On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> > >> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> > >> invasion this morning.
> > >>
> > >> So the question is, who did it?
> > >>
> > >> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> > >>
> > >> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> > >>
> > >> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> > >> something meaningful?
> > >>
> > >> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> > >
> > >
> > > Lover's quarrel.
>
> > This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> > Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> > reported:
> >
> > 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> >
> > 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> > interior.
> >
> > So par for the course for MAGA news.
> >
> > Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> > their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
>

That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.
X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.

(G) aslight <------ (you are here)
(O) bstruct
(P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)

> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
>

You. LMAO.

Cheers.

TE <randorwell@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
>> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
>>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
>>>> invasion this morning.
>>>>
>>>> So the question is, who did it?
>>>>
>>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
>>>>
>>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
>>>>
>>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
>>>> something meaningful?
>>>>
>>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
>>>
>>>
>>> Lover's quarrel.
>
>> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
>> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
>> reported:
>>
>> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
>>
>> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
>> interior.
>>
>> So par for the course for MAGA news.
>>
>> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
>> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
>
> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
>
> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?

The “lover” has made a statement. Will Tom and his ilk acknowledge it?

https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1587167366168838147?s=46&t=ApEk6VP2_yteGypcXIn6cg

--
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian,
liberal personality.” — Altie

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:37:26 PM UTC-7, xyzzy wrote:
> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> >> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> >>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> >>>> invasion this morning.
> >>>>
> >>>> So the question is, who did it?
> >>>>
> >>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> >>>>
> >>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> >>>>
> >>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> >>>> something meaningful?
> >>>>
> >>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Lover's quarrel.
> >
> >> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> >> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> >> reported:
> >>
> >> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> >>
> >> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> >> interior.
> >>
> >> So par for the course for MAGA news.
> >>
> >> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> >> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> >
> > I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
> >
> > I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> > double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
> The “lover” has made a statement. Will Tom and his ilk acknowledge it?
>
> https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1587167366168838147?s=46&t=ApEk6VP2_yteGypcXIn6cg
> --

I'm slightly amused by Tom's "I'm ignorant and don't know what you're talking about" shtick.

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 7:27:31 PM UTC-4, Eric Ramon wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:37:26 PM UTC-7, xyzzy wrote:
> > TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > >> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> > >>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> > >>>> invasion this morning.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So the question is, who did it?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> > >>>> something meaningful?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Lover's quarrel.
> > >
> > >> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> > >> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> > >> reported:
> > >>
> > >> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> > >>
> > >> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> > >> interior.
> > >>
> > >> So par for the course for MAGA news.
> > >>
> > >> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> > >> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> > >
> > > I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
> > >
> > > I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> > > double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
> > The “lover” has made a statement. Will Tom and his ilk acknowledge it?
> >
> > https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1587167366168838147?s=46&t=ApEk6VP2_yteGypcXIn6cg

> I'm slightly amused by Tom's "I'm ignorant and don't know what you're talking about" shtick.

At the time of my posting, I believe the sum total of info I was working with was "Paul Pelosi
was beaten over the head, in his home, with a hammer by some nude, or partially nude, guy."

Although I would imagine that [nearly] naked people lugging hammers around San Francisco
would not be that unusual, I couldn't understand how he got into Pelosi's house. Don't they have
renta-cops if not federal security types? Seems Pelosi' leads a rather complicated social life for
an old geezer.

Now, I gotta tell ya, this entire idea of of blaming it on MAGA, or even UTRA-MAGA, types
smells of rotting fish and desperation. Sounds like typical San Fran post-apocalyptic
crime, a violent drug addict with mental problems roaming the streets.

-TE

Life in Rural America (which is where Republican Trump voters live and govern), is clean, safe and
racially tolerant. Most places in America where life is dirty, polluted, dangerous, violent, and plagued
with racial hate and race riots, are cities that are almost exclusively populated by and governed by
Democrats.

Outside of these Democrat-run cities, America is peaceful, safe, clean, and racially tolerant.

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:54:01 PM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> > > >> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> > > >> invasion this morning.
> > > >>
> > > >> So the question is, who did it?
> > > >>
> > > >> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> > > >>
> > > >> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> > > >>
> > > >> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> > > >> something meaningful?
> > > >>
> > > >> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Lover's quarrel.
> >
> > > This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> > > Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> > > reported:
> > >
> > > 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> > >
> > > 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> > > interior.
> > >
> > > So par for the course for MAGA news.
> > >
> > > Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> > > their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> > I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
> >
> That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.

My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am.

WTF Are you guys getting so worked-up about? It's a joke.

> X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.
>
> (G) aslight <------ (you are here)
> (O) bstruct
> (P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)
> > I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> > double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
> >
> You. LMAO.

Thus far I've heard two main theories regarding this attack:

1. Pelosi was attacked by a male prostitute.
2. The attack on Pelosi was triggered by Trump

I believe that Pelosi was attacked by one of our standard violent drug addicts with mental
problems. Blaming Trump for this attack, by people who want to DEFUND THE POLICE and
flood our streets with criminals is pathetic.

-TE

“Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain, O’Sullivan,” my grammar school teacher, quoting
Goethe, would say as he handed back my weekly essay with helpful comments. “So what chance do you
have against it?”

On 10/31/2022 8:38 PM, TE wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:54:01 PM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
>>>> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
>>>>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
>>>>>> invasion this morning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the question is, who did it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
>>>>>> something meaningful?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lover's quarrel.
>>>
>>>> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
>>>> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
>>>> reported:
>>>>
>>>> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
>>>>
>>>> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
>>>> interior.
>>>>
>>>> So par for the course for MAGA news.
>>>>
>>>> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
>>>> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
>>> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
>>>
>> That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.
>
> My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am.
>
> WTF Are you guys getting so worked-up about? It's a joke.
>
>> X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.
>>
>> (G) aslight <------ (you are here)
>> (O) bstruct
>> (P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)
>>> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
>>> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
>>>
>> You. LMAO.
>
> Thus far I've heard two main theories regarding this attack:
>
> 1. Pelosi was attacked by a male prostitute.
> 2. The attack on Pelosi was triggered by Trump
>
> I believe that Pelosi was attacked by one of our standard violent drug addicts with mental
> problems. Blaming Trump for this attack, by people who want to DEFUND THE POLICE and
> flood our streets with criminals is pathetic.
>
> -TE
>
> “Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain, O’Sullivan,” my grammar school teacher, quoting
> Goethe, would say as he handed back my weekly essay with helpful comments. “So what chance do you
> have against it?”

+1
--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО

Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org> wrote:
> On 10/31/2022 8:38 PM, TE wrote:
>> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:54:01 PM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
>>>>> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
>>>>>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
>>>>>>> invasion this morning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So the question is, who did it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
>>>>>>> something meaningful?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lover's quarrel.
>>>>
>>>>> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
>>>>> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
>>>>> reported:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
>>>>> interior.
>>>>>
>>>>> So par for the course for MAGA news.
>>>>>
>>>>> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
>>>>> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
>>>> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
>>>>
>>> That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.
>>
>> My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
>> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am.
>>
>> WTF Are you guys getting so worked-up about? It's a joke.
>>
>>> X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.
>>>
>>> (G) aslight <------ (you are here)
>>> (O) bstruct
>>> (P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)
>>>> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
>>>> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
>>>>
>>> You. LMAO.
>>
>> Thus far I've heard two main theories regarding this attack:
>>
>> 1. Pelosi was attacked by a male prostitute.
>> 2. The attack on Pelosi was triggered by Trump
>>
>> I believe that Pelosi was attacked by one of our standard violent drug addicts with mental
>> problems. Blaming Trump for this attack, by people who want to DEFUND THE POLICE and
>> flood our streets with criminals is pathetic.
>>
>> -TE
>>
>> “Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain, O’Sullivan,” my
>> grammar school teacher, quoting
>> Goethe, would say as he handed back my weekly essay with helpful
>> comments. “So what chance do you
>> have against it?”
>
> +1

My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
to pretend MAGA isn’t violent:

The man accused of attacking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a
hammer told police he wanted to hold the Democratic leader hostage and
“break her kneecaps” to show other members of Congress there were
“consequences to actions,” authorities said Monday.

In a chilling federal complaint, officials say that David DePape, 42,
carrying zip ties, tape and a rope in a backpack, broke into the couple’s
San Francisco home early Friday morning, went upstairs where 82-year-old
Paul Pelosi was sleeping, and demanded to talk to “Nancy.”

…

Authorities said DePape smashed a glass door in the back of the home with a
hammer, went to the upstairs bedroom and told Paul Pelosi to wake up.
Confronting Pelosi, he demanded to know where “Nancy” was and said he would
wait for her, according to authorities.

…

In an interview with police, DePape told investigators he wanted to talk to
her and viewed her “as the “leader of the pack of lies told by the
Democratic Party,” according to the eight-page complaint.
“If she were to tell DePape the ‘truth,’ he would let her go and if she
’lied,’ he was going to break her kneecaps,” the complaint alleges.

…

“By breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into
Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were
consequences to actions,” the complaint says DePape told investigators.

--
“I usually skip over your posts because of your disguistng, contrarian,
liberal personality.” — Altie

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 9:18:14 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> Ken Olson <kol...@freedomnet.org> wrote:
> > On 10/31/2022 8:38 PM, TE wrote:
> >> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:54:01 PM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> >>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> >>>>> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> >>>>>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> >>>>>>> invasion this morning.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So the question is, who did it?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> >>>>>>> something meaningful?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lover's quarrel.
> >>>>
> >>>>> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> >>>>> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> >>>>> reported:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> >>>>> interior.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So par for the course for MAGA news.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> >>>>> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> >>>> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
> >>>>
> >>> That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.
> >>
> >> My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> >> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am.
> >>
> >> WTF Are you guys getting so worked-up about? It's a joke.
> >>
> >>> X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.
> >>>
> >>> (G) aslight <------ (you are here)
> >>> (O) bstruct
> >>> (P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)
> >>>> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> >>>> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
> >>>>
> >>> You. LMAO.
> >>
> >> Thus far I've heard two main theories regarding this attack:
> >>
> >> 1. Pelosi was attacked by a male prostitute.
> >> 2. The attack on Pelosi was triggered by Trump
> >>
> >> I believe that Pelosi was attacked by one of our standard violent drug addicts with mental
> >> problems. Blaming Trump for this attack, by people who want to DEFUND THE POLICE and
> >> flood our streets with criminals is pathetic.
> >>
> >> -TE
> >>
> >> “Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain, O’Sullivan,” my
> >> grammar school teacher, quoting
> >> Goethe, would say as he handed back my weekly essay with helpful
> >> comments. “So what chance do you
> >> have against it?”
> >
> > +1
> My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
> Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> to pretend MAGA isn’t violent:
>
> The man accused of attacking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a
> hammer told police he wanted to hold the Democratic leader hostage and
> “break her kneecaps” to show other members of Congress there were
> “consequences to actions,” authorities said Monday.
>
> In a chilling federal complaint, officials say that David DePape, 42,
> carrying zip ties, tape and a rope in a backpack, broke into the couple’s
> San Francisco home early Friday morning, went upstairs where 82-year-old
> Paul Pelosi was sleeping, and demanded to talk to “Nancy.”
>
> …
>
> Authorities said DePape smashed a glass door in the back of the home with a
> hammer, went to the upstairs bedroom and told Paul Pelosi to wake up.
> Confronting Pelosi, he demanded to know where “Nancy” was and said he would
> wait for her, according to authorities.
>
> …
>
> In an interview with police, DePape told investigators he wanted to talk to
> her and viewed her “as the “leader of the pack of lies told by the
> Democratic Party,” according to the eight-page complaint.
> “If she were to tell DePape the ‘truth,’ he would let her go and if she
> ’lied,’ he was going to break her kneecaps,” the complaint alleges.
>
> …
>
> “By breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into
> Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were
> consequences to actions,” the complaint says DePape told investigators.

I repeat myself, a simple off-the-cuff joke has you guys wetting yourselves:

"My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am."

But now, I'm understanding why you guys are getting so sensitive about this
episode, you want to blame MAGA, so any counter-argument is fake news:

"My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
to pretend MAGA isn’t violent: "

"Pretend MAGA isn't violent?" WTF? So this is "MAGAS" fault? That's what this whole
pathetic smear is about. MAGA? Yes, I remember the burning cities, the looted businesses,
the mass murders etc. those were MAGA guys wearing BLM t-shirts, right? Talk
about conspiracy theories. Hell, Pelosi was hit over the head with his own petard. Lunatics
roaming the streets is what the Democrats demanded, and they got it...now its' Trump's fault.

P A T H E T I C

BLM's latest mostly peaceful protestor going to spend time in jail:

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/26/us/waukesha-christmas-parade-trial

-TE

Stop being shocked when mainstream liberals express their desire to see their political
adversaries not only censored by a union of state and corporate power but also imprisoned.
The crux of American liberalism is authoritarianism.

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 7:19:49 PM UTC-7, TE wrote:

> Stop being shocked when mainstream liberals express their desire to see their political
> adversaries not only censored by a union of state and corporate power but also imprisoned.
> The crux of American liberalism is authoritarianism.

Because motherfuckers like you need to be saved from yourselves.

Five weeks from now (plus or minus a little time), I will have zero to lose by joining the violent.

Fuck you and fuck America if that's how this election is going to go.

Mike

On 10/31/2022 10:33 PM, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 7:19:49 PM UTC-7, TE wrote:
>
>> Stop being shocked when mainstream liberals express their desire to see their political
>> adversaries not only censored by a union of state and corporate power but also imprisoned.
>> The crux of American liberalism is authoritarianism.
>
> Because motherfuckers like you need to be saved from yourselves.
>
> Five weeks from now (plus or minus a little time), I will have zero to lose by joining the violent.
>
> Fuck you and fuck America if that's how this election is going to go.
>
> Mike

If you decide to join the violent I might send you my address.
--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 7:59:49 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:

> If you decide to join the violent I might send you my address.

At this point, the direction this country is headed, I may have to take you up on the offer.

Because I'll ask you the same question I ask everybody else -- since I am already viewed depraved enough to slit the throat of a singer I cared more about than my own life, who are you to think you'd get better?

Mike (Hint: They should've shot my ass in New York that night and still be powerwashing the brain matter off the side of the building.)

On 10/31/2022 11:10 PM, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 7:59:49 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:
>
>> If you decide to join the violent I might send you my address.
>
> At this point, the direction this country is headed, I may have to take you up on the offer.
>
> Because I'll ask you the same question I ask everybody else -- since I am already viewed depraved enough to slit the throat of a singer I cared more about than my own life, who are you to think you'd get better?
>
> Mike (Hint: They should've shot my ass in New York that night and still be powerwashing the brain matter off the side of the building.)

I'm not a teenage girl.
--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 7:19:49 PM UTC-7, TE wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 9:18:14 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > Ken Olson <kol...@freedomnet.org> wrote:
> > > On 10/31/2022 8:38 PM, TE wrote:
> > >> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:54:01 PM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> > >>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > >>>>> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> > >>>>>>> invasion this morning.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> So the question is, who did it?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> > >>>>>>> something meaningful?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Lover's quarrel.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> > >>>>> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> > >>>>> reported:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> > >>>>> interior.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So par for the course for MAGA news.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> > >>>>> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> > >>>> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
> > >>>>
> > >>> That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.
> > >>
> > >> My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> > >> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am.
> > >>
> > >> WTF Are you guys getting so worked-up about? It's a joke.
> > >>
> > >>> X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.
> > >>>
> > >>> (G) aslight <------ (you are here)
> > >>> (O) bstruct
> > >>> (P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)
> > >>>> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> > >>>> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
> > >>>>
> > >>> You. LMAO.
> > >>
> > >> Thus far I've heard two main theories regarding this attack:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Pelosi was attacked by a male prostitute.
> > >> 2. The attack on Pelosi was triggered by Trump
> > >>
> > >> I believe that Pelosi was attacked by one of our standard violent drug addicts with mental
> > >> problems. Blaming Trump for this attack, by people who want to DEFUND THE POLICE and
> > >> flood our streets with criminals is pathetic.
> > >>
> > >> -TE
> > >>
> > >> “Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain, O’Sullivan,” my
> > >> grammar school teacher, quoting
> > >> Goethe, would say as he handed back my weekly essay with helpful
> > >> comments. “So what chance do you
> > >> have against it?”
> > >
> > > +1
> > My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight ..
> > Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> > victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> > to pretend MAGA isn’t violent:
> >
> > The man accused of attacking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a
> > hammer told police he wanted to hold the Democratic leader hostage and
> > “break her kneecaps” to show other members of Congress there were
> > “consequences to actions,” authorities said Monday.
> >
> > In a chilling federal complaint, officials say that David DePape, 42,
> > carrying zip ties, tape and a rope in a backpack, broke into the couple’s
> > San Francisco home early Friday morning, went upstairs where 82-year-old
> > Paul Pelosi was sleeping, and demanded to talk to “Nancy.”
> >
> > …
> >
> > Authorities said DePape smashed a glass door in the back of the home with a
> > hammer, went to the upstairs bedroom and told Paul Pelosi to wake up.
> > Confronting Pelosi, he demanded to know where “Nancy” was and said he would
> > wait for her, according to authorities.
> >
> > …
> >
> > In an interview with police, DePape told investigators he wanted to talk to
> > her and viewed her “as the “leader of the pack of lies told by the
> > Democratic Party,” according to the eight-page complaint.
> > “If she were to tell DePape the ‘truth,’ he would let her go and if she
> > ’lied,’ he was going to break her kneecaps,” the complaint alleges.
> >
> > …
> >
> > “By breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into
> > Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were
> > consequences to actions,” the complaint says DePape told investigators.
> I repeat myself, a simple off-the-cuff joke has you guys wetting yourselves:
> "My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am."
> But now, I'm understanding why you guys are getting so sensitive about this
> episode, you want to blame MAGA, so any counter-argument is fake news:
> "My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
> Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> to pretend MAGA isn’t violent: "
> "Pretend MAGA isn't violent?" WTF? So this is "MAGAS" fault? That's what this whole
> pathetic smear is about. MAGA? Yes, I remember the burning cities, the looted businesses,
> the mass murders etc. those were MAGA guys wearing BLM t-shirts, right? Talk
> about conspiracy theories. Hell, Pelosi was hit over the head with his own petard. Lunatics
> roaming the streets is what the Democrats demanded, and they got it...now its' Trump's fault.
>
> P A T H E T I C
>
> BLM's latest mostly peaceful protestor going to spend time in jail:
>
> https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/26/us/waukesha-christmas-parade-trial
>
> -TE
>
> Stop being shocked when mainstream liberals express their desire to see their political
> adversaries not only censored by a union of state and corporate power but also imprisoned.
> The crux of American liberalism is authoritarianism.

I've concluded you're just nuts. Either that or totally dishonest. I suspect, though, you believe what you say.

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 10:19:49 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 9:18:14 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > Ken Olson <kol...@freedomnet.org> wrote:
> > > On 10/31/2022 8:38 PM, TE wrote:
> > >> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:54:01 PM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> > >>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > >>>>> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> > >>>>>>> invasion this morning.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> So the question is, who did it?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> > >>>>>>> something meaningful?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Lover's quarrel.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> > >>>>> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> > >>>>> reported:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> > >>>>> interior.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So par for the course for MAGA news.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> > >>>>> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> > >>>> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
> > >>>>
> > >>> That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.
> > >>
> > >> My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> > >> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am.
> > >>
> > >> WTF Are you guys getting so worked-up about? It's a joke.
> > >>
> > >>> X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.
> > >>>
> > >>> (G) aslight <------ (you are here)
> > >>> (O) bstruct
> > >>> (P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)
> > >>>> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> > >>>> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
> > >>>>
> > >>> You. LMAO.
> > >>
> > >> Thus far I've heard two main theories regarding this attack:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Pelosi was attacked by a male prostitute.
> > >> 2. The attack on Pelosi was triggered by Trump
> > >>
> > >> I believe that Pelosi was attacked by one of our standard violent drug addicts with mental
> > >> problems. Blaming Trump for this attack, by people who want to DEFUND THE POLICE and
> > >> flood our streets with criminals is pathetic.
> > >>
> > >> -TE
> > >>
> > >> “Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain, O’Sullivan,” my
> > >> grammar school teacher, quoting
> > >> Goethe, would say as he handed back my weekly essay with helpful
> > >> comments. “So what chance do you
> > >> have against it?”
> > >
> > > +1
> > My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight ..
> > Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> > victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> > to pretend MAGA isn’t violent:
> >
> > The man accused of attacking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a
> > hammer told police he wanted to hold the Democratic leader hostage and
> > “break her kneecaps” to show other members of Congress there were
> > “consequences to actions,” authorities said Monday.
> >
> > In a chilling federal complaint, officials say that David DePape, 42,
> > carrying zip ties, tape and a rope in a backpack, broke into the couple’s
> > San Francisco home early Friday morning, went upstairs where 82-year-old
> > Paul Pelosi was sleeping, and demanded to talk to “Nancy.”
> >
> > …
> >
> > Authorities said DePape smashed a glass door in the back of the home with a
> > hammer, went to the upstairs bedroom and told Paul Pelosi to wake up.
> > Confronting Pelosi, he demanded to know where “Nancy” was and said he would
> > wait for her, according to authorities.
> >
> > …
> >
> > In an interview with police, DePape told investigators he wanted to talk to
> > her and viewed her “as the “leader of the pack of lies told by the
> > Democratic Party,” according to the eight-page complaint.
> > “If she were to tell DePape the ‘truth,’ he would let her go and if she
> > ’lied,’ he was going to break her kneecaps,” the complaint alleges.
> >
> > …
> >
> > “By breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into
> > Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were
> > consequences to actions,” the complaint says DePape told investigators.
> I repeat myself, a simple off-the-cuff joke has you guys wetting yourselves:
> "My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am."

That's a fact, huh?

> But now, I'm understanding why you guys are getting so sensitive about this
> episode, you want to blame MAGA, so any counter-argument is fake news:
> "My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
> Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> to pretend MAGA isn’t violent: "
> "Pretend MAGA isn't violent?" WTF? So this is "MAGAS" fault? That's what this whole
> pathetic smear is about. MAGA? Yes, I remember the burning cities, the looted businesses,
> the mass murders etc. those were MAGA guys wearing BLM t-shirts, right? Talk
> about conspiracy theories. Hell, Pelosi was hit over the head with his own petard. Lunatics
> roaming the streets is what the Democrats demanded, and they got it...now its' Trump's fault.
>

Ahh, see, here's the problem. Fox News shows the same burning building for six months, and you think there was widespread arson, looting, and "mass murders". The actual facts - that violent crime in basically every major city in America is waaaaay down from the 80s and 90s - that 99% of the blm protests *were* peaceful - doesn't fit your narrative.

And you're all too happy to believe what *does* fit your narrative. Eager and willing. Useful, even.

> P A T H E T I C
>

Yeah. Agreed.

Cheers.

> BLM's latest mostly peaceful protestor going to spend time in jail:
>
> https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/26/us/waukesha-christmas-parade-trial
>
> -TE
>
> Stop being shocked when mainstream liberals express their desire to see their political
> adversaries not only censored by a union of state and corporate power but also imprisoned.
> The crux of American liberalism is authoritarianism.

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 5:45:26 AM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 10:19:49 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> > On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 9:18:14 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > Ken Olson <kol...@freedomnet.org> wrote:
> > > > On 10/31/2022 8:38 PM, TE wrote:
> > > >> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:54:01 PM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> > > >>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > >>>>> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> > > >>>>>>> invasion this morning.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> So the question is, who did it?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> > > >>>>>>> something meaningful?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Lover's quarrel.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> > > >>>>> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> > > >>>>> reported:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> > > >>>>> interior.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> So par for the course for MAGA news.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> > > >>>>> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> > > >>>> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.
> > > >>
> > > >> My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> > > >> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am.
> > > >>
> > > >> WTF Are you guys getting so worked-up about? It's a joke.
> > > >>
> > > >>> X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> (G) aslight <------ (you are here)
> > > >>> (O) bstruct
> > > >>> (P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)
> > > >>>> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> > > >>>> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> You. LMAO.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thus far I've heard two main theories regarding this attack:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Pelosi was attacked by a male prostitute.
> > > >> 2. The attack on Pelosi was triggered by Trump
> > > >>
> > > >> I believe that Pelosi was attacked by one of our standard violent drug addicts with mental
> > > >> problems. Blaming Trump for this attack, by people who want to DEFUND THE POLICE and
> > > >> flood our streets with criminals is pathetic.
> > > >>
> > > >> -TE
> > > >>
> > > >> “Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain, O’Sullivan,” my
> > > >> grammar school teacher, quoting
> > > >> Goethe, would say as he handed back my weekly essay with helpful
> > > >> comments. “So what chance do you
> > > >> have against it?”
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
> > > Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> > > victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> > > to pretend MAGA isn’t violent:
> > >
> > > The man accused of attacking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a
> > > hammer told police he wanted to hold the Democratic leader hostage and
> > > “break her kneecaps” to show other members of Congress there were
> > > “consequences to actions,” authorities said Monday.
> > >
> > > In a chilling federal complaint, officials say that David DePape, 42,
> > > carrying zip ties, tape and a rope in a backpack, broke into the couple’s
> > > San Francisco home early Friday morning, went upstairs where 82-year-old
> > > Paul Pelosi was sleeping, and demanded to talk to “Nancy.”
> > >
> > > …
> > >
> > > Authorities said DePape smashed a glass door in the back of the home with a
> > > hammer, went to the upstairs bedroom and told Paul Pelosi to wake up.
> > > Confronting Pelosi, he demanded to know where “Nancy” was and said he would
> > > wait for her, according to authorities.
> > >
> > > …
> > >
> > > In an interview with police, DePape told investigators he wanted to talk to
> > > her and viewed her “as the “leader of the pack of lies told by the
> > > Democratic Party,” according to the eight-page complaint.
> > > “If she were to tell DePape the ‘truth,’ he would let her go and if she
> > > ’lied,’ he was going to break her kneecaps,” the complaint alleges.
> > >
> > > …
> > >
> > > “By breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into
> > > Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were
> > > consequences to actions,” the complaint says DePape told investigators.
> > I repeat myself, a simple off-the-cuff joke has you guys wetting yourselves:
> > "My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> > in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am."
> That's a fact, huh?
> > But now, I'm understanding why you guys are getting so sensitive about this
> > episode, you want to blame MAGA, so any counter-argument is fake news:
> > "My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
> > Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> > victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> > to pretend MAGA isn’t violent: "
> > "Pretend MAGA isn't violent?" WTF? So this is "MAGAS" fault? That's what this whole
> > pathetic smear is about. MAGA? Yes, I remember the burning cities, the looted businesses,
> > the mass murders etc. those were MAGA guys wearing BLM t-shirts, right? Talk
> > about conspiracy theories. Hell, Pelosi was hit over the head with his own petard. Lunatics
> > roaming the streets is what the Democrats demanded, and they got it...now its' Trump's fault.
> >
> Ahh, see, here's the problem. Fox News shows the same burning building for six months, and you think there was widespread arson, looting, and "mass murders". The actual facts - that violent crime in basically every major city in America is waaaaay down from the 80s and 90s - that 99% of the blm protests *were* peaceful - doesn't fit your narrative.
>
> And you're all too happy to believe what *does* fit your narrative. Eager and willing. Useful, even.
> > P A T H E T I C
> >
> Yeah. Agreed.
>
> Cheers.
> > BLM's latest mostly peaceful protestor going to spend time in jail:
> >
> > https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/26/us/waukesha-christmas-parade-trial
> >
> > -TE
> >
> > Stop being shocked when mainstream liberals express their desire to see their political
> > adversaries not only censored by a union of state and corporate power but also imprisoned.
> > The crux of American liberalism is authoritarianism.
All those misguided voters are just imaging how unsafe they fell under the current state of America. Keep telling them how wrong they are.

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 5:45:26 AM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 10:19:49 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> > On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 9:18:14 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > Ken Olson <kol...@freedomnet.org> wrote:
> > > > On 10/31/2022 8:38 PM, TE wrote:
> > > >> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 1:54:01 PM UTC-4, dotsla...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 11:34:10 PM UTC-4, TE wrote:
> > > >>>> On Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 7:29:02 PM UTC-4, xyzzy wrote:
> > > >>>>> TE <rando...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>> On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:11:12 PM UTC-4, Michael Falkner wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> Nancy Pelosi's husband has apparently been beaten severely in a home
> > > >>>>>>> invasion this morning.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> So the question is, who did it?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> * Was it an inside job, as many Republicans believe it is?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> * Was it one of San Francisco's homeless population, of whom I about to rejoin?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> * Or has a Republican finally found his nutsack and actually tried to do
> > > >>>>>>> something meaningful?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> It'll be interesting to see who and how this goes down.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Lover's quarrel.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> This was reported by the Santa Monica Observer, a newspaper located (checks
> > > >>>>> Google maps) 400 miles from San Francisco. This fine news outlet has also
> > > >>>>> reported:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> 1. that Hillary Clinton was dead in 2016 and Trump defeated a body double.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> 2. That President Trump appointed Kanye West to the department of the
> > > >>>>> interior.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> So par for the course for MAGA news.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Heck even Elon Musk figured out he’d been had and deleted his retweet of
> > > >>>>> their “report”, though not till after gullible wingnuts ran with it.
> > > >>>> I have no idea what you are on about. So Pelosi wasn't attacked by nut with a hammer?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> That's the source for your "lovers quarrel" comment.
> > > >>
> > > >> My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> > > >> in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am.
> > > >>
> > > >> WTF Are you guys getting so worked-up about? It's a joke.
> > > >>
> > > >>> X's mistake is thinking the actual "truth" matters to you. Like, even a little bit.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> (G) aslight <------ (you are here)
> > > >>> (O) bstruct
> > > >>> (P) roject <----- (maybe here? NTTAWWT)
> > > >>>> I wouldn't trust any "news" outlet that shovels shit about the Dems running a body
> > > >>>> double or the President Trump was a Russian asset. Who would?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> You. LMAO.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thus far I've heard two main theories regarding this attack:
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Pelosi was attacked by a male prostitute.
> > > >> 2. The attack on Pelosi was triggered by Trump
> > > >>
> > > >> I believe that Pelosi was attacked by one of our standard violent drug addicts with mental
> > > >> problems. Blaming Trump for this attack, by people who want to DEFUND THE POLICE and
> > > >> flood our streets with criminals is pathetic.
> > > >>
> > > >> -TE
> > > >>
> > > >> “Against stupidity the gods themselves struggle in vain, O’Sullivan,” my
> > > >> grammar school teacher, quoting
> > > >> Goethe, would say as he handed back my weekly essay with helpful
> > > >> comments. “So what chance do you
> > > >> have against it?”
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
> > > Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> > > victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> > > to pretend MAGA isn’t violent:
> > >
> > > The man accused of attacking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband with a
> > > hammer told police he wanted to hold the Democratic leader hostage and
> > > “break her kneecaps” to show other members of Congress there were
> > > “consequences to actions,” authorities said Monday.
> > >
> > > In a chilling federal complaint, officials say that David DePape, 42,
> > > carrying zip ties, tape and a rope in a backpack, broke into the couple’s
> > > San Francisco home early Friday morning, went upstairs where 82-year-old
> > > Paul Pelosi was sleeping, and demanded to talk to “Nancy.”
> > >
> > > …
> > >
> > > Authorities said DePape smashed a glass door in the back of the home with a
> > > hammer, went to the upstairs bedroom and told Paul Pelosi to wake up.
> > > Confronting Pelosi, he demanded to know where “Nancy” was and said he would
> > > wait for her, according to authorities.
> > >
> > > …
> > >
> > > In an interview with police, DePape told investigators he wanted to talk to
> > > her and viewed her “as the “leader of the pack of lies told by the
> > > Democratic Party,” according to the eight-page complaint.
> > > “If she were to tell DePape the ‘truth,’ he would let her go and if she
> > > ’lied,’ he was going to break her kneecaps,” the complaint alleges.
> > >
> > > …
> > >
> > > “By breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into
> > > Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were
> > > consequences to actions,” the complaint says DePape told investigators.
> > I repeat myself, a simple off-the-cuff joke has you guys wetting yourselves:
> > "My source is the fact that one semi-naked man hit another semi-naked man with a hammer
> > in one of the men's San Francisco homes at 2/3 am."
> That's a fact, huh?
> > But now, I'm understanding why you guys are getting so sensitive about this
> > episode, you want to blame MAGA, so any counter-argument is fake news:
> > "My dudes, the perp told the police why he was there, plain as daylight .
> > Listen to him. Unless you don’t want to because it would disturb your MAGA
> > victim complex or your false flag conspiracy theory or whatever allows you
> > to pretend MAGA isn’t violent: "
> > "Pretend MAGA isn't violent?" WTF? So this is "MAGAS" fault? That's what this whole
> > pathetic smear is about. MAGA? Yes, I remember the burning cities, the looted businesses,
> > the mass murders etc. those were MAGA guys wearing BLM t-shirts, right? Talk
> > about conspiracy theories. Hell, Pelosi was hit over the head with his own petard. Lunatics
> > roaming the streets is what the Democrats demanded, and they got it...now its' Trump's fault.

> Ahh, see, here's the problem. Fox News shows the same burning building for six months, and you think there was
> widespread arson, looting, and "mass murders". The actual facts - that violent crime in basically every major city
> in America is waaaaay down from the 80s and 90s - that 99% of the blm protests *were* peaceful - doesn't fit your
> narrative.

BLM Protests were mostly peaceful.
Jan 6 Protests were mostly peaceful.

BLM Protests were magnitudes greater in violence and damage than Jan 6, or any other right-leaning protest.

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 8:29:50 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:

> I'm not a teenage girl.

She was 28 when it happened.

Try again, Space Cadet.

Mike

Dammit, and I even had a more important point, the moment I hit Send:

On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 8:29:50 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:

> I'm not a teenage girl.

Maybe you need to start protecting the teenage girls in your circle then.

(On top of what I said in the first reply.)

Because, whether or not I would, the law fully adjudges I would. Assumed depravity.

Shoot or shut up.

Mike

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 5:02:12 AM UTC-7, floaterjr wrote:

> All those misguided voters are just imaging how unsafe they fell under the current state of America. Keep telling them how wrong they are.

The fact of the matter is, you have a recourse: Assemble a militia and kill us. It's THAT SIMPLE.

You don't have the balls to do it, unlike the BLM protests (which is how I answer TE's comment in the other post).

That's the one great paradox of American society: Most productive people are so close to the edge, they cannot even afford to be ARRESTED -- forget if there's a conviction or anything else.

Most of the rest of us have nothing left to lose. Some of us tried to play along and saw the merits of the situation and saw how little being a law-abiding citizen actually did.

You are probably going to have to kill the leftward half of the population. (About 30% or so now, the rest over the next generation or so -- especially if they are "replacing" the good White Right population.)

Mike

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 6:21:15 AM UTC-7, TE wrote:

> Brooks is racist BLM-supporting mass murderer. No mention in the story about him being a BLM supporter,
> no mention of his racists posts, no fingers pointed at Biden or Harris or MSNBC or the New York Times about
> their violent rhetoric. "WE need to stamp-out whiteness!!!!" Some waked-out illegal alien attacks Paul Pelosi
> and all of the sudden MAGA IS VIOLENT!

BLM is a violent response to the violence of MAGA.

Some of us on the Left understood that the George Floyd riots were, in fact, the start of the Second American Civil War.

And you fuckers who think your guns are going to save you without use need to know that this entire situation has been creeping through the suburbs and exurbs as we speak.

We are coming. It is that simple.

Mike

On 11/1/2022 11:14 AM, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Monday, October 31, 2022 at 8:29:50 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:
>
>> I'm not a teenage girl.
>
> She was 28 when it happened.
>
> Try again, Space Cadet.
>
> Mike

OK. I'm not a 28 year old female.
--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 12:42:40 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:

> OK. I'm not a 28 year old female.

I actually hate men more than I do women.

Mike

On 11/1/2022 3:54 PM, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 12:42:40 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:
>
>> OK. I'm not a 28 year old female.
>
> I actually hate men more than I do women.
>
> Mike

One more thing I can use against you.
--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО

On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 1:44:38 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:

> One more thing I can use against you.

You may have to.

Because by the first of the year, I do not anticipate having anything left to lose by getting the rest of my life in prison -- with all the threats that implies.

Mike

On 11/1/2022 5:37 PM, Michael Falkner wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 1:44:38 PM UTC-7, Ken Olson wrote:
>
>> One more thing I can use against you.
>
> You may have to.
>
> Because by the first of the year, I do not anticipate having anything left to lose by getting the rest of my life in prison -- with all the threats that implies.
>
> Mike

At least you can make friends there.
--
ÄLSKAR - Fänga Dagen

Слава Україні та НАТО