Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

It is the theory which decides what can be observed. -- Albert Einstein


tech / sci.math / Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.

SubjectAuthor
* Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|+- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|`- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
+- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
+- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Gus Gassmann
+- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Mathin3D
+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
|`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
| +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
| |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
| | `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
| |  `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
| +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Gus Gassmann
| |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
| | +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Gus Gassmann
| | |`- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Dan Christensen
| | `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
| `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
+- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Dan Christensen
|`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
| +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
| +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Dan Christensen
| +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
| |+- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
| |+- STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of JG's fake mathDan Christensen
| |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
| | +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
| | +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
| | +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
| | `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
| |  `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
| |   +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
| |   `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
| |    +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
| |    |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
| |    | `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
| |    `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Takabe Matsumura
| `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|+- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
|+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
||+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
|||`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
||| `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
|||  `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   |+- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
|||   |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   | +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Gus Gassmann
|||   | |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   | | +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Gus Gassmann
|||   | | |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   | | | +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   | | | |`- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   | | | +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Gus Gassmann
|||   | | | +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Russ Diaz
|||   | | | `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | | `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | |  `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   | |   `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
|||   | | +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
|||   | | |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
|||   | | | +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | | | |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FredJeffries
|||   | | | | `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | | | `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
|||   | | |  `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | | `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
|||   |  `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   |   +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
|||   |   |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   |   | `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.FromTheRafters
|||   |   |  `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   |   |   +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   |   |   `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   |   +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   |   `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Alan Mackenzie
|||   |    `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   |     `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   |+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   ||+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   |||`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   ||| `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   ||`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
|||   || `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Takabe Matsumura
|||   ||  `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
|||   |`- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
|||   +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Jim Burns
|||   |+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Ross A. Finlayson
|||   ||`- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Takabe Matsumura
|||   |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   | +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.sergio
|||   | +- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Takabe Matsumura
|||   | +* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Jim Burns
|||   | |`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.WM
|||   | `* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Eram semper recta
|||   `- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
||`- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.zelos...@gmail.com
|`- Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.Mathin3D
+* Bullshit baffles brains.Eram semper recta
+* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.David Petry
`* Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.mitchr...@gmail.com

Pages:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.

<tis8bs$1llo$3@gioia.aioe.org>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=116506&group=sci.math#116506

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!jq9Zon5wYWPEc6MdU7JpBw.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: inva...@invalid.com (Sergi o)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Cantor's notion of countability is trash.
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:42:52 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <tis8bs$1llo$3@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <1b2a6b63-c249-413f-891d-b382fc9d2fben@googlegroups.com>
<c482ecf0-5c96-4b96-9481-9dce915ad6b4n@googlegroups.com>
<39eca901-bf51-4d7d-8ff0-0084da5a209cn@googlegroups.com>
<187c2031-e5c7-4a3c-a022-922ed74b89b8n@googlegroups.com>
<867caab1-b34d-42b1-9d27-4691af23cce1n@googlegroups.com>
<d87d9ccb-4d10-4997-9e92-a5f03b042855n@googlegroups.com>
<26d43a7c-7a5b-483a-a772-17875188588en@googlegroups.com>
<13564544-0cc6-4e77-9d89-245cbf008e6en@googlegroups.com>
<5d7a65f1-c974-496e-bc7e-39187dea4353n@googlegroups.com>
<bd1088d9-304f-4507-87bd-37a5a716bc02n@googlegroups.com>
<209a416d-79dd-47a2-9b48-6e4130689727n@googlegroups.com>
<60b378d8-bd81-4291-b2c8-63177518b2c4n@googlegroups.com>
<5bb9fb05-dbbe-4c4a-aa4a-6a0b3c02bca8n@googlegroups.com>
<7a93b035-e1fc-4274-9222-c4e9b66fe0cbn@googlegroups.com>
<132d9eb0-5358-4bbd-bfeb-8db74ceb0100n@googlegroups.com>
<t41l1h$r4n$1@gioia.aioe.org>
<4b7444b8-5aee-4025-9cc0-5087094550d0n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="54968"; posting-host="jq9Zon5wYWPEc6MdU7JpBw.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.4.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Sergi o - Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:42 UTC

On 4/24/2022 5:14 AM, WM wrote:
> sergio schrieb am Samstag, 23. April 2022 um 21:46:03 UTC+2:
>
>> if dark numbers existed, how would you know ?
>
> We can reach omega by collectively treating the natural numbers
>
> {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = {omega} ,

so omega is your last natural number ?

>
> but not by individually treating them. For all definable n we get
>
> ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: {1, 2, 3, ..., omega} \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n} = {n+1, n+2, ..., omega} .
>
> This proves the existence of numbers which can only be treated collectively. I call them dark numbers.
>
> Regards, WM
>

Pages:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor