Ver crossing the line or not?

To me it looks like he did.
If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion organization
no camera's on it?

Edmund

--
“The further a society drift from the truth,
the more it will hate those who speak it”

George Orwell

On 6/1/2022 11:11 AM, Edmund wrote:
> Ver crossing the line or not?
>
> To me it looks like he did.
> If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
> organization
> no camera's on it?
>
>
> Edmund
>
>

Issue was raised, timely, and never got traction.

Edmund wrote:

> Ver crossing the line or not?
>
> To me it looks like he did.
> If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
> organization no camera's on it?
>

Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.

--
Bozo Bin
Alan Baker
Texasgate

On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> Edmund wrote:
>
>> Ver crossing the line or not?
>>
>> To me it looks like he did.
>> If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
>> organization no camera's on it?
>>
>
> Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.

The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years
International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year). However
they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was rejected. See
the official document:

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf

--
Mark Jackson - https://mark-jackson.online/
It's not a lie if they don't believe you.
- Willy (Joe Martin)

Mark Jackson wrote:

> On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> > Edmund wrote:
> >
> > > Ver crossing the line or not?
> > >
> > > To me it looks like he did.
> > > If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
> > > organization no camera's on it?
> > >
> >
> > Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
>
> The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years
> International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
> Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year).
> However they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was
> rejected. See the official document:
>
>
https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf

That's what I said :-)

--
Bozo Bin
Alan Baker
Texasgate

On 6/1/2022 4:58 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> Mark Jackson wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
>>> Edmund wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ver crossing the line or not?
>>>>
>>>> To me it looks like he did.
>>>> If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
>>>> organization no camera's on it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
>>
>> The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years
>> International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
>> Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year).
>> However they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was
>> rejected. See the official document:
>>
>>
> https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf
>
> That's what I said :-)
>

Got no traction, as originally stated.

News wrote:

> On 6/1/2022 4:58 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> > Mark Jackson wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> > > > Edmund wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ver crossing the line or not?
> > > > >
> > > > > To me it looks like he did.
> > > > > If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi
> > > > > billion organization no camera's on it?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
> > >
> > > The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last
> > > years International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in
> > > the Race Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last
> > > year). However they did not breach the current ISC, so the
> > > protest was rejected. See the official document:
> > >
> > >
> >
https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf
> >
> > That's what I said :-)
> >
>
> Got no traction, as originally stated.

You're confused. I suggest you read fully before you respond.

--
Bozo Bin
Alan Baker
Texasgate

On 6/2/2022 3:15 PM, Bigbird wrote:
> News wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2022 4:58 PM, Bigbird wrote:
>>> Mark Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
>>>>> Edmund wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ver crossing the line or not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To me it looks like he did.
>>>>>> If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi
>>>>>> billion organization no camera's on it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
>>>>
>>>> The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last
>>>> years International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in
>>>> the Race Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last
>>>> year). However they did not breach the current ISC, so the
>>>> protest was rejected. See the official document:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf
>>>
>>> That's what I said :-)
>>>
>>
>> Got no traction, as originally stated.
>
> You're confused. I suggest you read fully before you respond.
>

> On 6/1/2022 11:11 AM, Edmund wrote:
>> Ver crossing the line or not?
>>
>> To me it looks like he did.
>> If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion organization
>> no camera's on it?
>>
>>
>> Edmund
>>
>>
>
> Issue was raised, timely, and never got traction.

Mark Jackson <mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
>> Edmund wrote:
>>
>>> Ver crossing the line or not?
>>>
>>> To me it looks like he did.
>>> If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
>>> organization no camera's on it?
>>>
>>
>> Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
>
> The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years
> International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
> Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year).
> However they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was
> rejected. See the official document:
>
> https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf

So their official documents were contradictory. Insert face-palm emoji
here.

Sometimes I get the impression that the FIA couldn't organise a fuck-up
in a brothel.

One question that remains is why there was a need to change that rule in
the ISC? What was so wrong with it that needed to be changed? Who
proposed the change, with what justification, and who signed off on it?
Are they trying to force teams to employ more bookworms and fewer
engineers? Is the aim now the pinacle of language-lawyering rather than
the pinacle of motorsport?

Anyway, looking forward to more jolly hijinx from the ghost of Masi
later in the season. Can we have comic sound effects next time please.

Booioioioioing!
Phil
--
We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have
gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast
aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

On 2022-06-07 6:54 a.m., Phil Carmody wrote:
> Mark Jackson <mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>> On 6/1/2022 4:29 PM, Bigbird wrote:
>>> Edmund wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ver crossing the line or not?
>>>>
>>>> To me it looks like he did.
>>>> If it is so important to know, why don't have that multi billion
>>>> organization no camera's on it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Needs to be the whole trye; it wasn't.
>>
>> The actual positions of the front and rear tires breached last years
>> International Sporting Code, which was still reflected in the Race
>> Director's Notes for the event (cut-and-paste from last year).
>> However they did not breach the current ISC, so the protest was
>> rejected. See the official document:
>>
>> https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Monaco%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Decision%20-%20Protest%20lodged%20against%20Car%201.pdf
>
> So their official documents were contradictory. Insert face-palm emoji
> here.
>
> Sometimes I get the impression that the FIA couldn't organise a fuck-up
> in a brothel.
>
> One question that remains is why there was a need to change that rule in
> the ISC? What was so wrong with it that needed to be changed? Who
> proposed the change, with what justification, and who signed off on it?
> Are they trying to force teams to employ more bookworms and fewer
> engineers? Is the aim now the pinacle of language-lawyering rather than
> the pinacle of motorsport?
>
> Anyway, looking forward to more jolly hijinx from the ghost of Masi
> later in the season. Can we have comic sound effects next time please.
>
> Booioioioioing!
> Phil

To some of us, the incompetence and corruption of the FIA (and other
similar organizations) is completely unsurprising.

What's amusing is that there are those who point to actions of the FIA
from time to time...

....AS IF THEY WERE COMPETENT.

:-)

On Tuesday, June 7, 2022 at 11:24:21 AM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

> To some of us, the incompetence and corruption of the FIA (and other
> similar organizations) is completely unsurprising.
>
> What's amusing is that there are those who point to actions of the FIA
> from time to time...
>
> ...AS IF THEY WERE COMPETENT.

fuck off buffoon