Preface: Something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Evidence suggests that the NFL has pressured
_____?_____ (everyone they could pressure) to
PRETEND there was BLATANT holding on that
controversial play, and PRETEND NFL officiating
is perfect and PRETEND officials never make mis-
takes, and PRETEND Carl Cheffers' holding call
was PERFECT / RIGHTEOUS / UNQUESTIONABLE.

I suspect the MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS of adver-
tising dollars reside somewhere underneath all
the deceit that has transpired after that terrible
call ruined what otherwise would've been one of
the greatest Super Bowls in history.

The following video is titled "NFL Films footage
shows James Bradberry pulling JuJu Smith-" ...
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/02/16/nfl-films-footage-shows-james-bradberry-pulling-juju-smith-schusters-jersey/

In watching the referenced video, the 2 announc-
ers cheered for the call, one of them not sure of
who called the penalty, going on and on as if the
call was the BEST call in the history of football.

The official who made that holding call, Carl
Cheffers, he threw the most penalties in 2022
https://www.nflpenalties.com/all-referees.php?year=2022
and in 2021
https://www.nflpenalties.com/all-referees.php?year=2021

Why the announcers were so cheeringly sup-
portive of the holding call? Seems to me whom-
ever is behind their blather (the NFL?) should be
wearing Chiefs cheerleader outfits & cheering for
the Chiefs as the video is the most heavily biased
cheerleading for a holding call that I've ever seen.

One of the announcers, not satisfied with the hold-
ing call, wanted 2 holding calls & also wanted pass
interference.

Odd, they showed game photos that they claim
showed holding but not one iota of a hold shows
up on the video, just still photos and NO pulling
on a jersey is shown.

NFL Films footage? There wasn't any, there were
simply still photos without one iota of a supposed
jersey pull shown, no video, just still photos, no
supposed jersey pull.

They say James should be admired for admitting
he made a mistake. They didn't show one iota of
any evidence he actually made a mistake, despite
going on and on about it supposedly being clear, it
was NOT clear.

That announcer implies Bradberry was told he was
going to be in a very vulnerable position here (before
the play). That's vacuous, not one iota of evidence
Bradberry was told that. Simply making it up as they
go along, the stance of the announcers in that video.

The announcer says the league should pop a bottle
of champagne and be happy Bradberry defended the
call & said he held. "What a man" that announcer re-
peated over & over again.

That announcer, about the call, said "IT HAD TO BE
CALLED THERE" followed by "I KNOW IT STINKS".
Now, which is it, that's contradictory. For one thing,
holding is a *subjective* call, by definition, a judg-
ment call.

What the announcers didn't mention is that the ref
that made the call threw more flags than any other
ref in the last two years (see above). The announcers,
trying to get everyone convinced that officials are
perfect except they too often don't throw enough
flags.

I guess those announcers LOVE PENALTIES, & want
MORE PENALTIES, as they seemed to be of the opin-
ion that refs are guilty of throwing too FEW penalties
in post-season games.

All together now, let's cheer for penalties.

YEAH PENALTIES, WE WANT MORE FLAGS THROWN.

The word _?_ comes to mind (insert you own opinion),
but whatever, the announcers adopted the stance that
we want everyone to believe there was holding & Brad-
berry said he held (but hoped he wouldn't be caught) ...

.... & the official said there was & that's that, it's NOT
a subjective call, Bradberry's hold was the most egre-
gious evidence of holding we (the announcers) have
ever seen, what a man for owning up to it, the NFL
loves Bradberry complementing the official for throw-
ing a flag & saying he wished they hadn't noticed it.

The announcer kept saying "pull jerseys" & yet ironic-
ally, they say NFL Films footage shows that & NO, all
they showed were still photos without an iota of evi-
dence there was any jersey pull (you know, evidence
as in moving video).

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/something-is-rotten-in-the-state-of-denmark

A line spoken by Marcellus in William Shakespeare's
Hamlet, Act I, scene iv.

--- --- ---

NFL Films has perfect angle of
James Bradberry's Super Bowl
https://youtu.be/A8EB4HR_S4I

Note, the freeze frame & slow motion
make it impossible to determine what
that supposed 'hold' looked like in real
time.

For some reason, the video clip shows
the Eagles center walking on the sideline
in slow motion as the narrator defends
the call.

Every iota of the video is in slow motion,
as if the NFL is trying to pretend the sup-
posed hold lasted for a long time when
actually it was only long in the imagination
of whomever concocted the slow motion
presentation in the video.

Weird, not one iota of that video is shown
in real time, with the announcer/narrator
going on & on about the call as if it was
indisputable. The narrator references 'brief'
once, but we have no way of assessing
how 'brief' it was because the entire ...

.... video is shown in slow motion with
freeze frames to make it appear that
the hold was indisputable as if it lasted
for a long time when in actuality it was
insignificant in real time, as shown in
the original video starting 15:40 into
the video: https://youtu.be/BWkt79xkd00

Practically unnoticable, the video by
NFL Films using slow mo & freeze frame
to PRETEND something happened that
as you can see in the real time video
above, happened in a fraction of a sec-
ond, not in the manner the NFL Films
video pretended it happened.

Deceit/cover-up, the NFL covering up
the fact that the official blew it & Brad-
berry also covering up that fact by act-
ing as if he should've been called for a
hold when the video in real-time shows
he shouldn't have been called for a hold.

The narrator states Smith-Schuster was
held early in the game, the Chiefs had to
punt, and claims that missed call forced
the Chiefs to punt early in the game. The
narrator didn't mention any missed calls
on Chiefs holding giving the impression ...

.... that the entire video was designed to
promote the Chiefs being worthy as Super
Bowl winner & ignoring any uncalled pen-
alties that the Chiefs committed (implica-
tion, there weren't any).

As I said in the first post in this thread,
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark,
and apparently, NFL Films is also involved
in the NFL deceit, trying to slow motion their
way into defending an illegitimate holding
call as if slow motion can alter actual time
& what really happened can be ignored by
pretending slow motion is reality.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 1:35:27 PM UTC-6, observer wrote:

..> Preface: Something is rotten in the state of Denmark
..>
..> Evidence suggests that the NFL has pressured
..> _____?_____ (everyone they could pressure) to
..> PRETEND there was BLATANT holding on that
..> controversial play, and PRETEND NFL officiating
..> is perfect and PRETEND officials never make mis-
..> takes, and PRETEND Carl Cheffers' holding call
..> was PERFECT / RIGHTEOUS / UNQUESTIONABLE.
..>
..> I suspect the MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS of adver-
..> tising dollars reside somewhere underneath all
..> the deceit that has transpired after that terrible
..> call ruined what otherwise would've been one of
..> the greatest Super Bowls in history.
..>
..> The following video is titled "NFL Films footage
..> shows James Bradberry pulling JuJu Smith-" ...
..> https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2023/02/16/nfl-films-footage-shows-james-bradberry-pulling-juju-smith-schusters-jersey/
..>
..> In watching the referenced video, the 2 announc-
..> ers cheered for the call, one of them not sure of
..> who called the penalty, going on and on as if the
..> call was the BEST call in the history of football.
..>
..> The official who made that holding call, Carl
..> Cheffers, he threw the most penalties in 2022
..> https://www.nflpenalties.com/all-referees.php?year=2022
..> and in 2021
..> https://www.nflpenalties.com/all-referees.php?year=2021
..>
..> Why the announcers were so cheeringly sup-
..> portive of the holding call? Seems to me whom-
..> ever is behind their blather (the NFL?) should be
..> wearing Chiefs cheerleader outfits & cheering for
..> the Chiefs as the video is the most heavily biased
..> cheerleading for a holding call that I've ever seen.
..>
..> One of the announcers, not satisfied with the hold-
..> ing call, wanted 2 holding calls & also wanted pass
..> interference.
..>
..> Odd, they showed game photos that they claim
..> showed holding but not one iota of a hold shows
..> up on the video, just still photos and NO pulling
..> on a jersey is shown.
..>
..> NFL Films footage? There wasn't any, there were
..> simply still photos without one iota of a supposed
..> jersey pull shown, no video, just still photos, no
..> supposed jersey pull.
..>
..> They say James should be admired for admitting
..> he made a mistake. They didn't show one iota of
..> any evidence he actually made a mistake, despite
..> going on and on about it supposedly being clear, it
..> was NOT clear.
..>
..> That announcer implies Bradberry was told he was
..> going to be in a very vulnerable position here (before
..> the play). That's vacuous, not one iota of evidence
..> Bradberry was told that. Simply making it up as they
..> go along, the stance of the announcers in that video.
..>
..> The announcer says the league should pop a bottle
..> of champagne and be happy Bradberry defended the
..> call & said he held. "What a man" that announcer re-
..> peated over & over again.
..>
..> That announcer, about the call, said "IT HAD TO BE
..> CALLED THERE" followed by "I KNOW IT STINKS".
..> Now, which is it, that's contradictory. For one thing,
..> holding is a *subjective* call, by definition, a judg-
..> ment call.
..>
..> What the announcers didn't mention is that the ref
..> that made the call threw more flags than any other
..> ref in the last two years (see above). The announcers,
..> trying to get everyone convinced that officials are
..> perfect except they too often don't throw enough
..> flags.
..>
..> I guess those announcers LOVE PENALTIES, & want
..> MORE PENALTIES, as they seemed to be of the opin-
..> ion that refs are guilty of throwing too FEW penalties
..> in post-season games.
..>
..> All together now, let's cheer for penalties.
..>
..> YEAH PENALTIES, WE WANT MORE FLAGS THROWN.
..>
..> The word _?_ comes to mind (insert you own opinion),
..> but whatever, the announcers adopted the stance that
..> we want everyone to believe there was holding & Brad-
..> berry said he held (but hoped he wouldn't be caught) ...
..>
..> ... & the official said there was & that's that, it's NOT
..> a subjective call, Bradberry's hold was the most egre-
..> gious evidence of holding we (the announcers) have
..> ever seen, what a man for owning up to it, the NFL
..> loves Bradberry complementing the official for throw-
..> ing a flag & saying he wished they hadn't noticed it.
..>
..> The announcer kept saying "pull jerseys" & yet ironic-
..> ally, they say NFL Films footage shows that & NO, all
..> they showed were still photos without an iota of evi-
..> dence there was any jersey pull (you know, evidence
..> as in moving video).
..>
..> Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
..> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/something-is-rotten-in-the-state-of-denmark
..>
..> A line spoken by Marcellus in William Shakespeare's
..> Hamlet, Act I, scene iv.
..>
..> *--- --- ---*