According to my analytics site i use to handicap, WFT is a house of cards, they are ranked 22nd, only 1 spot above the Giants in Weighted DVOA...."weighted" meaning the early season games are now givin less value to give a more "how they are doing lately" picture. Dallas is rated a lofty 3rd AND have a few key players on D coming back. So even tho its at WASH it seems giving 5.5 is a good bet. But ya never know.....

On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 9:44:10 AM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> According to my analytics site i use to handicap, WFT is a house of cards, they are ranked 22nd, only 1 spot above the Giants in Weighted DVOA...."weighted" meaning the early season games are now givin less value to give a more "how they are doing lately" picture. Dallas is rated a lofty 3rd AND have a few key players on D coming back. So even tho its at WASH it seems giving 5.5 is a good bet. But ya never know.....

That makes no sense the what the fucks being rated low because early season does not count as much as they are now on a 5 game winning streak after a terrible start only beating the Giants because of that offsides call on the last play.

On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 10:58:07 AM UTC-5, jeffg...@webtv.net wrote:
> On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 9:44:10 AM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> > According to my analytics site i use to handicap, WFT is a house of cards, they are ranked 22nd, only 1 spot above the Giants in Weighted DVOA...."weighted" meaning the early season games are now givin less value to give a more "how they are doing lately" picture. Dallas is rated a lofty 3rd AND have a few key players on D coming back. So even tho its at WASH it seems giving 5.5 is a good bet. But ya never know.....
> That makes no sense the what the fucks being rated low because early season does not count as much as they are now on a 5 game winning streak after a terrible start only beating the Giants because of that offsides call on the last play.

Well i can't tell you exactly how they do the math but obviously the math says wft has been getting by by the skin of their teeth and is doing it with smoke and mirrors.....very impressive win vs TB 4 weeks ago but otherwise not so impressive. We shall see...

On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 10:58:07 AM UTC-5, jeffg...@webtv.net wrote:
> On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 9:44:10 AM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> > According to my analytics site i use to handicap, WFT is a house of cards, they are ranked 22nd, only 1 spot above the Giants in Weighted DVOA...."weighted" meaning the early season games are now givin less value to give a more "how they are doing lately" picture. Dallas is rated a lofty 3rd AND have a few key players on D coming back. So even tho its at WASH it seems giving 5.5 is a good bet. But ya never know.....
> That makes no sense the what the fucks being rated low because early season does not count as much as they are now on a 5 game winning streak after a terrible start only beating the Giants because of that offsides call on the last play.

Also you are in error, it's 4 game streak for Wash.

On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 11:49:15 AM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 10:58:07 AM UTC-5, jeffg...@webtv.net wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 9:44:10 AM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> > > According to my analytics site i use to handicap, WFT is a house of cards, they are ranked 22nd, only 1 spot above the Giants in Weighted DVOA....."weighted" meaning the early season games are now givin less value to give a more "how they are doing lately" picture. Dallas is rated a lofty 3rd AND have a few key players on D coming back. So even tho its at WASH it seems giving 5.5 is a good bet. But ya never know.....
> > That makes no sense the what the fucks being rated low because early season does not count as much as they are now on a 5 game winning streak after a terrible start only beating the Giants because of that offsides call on the last play.
> Well i can't tell you exactly how they do the math but obviously the math says wft has been getting by by the skin of their teeth and is doing it with smoke and mirrors.....very impressive win vs TB 4 weeks ago but otherwise not so impressive. We shall see...

Also i like Denver to destroy Detroit.....already the biggest fave of the week at -11 Detroit has a bunch of guys out with covid and the Flu plus beyond the numbers you got the "win one for Demarius" factor. Again who knows, that's what makes it fun.

On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 9:44:10 AM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> According to my analytics site i use to handicap, WFT is a house of cards, they are ranked 22nd, only 1 spot above the Giants in Weighted DVOA...."weighted" meaning the early season games are now givin less value to give a more "how they are doing lately" picture. Dallas is rated a lofty 3rd AND have a few key players on D coming back. So even tho its at WASH it seems giving 5.5 is a good bet. But ya never know.....
I think the analytic lock of the century should have been Army Navy yesterday. 8-3 Army was the favorite over 3-8 Navy, I think by 5.5. That makes sense until you see that Navy had the 3rd hardest schedule in the country. They even lost by only 7 to undefeated and going to the playoffs Cincinnati. Army's schedule was one of the easiest in the country, difficulty over 100. Navy losyt close to good teams while Army feasted on terrible teams.

On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 7:24:01 PM UTC-5, jeffg...@webtv.net wrote:
> On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 9:44:10 AM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> > According to my analytics site i use to handicap, WFT is a house of cards, they are ranked 22nd, only 1 spot above the Giants in Weighted DVOA...."weighted" meaning the early season games are now givin less value to give a more "how they are doing lately" picture. Dallas is rated a lofty 3rd AND have a few key players on D coming back. So even tho its at WASH it seems giving 5.5 is a good bet. But ya never know.....
> I think the analytic lock of the century should have been Army Navy yesterday. 8-3 Army was the favorite over 3-8 Navy, I think by 5.5. That makes sense until you see that Navy had the 3rd hardest schedule in the country. They even lost by only 7 to undefeated and going to the playoffs Cincinnati. Army's schedule was one of the easiest in the country, difficulty over 100.. Navy losyt close to good teams while Army feasted on terrible teams.

I think i fell asleep as soon as that game started!.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 7:34:34 PM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 7:24:01 PM UTC-5, jeffg...@webtv.net wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 9:44:10 AM UTC-5, iommiRULES wrote:
> > > According to my analytics site i use to handicap, WFT is a house of cards, they are ranked 22nd, only 1 spot above the Giants in Weighted DVOA....."weighted" meaning the early season games are now givin less value to give a more "how they are doing lately" picture. Dallas is rated a lofty 3rd AND have a few key players on D coming back. So even tho its at WASH it seems giving 5.5 is a good bet. But ya never know.....
> > I think the analytic lock of the century should have been Army Navy yesterday. 8-3 Army was the favorite over 3-8 Navy, I think by 5.5. That makes sense until you see that Navy had the 3rd hardest schedule in the country. They even lost by only 7 to undefeated and going to the playoffs Cincinnati. Army's schedule was one of the easiest in the country, difficulty over 100. Navy losyt close to good teams while Army feasted on terrible teams.
> I think i fell asleep as soon as that game started!.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Oh yeah and that fake punt that you thought was such a "great call" was a mistake! According to the Navy HC and Fagot. I guess the center messed up but it turned out good. Even armies uniforms are boring!