Alan wrote:

> On 2022-02-18 2:15 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > Alan wrote:
> >
> > > On 2022-02-16 3:52 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 2022-02-16 3:01 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2022-02-13 11:04 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 2022-02-10 5:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-02-09 1:31 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-02-09 11:44 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-02-08 1:29 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alan wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-02-07 1:47 a.m., Bigbird
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Never mind the unambiguous
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > truth that you can't have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually known what my
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge in this area was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when you made those
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > statements...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...and that you KNEW you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > couldn't have actually know.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, never mind pertinent facts
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when lies come so easily to you.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What "pertinent facts", hmmm?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What "lies"?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I knew what tire profile was...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...you were clueless.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Demonstrating your ignorance yet
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I clearly knew what a profile was I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simply have never had reason to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > calculate it an overlooked
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > something; algebra not ignorance.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You didn't "do the math wrong".
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you did one thing correctly you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > identified where my mathematics was at
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fault.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No. I identified where your idea of what
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "profile" meant in the context of tires
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was wrong.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wrong.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stop proving how stupid you are. We already
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > have a pretty good idea.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I read that the profile is the ratio of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > width to sidewall and miscalculated because
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I calculated the tyre width less the rim
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > width.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > No. You misunderstood what you read and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > calculated profile based on subtracting rim
> > > > > > > > > > > > > DIAMETER from overall diameter and failed to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > understand that since profile IS the ratio of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > sidewall height to overall tire section width
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that you would need to allow for the fact
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that there are two instances of the sidewall
> > > > > > > > > > > > > height in overall diameter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Lol, you claim to know what I did better than I
> > > > > > > > > > > > do.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I do because it's true.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You've lost your stupid little mind.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Would you like to see the math?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The maths that proves you know what I did better
> > > > > > > > > > than I do? It's alright I'll leave your fantasies
> > > > > > > > > > to you.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > There is conceit and there is sheer stupidity.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want, I'll take your erroneous figures
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and demonstrate your ignorance for you in more
> > > > > > > > > > > > > rigorous terms.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You can't, you have only confirmed your own. I
> > > > > > > > > > > > told you what I did and you lied like the lying
> > > > > > > > > > > > cunt you are.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > No. You got it wrong what you got wrong.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Listen to yourself.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You're too stupid for words.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Do you want me to prove it to you mathematically?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You can't.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I know exactly what I did.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Your conceit and dishonesty are amusing but in a
> > > > > > > > > > tiresome, bored of watching the puppy eat it's own
> > > > > > > > > > shit, kind of way.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Or how about I simply point out that there was no
> > > > > > > > > > > "rim width" provided, so you couldn't possibly
> > > > > > > > > > > have based any of your calculations on a figure
> > > > > > > > > > > you didn't even have?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The rim diameter you stupid twat.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So you calculated "tire width less rim diameter" now?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nope.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You really are making an ass of yourself.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That is literally what you just said.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You said (earlier):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "because I calculated the tyre width less the rim width."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And when I pointed out that rim width was included in any
> > > > > > > figures we were given you said:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "The rim diameter"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So if that was what imply you meant instead of "rim
> > > > > > > width", then your statement becomes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "because I calculated the tyre width less the rim
> > > > > > > diameter."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No those are your words, fuckwit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Those were YOUR words with "rim width" replaced with "rim
> > > > > diameter" as YOU stated you had actually meant to do.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I never stated that.
> > > >
> > > > You're being infantile.
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To make such an inane suggestion after "correcting" my
> > > > > > > > original numbers calls into question your claimed
> > > > > > > > understanding of the whole subject.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No, actually.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It calls into question your ability to simply admit you
> > > > > > > didn't really understand in the first place.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Didn't understand what, fuckwit?
> > > > >
> > > > > Didn't really understand what a tire's profile was a measure
> > > > > of.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you had, you'd have done the math correctly.
> > > >
> > > > What an ignorant non-sequitur.
> > > >
> > > > I see where you went wrong. You are claiming to be too stupid
> > > > to believe what I told you I did and what my calculations bear
> > > > out.
> > > >
> > > > Instead you have made a convoluted explanation in order to
> > > > support a litany of falsehoods, lies and misrepresentations.
> > > >
> > > > You really are looking like an habitually dishonest person...
> > > > to the core.
> > > >
> > > > As I told you. I found what the profile ratio represents then
> > > > calculated that number but used the diameter instead of the
> > > > radius.
> > > >
> > > > Your only reason to claim otherwise is to support your dishonest
> > > > representations.
> > > >
> > > > You thought you were being clever in trying to belittle me for a
> > > > simple error but all you have done is prove what a dishonest
> > > > little twat you are.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Dude... ...give it a rest.
> > >
> > > You got it wrong.
> > >
> >
> > Again your habitual dishonesty has you attempting to imply I have
> > claimed otherwise.
>
> I can't help noticing you've snipped all the factual analysis.

There is nothing there that has not been discussed and/or refuted,
rebutted or shown to be misleading or false representation.

A lie told many times is still a lie.

--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!