Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The one sure way to make a lazy man look respectable is to put a fishing rod in his hand.

sport / alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants / Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

SubjectAuthor
* We're #9!, We're #9!iommiRULES
`* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!jeffg...@webtv.net
 +* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!iommiRULES
 |+- Re: We're #9!, We're #9!iommiRULES
 |`- Re: We're #9!, We're #9!iommiRULES
 `* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!TomBenton
  `* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!iommiRULES
   `* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!TomBenton
    `* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!number6
     `* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!iommiRULES
      `* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!number6
       `* Re: We're #9!, We're #9!iommiRULES
        `- Re: We're #9!, We're #9!iommiRULES

1
We're #9!, We're #9!

<7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1309&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1309

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4b:: with SMTP id c11mr29836488qvr.18.1625754364006;
Thu, 08 Jul 2021 07:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5c7:: with SMTP id 65mr24184245otd.360.1625754363634;
Thu, 08 Jul 2021 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.213.241.109; posting-account=i2mDUwoAAAC9i_tc7Dfr2sc0XCSNUI4B
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.213.241.109
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: gregkane...@gmail.com (iommiRULES)
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 14:26:03 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: iommiRULES - Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:26 UTC

This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1310&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1310

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:294b:: with SMTP id n11mr24404755qkp.63.1625758524962;
Thu, 08 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:cf02:: with SMTP id f2mr4105861oig.131.1625758524725;
Thu, 08 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2604:2000:2fc0:27:29ff:ca3b:673c:92f5;
posting-account=4DCM7woAAABOaeKkJG72BrlcPrLgFh0U
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2604:2000:2fc0:27:29ff:ca3b:673c:92f5
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: jeffgers...@webtv.net (jeffg...@webtv.net)
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 15:35:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: jeffg...@webtv.net - Thu, 8 Jul 2021 15:35 UTC

On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
>
>
> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<fcb1d2d8-bf08-4c0f-82a7-11eca2bf47b2n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1311&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1311

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4110:: with SMTP id j16mr9848509qko.37.1625761192524; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 09:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4ec9:: with SMTP id c192mr4180932oib.43.1625761192267; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 09:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.213.241.109; posting-account=i2mDUwoAAAC9i_tc7Dfr2sc0XCSNUI4B
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.213.241.109
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com> <da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fcb1d2d8-bf08-4c0f-82a7-11eca2bf47b2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: gregkane...@gmail.com (iommiRULES)
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 16:19:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 14
 by: iommiRULES - Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:19 UTC

On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 11:35:25 AM UTC-4, jeffg...@webtv.net wrote:
> On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> >
> >
> > https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.

I've always said the '86 team was the only team we had that was EXPECTED to win and was by far the strongest championship team we had....so 4-1 is a great record:

'87 Denver +9.5
'91 Bills -7
'01 Ravens -3
"08 Pats -12.5
'12 Pats -2.5

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<fa8a5bd3-6c56-4660-a7f1-c415050588dan@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1312&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1312

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9504:: with SMTP id x4mr31597503qkd.235.1625761713283;
Thu, 08 Jul 2021 09:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5d01:: with SMTP id b1mr23659969oti.158.1625761712987;
Thu, 08 Jul 2021 09:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <fcb1d2d8-bf08-4c0f-82a7-11eca2bf47b2n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.213.241.109; posting-account=i2mDUwoAAAC9i_tc7Dfr2sc0XCSNUI4B
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.213.241.109
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>
<da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <fcb1d2d8-bf08-4c0f-82a7-11eca2bf47b2n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <fa8a5bd3-6c56-4660-a7f1-c415050588dan@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: gregkane...@gmail.com (iommiRULES)
Injection-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 16:28:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: iommiRULES - Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:28 UTC

On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 12:19:52 PM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 11:35:25 AM UTC-4, jeffg...@webtv.net wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > > This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> > >
> > >
> > > https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> > LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
> I've always said the '86 team was the only team we had that was EXPECTED to win and was by far the strongest championship team we had....so 4-1 is a great record:
>
> '87 Denver +9.5
> '91 Bills -7
> '01 Ravens -3
> "08 Pats -12.5
> '12 Pats -2.5
Of course i'm talking SB champion, NFL champion i wasnt around, and not many left who were....being the last one was '56....

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<5d943f78-b8af-427f-8cb0-e56e563b64een@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1313&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1313

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:56e4:: with SMTP id cr4mr14701992qvb.54.1625843060527; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2252:: with SMTP id t18mr29097553otd.152.1625843060216; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 08:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <fcb1d2d8-bf08-4c0f-82a7-11eca2bf47b2n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.213.241.109; posting-account=i2mDUwoAAAC9i_tc7Dfr2sc0XCSNUI4B
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.213.241.109
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com> <da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <fcb1d2d8-bf08-4c0f-82a7-11eca2bf47b2n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5d943f78-b8af-427f-8cb0-e56e563b64een@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: gregkane...@gmail.com (iommiRULES)
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:04:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 27
 by: iommiRULES - Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:04 UTC

On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 12:19:52 PM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 11:35:25 AM UTC-4, jeffg...@webtv.net wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > > This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing.... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> > >
> > >
> > > https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> > LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
> I've always said the '86 team was the only team we had that was EXPECTED to win and was by far the strongest championship team we had....so 4-1 is a great record:
>
> '87 Denver +9.5
> '91 Bills -7
> '01 Ravens -3
> "08 Pats -12.5
> '12 Pats -2.5

Interesting aside....when i looked up these point spreads i think most would say the biggest was colt vs Jets....nope, but close. The biggest was Niners vs Chargers 18.5, Colts was 18....the oddsmakers nailed it on the Niners tho, they won by 21, and as i recall it didnt even feel that close.

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1315&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1315

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx42.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: TomBen...@agent.com
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
Message-ID: <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com>
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com> <da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 12
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 17:13:58 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1578
 by: TomBen...@agent.com - Fri, 9 Jul 2021 21:13 UTC

On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT), "jeffg...@webtv.net"
<jeffgersten@webtv.net> wrote:

>On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
>> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
>LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.

It breaks my heart that we'll never find out.

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<a5e2fb9a-3064-493e-901f-eed45f2bcd09n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1317&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1317

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4741:: with SMTP id k1mr35965619qtp.374.1625871499183;
Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:64d4:: with SMTP id n20mr29026680otl.10.1625871498977;
Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.213.241.109; posting-account=i2mDUwoAAAC9i_tc7Dfr2sc0XCSNUI4B
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.213.241.109
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>
<da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a5e2fb9a-3064-493e-901f-eed45f2bcd09n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: gregkane...@gmail.com (iommiRULES)
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:58:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: iommiRULES - Fri, 9 Jul 2021 22:58 UTC

On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT), "jeffg...@webtv.net"
> <jeffg...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> >> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> >>
> >>
> >> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> >LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
> It breaks my heart that we'll never find out.

We did find out Tom.....they lost and never Made the top 10 list! If that isnt a "What if your aunt had Balls" question nuttin is!

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<ja6oeg5ctgd0rppfbapopujq8n8veo505i@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1323&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1323

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc3.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx01.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: TomBen...@agent.com
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
Message-ID: <ja6oeg5ctgd0rppfbapopujq8n8veo505i@4ax.com>
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com> <da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com> <a5e2fb9a-3064-493e-901f-eed45f2bcd09n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 06:29:20 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2032
 by: TomBen...@agent.com - Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:29 UTC

On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT), iommiRULES
<gregkaney53@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT), "jeffg...@webtv.net"
>> <jeffg...@webtv.net> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
>> >> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
>> >LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
>> It breaks my heart that we'll never find out.
>
>We did find out Tom.....they lost and never Made the top 10 list! If that isnt a "What if your aunt had Balls" question nuttin is!

I was trying to be ironic.

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<8f75605e-ec6c-4217-ad06-73cf5e086f2an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1324&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1324

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d602:: with SMTP id c2mr51439505qvj.41.1626098701088;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 07:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:eb4e:: with SMTP id j75mr8708361oih.43.1626098700768;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 07:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 07:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ja6oeg5ctgd0rppfbapopujq8n8veo505i@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:84:8700:fe20:e967:efaf:880e:2dee;
posting-account=kMFUKgkAAABk8Srs8Ra7yo3npCB0-8jR
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:84:8700:fe20:e967:efaf:880e:2dee
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>
<da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com>
<a5e2fb9a-3064-493e-901f-eed45f2bcd09n@googlegroups.com> <ja6oeg5ctgd0rppfbapopujq8n8veo505i@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8f75605e-ec6c-4217-ad06-73cf5e086f2an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: snumb...@aol.com (number6)
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:05:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: number6 - Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:05 UTC

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 6:29:23 AM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT), iommiRULES
> <gregk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> >> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT), "jeffg...@webtv.net"
> >> <jeffg...@webtv.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> >> >> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> >> >LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
> >> It breaks my heart that we'll never find out.
> >
> >We did find out Tom.....they lost and never Made the top 10 list! If that isnt a "What if your aunt had Balls" question nuttin is!
> I was trying to be ironic.

I got it ... and all but the brain dead did also ...

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<cfc3454e-a6bf-434b-a81d-b8c8903c6fa5n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1325&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1325

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1105:: with SMTP id e5mr1965318qty.268.1626109399585; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:61b:: with SMTP id w27mr6055oti.97.1626109399292; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8f75605e-ec6c-4217-ad06-73cf5e086f2an@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.213.241.109; posting-account=i2mDUwoAAAC9i_tc7Dfr2sc0XCSNUI4B
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.213.241.109
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com> <da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com> <a5e2fb9a-3064-493e-901f-eed45f2bcd09n@googlegroups.com> <ja6oeg5ctgd0rppfbapopujq8n8veo505i@4ax.com> <8f75605e-ec6c-4217-ad06-73cf5e086f2an@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <cfc3454e-a6bf-434b-a81d-b8c8903c6fa5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: gregkane...@gmail.com (iommiRULES)
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:03:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 35
 by: iommiRULES - Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:03 UTC

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 10:05:01 AM UTC-4, number6 wrote:
> On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 6:29:23 AM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT), iommiRULES
> > <gregk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT), "jeffg...@webtv.net"
> > >> <jeffg...@webtv.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > >> >> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> > >> >LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
> > >> It breaks my heart that we'll never find out.
> > >
> > >We did find out Tom.....they lost and never Made the top 10 list! If that isnt a "What if your aunt had Balls" question nuttin is!
> > I was trying to be ironic.
> I got it ... and all but the brain dead did also ...
And what about my post said i DIDNT get it?. Tom assumed i didnt get his post but i did, why he assumed that i dunno. But I got what Tom was saying, my post was more of a comment to THE ORIGINAL question....in other words Tom didnt get MY post, it wast i didnt get his. I was saying that imagining that the Patriots had won is like saying "Well if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle". Whoooooooooshhhhh, right over your head....but thats par for the course here....

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<26e46ec7-f5f2-48cc-ad5b-451a0a12c6dfn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1326&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1326

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a37:2d04:: with SMTP id t4mr10200124qkh.160.1626111078726;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7090:: with SMTP id l16mr85700otj.213.1626111078411;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <cfc3454e-a6bf-434b-a81d-b8c8903c6fa5n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:84:8700:fe20:e967:efaf:880e:2dee;
posting-account=kMFUKgkAAABk8Srs8Ra7yo3npCB0-8jR
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:84:8700:fe20:e967:efaf:880e:2dee
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>
<da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com>
<a5e2fb9a-3064-493e-901f-eed45f2bcd09n@googlegroups.com> <ja6oeg5ctgd0rppfbapopujq8n8veo505i@4ax.com>
<8f75605e-ec6c-4217-ad06-73cf5e086f2an@googlegroups.com> <cfc3454e-a6bf-434b-a81d-b8c8903c6fa5n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <26e46ec7-f5f2-48cc-ad5b-451a0a12c6dfn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: snumb...@aol.com (number6)
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:31:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: number6 - Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:31 UTC

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 1:03:20 PM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 10:05:01 AM UTC-4, number6 wrote:
> > On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 6:29:23 AM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT), iommiRULES
> > > <gregk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> > > >> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT), "jeffg...@webtv.net"
> > > >> <jeffg...@webtv.net> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > > >> >> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> > > >> >LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
> > > >> It breaks my heart that we'll never find out.
> > > >
> > > >We did find out Tom.....they lost and never Made the top 10 list! If that isnt a "What if your aunt had Balls" question nuttin is!
> > > I was trying to be ironic.
> > I got it ... and all but the brain dead did also ...
> And what about my post said i DIDNT get it?. Tom assumed i didnt get his post but i did, why he assumed that i dunno. But I got what Tom was saying, my post was more of a comment to THE ORIGINAL question....in other words Tom didnt get MY post, it wast i didnt get his. I was saying that imagining that the Patriots had won is like saying "Well if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle". Whoooooooooshhhhh, right over your head....but thats par for the course here....
Thanks for once again proving my point ...

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<b65c30e7-e843-49a7-ac35-ec7a48b1d97bn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1327&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1327

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a816:: with SMTP id r22mr2596899qke.100.1626111523215;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:8749:: with SMTP id a9mr243789ooi.71.1626111522938;
Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <26e46ec7-f5f2-48cc-ad5b-451a0a12c6dfn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.213.241.109; posting-account=i2mDUwoAAAC9i_tc7Dfr2sc0XCSNUI4B
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.213.241.109
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com>
<da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com>
<a5e2fb9a-3064-493e-901f-eed45f2bcd09n@googlegroups.com> <ja6oeg5ctgd0rppfbapopujq8n8veo505i@4ax.com>
<8f75605e-ec6c-4217-ad06-73cf5e086f2an@googlegroups.com> <cfc3454e-a6bf-434b-a81d-b8c8903c6fa5n@googlegroups.com>
<26e46ec7-f5f2-48cc-ad5b-451a0a12c6dfn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b65c30e7-e843-49a7-ac35-ec7a48b1d97bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: gregkane...@gmail.com (iommiRULES)
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:38:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: iommiRULES - Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:38 UTC

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 1:31:19 PM UTC-4, number6 wrote:
> On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 1:03:20 PM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 10:05:01 AM UTC-4, number6 wrote:
> > > On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 6:29:23 AM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT), iommiRULES
> > > > <gregk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> > > > >> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT), "jeffg...@webtv.net"
> > > > >> <jeffg...@webtv.net> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > > > >> >> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> > > > >> >LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
> > > > >> It breaks my heart that we'll never find out.
> > > > >
> > > > >We did find out Tom.....they lost and never Made the top 10 list! If that isnt a "What if your aunt had Balls" question nuttin is!
> > > > I was trying to be ironic.
> > > I got it ... and all but the brain dead did also ...
> > And what about my post said i DIDNT get it?. Tom assumed i didnt get his post but i did, why he assumed that i dunno. But I got what Tom was saying, my post was more of a comment to THE ORIGINAL question....in other words Tom didnt get MY post, it wast i didnt get his. I was saying that imagining that the Patriots had won is like saying "Well if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle". Whoooooooooshhhhh, right over your head....but thats par for the course here....
> Thanks for once again proving my point ...
Yes because my point was i was agreeing with tom, he was saying he "it breaks my heart" to imagine it , i was saying YOU DONT HAVE TO IMAGINE IT, because we saw what actually happend.....time for your meds gramps, then wake up and read it again....

Re: We're #9!, We're #9!

<47e64df5-c17c-4d58-92b4-4aeeb96fe4d4n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=1328&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants#1328

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1195:: with SMTP id b21mr30187654qkk.71.1626112389679; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2781:: with SMTP id c1mr196540otb.34.1626112389411; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.ny-giants
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b65c30e7-e843-49a7-ac35-ec7a48b1d97bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=32.213.241.109; posting-account=i2mDUwoAAAC9i_tc7Dfr2sc0XCSNUI4B
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.213.241.109
References: <7e8fdbae-e581-4759-a47a-a9f34db4d0a7n@googlegroups.com> <da986ef0-9266-4933-8b6a-22549b910305n@googlegroups.com> <kvehegp8005s0d9sv4ossmc6fmponipu5v@4ax.com> <a5e2fb9a-3064-493e-901f-eed45f2bcd09n@googlegroups.com> <ja6oeg5ctgd0rppfbapopujq8n8veo505i@4ax.com> <8f75605e-ec6c-4217-ad06-73cf5e086f2an@googlegroups.com> <cfc3454e-a6bf-434b-a81d-b8c8903c6fa5n@googlegroups.com> <26e46ec7-f5f2-48cc-ad5b-451a0a12c6dfn@googlegroups.com> <b65c30e7-e843-49a7-ac35-ec7a48b1d97bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <47e64df5-c17c-4d58-92b4-4aeeb96fe4d4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: We're #9!, We're #9!
From: gregkane...@gmail.com (iommiRULES)
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:53:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 48
 by: iommiRULES - Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:53 UTC

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 1:38:43 PM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 1:31:19 PM UTC-4, number6 wrote:
> > On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 1:03:20 PM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > > On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 10:05:01 AM UTC-4, number6 wrote:
> > > > On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 6:29:23 AM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:58:18 -0700 (PDT), iommiRULES
> > > > > <gregk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 5:14:00 PM UTC-4, TomB...@agent.com wrote:
> > > > > >> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:35:24 -0700 (PDT), "jeffg...@webtv.net"
> > > > > >> <jeffg...@webtv.net> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 10:26:04 AM UTC-4, iommiRULES wrote:
> > > > > >> >> This is a pretty good top 10 list. Hard to argue with. And best thing... NO PATRIOTS! Thanks to our 2007 team that is. In fact the most recent team was '99 Rams who our '86 Giants nudged out by 1 spot.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ranking-the-top-10-teams-of-the-super-bowl-era-78-steelers-72-dolphins-battle-for-top-spot/
> > > > > >> >LOL, I first read the header as We're #91, and wondered what the big deal was. I wonder how high the Patriot team that lost Super Bowl #42 would have ranked if they won and were 19-0.
> > > > > >> It breaks my heart that we'll never find out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >We did find out Tom.....they lost and never Made the top 10 list! If that isnt a "What if your aunt had Balls" question nuttin is!
> > > > > I was trying to be ironic.
> > > > I got it ... and all but the brain dead did also ...
> > > And what about my post said i DIDNT get it?. Tom assumed i didnt get his post but i did, why he assumed that i dunno. But I got what Tom was saying, my post was more of a comment to THE ORIGINAL question....in other words Tom didnt get MY post, it wast i didnt get his. I was saying that imagining that the Patriots had won is like saying "Well if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle". Whoooooooooshhhhh, right over your head....but thats par for the course here....
> > Thanks for once again proving my point ...
> Yes because my point was i was agreeing with tom, he was saying he "it breaks my heart" to imagine it , i was saying YOU DONT HAVE TO IMAGINE IT, because we saw what actually happend.....time for your meds gramps, then wake up and read it again....

I TOTALLY got what he meant, why he didnt get what i meant i dunno. Because its plain as day my "we did find out" was just a play on his "We will never find out".

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor