Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Bill Dickey is learning me his experience. -- Yogi Berra in his rookie season.


sport / rec.autos.sport.f1 / Re: Well, that's cleared that up then

SubjectAuthor
* Well, that's cleared that up thenGeoff May
+- Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenMark Jackson
+- Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenXYXPDQ
+* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thengeoff
|+* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenSir Tim
||`* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thengeoff
|| `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenalister
||  `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thengeoff
||   `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenalister
||    `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenBigbird
||     `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenNews
||      +- Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenalister
||      `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenBigbird
||       `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenNews
||        `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenBigbird
||         `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenNews
||          `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenBigbird
||           `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenNews
||            `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenBigbird
||             `- Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenNews
|+* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenAnthonyL
||`* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thengeoff
|| +* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenAlan LeHun
|| |`- Re: Well, that's cleared that up thengeoff
|| `* Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenSir Tim
||  `- Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenNews
|`- Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenBigbird
`- Re: Well, that's cleared that up thenalister

Pages:12
Re: Well, that's cleared that up then

<t1d634$1fs$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=16314&group=rec.autos.sport.f1#16314

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: New...@Group.Name (News)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
Subject: Re: Well, that's cleared that up then
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:55:31 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 104
Message-ID: <t1d634$1fs$1@dont-email.me>
References: <t0t7qc$1jqh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<qIadnWWRU_6kBq__nZ2dnUU7-K3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<j9g7daFbbd6U1@mid.individual.net>
<V9ydndxH5K5KYK__nZ2dnUU7-T2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
<t12fok$1mgv$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<X-WdnUW5-aw9gqj_nZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <t14k7a$ui7$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<xn0nfk07id93fy4000@news.eternal-september.org> <t1a7qv$cnt$1@dont-email.me>
<xn0nfn4fwgj16cm001@news.eternal-september.org> <t1apab$sbd$1@dont-email.me>
<xn0nfo2tvhcmwk7003@news.eternal-september.org> <t1cihh$dug$1@dont-email.me>
<xn0nfog6dhunr9u008@news.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 18:55:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="89b26bfa0938b882c253b50fd8f33b2c";
logging-data="1532"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1Tzwd6UaVaS1/aUB9OTTd"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.7.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VfWvzYuRKxdoVjppcd6Lhm9ABxI=
In-Reply-To: <xn0nfog6dhunr9u008@news.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: News - Tue, 22 Mar 2022 18:55 UTC

On 3/22/2022 2:23 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> News wrote:
>
>> On 3/22/2022 5:58 AM, Bigbird wrote:
>>> News wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
>>>>> News wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>> alister wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geoff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave absolutely no room at all for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> misinterpretation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> geoff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn’t that what the revision does?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to
>>>>>>>>>>> mean "all".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> geoff
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to'
>>>>>>>>> bit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> geoff
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the
>>>>>>>> original rule that anyone with a basic understanding of
>>>>>>>> English would have found confusing. it was a smoke screen
>>>>>>>> for a stupid F**k up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to
>>>>>>> obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly but
>>>>>>> rather used in their favour.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha Tauri?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
>>>>>
>>>>> ...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FIA remains FUBAR.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not going to disagree.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
>>>
>>> ...which was a non-sequitur.
>>>
>>
>> Only to the illiterate and ignorant. Take a bow.
>
> I would not want to deprive you of the honour.
>
> There was no earlier opportunity to safely unlap the lapped cars.
>
> This was explained at the time in a manner that anyone but the most
> ignorant and/or illiterate could understand...
> ...so go ahead and take that bow now.
>
>

Illustrating you're still clueless, after all these years.

But go ahead...

Re: Well, that's cleared that up then

<xn0nfoh7vhw0ub400f@news.eternal-september.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=16315&group=rec.autos.sport.f1#16315

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bigbird....@gmail.com (Bigbird)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
Subject: Re: Well, that's cleared that up then
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:01:22 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 112
Message-ID: <xn0nfoh7vhw0ub400f@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <t0t7qc$1jqh$1@gioia.aioe.org> <qIadnWWRU_6kBq__nZ2dnUU7-K3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <j9g7daFbbd6U1@mid.individual.net> <V9ydndxH5K5KYK__nZ2dnUU7-T2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <t12fok$1mgv$2@gioia.aioe.org> <X-WdnUW5-aw9gqj_nZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <t14k7a$ui7$2@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0nfk07id93fy4000@news.eternal-september.org> <t1a7qv$cnt$1@dont-email.me> <xn0nfn4fwgj16cm001@news.eternal-september.org> <t1apab$sbd$1@dont-email.me> <xn0nfo2tvhcmwk7003@news.eternal-september.org> <t1cihh$dug$1@dont-email.me> <xn0nfog6dhunr9u008@news.eternal-september.org> <t1d634$1fs$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:01:22 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ec5035e35c1677245b2c3bd83e5289dd";
logging-data="5046"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5XuKsGxuI7RwcdgDCwibH"
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.373 (x64; Portable ISpell)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XQULby57iWVGCH72Df092a3LTnI=
X-Ref: news.eternal-september.org ~XNS:00001844
 by: Bigbird - Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:01 UTC

News wrote:

> On 3/22/2022 2:23 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> > News wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/22/2022 5:58 AM, Bigbird wrote:
> > > > News wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > News wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > > > alister wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geoff
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave absolutely no room at all for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > misinterpretation.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > geoff
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Isn’t that what the revision does?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended
> > > > > > > > > > > > to mean "all".
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > geoff
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the
> > > > > > > > > > '22.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to'
> > > > > > > > > > bit.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > geoff
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with
> > > > > > > > > the original rule that anyone with a basic
> > > > > > > > > understanding of English would have found confusing.
> > > > > > > > > it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it
> > > > > > > > to obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly
> > > > > > > > but rather used in their favour.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha
> > > > > > > Tauri?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > FIA remains FUBAR.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am not going to disagree.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
> > > >
> > > > ...which was a non-sequitur.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Only to the illiterate and ignorant. Take a bow.
> >
> > I would not want to deprive you of the honour.
> >
> > There was no earlier opportunity to safely unlap the lapped cars.
> >
> > This was explained at the time in a manner that anyone but the most
> > ignorant and/or illiterate could understand...
> > ...so go ahead and take that bow now.
> >
> >
>
> Illustrating you're still clueless, after all these years.
>
> But go ahead...

Well what a comprehensive rebuttal...

....not quite as gracious as capitulation but close enough.

Re: Well, that's cleared that up then

<t1d8v6$po9$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/sport/article-flat.php?id=16323&group=rec.autos.sport.f1#16323

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: New...@Group.Name (News)
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
Subject: Re: Well, that's cleared that up then
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 15:44:37 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 115
Message-ID: <t1d8v6$po9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <t0t7qc$1jqh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<qIadnWWRU_6kBq__nZ2dnUU7-K3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<j9g7daFbbd6U1@mid.individual.net>
<V9ydndxH5K5KYK__nZ2dnUU7-T2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
<t12fok$1mgv$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<X-WdnUW5-aw9gqj_nZ2dnUU7-IOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <t14k7a$ui7$2@gioia.aioe.org>
<xn0nfk07id93fy4000@news.eternal-september.org> <t1a7qv$cnt$1@dont-email.me>
<xn0nfn4fwgj16cm001@news.eternal-september.org> <t1apab$sbd$1@dont-email.me>
<xn0nfo2tvhcmwk7003@news.eternal-september.org> <t1cihh$dug$1@dont-email.me>
<xn0nfog6dhunr9u008@news.eternal-september.org> <t1d634$1fs$1@dont-email.me>
<xn0nfoh7vhw0ub400f@news.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:44:38 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="89b26bfa0938b882c253b50fd8f33b2c";
logging-data="26377"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18d3YFPH5hDQlCj9mUUrjlV"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.7.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/CgbVAqZqHVLacDoyyqGeCeUPxk=
In-Reply-To: <xn0nfoh7vhw0ub400f@news.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: News - Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:44 UTC

On 3/22/2022 3:01 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> News wrote:
>
>> On 3/22/2022 2:23 PM, Bigbird wrote:
>>> News wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/22/2022 5:58 AM, Bigbird wrote:
>>>>> News wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>> News wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:
>>>>>>>>> alister wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geoff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave absolutely no room at all for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> misinterpretation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> geoff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn’t that what the revision does?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to mean "all".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> geoff
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the
>>>>>>>>>>> '22.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to'
>>>>>>>>>>> bit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> geoff
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with
>>>>>>>>>> the original rule that anyone with a basic
>>>>>>>>>> understanding of English would have found confusing.
>>>>>>>>>> it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it
>>>>>>>>> to obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly
>>>>>>>>> but rather used in their favour.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha
>>>>>>>> Tauri?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FIA remains FUBAR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not going to disagree.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...which was a non-sequitur.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Only to the illiterate and ignorant. Take a bow.
>>>
>>> I would not want to deprive you of the honour.
>>>
>>> There was no earlier opportunity to safely unlap the lapped cars.
>>>
>>> This was explained at the time in a manner that anyone but the most
>>> ignorant and/or illiterate could understand...
>>> ...so go ahead and take that bow now.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Illustrating you're still clueless, after all these years.
>>
>> But go ahead...
>
> Well what a comprehensive rebuttal...
>
> ...not quite as gracious as capitulation but close enough.

Yes, and thanks for capitulating.

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor