Alan wrote:

> On 2021-12-16 3:42 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > Alan wrote:
> >
> > > BTW, I agree completely that the rules should be written with as
> > > little ambiguity as possible, but I also acknowledge that it is
> > > very difficult in any sport to write a hard and fast rule that
> > > will apply equitably in every situation.
> >
> > Difficult, it's absolutely impossible when the RD can do what he
> > likes then retrospectively reinterpret the regs on the fly in ways
> > they were never intended.
> >
>
> Again, you display your omniscience.

Repeating asinine comments does not make them less asinine.

The hypocrisy of trying to belittle common sense and common
comprehension while you have recently insisted you know what drivers
were thinking or doing, after asserting that words in the regs have
some unique usage outside of the rest of the English language.

Take the beam out of your eye and fuck right off, mate.

--
Bozo bin
Build
Texasgate
Enjoy!

Alan wrote:

> On 2021-12-16 3:42 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > Alan wrote:
> >
> > > BTW, I agree completely that the rules should be written with as
> > > little ambiguity as possible, but I also acknowledge that it is
> > > very difficult in any sport to write a hard and fast rule that
> > > will apply equitably in every situation.
> >
> > Difficult, it's absolutely impossible when the RD can do what he
> > likes then retrospectively reinterpret the regs on the fly in ways
> > they were never intended.
> >
>
> Again, you display your omniscience.

So do you think 15.3 was ever intended to give the RD the right to
ignore all the written SC procedures and do what ever he likes?
Similarly, that 48.13 was ever intended to be used as an excuse to
ignore 48.12?

Sometimes even a dumbass has to admit he's wrong... at least to himself
and desist. You've won Twat of the Year... that time has come.

--
Bozo bin
Build
Texasgate
Enjoy!

On Friday, December 17, 2021 at 5:02:41 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

> that time has come.

like when germany was bombing britain?
you slow fuck