19W57_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:a400:cb41:905b:7e0e:2eed:647
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com> <641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com> <s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com> <c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: rowsafe...@gmail.com (Marc Messing)
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:41:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 430
 by: Marc Messing - Mon, 10 May 2021 17:41 UTC

On Sunday, May 9, 2021 at 6:09:19 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> On 09/05/2021 19:45, Marc Messing wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 5:29:01 AM UTC-4, Peter wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
> >>> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
> >>>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
> >>>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
> >>>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
> >>>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
> >>>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
> >>>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
> >>>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
> >>>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
> >>>>>> nevertheless.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Henry -
> >>>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
> >>>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
> >>>>> ill-informed comments.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
> >>>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
> >>>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
> >>>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
> >>>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
> >>>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
> >>>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
> >>>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
> >>>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
> >>>>> better information - what do we know so far?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
> >>>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
> >>>>> country with very little natural shelter.
> >>>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
> >>>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
> >>>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
> >>>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
> >>>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
> >>>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
> >>>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
> >>>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
> >>>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
> >>>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
> >>>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
> >>>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
> >>>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
> >>>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
> >>>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
> >>>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
> >>>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
> >>>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
> >>>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
> >>>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
> >>>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
> >>>>> end.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
> >>>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
> >>>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
> >>>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
> >>>>> wearing bulky clothing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
> >>>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
> >>>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
> >>>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
> >>>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
> >>>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
> >>>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
> >>>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
> >>>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
> >>>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
> >>>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
> >>>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
> >>>>> English Covid lock-down.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
> >>>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
> >>>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
> >>>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
> >>>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
> >>>>> inadvertent errors.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
> >>>>> Carl
> >>>>>
> >>>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
> >>>>
> >>>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
> >>>>
> >>>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
> >>>>
> >>> Thank you, Don.
> >>>
> >>> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
> >>> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
> >>> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
> >>> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
> >>> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
> >>> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
> >>>
> >>> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
> >>> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
> >>> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00..
> >>> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
> >>> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
> >>> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
> >>> boating in winds >14mph.
> >>>
> >>> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
> >>> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
> >>> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
> >>> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
> >>> temperatures fall below certain limits.
> >>>
> >>> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
> >>> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
> >>> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
> >>> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
> >>> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
> >>> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
> >>> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
> >>> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
> >>>
> >>> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
> >>> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
> >>> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
> >>> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
> >>> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
> >>> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
> >>> the same old mistakes.
> >>> Carl
> >>> --
> >>> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> >>> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> >>> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> >>> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> >>> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> >>> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> >>> https://www.avg.com
> >> I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
> >> The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
> >> A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
> >>
> >> pgk
> >
> >
> > Little Wall Lake, where the ISU accident occurred, is about 250 acres (100 hectares) with a maximum depth of about 13 ft (4 m). Because it's round and flat, water temperatures vary but have been reported at 40f +/- f (1.7 - 7.2 c). The issue of wind speeds is less well known, as the cox reported the lake calm when they set out but videos of the rescue efforts clearly showed whitecaps with relatively strong winds. Beyond this, I can add a little more information, some of which I believe has appeared in news reports: 1) at least one of the two young men who drowned had been a competitive swimmer in high school, 2) apparently two of the women who survived were rescued by residents who launched personal kayaks to help when they heard the cries of distress, 3) the crew apparently capsized as the winds picked up and they attempted to return to the boathouse. This last point would explain them being broadside to the waves.
> >
> > I will add three points without feigning IMHO. The first is that I see no good reason why rowers aren't advised to wear PFDs on cold water, i.e., below 50f/10c. Especially novices! USRowing has historically taken the position that they don't have the authority to set safety standards -- something that is untrue -- and has continually failed to recommend that PFDs be worn on cold water. If young rowers took the recommendation to put on a PFD on cold water as seriously as they take the "requirement" to take a simple swim test in a well-heated pool, those ISU novices probably would have put on PFDs before setting out.
> >
> > Secondly, too much attention is being given to the absence of a launch in this instance. USRowing recommends that a launch be within 100 yards on cold water. That's better than being a mile away or still at the dock, but a launch was right alongside Mohammed Ramzan when he drowned at Northwestern University in 2017, launches were nearby when John Steve Catilo drowned on the Potomac River, and Dzmitry Ryshkevich was surrounded by professional personnel when he drowned at the World Championships. We also have a growing number of accounts of launches overturning when they try to get rowers out of the water. Wearing a PFD keeps people afloat until help arrives. Coaching launches sometimes help and sometimes fail.
> >
> > Finally, it is worth noting that the emergency response time in this instance was pretty good. Very few emergency response teams (fire/ems) maintain personnel on station and fewer still maintain any professional response teams on the water. Under the best of circumstances, after a 911 call is received the dispatcher still has to tone out (alert) the appropriate agencies and then response teams (boat and trailer drivers, EMS, etc) have to be assembled. Only once those teams have been assembled can they be dispatched to the site of accidents.
> >
> > It should go without saying that a person in cold water without a PFD usually can't survive until professional help arrives.
> >
> > Marc Messing
> > RowSafeUSA.Org
> > RowSa...@Gmail.com
> >
> All very well put, Marc. And no less that I'd have expected from you.
> So - many thanks.
>
> Some points I might add:
> John Steve Catilo drowned because he fell into the water & his
> driverless launch circled him until he was lost. A kayaker saw what had
> happened & made a bee line, but from some distance, so was too late. My
> understanding (I had some involvement in the aftermath of this case) is
> that no launches were close enough to render timely assistance, or they
> were unaware that there was a problem before it was too late.
>
> This happened only a few weeks after 3 eights, on 2 separate days, had
> swamped & sunk on that same wide, exposed river & the rowers were
> rescued not by club launches but by the Fire Department.
>
> John Steve was ejected into the water when he accidentally started the
> motor 'in gear'. Because the kill cords were locked away in the club
> office he lacked that essential safety device which would have
> immediately stopped the boat & thus, in all probability, have ensured
> his survival. Because the club's PFDs had been taken to pad boats for
> trailing to a regatta, he also had no PFD to keep him afloat when in
> difficulties. An all-round good guy, & a promising student, was thus
> lost in front of a learn-to-row eight of young teens.
>
> The case of para sculler Dzmitry Ryshkevich remains clouded, unless
> others know better. From evidence I have seen, a bolt or bolts on one
> side of his wing rigger (equipped of course with pontoons) failed. This
> detached that side of his boat from the rigger. His boat then rolled,
> putting undue strain on the attachment points on the other side of the
> boat, which then broke away. So despite the pontoons, Dzmitry's boat
> capsized.
>
> As a para sculler, Dzmitry was strapped into his seat. I heard that his
> feet were also strapped into the shoes. I understand that, despite
> being under water, he was able to free his feet & may have just managed
> to unstrap his body from the seat. I don't know how long this all took
> but it may have been some time, during which - as he was training hard
> at the time - he may have been under significant respiratory stress.
>
> There's an element of surmise in those details but they appear to tally.
> As a launch reached him, Dzmitry did get his head above water but,
> before anyone could get hold of him, he slipped under &, when found once
> more, could not be resuscitated.
>
> It was being said around that time that perhaps a nut had come loose, &
> that lock-nuts should therefore be mandatory. My own hunch is that a
> nut or nuts may have stripped (perhaps from repeated tightening - we
> tend to over-tighten small bolts, or to fatigue them, by repeatedly
> checking their tightness). Whatever, I understand that the relevant
> bolts in the undamaged part of the boat were missing when the boat was
> recovered & never found.
>
> As well as underlining the problem of getting a rescue launch there in
> time (as both cases do) I wonder what is being done to ensure that a
> para sculler can be immediately released in the event of a mishap. I
> think this is possible, & have a few ideas, but other pressing matters
> have unfortunately intruded upon my time since I first learned in more
> detail the circumstances surrounding Dzmitry's tragic loss.
> Carl
>
> --
> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=139&group=rec.sport.rowing#139

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: car...@carldouglasrowing.com (carl)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 23:49:31 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 324
Message-ID: <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
<DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
<13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>
<ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com>
<s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 22:49:11 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5e56090eaa96de90ce16106fc885e411";
logging-data="6619"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19KoZkA96oNMDPlOXOb9imV465vDN0dqcU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZC8zMupvCl+d7lSkILV59mLFAbg=
In-Reply-To: <f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210511-6, 11/05/2021), Outbound message
 by: carl - Tue, 11 May 2021 22:49 UTC

On 10/05/2021 18:41, Marc Messing wrote:
> On Sunday, May 9, 2021 at 6:09:19 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
>> On 09/05/2021 19:45, Marc Messing wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 5:29:01 AM UTC-4, Peter wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 20:10:28 UTC+1, carl wrote:
>>>>> On 06/04/2021 18:02, don Vickers wrote:
>>>>>> On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 2:44:35 PM UTC-4, carl wrote:
>>>>>>> On 01/04/2021 17:44, Henry Law wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 07:05:07 -0700, Robin Harries wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This thread has just been posted on r/rowing. It's impossible to verify,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A great deal of uninformed speculation about the cause of the Iowa
>>>>>>>> incident, which is unfortunate, but lots of first-time experience of
>>>>>>>> other incidents in similar conditions which (for those of us who've been
>>>>>>>> even near one) have the ring of truth about them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hope to find that the assertion that two of the four were first-time
>>>>>>>> novices, afloat without a safety launch in wintery conditions, is false.
>>>>>>>> It had better be; otherwise there's a valid charge of gross negligence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Our club is having a drive on heel release cord length at the moment; the
>>>>>>>> emphasis should be there all the time, granted, but it's timely
>>>>>>>> nevertheless.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Henry -
>>>>>>> Thanks for your measured comments. I heard about this tragedy very soon
>>>>>>> after it had happened, and of course the reportage was awash with
>>>>>>> ill-informed comments.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The stuff about heel restraints, which a reddit poster describes as
>>>>>>> "these peices of string (normally a shoelace) that keep your heels in
>>>>>>> the boat, and don't let the shoes lift up too far" is possibly
>>>>>>> misinformed (see later) but sadly typifies the despicable attitudes
>>>>>>> towards rower safety whereby a bootlace of indeterminate length is
>>>>>>> broadly considered a safety device. Would trust your life to a shoe-lace??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most disturbing is the usual presumption of a capsize - "for how else do
>>>>>>> rowers end up swimming?" What a pity folk can't stop idly speculating.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I deplore the knee-jerk resort to typical "blame culture" reaction, but
>>>>>>> I do favour a careful listing of the possibilities in order of
>>>>>>> probability. Let's explore just a little way, then await further &
>>>>>>> better information - what do we know so far?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. It seems to have been a 4+ as 5 people were immersed & 2 died.
>>>>>>> 2. This was on a lake, measuring about 1000m x 1700m, set in open, flat
>>>>>>> country with very little natural shelter.
>>>>>>> 3. The wind was variously described as blowing at 20-25mph or 9-11m/sec
>>>>>>> 4. The lake is relatively shallow - a depression left by a former glacier.
>>>>>>> 5. The water temperature has been variously given as 37-40F or 3-4.5C,
>>>>>>> & there had until recently been freezing conditions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So the water would have been cold & rough. Crew shells are not fit for
>>>>>>> wave heights as little as 20cm/8". If you take a fetch of 1.5km & a
>>>>>>> wind speed of 10m/sec, expect a significant wave height of around 20cm.
>>>>>>> At 12m/sec wind speed it might be 24cm waves. But wind is rarely
>>>>>>> steady, & wave heights are never uniform but form a spectrum with
>>>>>>> occasional "rogue" waves rather larger than those around them (up to 30
>>>>>>> - 50% higher). These will rapidly fill a shell by slopping over the
>>>>>>> sides. The next issue is that the shape of the lake, & depth
>>>>>>> variations, can create areas of increased wave height.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The first question to ask is: did the boat actually capsize (possible
>>>>>>> but less usual) or was it swamped & sank below the water surface?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In rough conditions an inexperienced crew could indeed capsize, but lay
>>>>>>> people love to jump to ignorant conclusions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, there are no excuses for under-buoyant shells. We fought that
>>>>>>> battle in the UK for 10 years (against unprincipled UK officialdom) from
>>>>>>> 2000 until FISA mandated full shell buoyancy, but I know that very many
>>>>>>> shells in the USA have never been assessed for adequate buoyancy & still
>>>>>>> lack the fully-enclosed under-seat compartments which would a) provide
>>>>>>> up to 40kg of added buoyancy per seat (making eights and fours fully
>>>>>>> buoyant such that they remain safely rowable when swamped) & b) prevent
>>>>>>> water already in the boat from rushing to & depressing the least buoyant
>>>>>>> end.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A further question concerns type of shell: we think it was a coxed
>>>>>>> four, but was it bow steers or stern? With bow steers you have rather
>>>>>>> more open volume for water to fill, & it is significantly harder for cox
>>>>>>> to extract themselves if the boat is swamped or inverted, especially if
>>>>>>> wearing bulky clothing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other questions include: presence or otherwise of a capable launch,
>>>>>>> adequacy of clothing (multilayer, close-fitting kit is a life-saver in
>>>>>>> cold immersion as it keeps an insulating layer of non-flowing water
>>>>>>> close to the body), self-rescue instructions, supervision, skill levels
>>>>>>> & prior assessment of conditions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Finally, at those indicated water temperatures to have lost 2 out of 5
>>>>>>> after sudden & prolonged immersion is an unsurprising result - the loss
>>>>>>> of limb strength through automatic restriction of blood circulation when
>>>>>>> chilled can be rapid, rendering a person unable to swim within minutes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One can understand that young people, after many months of Covid
>>>>>>> restrictions, might tend to throw caution to the winds, but this was a
>>>>>>> devastating & probably preventable outcome. One of my colleagues is a
>>>>>>> volunteer with the RNLI on the R Thames & is aghast at the inane
>>>>>>> behaviour of so many "de-mob happy" boaters following the end of the
>>>>>>> English Covid lock-down.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Finally, while no one meant this to happen, the blame game (& with it
>>>>>>> the denial of blame) may well take precedence over the careful learning
>>>>>>> of lessons & proper support for the bereaved. If people messed up, then
>>>>>>> it will be far more useful to all if they can be allowed to admit this
>>>>>>> without having to go into denial mode in order to defend their doubtless
>>>>>>> inadvertent errors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our thoughts go to all affected -
>>>>>>> Carl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is an update to this tragedy: Iowa State Crew Club president said lake was 'like glass' before deadly accident <https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/2021/04/04/isu-crew-president-rowers-surprised-wind-waves-before-capsize-accident-little-wall-lake-deaths/7082723002/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The club president was the coxswain in what the article indicates was a stern loader. The club doesn't have a launch; or a dock. The club doesn't require swimming tests. The article indicates the boat did actually did actually capsize while perpendicular to the wind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As any experienced rower knows, the wave through and peaks while the boat is parallel to the wave motion makes the boat very unstable and requires good blade control.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, Don.
>>>>>
>>>>> So capsize it was (not a common event), & a stern coxed 4. Avoiding
>>>>> capsize is feasible in similar conditions, provided the crew sit still &
>>>>> keep oars perpendicular to the boat, but that may require a level of
>>>>> calm & awareness beyond an inexperienced crew in such conditions. One
>>>>> would want to turn quickly to get end-on to the waves, which may have
>>>>> unduly exposed them those beam waves.
>>>>>
>>>>> On a wide lake squalls can arrive largely unseen & unsuspected as
>>>>> precursors of a coming gale. The crew boated at ~08:30, the 06:30
>>>>> forecast having been for winds 11-14mph, increasing to 17mph by 11:00.
>>>>> (Earlier reports suggested winds of 20-25mph, which would have
>>>>> corresponded well enough with 1ft waves). Steady wind speed predictions
>>>>> often ignore tendency for gusts. I note there was a rule about not
>>>>> boating in winds >14mph.
>>>>>
>>>>> The commentary on USRowing rules is interesting, in having no quoted
>>>>> mention of full shell buoyancy (a FISA standard) but with advice to
>>>>> carry PFDs in the boat. Effective PFDs do exist which do _not_
>>>>> incommode rowers, & IMHO they should be mandatory wear when water
>>>>> temperatures fall below certain limits.
>>>>>
>>>>> As indicated in the latest report, the crew tried to swim ashore. We
>>>>> don't know the distance but, if the water was as cold as previously
>>>>> suggested, & if that swim took over a minute in normal temperatures,
>>>>> then it was almost certain that some would lose all swimming ability &
>>>>> drown long before reaching safety. If the boat was also not fully
>>>>> buoyant, swimming away is the more understandable as it would then seem
>>>>> to offer little support & the crew in the water would already be
>>>>> suffering from the cold & consequent failing grip strength.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hindsight is a terrible thing. Worse still would be litigation over
>>>>> this. One must hope that lawyers do not get involved as nothing they
>>>>> might do will bring back the dead. The vital thing is for all of rowing
>>>>> to learn from this dreadful accident & do those simple things which,
>>>>> without impairing the sport, can make rowing that much safer. Sadly, we
>>>>> seem too often to ignore warnings & precedents, as a result repeating
>>>>> the same old mistakes.
>>>>> Carl
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
>>>>> Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
>>>>> Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
>>>>> Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
>>>>> Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
>>>>> URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>>>> https://www.avg.com
>>>> I read the linked articles as stating that the crew had passed swim tests and that water temp was 40F and that the boat was pependicular to the waves when a large one swamped them.
>>>> The unknowns in this tragedy are really down to the experience of the crew. Passing a swim test isn't the same as confidence and ability in water and also how fit the crew was and their boat experience and how wet and cold they might have got before the boat went down. The suggestion being that all less experienced crews need to be accompanied by THEIR OWN safety launch.
>>>> A wooden boat, however swamped would still have some bouyancy but does that apply to more recent resin constructions?
>>>>
>>>> pgk
>>>
>>>
>>> Little Wall Lake, where the ISU accident occurred, is about 250 acres (100 hectares) with a maximum depth of about 13 ft (4 m). Because it's round and flat, water temperatures vary but have been reported at 40f +/- f (1.7 - 7.2 c). The issue of wind speeds is less well known, as the cox reported the lake calm when they set out but videos of the rescue efforts clearly showed whitecaps with relatively strong winds. Beyond this, I can add a little more information, some of which I believe has appeared in news reports: 1) at least one of the two young men who drowned had been a competitive swimmer in high school, 2) apparently two of the women who survived were rescued by residents who launched personal kayaks to help when they heard the cries of distress, 3) the crew apparently capsized as the winds picked up and they attempted to return to the boathouse. This last point would explain them being broadside to the waves.
>>>
>>> I will add three points without feigning IMHO. The first is that I see no good reason why rowers aren't advised to wear PFDs on cold water, i.e., below 50f/10c. Especially novices! USRowing has historically taken the position that they don't have the authority to set safety standards -- something that is untrue -- and has continually failed to recommend that PFDs be worn on cold water. If young rowers took the recommendation to put on a PFD on cold water as seriously as they take the "requirement" to take a simple swim test in a well-heated pool, those ISU novices probably would have put on PFDs before setting out.
>>>
>>> Secondly, too much attention is being given to the absence of a launch in this instance. USRowing recommends that a launch be within 100 yards on cold water. That's better than being a mile away or still at the dock, but a launch was right alongside Mohammed Ramzan when he drowned at Northwestern University in 2017, launches were nearby when John Steve Catilo drowned on the Potomac River, and Dzmitry Ryshkevich was surrounded by professional personnel when he drowned at the World Championships. We also have a growing number of accounts of launches overturning when they try to get rowers out of the water. Wearing a PFD keeps people afloat until help arrives. Coaching launches sometimes help and sometimes fail.
>>>
>>> Finally, it is worth noting that the emergency response time in this instance was pretty good. Very few emergency response teams (fire/ems) maintain personnel on station and fewer still maintain any professional response teams on the water. Under the best of circumstances, after a 911 call is received the dispatcher still has to tone out (alert) the appropriate agencies and then response teams (boat and trailer drivers, EMS, etc) have to be assembled. Only once those teams have been assembled can they be dispatched to the site of accidents.
>>>
>>> It should go without saying that a person in cold water without a PFD usually can't survive until professional help arrives.
>>>
>>> Marc Messing
>>> RowSafeUSA.Org
>>> RowSa...@Gmail.com
>>>
>> All very well put, Marc. And no less that I'd have expected from you.
>> So - many thanks.
>>
>> Some points I might add:
>> John Steve Catilo drowned because he fell into the water & his
>> driverless launch circled him until he was lost. A kayaker saw what had
>> happened & made a bee line, but from some distance, so was too late. My
>> understanding (I had some involvement in the aftermath of this case) is
>> that no launches were close enough to render timely assistance, or they
>> were unaware that there was a problem before it was too late.
>>
>> This happened only a few weeks after 3 eights, on 2 separate days, had
>> swamped & sunk on that same wide, exposed river & the rowers were
>> rescued not by club launches but by the Fire Department.
>>
>> John Steve was ejected into the water when he accidentally started the
>> motor 'in gear'. Because the kill cords were locked away in the club
>> office he lacked that essential safety device which would have
>> immediately stopped the boat & thus, in all probability, have ensured
>> his survival. Because the club's PFDs had been taken to pad boats for
>> trailing to a regatta, he also had no PFD to keep him afloat when in
>> difficulties. An all-round good guy, & a promising student, was thus
>> lost in front of a learn-to-row eight of young teens.
>>
>> The case of para sculler Dzmitry Ryshkevich remains clouded, unless
>> others know better. From evidence I have seen, a bolt or bolts on one
>> side of his wing rigger (equipped of course with pontoons) failed. This
>> detached that side of his boat from the rigger. His boat then rolled,
>> putting undue strain on the attachment points on the other side of the
>> boat, which then broke away. So despite the pontoons, Dzmitry's boat
>> capsized.
>>
>> As a para sculler, Dzmitry was strapped into his seat. I heard that his
>> feet were also strapped into the shoes. I understand that, despite
>> being under water, he was able to free his feet & may have just managed
>> to unstrap his body from the seat. I don't know how long this all took
>> but it may have been some time, during which - as he was training hard
>> at the time - he may have been under significant respiratory stress.
>>
>> There's an element of surmise in those details but they appear to tally.
>> As a launch reached him, Dzmitry did get his head above water but,
>> before anyone could get hold of him, he slipped under &, when found once
>> more, could not be resuscitated.
>>
>> It was being said around that time that perhaps a nut had come loose, &
>> that lock-nuts should therefore be mandatory. My own hunch is that a
>> nut or nuts may have stripped (perhaps from repeated tightening - we
>> tend to over-tighten small bolts, or to fatigue them, by repeatedly
>> checking their tightness). Whatever, I understand that the relevant
>> bolts in the undamaged part of the boat were missing when the boat was
>> recovered & never found.
>>
>> As well as underlining the problem of getting a rescue launch there in
>> time (as both cases do) I wonder what is being done to ensure that a
>> para sculler can be immediately released in the event of a mishap. I
>> think this is possible, & have a few ideas, but other pressing matters
>> have unfortunately intruded upon my time since I first learned in more
>> detail the circumstances surrounding Dzmitry's tragic loss.
>> Carl
>>
>> --


Click here to read the complete article
Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=140&group=rec.sport.rowing#140

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1121:: with SMTP id p1mr33597011qkk.299.1620842829122;
Wed, 12 May 2021 11:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1248:: with SMTP id t8mr50862305ybu.117.1620842828909;
Wed, 12 May 2021 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:9000:5f01:21e5:1c3b:6d59:44b1:3246;
posting-account=L5gH8QoAAAB4LMI2VgEHVsX2VKo3Ci20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:9000:5f01:21e5:1c3b:6d59:44b1:3246
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com> <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: lakega...@gmail.com (don Vickers)
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 18:07:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: don Vickers - Wed, 12 May 2021 18:07 UTC

There were clearly some horribly poor choices made in the Iowa State tragedy. Carl made a great case of the culture problem at the top of the blazer hierarchy. I suggest there is also a culture issue that likely played into the tragedy in this case. This is a culture where the boat is only a minor consideration of the sport. Carl has posted here here very well about the lack of boatmanship. I wonder how much the kids in this tragedy understood about being ON and IN the water.

It would seem a good thing to have the various national rowing organizations place a bit more emphasis on the BOAT and WATER aspects of the sport. We can always dream because this seems highly unlikely.

One would hope that the ISU rowing team required swim tests. As a part of my high school swim tests, we were also lectured about safety procedures. One of the core messages in that lecture was to NEVER leave the boat even it was totally under the surface. The reports of the accident indicate that the two kids that drowned started swimming to, apparently opposite, shore. This could have been as little as 200 meters and as much as 500 meters. That is an exceptionally long distance to swim in water just above freezing..

I had the experience of being in an almost identical situation when I was in my first year of rowing as a 14-year-old. The difference was that we had a launch and a coach to provide leadership. Being in that icy water was very debilitating.

The lake in which this occurred, Little Wall Lake <https://www.google.com/maps/place/Little+Wall+Lake/@42.2691266,-93.6450937,2652m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x87ee0e90c589a4f5:0x5392df7181a19553!8m2!3d42.2686405!4d-93.6382472>, is just over 1 k north to south and 1.5 k east to west.

For what little it is worth,
don Vickers

Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=141&group=rec.sport.rowing#141

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1049:: with SMTP id f9mr34413488qte.140.1620845119758;
Wed, 12 May 2021 11:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:1d0:: with SMTP id f16mr27441455ybp.505.1620845119524;
Wed, 12 May 2021 11:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:9000:5f01:21e5:1c3b:6d59:44b1:3246;
posting-account=L5gH8QoAAAB4LMI2VgEHVsX2VKo3Ci20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:9000:5f01:21e5:1c3b:6d59:44b1:3246
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com> <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: lakega...@gmail.com (don Vickers)
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 18:45:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: don Vickers - Wed, 12 May 2021 18:45 UTC

Just a few minutes after posting the above I came across this announcement of a safety seminar via Zoom by USRowing for tomorrow, 13-May-2021:

Topic Safety, Safety, Safety - Making Sure You're REALLY Ready to get Back to the Water

Description
USRowing Safety Committee members Rachel LeMieux (Chair) and Matt Logue will discuss minimum guidelines for safe Rowing practices. They will cover many topics including: Weather, Water Conditions, Emergency Plans/Rules, Coast Guard regulations, among others.

Time May 13, 2021 07:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)

URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_WZYxEpniTZKz1DtgfacONQ

don Vickers

Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<75be9222-d598-4e79-98cf-61ef4fb30137n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=142&group=rec.sport.rowing#142

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a37:ba03:: with SMTP id k3mr35189522qkf.496.1620855772355;
Wed, 12 May 2021 14:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6981:: with SMTP id e123mr52544386ybc.114.1620855772104;
Wed, 12 May 2021 14:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!usenet.pasdenom.info!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 14:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:a400:cb41:5cfb:1b48:3f76:7f76;
posting-account=kRlXMQoAAAC90bJqqiT87VzgCC19W57_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:a400:cb41:5cfb:1b48:3f76:7f76
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com> <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com> <4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <75be9222-d598-4e79-98cf-61ef4fb30137n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: rowsafe...@gmail.com (Marc Messing)
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 21:42:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Marc Messing - Wed, 12 May 2021 21:42 UTC

Don,

Thanks for the heads-up on the USR zoom meeting.

Marc

On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 2:45:21 PM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
> Just a few minutes after posting the above I came across this announcement of a safety seminar via Zoom by USRowing for tomorrow, 13-May-2021:
>
>
> Topic Safety, Safety, Safety - Making Sure You're REALLY Ready to get Back to the Water
>
> Description
> USRowing Safety Committee members Rachel LeMieux (Chair) and Matt Logue will discuss minimum guidelines for safe Rowing practices. They will cover many topics including: Weather, Water Conditions, Emergency Plans/Rules, Coast Guard regulations, among others.
>
> Time May 13, 2021 07:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
>
> URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_WZYxEpniTZKz1DtgfacONQ
>
> don Vickers

USR safety meeting

<2b1ca681-ba14-42fd-a8db-c94af0a39366n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=143&group=rec.sport.rowing#143

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4756:: with SMTP id k22mr35147973qtp.193.1620855876597;
Wed, 12 May 2021 14:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:1d0:: with SMTP id f16mr28448486ybp.505.1620855876472;
Wed, 12 May 2021 14:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 14:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:a400:cb41:5cfb:1b48:3f76:7f76;
posting-account=kRlXMQoAAAC90bJqqiT87VzgCC19W57_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:a400:cb41:5cfb:1b48:3f76:7f76
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com> <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com> <4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2b1ca681-ba14-42fd-a8db-c94af0a39366n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: USR safety meeting
From: rowsafe...@gmail.com (Marc Messing)
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 21:44:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Marc Messing - Wed, 12 May 2021 21:44 UTC

Don,

Thanks for the heads-up on the USR meeting.

Did you come across that on their website, or through some other notification?

Marc

On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 2:45:21 PM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
> Just a few minutes after posting the above I came across this announcement of a safety seminar via Zoom by USRowing for tomorrow, 13-May-2021:
>
>
> Topic Safety, Safety, Safety - Making Sure You're REALLY Ready to get Back to the Water
>
> Description
> USRowing Safety Committee members Rachel LeMieux (Chair) and Matt Logue will discuss minimum guidelines for safe Rowing practices. They will cover many topics including: Weather, Water Conditions, Emergency Plans/Rules, Coast Guard regulations, among others.
>
> Time May 13, 2021 07:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
>
> URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_WZYxEpniTZKz1DtgfacONQ
>
> don Vickers

Re: tragedy in Iowa.

<14a5a7b6-7a5a-4f61-a642-925f5a6ee918n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=144&group=rec.sport.rowing#144

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a37:ac0f:: with SMTP id e15mr25294007qkm.6.1620857060098;
Wed, 12 May 2021 15:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1248:: with SMTP id t8mr52255286ybu.117.1620857059911;
Wed, 12 May 2021 15:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 15:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:a400:cb41:5cfb:1b48:3f76:7f76;
posting-account=kRlXMQoAAAC90bJqqiT87VzgCC19W57_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:a400:cb41:5cfb:1b48:3f76:7f76
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com> <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <14a5a7b6-7a5a-4f61-a642-925f5a6ee918n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: tragedy in Iowa.
From: rowsafe...@gmail.com (Marc Messing)
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 22:04:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Marc Messing - Wed, 12 May 2021 22:04 UTC

It was reported early on that the ISU students had taken some sort of swim test, presumably in a heated pool, and that they felt it was ok to take a boat out because the swim test represented some sort of "certification."

A friend of Derek Nanni, one of the students who died, wrote on Reddit/rowing that Derek had been competitive swimmer in high school. In the absence of the findings of official investigations there haven't been any reliable accounts of what happened in the first critical minutes after the boat capsized. It isn't known if any of the rowers tried to hold on to the boat, but were unable to reach it because of the wind and the waves or unable to hold onto it in 40f water.

What is known is that one of the effects of cold shock is panic and that panic clouds rational judgment. It is also known that rowers can, in fact, row in life-jackets and that life-jackets save lives. And it is known that USRowing has downplayed these last two facts for years.

As long as new rowers are instructed that they must take a simple swim test in a heated pool before rowing, but that they needn't wear life-jackets under life-threatening conditions (i.e., water temps below 50f/10c), rowers will continue to drown in cold water.

Marc

Marc Messing
RowSafeUSA.Org
RowSafeUSA@Gmail.Com

On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 2:07:10 PM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
> There were clearly some horribly poor choices made in the Iowa State tragedy. Carl made a great case of the culture problem at the top of the blazer hierarchy. I suggest there is also a culture issue that likely played into the tragedy in this case. This is a culture where the boat is only a minor consideration of the sport. Carl has posted here here very well about the lack of boatmanship. I wonder how much the kids in this tragedy understood about being ON and IN the water.
>
> It would seem a good thing to have the various national rowing organizations place a bit more emphasis on the BOAT and WATER aspects of the sport. We can always dream because this seems highly unlikely.
>
> One would hope that the ISU rowing team required swim tests. As a part of my high school swim tests, we were also lectured about safety procedures. One of the core messages in that lecture was to NEVER leave the boat even it was totally under the surface. The reports of the accident indicate that the two kids that drowned started swimming to, apparently opposite, shore. This could have been as little as 200 meters and as much as 500 meters. That is an exceptionally long distance to swim in water just above freezing.
>
> I had the experience of being in an almost identical situation when I was in my first year of rowing as a 14-year-old. The difference was that we had a launch and a coach to provide leadership. Being in that icy water was very debilitating.
>
> The lake in which this occurred, Little Wall Lake <https://www.google.com/maps/place/Little+Wall+Lake/@42.2691266,-93.6450937,2652m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x87ee0e90c589a4f5:0x5392df7181a19553!8m2!3d42.2686405!4d-93.6382472>, is just over 1 k north to south and 1.5 k east to west.
>
> For what little it is worth,
> don Vickers

Re: USR safety meeting

<574ec25b-6168-49f9-8546-def1442a6514n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=145&group=rec.sport.rowing#145

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1493:: with SMTP id t19mr37343437qtx.147.1620907108076;
Thu, 13 May 2021 04:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:880c:: with SMTP id c12mr56229304ybl.399.1620907107907;
Thu, 13 May 2021 04:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 04:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2b1ca681-ba14-42fd-a8db-c94af0a39366n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:9000:5f01:21e5:48a8:8144:25c3:afec;
posting-account=L5gH8QoAAAB4LMI2VgEHVsX2VKo3Ci20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:9000:5f01:21e5:48a8:8144:25c3:afec
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com> <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com> <4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
<2b1ca681-ba14-42fd-a8db-c94af0a39366n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <574ec25b-6168-49f9-8546-def1442a6514n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USR safety meeting
From: lakega...@gmail.com (don Vickers)
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 11:58:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: don Vickers - Thu, 13 May 2021 11:58 UTC

On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 5:44:37 PM UTC-4, Marc Messing wrote:
> Don,
>
> Thanks for the heads-up on the USR meeting.
>
> Did you come across that on their website, or through some other notification?
>
> Marc
> On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 2:45:21 PM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
> > Just a few minutes after posting the above I came across this announcement of a safety seminar via Zoom by USRowing for tomorrow, 13-May-2021:
> >
> >
> > Topic Safety, Safety, Safety - Making Sure You're REALLY Ready to get Back to the Water
> >
> > Description
> > USRowing Safety Committee members Rachel LeMieux (Chair) and Matt Logue will discuss minimum guidelines for safe Rowing practices. They will cover many topics including: Weather, Water Conditions, Emergency Plans/Rules, Coast Guard regulations, among others.
> >
> > Time May 13, 2021 07:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
> >
> > URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_WZYxEpniTZKz1DtgfacONQ
> >
> > don Vickers
Marc,

The notification I saw was a Tweet from USRowing. While it is a great that they are running this virtual meeting they certainly don't seem interested in promoting or advertising it.

don

Re: USR safety meeting

<129f0263-e261-45a0-b5b4-233194c39bd9n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=146&group=rec.sport.rowing#146

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:edcd:: with SMTP id c196mr38460255qkg.441.1620925062553;
Thu, 13 May 2021 09:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:1d0:: with SMTP id f16mr34315772ybp.505.1620925062400;
Thu, 13 May 2021 09:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!news.nntp4.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 09:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <574ec25b-6168-49f9-8546-def1442a6514n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:a400:cb41:7873:4104:f11b:ab17;
posting-account=kRlXMQoAAAC90bJqqiT87VzgCC19W57_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:a400:cb41:7873:4104:f11b:ab17
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com> <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com> <4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
<2b1ca681-ba14-42fd-a8db-c94af0a39366n@googlegroups.com> <574ec25b-6168-49f9-8546-def1442a6514n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <129f0263-e261-45a0-b5b4-233194c39bd9n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USR safety meeting
From: rowsafe...@gmail.com (Marc Messing)
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 16:57:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Marc Messing - Thu, 13 May 2021 16:57 UTC

They have never convinced me of their interest in promoting safety.

When Amanda Kraus took over as CEO last year I wrote her a brief note of congratulations and my interest in youth safety standards. She assured me "Safety is the number one priority at USRowing and it's good to hear from others who are aligned on this work." I wrote her back and said "Safety, in particular youth safety, should be a top priority for USRowing, but it isn't," and then went through a litany of their failures in this regard.

I also called to speak with her immediately after the ISU accident and was told she was unavailable because she was on vacation. Less than six months in her new position as CEO of USR, in the days following a fatal accident she was on vacation and unavailable to return calls.

USR and I have different views on what a commitment to safety means.

Marc

On Thursday, May 13, 2021 at 7:58:29 AM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 5:44:37 PM UTC-4, Marc Messing wrote:
> > Don,
> >
> > Thanks for the heads-up on the USR meeting.
> >
> > Did you come across that on their website, or through some other notification?
> >
> > Marc
> > On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 2:45:21 PM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
> > > Just a few minutes after posting the above I came across this announcement of a safety seminar via Zoom by USRowing for tomorrow, 13-May-2021:
> > >
> > >
> > > Topic Safety, Safety, Safety - Making Sure You're REALLY Ready to get Back to the Water
> > >
> > > Description
> > > USRowing Safety Committee members Rachel LeMieux (Chair) and Matt Logue will discuss minimum guidelines for safe Rowing practices. They will cover many topics including: Weather, Water Conditions, Emergency Plans/Rules, Coast Guard regulations, among others.
> > >
> > > Time May 13, 2021 07:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
> > >
> > > URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_WZYxEpniTZKz1DtgfacONQ
> > >
> > > don Vickers
> Marc,
>
> The notification I saw was a Tweet from USRowing. While it is a great that they are running this virtual meeting they certainly don't seem interested in promoting or advertising it.
>
> don

Re: USR safety meeting

<b0489eb9-bf53-49b9-920e-3cdd4d1ad651n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=147&group=rec.sport.rowing#147

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7fc5:: with SMTP id b5mr40536116qtk.122.1620953149187;
Thu, 13 May 2021 17:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:11c6:: with SMTP id 189mr60586664ybr.154.1620953148988;
Thu, 13 May 2021 17:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!fdc3.netnews.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 17:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <129f0263-e261-45a0-b5b4-233194c39bd9n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:7080:a400:cb41:bc73:6449:78ad:46a0;
posting-account=kRlXMQoAAAC90bJqqiT87VzgCC19W57_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:7080:a400:cb41:bc73:6449:78ad:46a0
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com> <DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me> <13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me> <ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com> <s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com> <s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com> <4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
<2b1ca681-ba14-42fd-a8db-c94af0a39366n@googlegroups.com> <574ec25b-6168-49f9-8546-def1442a6514n@googlegroups.com>
<129f0263-e261-45a0-b5b4-233194c39bd9n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b0489eb9-bf53-49b9-920e-3cdd4d1ad651n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: USR safety meeting
From: rowsafe...@gmail.com (Marc Messing)
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 00:45:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 4682
 by: Marc Messing - Fri, 14 May 2021 00:45 UTC

After tonight's webinar I'll soften my view on USR slightly. They're trying; they're just very timid and have persuaded themselves they don't have the authority to set minimum standards.

Marc

On Thursday, May 13, 2021 at 12:57:43 PM UTC-4, Marc Messing wrote:
> They have never convinced me of their interest in promoting safety.
>
> When Amanda Kraus took over as CEO last year I wrote her a brief note of congratulations and my interest in youth safety standards. She assured me "Safety is the number one priority at USRowing and it's good to hear from others who are aligned on this work." I wrote her back and said "Safety, in particular youth safety, should be a top priority for USRowing, but it isn't," and then went through a litany of their failures in this regard.
>
> I also called to speak with her immediately after the ISU accident and was told she was unavailable because she was on vacation. Less than six months in her new position as CEO of USR, in the days following a fatal accident she was on vacation and unavailable to return calls.
>
> USR and I have different views on what a commitment to safety means.
>
> Marc
> On Thursday, May 13, 2021 at 7:58:29 AM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 5:44:37 PM UTC-4, Marc Messing wrote:
> > > Don,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the heads-up on the USR meeting.
> > >
> > > Did you come across that on their website, or through some other notification?
> > >
> > > Marc
> > > On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 2:45:21 PM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
> > > > Just a few minutes after posting the above I came across this announcement of a safety seminar via Zoom by USRowing for tomorrow, 13-May-2021:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Topic Safety, Safety, Safety - Making Sure You're REALLY Ready to get Back to the Water
> > > >
> > > > Description
> > > > USRowing Safety Committee members Rachel LeMieux (Chair) and Matt Logue will discuss minimum guidelines for safe Rowing practices. They will cover many topics including: Weather, Water Conditions, Emergency Plans/Rules, Coast Guard regulations, among others.
> > > >
> > > > Time May 13, 2021 07:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
> > > >
> > > > URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_WZYxEpniTZKz1DtgfacONQ
> > > >
> > > > don Vickers
> > Marc,
> >
> > The notification I saw was a Tweet from USRowing. While it is a great that they are running this virtual meeting they certainly don't seem interested in promoting or advertising it.
> >
> > don

Re: USR safety meeting

<s7kk8l$6cr$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=148&group=rec.sport.rowing#148

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: car...@carldouglasrowing.com (carl)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.rowing
Subject: Re: USR safety meeting
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 02:37:29 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <s7kk8l$6cr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <6de45a42-6030-49fd-8269-6b76ba2c5498n@googlegroups.com>
<641adbbc-f797-402d-9c1a-e8ba125b8074n@googlegroups.com>
<DOednWZpxN4ZZfj9nZ2dnUU78QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <s454ah$s69$1@dont-email.me>
<13f39664-0ea2-48b7-bd20-e0504abf4382n@googlegroups.com>
<s4ibn2$gti$1@dont-email.me>
<ac395965-da13-43df-8d8f-53a5e0e88543n@googlegroups.com>
<c39766d6-2c52-45cd-b2dc-206cae3deccan@googlegroups.com>
<s79mic$qnq$1@dont-email.me>
<f8b3af92-52da-4a33-a193-4c35894e9d03n@googlegroups.com>
<s7f1l7$6er$1@dont-email.me>
<0dc0e07c-219c-4917-92c8-e115e97c3bc3n@googlegroups.com>
<4436af89-0c9b-4321-a723-65d6b56f2cdbn@googlegroups.com>
<2b1ca681-ba14-42fd-a8db-c94af0a39366n@googlegroups.com>
<574ec25b-6168-49f9-8546-def1442a6514n@googlegroups.com>
<129f0263-e261-45a0-b5b4-233194c39bd9n@googlegroups.com>
<b0489eb9-bf53-49b9-920e-3cdd4d1ad651n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 01:37:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c2660e0ef75514cd748f8cb43e7112fe";
logging-data="6555"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/k2ffNM9pwoG1gjOFpXtHi8t6mnXSvciE="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6G5r+9KTQuU77mfmK5NVr+DZeRo=
In-Reply-To: <b0489eb9-bf53-49b9-920e-3cdd4d1ad651n@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210513-10, 13/05/2021), Outbound message
 by: carl - Fri, 14 May 2021 01:37 UTC

On 14/05/2021 01:45, Marc Messing wrote:
> After tonight's webinar I'll soften my view on USR slightly. They're trying; they're just very timid and have persuaded themselves they don't have the authority to set minimum standards.
>
> Marc
>
> On Thursday, May 13, 2021 at 12:57:43 PM UTC-4, Marc Messing wrote:
>> They have never convinced me of their interest in promoting safety.
>>
>> When Amanda Kraus took over as CEO last year I wrote her a brief note of congratulations and my interest in youth safety standards. She assured me "Safety is the number one priority at USRowing and it's good to hear from others who are aligned on this work." I wrote her back and said "Safety, in particular youth safety, should be a top priority for USRowing, but it isn't," and then went through a litany of their failures in this regard.
>>
>> I also called to speak with her immediately after the ISU accident and was told she was unavailable because she was on vacation. Less than six months in her new position as CEO of USR, in the days following a fatal accident she was on vacation and unavailable to return calls.
>>
>> USR and I have different views on what a commitment to safety means.
>>
>> Marc
>> On Thursday, May 13, 2021 at 7:58:29 AM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 5:44:37 PM UTC-4, Marc Messing wrote:
>>>> Don,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the heads-up on the USR meeting.
>>>>
>>>> Did you come across that on their website, or through some other notification?
>>>>
>>>> Marc
>>>> On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 2:45:21 PM UTC-4, don Vickers wrote:
>>>>> Just a few minutes after posting the above I came across this announcement of a safety seminar via Zoom by USRowing for tomorrow, 13-May-2021:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Topic Safety, Safety, Safety - Making Sure You're REALLY Ready to get Back to the Water
>>>>>
>>>>> Description
>>>>> USRowing Safety Committee members Rachel LeMieux (Chair) and Matt Logue will discuss minimum guidelines for safe Rowing practices. They will cover many topics including: Weather, Water Conditions, Emergency Plans/Rules, Coast Guard regulations, among others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Time May 13, 2021 07:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_WZYxEpniTZKz1DtgfacONQ
>>>>>
>>>>> don Vickers
>>> Marc,
>>>
>>> The notification I saw was a Tweet from USRowing. While it is a great that they are running this virtual meeting they certainly don't seem interested in promoting or advertising it.
>>>
>>> don

They're not still playing that same harp, are they?
"We don't have the authority to set minimum standards"

They were saying that in 2006, when I was interviewed by USR lawyers in
connection with the case of the drowned John Steve Catilo. I had to
remind them that they policed competition matters very closely. And
that they did have a safety committee, albeit absent from duty.
Whereupon they dropped that "you can't expect us to police safety"
argument like a hot potato.

Keep at it, Marc.

Carl

PS A week ago or more, in a FB discussion, I invited Rachel le Mieux
(USRA Water Safety Chair) to contact me to discuss safety matters. As
yet, no response.
C

--
Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
Email: carl@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor