Positions 5 to 32 according to points total. In parenthesis, goals scored
and goals conceded. Ties broken by GD, then goals scored.

5 Netherlands 11 (10-4)
6 England 10 (13-4)
7 Brasil 10 (8-3)
8 Portugal 9 (12-6)
---------------------
9 Japan 7
10 Senegal 6 (5-7)
11 Australia 6 (4-6)
12 Switzerland 6 (5-9)
13 Spain 5 (9-3)
14 United States 5 (3-4)
15 Poland 4 (3-5)
16 South Korea 4 (5-8)
---------------------
17 Germany 4 (6-5)
18 Ecuador 4 (4-3)
19 Cameroon 4 (4-4)
20 Uruguay 4 (2-2)
21 Tunisia 4 (1-1)
22 Mexico 4 (2-3)
23 Belgium 4 (1-2)
24 Ghana 3 (5-7)
25 Saudi Arabia 3 (3-5)
26 Iran 3 (4-7)
27 Costa Rica 3 (3-11)
28 Denmark 1 (1-3)
29 Serbia 1 (5-8)
30 Wales 1 (1-6)
31 Canada 0 (2-7)
32 Qatar 0 (1-7)

Best regards,

Lléo

On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 10:19:40 PM UTC-5, Lléo wrote:

> ---------------------
> 17 Germany 4 (6-5)
> 18 Ecuador 4 (4-3)
> 19 Cameroon 4 (4-4)
> 20 Uruguay 4 (2-2)
> 21 Tunisia 4 (1-1)
> 22 Mexico 4 (2-3)
> 23 Belgium 4 (1-2)

That is *a lot* of teams that went home with 4 points. In 24-team tournaments (48-team tournament?) , I have often stated that 4 points are usually enough to go through as a best third, but this would not have been true in this WC.

In article <06446ad8-da7b-4a86-8420-f8f20856c31bn@googlegroups.com>,
Lléo <llb.moura@gmail.com> wrote:
>Positions 5 to 32 according to points total. In parenthesis, goals scored
>and goals conceded. Ties broken by GD, then goals scored.
>
>5 Netherlands 11 (10-4)
>6 England 10 (13-4)
>7 Brasil 10 (8-3)
>8 Portugal 9 (12-6)
>---------------------
>9 Japan 7
>10 Senegal 6 (5-7)
>11 Australia 6 (4-6)
>12 Switzerland 6 (5-9)
>13 Spain 5 (9-3)
>14 United States 5 (3-4)
>15 Poland 4 (3-5)
>16 South Korea 4 (5-8)
>---------------------
>17 Germany 4 (6-5)
>18 Ecuador 4 (4-3)
>19 Cameroon 4 (4-4)
>20 Uruguay 4 (2-2)
>21 Tunisia 4 (1-1)
>22 Mexico 4 (2-3)
>23 Belgium 4 (1-2)
>24 Ghana 3 (5-7)
>25 Saudi Arabia 3 (3-5)
>26 Iran 3 (4-7)
>27 Costa Rica 3 (3-11)
>28 Denmark 1 (1-3)
>29 Serbia 1 (5-8)
>30 Wales 1 (1-6)
>31 Canada 0 (2-7)
>32 Qatar 0 (1-7)
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Lléo

Some will pip up in the overall ratings!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b
Happy Christmas 2022 and Merry New Year 2023 Beware https://mindspring.com

On Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 4:19:40 AM UTC+1, Lléo wrote:
> Positions 5 to 32 according to points total. In parenthesis, goals scored
> and goals conceded. Ties broken by GD, then goals scored.
>
> 5 Netherlands 11 (10-4)
> 6 England 10 (13-4)
> 7 Brasil 10 (8-3)
> 8 Portugal 9 (12-6)
> ---------------------
> 9 Japan 7
> 10 Senegal 6 (5-7)
> 11 Australia 6 (4-6)
> 12 Switzerland 6 (5-9)
> 13 Spain 5 (9-3)
> 14 United States 5 (3-4)
> 15 Poland 4 (3-5)
> 16 South Korea 4 (5-8)
> ---------------------
> 17 Germany 4 (6-5)
> 18 Ecuador 4 (4-3)
> 19 Cameroon 4 (4-4)
> 20 Uruguay 4 (2-2)
> 21 Tunisia 4 (1-1)
> 22 Mexico 4 (2-3)
> 23 Belgium 4 (1-2)
> 24 Ghana 3 (5-7)
> 25 Saudi Arabia 3 (3-5)
> 26 Iran 3 (4-7)
> 27 Costa Rica 3 (3-11)
> 28 Denmark 1 (1-3)
> 29 Serbia 1 (5-8)
> 30 Wales 1 (1-6)
> 31 Canada 0 (2-7)

At least we now know that Canada were in the strongest group and
did against Morocco what Spain and Portugal couldn't.

Ciao,
Werner

> 32 Qatar 0 (1-7)
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lléo

Lléo avait énoncé :

There's a mistake ;)

21 Mexico 4 (2-3)
22 Belgium 4 (1-2)
23 Ghana 3 (5-7)
24 Saudi Arabia 3 (3-5)
25 Iran 3 (4-7)
26 Costa Rica 3 (3-11)
27 Tunisia 2 (1-2)

--
Ixion

On Tuesday, December 13, 2022 at 7:49:24 PM UTC+1, ixion martin - GdBx wrote:
> Lléo avait énoncé :
>
> There's a mistake ;)
>
> 21 Mexico 4 (2-3)
> 22 Belgium 4 (1-2)
> 23 Ghana 3 (5-7)
> 24 Saudi Arabia 3 (3-5)
> 25 Iran 3 (4-7)
> 26 Costa Rica 3 (3-11)
> 27 Tunisia 2 (1-2)

Imagine seeing your team in a World Cup semifinal and still being this petty about a not even
that controversial and ultimately completely irrelevant call.

Ciao,
Werner