Re: Andrew Beal owes Archimedes Plutonium $1 million for proof of Generalized FLT, and no charge for throwing out Trigonometry unto math garbage dump
728 views
by Jan Bielawski Aug 3, 2018, 2:13:19 PM

Archimedes Plutonium
May 16, 2020, 7:58:41 PM
to sci.math
AP writes: well the world has to put a stop to money freaks like Andrew Beal who offers a prize for a math problem but never pays out, only because, he wants publicity, cheap cheap publicity, rather than "keep his word"

Math is its own reward and stop putting "dirty money" with a math prize.

World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium

World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof

Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019 I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.

As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).
Length: 74 pages

File Size: 1445 KB
Print Length: 74 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PQKGW4M
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

This book was revised

6th published book

World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.

Preface:
Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.

Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.

Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.

As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQKGW4M
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1503 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 156 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

Yes, Andrew Beal if sensible instead of his commercial ploy of free publicity, should spend the money to saving more whales. And get off of his greed of money trip in life.

Beal means well, but this intrusion of people outside of math trying to influence math with offers of Money has got to cease for the reason that math and science needs no money prodding, for doing science is its own reward. And the trouble when Beal or others throw money into science, the trouble comes that money easily pollutes and corrupts science, so that the money is given to a fakester, a con artist and thus does the Science itself much harm.. For then someone else has to show the fraud fake science and give the proper true proof.

It was nice of Beal to offer Money, but this money mix with science needs to stop for it more likely Pollutes science than it helps science.

And we see the pollution quite clearly in Andrew Beal getting free advertisement for himself and his bank in Texas, cheap cheap advertisement for just a paltry 1 million dollars. Telling the AMS-- never hand out the money, as AMS is caretaker of the 1 million.

Thanks Andrew Beal, but this nonsense of money for science needs to stop with your prize. And this should be a Counterpoint on your first page of a Google Search for Andrew Beal.

AP in fact proved your conjecture way back in 2015, yet here it is 2022 and the AMS has still not called up AP to congratulate his work. So, Andrew, I am afraid I have to charge you interest on your 1 million reward. Perhaps Compound Interest, you as a banker is quite familiar and privy to interest charges. I would say 10% compound yearly interest starting 2015.

Andrew did make a substantial contribution to math itself, but this prize money puts a dark blotch spot on his further math endeavors.

Why, Andrew Beal to this very day still believes the AMS when they preach a ellipse is a conic when in truth that is a oval, and Andrew Beal believes in Boole logic with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. But worst of all, Andrew Beal probably recognizes that the calculus is geometry, yet Andrew never found or never asked a mathematician to give a geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Pete Olcott and Amine have a Counterpoint on their first page of Google Search showing them to be cranks crackpots of math. Andrew Beal is Not a crank crackpot of math but a "bad sponsor" of math and needs a 1st page counterpoint to detail his harm to mathematics.

Pete Olcott
unread,
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V6
On 3/27/2022 9:10 PM, Dennis Bush wrote: > On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:04:22 PM UTC-4, olcott
9:24 PM

Amine Moulay Ramdane's profile photo
Amine Moulay Ramdane
unread,
More of my philosophy about smartness and about discovering patterns and more of my thoughts..
9:11 PM

Amine Moulay Ramdane's profile photo
Amine Moulay Ramdane
unread,
More of my philosophy about the Gödel's First incompleteness theorem and more of my thoughts..

#9-1, 5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



#9-2, 27th published book

Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.

Preface:
These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic

Equal+Not                    
T = T  =  T                      
T = ~F = T                      
F = ~T = T
F = F   = T   

If--> then                  
T --> T  = T
T --> F  = F
F --> T  = U  (unknown or uncertain)           
F --> F  = U  (unknown or uncertain)

And
T  &  T = T                       
T  &  F = T                      
F  &  T = T                      
F  &  F = F                      

Or
T  or  T  = F
T  or  F  = T
F  or  T  = T
F  or  F  = F

Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.

Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:

|    | ~p
|    |---
|    | .
|    | .
|    | q
|    | .
|    | .
|    | ~q
| p

Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.

Product details
• ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
• Publication date : March 23, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1178 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 86 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic
•

#9-3, 143rd published book

DeMorgan's Laws are fantasies, not laws// Teaching True Logic series, book 3 Kindle Edition
By Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 30Apr2021. This is AP's 143rd published book.

Preface: The Logic community never had the correct truth table of the primitive 4 connectors of Logic, (1) Equal compounded with NOT, (2) AND, (3) OR, (4) IF->THEN. In 1800s, the founders of Logic messed up in terrible error all 4 of the primitive logic connectors. And since the 1990s, AP has wanted an explanation of why Old Logic got all 4 connectors in total error? What was the reason for the mess up? And in the past few years, I finally pinned the reason to starting Logic with DeMorgan's fake laws, from which Boole, a close friend of DeMorgan, was going to keep his friendship and accept the DeMorgan Laws. That meant that DeMorgan, Boole, Jevons accepted OR as being that of Either..Or..Or..Both, what is called the inclusive OR. But the inclusive OR is a contradiction in terms, for there never can exist a combo of OR with AND simultaneously. This book goes into detail why the DeMorgan laws are fake and fantasy.

Cover Picture: Looks a bit rough, but I want students and readers to see my own handwriting as if this were a lecture and the cover picture a blackboard where I write out DeMorgan's two (fake) laws of logic.

Product details
• File Size : 620 KB
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 38 pages
• ASIN : B08M4BY4XM
• Publication Date : October 27, 2020
• Language: : English
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Lending : Enabled
•
•

#9-4, 100th published book

Pragmatism, the only Philosophy I loved // Teaching True Logic series, book 4 Kindle Edition
By Archimedes Plutonium

I need to give credit to the philosophy of Pragmatism, the only philosophy that I know of that is based on science. Credit for my discovery of the Plutonium Atom Totality in 1990, came in part, partially due to a passage of the Pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce in Peirce's Cosmology:

 Peirce's The Architecture of Theories...
         ...would be a Cosmogonic Philosophy. It would suppose that in the beginning - infinitely remote - there was a chaos of unpersonalized feeling, which being without connection or regularity would properly be without existence. This feeling, sporting here and there in pure arbitrariness, would have
started the germ of a generalizing tendency. Its other sportings would be evanescent, but this would have a growing virtue. Thus, the tendency to habit would be started; and from this, with the other principles of evolution, all the regularities of the universe would be evolved. At any time, however, an element of pure chance survives and will remain until the world becomes an absolutely perfect, rational, and symmetrical system, in which mind is at last crystallized in the infinitely distant future.
--- end quoting Peirce's Cosmology ---

But also I must give credit to Pragmatism for making it a philosophy one can actually live their lives by, for living a life of pragmatic solutions to everyday problems that occur in my life. A case in point example is now in March 2020, being the pragmatist that I am, and enduring the 2020 corona virus pandemic. No other philosophy that I know of is so keenly in tune with a person, the surrounding environment and how to live.

5-Olcott,Cambridge Sainsbury, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes,Ahnert,Alai as spam mill insane as Olcott with his 938MeV proton, his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and his ellipse a conic when it is a oval, and never a geometry proof of fundamental theorem of calculus. Olcott spams sci.math everyday for decades and does it only because he likes to piss people off, for Olcott is a failure of science

Why Cambridge England encourages crazy insane spam of Olcott. Harry Cliff, any answers on that???? And is that why you think the electron of atoms is 0.5MeV when it is the muon.
olcott, olcott 47
unread,
Refuting the Peter Linz Halting Problem Proof V6
On 3/30/2022 9:59 PM, Dennis Bush wrote: > On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 10:52:11 PM UTC-4,
> > > >
> 4 > > Is everyone at Cambridge a blind logical misfit with their Rutherford atom of 938MeV proton and electron at 0.5MeV and as insane as the spammer Olcott with his endless spam of HALTING.
> > > > Cambridge professors insane about Logic turns students like Pete Olcott insane also.
> > > > David Sainsbury Cambridge Univ
> > > > Cambridge Physics Dept
> > > >
> 5 > > Ahnert, Alai, Alexander, Allison, Ansorge, Atature, Barker, Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg, Bohndiek, Bowman, Brown, Buscher, Butler, Campbell Carilli, Carter, Castelnovo, Challis, Chalut, Chaudhri, Chin, Ciccarelli, Cicuta, Cole, Cooper, Cowburn, Credgington, Cross, Croze, Deschler, Donald, Duffett-Smith, Dutton, Eiser, Ellis, Euser, Field, Flynn, Ford, Friend, Gibson, Green, Greenham, Gripaios, Grosche, Guck, Gull, Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine, Jenkins, Jones, Josephson, Keyser, Khmeinitskii, King, Kotlyar, Lamacraft, Lasenby, Lester, Longair, Lonzarich, Maiolino, Marshall, Martin, Mitov, Morris, Mortimer, Moller, Needs, Norman, Nunnenkamp, Padman,Parker, Patel, Payne, Pepper, Phillips, Pramauro, Queloz, Rao, Richer, Riley, Ritchie, Sargent, Saunders, Saxena, Schneider, Scott, Scrivener, Sebastian, Simmons, Simons, Sirringhaus, Smith, Sutherland, Taylor, Teichmann, Terentjev, Thomson, Verrechia, Walker, Ward, Warner, Weale, Webber, Whyles, Withington.
> > > >
> > > > Cambridge Math Dept
> > > >
> > > > Alan Baker
> > > > Bela Bollobas
> > > > Darwin Smith
> > > > John Coates
> > > > Timothy Gowers
> > > > Peter Johnstone
> > > > Imre Leader
> > > > Gabriel Paternain
> > > > ..
> > > > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > > > , . `.' ' `.
> > > > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > > > . ; .' . `. ;
> > > > ; . ' `. . '
> > > > . ' ` `. |
> > > > . '. '
> > > > . 0 0 ' `.
> > > > ' `
> > > > ; `
> > > > .' `
> > > > ; U `
> > > > ; '; `
> > > > : | ;.. :` `
> > > > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > > > '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> > > > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi I am Pete Olcott who failed logic and math and now is satisfied in spamming sci.math with loads of waste paper from the computer room. I love to pester people who do know logic and math, since I am a crank failure. Crank crank crank.
> > > > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > > > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > > > ` . ' '
> > > > / ` `. ' ' .
> > > > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > > > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > > > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > > > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > > > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > > > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > > > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > > > | ' ` ' `. `
> > > > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > > > `.' ` ; `-'
> > > > `...'
> > > > Can any-one at Cambridge start correcting the error filled Boole, Jevons, Russell, Whitehead, Godel, Wittgenstein, all failures of logic and logical reasoning, include Cantor and his tripe of undefined infinity, an infinity without a borderline between finite and infinite.
> > > >
> > > > Cambridge, you no longer are a premiere University but a school that fosters and shelters losers of logical reasoning.
> > > > Pete Olcott closing down Cambridge University because they teach hypocrisy of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 12:45:05 PM UTC-5, peteolcott wrote:
> > > > > this is bloody well not frigging spam.
> > > > Olcott loves to irritate people in science, for he must have failed science to spend this inordinate amount of time posting computer waste and pretending to talk about Logic.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Olcott can John Coates,David Sainsbury, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or is that totally foreign to them? Mind you, not a limit analysis hornswaggle for that is not geometry, limit analysis is not even a math proof for anyone can analysis things, analysis this post and only math hypocrites would think it is a proof.
> > > >
> > > > Re: Cambridge, you no longer are a premiere University but a school that fosters and shelters losers of logical reasoning. And why do you encourage crank screwballs that repeat computer trash, Pete Olcott, spamming sci.math everyday?
> > > >
> > > > > Olcott can Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, ever ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or does that thought fly way too above their heads?
> > > > >
> > > > > Copyright 2021 Pete Olcott
> > > > > Spammers hit targets no one else can hit;
> > > > > Crackpots hit a target no one else cares to see.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Olcott, why cannot Haniff, Heavens-Ward, Heine, Hine, Hobson, Hope-Coles, Howie, Hughes, Irvine, Jardine ask the question which is the atom's real electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle? Is it because they cannot even do logic correctly with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Olcott why does Cambridge Univ Stephen J. Toope, David Sainsbury, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain keep teaching Boole error filled logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and these crazies still think the slant cut in cone is a ellipse when in fact it is a Oval. Why brainwash and pollute more students like Pete Olcott who is crazy enough as it is.
> > > > 
> > > > > Cambridge failures of physics who cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true real electron-- the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Harry Cliff, AP requires that Harry Cliff LHCb physicist to publish in the Cambridge Univ student newspaper of how sorry he is and apologizes for his physics stupidity of thinking that a hydrogen atom is composed of a electron of 0.5MeV flying around outside of a proton of 938MeV, flying around at 99% speed of light and still holding up and holding together as a hydrogen atom. Such stupid physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Whereas the truth be known the real electron of a hydrogen atom is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus of 8 rings, where the muon and proton are doing the Faraday Law of producing more new electricity and storaging that electricity in what are known as neutrons. Because the muon is inside the proton it can fly around the torus inside at nearly the speed of light.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Old Physics which Harry Cliff is a member, never took Logic, never learned how to think straight, think clear, and thus his physics knowledge is just hand down memorization. So stupid he never understood what the hell is angular momentum for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5MeV particle flying around at 99% speed of light and stay put on a proton of 938MeV.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AP says the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. Now Dirac was a real physicist, but not Harry Cliff and everyone at CERN with their electron = 0.5MeV.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So, Harry Cliff, AP requires you to publish in Cambridge student newspaper your apology for the boneheaded physics you pursue and teach and test on fake physics of the atom.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics.. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > #3-1, 2nd published book

Dan & Kibo, is that how Univ Oxford teaches these days
On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
Kibo Parry Moroney replied from Boston's hate channel World std Barry Shein:
Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
By Richard Cranium 1 post 3 views updated 8:30 PM

On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 3:09:33 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 3/26/2022 9:32 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science
> >> James Kibo ...
> >
> He will NEVER learn.
> He isn't smart enough to learn. In fact he's STOOOPID as Uncle Al would say.
> He never learned not to attack me.
> He even thinks I'm James Parry.
> >
>>who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.
> >
> >OWN WORDS here:

On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan

> >
Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Homosexual says Zelos Malum, Markus Hennrich, Carl XVI Gustaf, Tommy Ohlsson, Paul Crutzen, stalker-- Zelos Malum, Can't do proper Calculus, thinks electron is .5MeV when it is Dirac's monopole , Real Proton = 840MeV

On Wednesday, December 1, 2021 at 5:25:22 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> I call him out cause it is hilarious

Zelos, did you point out to John Stillwell a single cone has 1 axis of symmetry not 2 and so the slant cut is a Oval, never the Ellipse, and he still got it wrong?
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 7:24:59 AM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> all still fucking wrong

On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 6:27:45 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> why would one need to do it geometrically?

Zelos Malum, did you point out to John Stillwell that calculus is geometry, and a geometric proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is demanded, yet he still is too dumb to do one.

On Monday, March 7, 2022 at 11:19:30 PM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> We know you're homosexual, why do you need to tell us?

Unplugging Dan Christensen and entire Univ Western Ontario uwo from sci.math as a demented racist defaming poster

John Woods, Mario Bunge, Ted Honderich, Brendan Myers, Joachim Lambek, Carrie Jenkins, Katalin Bimbo, Doug Walton.

Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM



Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM

Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron,   Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias  Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon

Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz
President Alan Shepard
Amit Chakma (chem engr)

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang

Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM

Re: Bill Blair, David Vigneault please help us put Dan Christensen into a Canadian Asylum or psychiatric treatment where he belongs
By Donald Trump Mar 30, 2020, 11:30:25 PM

Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021

Re: Dan Christensen says close all math, physics, chemistry dept. in ALL Canadian Colleges with their fake electron (muon is real electron), fake geometry proof of calculus (Old Math sums up 0 width rectangles), fake Lewis 8 Structure (dissociation...
by Giant Radioactive Easter Bunnie Jan 21, 2021, 5:38:37 PM

Re: Stewart failed Calculus also, and his book should be removed
by Dan Christensen
Jun 24, 2018, 10:52:49 PM

Re: Markus Klyver greatest math fool of Sweden-- thinks an ellipse is a conic section
by
Dan Christensen Aug 2, 2017, 11:52:21 PM

On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>
> Dan

Re: 81,045-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F.. West, Michael B. Walker
by Frank Cassa 12Apr2021 7:00 AM 

Re: 7,744-Student victims of Linda Hasenfratz Univ Western Ontario from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Chancellor Linda Hasenfratz President Alan Shepard
11:53 AM 10Apr2021
by Wayne Decarlo

Re: 102,852-Student victims of Dominic Barton, Univ Waterloo from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Dominic Barton, President Feridun Hamdullahpur physics
by konyberg Apr 15, 2021, 3:09:41 PM 

Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus... 0.5MeV electron when in truth it is the muon as the real electron
by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM

Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of
May 10, 2021
by Professor Wordsmith

Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle
by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,

Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM 

Re: Spamming fuckdog Dan Christensen says fire Stanford's John Lipa, Alexander Fetter, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash our
by Mutt Buncher

Re: 2-fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Dan Christensen, Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP??
Earl Biggs

Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
Earl Biggs

                              ..
            .- " `-.   ,..-'''  ```.....'`-..
           ,      . `.'            '        `.
         .'   .' `    `           '   `..     ;
         .   ;  .'                     . `.    ;
         ;   . '                       `.  .   '
          . '                            ` `.  |
        . '.                                  '
       .          0              0            ' `.
      '                                          `
     ;                                            `
    .'                                             `
    ;                      U                        `
    ;    ';                                         `
    :   | ;..                                 :`     `
    :    `;. ```.                           .-; |    '
    '.      `    ``..,                   .'   :'    '
     ;       `        ;'...          ..-''    '     '  I am Christensen,I am such a stupid insane imp of math and logic that I thought a vertex has a derivative, that distinct means not-distinct, and that 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. And I love spam reading of vvgra and tomato hello, and I am a failure of academics and so I spend most days making out hate-lists of people who actually succeed in science for my pea sized brain is envious and jealous of those who succeed in science yet I failed in science.
      `       `        ;  ````'''""'  ;      '    '
       `       `        ;            ;      '    '
        `       `        ;          ;      '    '
         `       `.       ````''''''      '    '
           `       .                     '    '
         /  `       `.                  '    '        .
        /     `       ..            ..'    .'"""""...'
       /   .`   `       ``.........-'     .'` .....'''
      / .'' ;     `                    .'   `
  ...'.'    ;    .' `                .'      `
   ""      .'  .' |    `           .; \       `
           ; .'   |      `. . . . ' .  \       `
           :'     |     '   `       ,   `.     `
                  |    '     `      '     `.    `
                  `   '       `     ;       `.  |
                  `.'          `    ;         `-'
                                `...'

Andrew Beal and NSF Dr. Panchanathan, how much do you pay Kibo Parry Moron to stalk AP for 30 years nonstop, is it more than 0 dollars???
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 2:00:15 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "little stinker"
> fails at math and science:
>"barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. AP no longer tolerates insane stalkers like Kibo no matter where they are located. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>

About 5,610,000 results (0.53 seconds)
Search Results

Andrew Beal
Chairperson of BEAL BANK
Overview
Videos
Main Results
Images
Image result for andrew beal
Image result for andrew beal
Image result for andrew beal
Image result for andrew beal
More images
Web results

Andrew Beal - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Andrew_Beal
Daniel Andrew Beal (born November 29, 1952) is an American banker, businessman, investor, and amateur mathematician. He is a Dallas-based businessman who ...
Political party: Libertarian
Children: 8
Born: Daniel Andrew Beal; November 29, 1952 ...
Spouse(s): Susan Kaminski (divorced) Simona ...
‎The Professor, the Banker · ‎Beal conjecture · ‎Beal Bank
People also ask
How did Andy Beal make his money?
How old is Andy Beal?
Feedback

Andrew Beal - Forbeshttps://www.forbes.com › profile › andrew-beal
Andrew Beal is the founder and owner of Beal Financial Corporation, which owns Beal Bank and has assets of more than $8 billion. · The Texas banker is known for ...
andrew beal from www.forbes.com

Andy Beal Homehttps://www.andrewbeal.com
Andy Beal is the founder and chairman of Beal Bank and Beal Bank USA as well as other affiliated companies.
‎Beal Conjecture · ‎Beal Aerospace · ‎Andy Beal Biography · ‎Andy Beal Career

our founder: andy bealhttps://www.bealbank.com › andrew-beal
Andy Beal is the founder and chairman of Beal Bank and Beal Bank USA as well as other affiliated companies. He and his banks have donated millions of ....
Videos

PREVIEW
4:10
#SecretsSelfmadeBillionaires 1015 Andy Beal Twice College ...
YouTube · #SecretsSelfmadeBillionaires by Paul Chan
Feb 13, 2021

PREVIEW
2:13
Billionaire Andy Beal's $36 Million Dallas Flip | Forbes
YouTube · Forbes
May 9, 2018

PREVIEW
3:38
#SecretsSelfmadeBillionaires 1016 Andy Beal Twice College ...
YouTube · #SecretsSelfmadeBillionaires by Paul Chan
Feb 14, 2021

3 key moments in this video
View all

No. 5: Andrew Beal - Texas Monthlyhttps://www.texasmonthly.com › Telling Fortunes
The founder of one of the state's biggest private banks is also a math whiz who taught himself number theory; in 1993 Andy Beal used his bank's fifteen ...

Andy Beal - Bloomberg Billionaires Indexhttps://www.bloomberg.com › profiles › daniel-a-beal
Beal is an accomplished poker player -- he counted cards during college and won $10.6 million in 2004, in what was then the world's richest poker game.. In 2015, ...
Age: 69

Andrew Beal's Net Worth (Updated 2021) - Wealthy Gorillahttps://wealthygorilla.com › Net Worth
Mar 23, 2022 — Andrew Beal is an American banker, businessman, investor, and amateur mathematician. ... Beal is a Dallas-based businessman who accumulated wealth ...

D. Andrew Beal - Founder and Chairman - LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com › d-andrew-beal-a3297272
Dallas, Texas, United States · Founder and Chairman · Beal Bank and Beal Bank USA
Founder and Chairman, Beal Bank and Beal Bank USA · Experience · Education · View D. Andrew's full profile.

Andrew Beal Wiki, Bio, Age, Wife, Children, Net Worth, Beal ...https://www.wiki.ng › wiki › andrew-beal-wiki-bio-age...
Andrew Beal (Daniel Andrew “Andy” Beal) is an American banker, businessman, investor, poker player, and amateur mathematician. He is founder and chairman of ...

Andrew Beal – Family, Family Treehttps://www.celebfamily.com › entrepreneur › andrew-...
Andrew Beal who is also known as Daniel Andrew “Andy” Beal is an American entrepreneur and banker, who is also a poker player, an investor and an amateur ...
andrew beal from www.celebfamily.com
Related searches
Image of Andrew Beal house
Andrew Beal house
Feedback
andy beal new wife
andrew beal poker
andy beal son
andrew beal news
d andrew beal
andy beal aspen house
andrew beal dallas
Page Navigation

Kibo on Andrew Beal as Advertising spamtard. Why Kibo Parry M? Because Beal never pays out his FLT reward, but just clings onto it even after AP proved his math problem in 2015? So Kibo, you are saying Andrew Beal is a cheat and cheapskate, and a fraud of the math community. Or is it, Kibo Parry M, that you have 2 Counterpoints on your first page of a Google Search list telling how you failed science with your 938 is 12% short of 945, while Beal has nothing but sugar coated lollipop glop on his Google Search list and no Counterpoints. Beal seems to rig everything in his favor.

On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 1:36:31 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "spamtard"
> tarded:
>the despised

Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao as Kibo Parry M calls mindless barking fuckdog. Why Kibo? Because they can do a proper percentage, not your 938 is 12% short of 945?
On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 10:29:08 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "mindless barking fuckdog"
> "mentally...slow"

Dartmouth's Philip Hanlon, John D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, mentally slow says the 30 year stalker Kibo Parry M. Why Kibo? Because they still are in caves when it comes to conic sections, that the Oval is the slant cut, not the ellipse in a single cone.

On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 9:30:30 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"mentally...slow"
>"barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. AP no longer tolerates insane stalkers like Kibo no matter where they are located. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"

AP 2021: "Every University is _responsible_ for the filthy stalker or spammer who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker or spammer on Usenet". Most college professors are new to the age of internet and the responsibilities have not seeped into them as yet, that if they have a mindless spammer in their community, it is their responsibility to guide and direct that misplaced soul to a rightful venue to unleash his/her mind.

AP 1990s: The Internet is new form of schooling with its openness, its publicity, and its international reach that College degrees in science can be passed out but also be made null & void if the beholder becomes an outrageous stalker & spammer of science on the Internet.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Imp of Math"
>"barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> fails at math and science:
>in science, as he tries to brainwash
> children as young as 5 into mislearning science and likely hating it.

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:29:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
>"one marble illogical brain"

On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"

On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 1:31:34 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"
> "has anyone seen my marbles"

On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:22:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "barking fuckdog" David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> William J. Burns "Putin's Stooge"

On Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 10:37:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:

Re: software that engineers out stalking bullies on Twitter, Facebook, Google Newsgroups Re: Michael Moroney Anal ButtfuckManure stalker for 26 years
By Dan Christensen 39 posts 472 views updated 2:53 AM

Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker
By Zelos Malum 15 posts 108 views updated 2:49 AM

Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"

Shithead Dartmouth College:Philip J. Hanlon, Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser __SO SAYS__ the 30 year stalker Kibo Parry M & Swiss Jan Burse, Sweden Zelos Malum stalkers

Why Kibo Parry M stalker of 30 years-- because they fail in math unable to tell apart a oval from a ellipse in slant cut of single cone.

On Friday, March 18, 2022 at 2:55:37 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>Shithead
>Front Page Hog

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Dartmouth College:Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner

On Friday, March 18, 2022 at 2:38:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"math hater"
> fails at math and science:
>"one marble illogical brain" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM

Re: Zelos Malum calls dipshit --Max Tegmark, Erik Palmgren, Tom Britton, Carl XVI Gustaf stalker-- Zelos Malum fails Calculus, thinks electron is .5MeV when it is Dirac's monopole , Real Proton = 840MeV Real Electron= 105MeV
by Zelos Malum
7/7/18

Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM

Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
By Michael Moroney 39 posts 288 views updated 2:16 AM

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Kibo Parry M calls Andrew Beal a spamtard, probably because Beal has a prize money for proving "Generalized FLT" but never intending to payout the $1 million, just use it as free advertisement.

On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 4:36:26 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "spamtard"
> tarded:

But AP proved Beal's conjecture, in 2014 and to this day, Andrew Beal has corruptly not paid AP. And this is the reason that AP is insistent in the future going forward we put a stop to these corrupt charlatans like Andrew Beal, offering a prize that never existed and gaining decades of free publicity. Beal is a publicity stunt. And his banks in Texas probably are also just publicity stunts.

Science needs no prizes, for it is its own reward. And we must cast aside any outside hypocrite offering a prize to do science.

6th published book

World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.

Preface:
Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.

Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.

Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.

As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQKGW4M
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1503 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 156 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

AP is going to charge Andrew Beal compound interest for his 1 million prize, starting 2015, yearly compound interest of 10% yearly.

2014 = $1 million
2015 = $1.1million
2016 = $1.21 million
2017 = $1.331 million
2018 = $1.4641 million
2019 = $1.61051 million
2020 = $1.771561 million
2021 = $1.9487171 million
2022 = $2.14358881 million

Andrew, it is conceivable that the Plutonium Atom Foundation will take control of all your banks, due to you not taking due diligence care of offering a prize with never the intention of a payout.

No point in asking the failure Kibo Parry M, who cannot even do a math percentage.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 
 > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
 > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
 
>  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass
 > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

2- Kibo Parry M calls Andrew Beal a spamtard, probably because Beal has a prize money for proving "Generalized FLT" but never intending to payout the $1 million, just use it as free advertisement.
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's lackey"
> fails at math and science:
> On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 4:36:26 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "spamtard"
> > tarded:
>
> But AP proved Beal's conjecture, in 2014 and to this day, Andrew Beal has corruptly not paid AP. And this is the reason that AP is insistent in the future going forward we put a stop to these corrupt charlatans like Andrew Beal, offering a prize that never existed and gaining decades of free publicity. Beal is a publicity stunt. And his banks in Texas probably are also just publicity stunts.
>
> Science needs no prizes, for it is its own reward. And we must cast aside any outside hypocrite offering a prize to do science.
>
> 6th published book
>
> World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.
>
> Preface:
> Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.
>
> Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.
>
> Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.
>
> As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQKGW4M
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1503 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 156 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
> AP is going to charge Andrew Beal compound interest for his 1 million prize, starting 2015, yearly compound interest of 10% yearly.
>
> 2014 = $1 million
> 2015 = $1.1million
> 2016 = $1.21 million
> 2017 = $1.331 million
> 2018 = $1.4641 million
> 2019 = $1.61051 million
> 2020 = $1.771561 million
> 2021 = $1.9487171 million
> 2022 = $2.14358881 million
>
> Andrew, it is conceivable that the Plutonium Atom Foundation will take control of all your banks, due to you not taking due diligence care of offering a prize with never the intention of a payout.
>
> No point in asking the failure Kibo Parry M, who cannot even do a math percentage.
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
Kibo Parry M hiding under his fake name and hate spew address
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's lackey"
> fails at math and science:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 10:55:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"little fish"
>"mindless barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo Parry M, which is worse? Andrew Beal unable to tell slant cut in single cone is a Oval never ellipse or his Boole Logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or his unable to ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

- Kibo Parry M calls Andrew Beal a spamtard, probably because Beal has a prize money for proving "Generalized FLT" but never intending to payout the $1 million, just use it as free advertisement.
> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Putin's lackey"
> > fails at math and science:
> > On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 4:36:26 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > "spamtard"
> > > tarded:
> >
> > But AP proved Beal's conjecture, in 2014 and to this day, Andrew Beal has corruptly not paid AP. And this is the reason that AP is insistent in the future going forward we put a stop to these corrupt charlatans like Andrew Beal, offering a prize that never existed and gaining decades of free publicity. Beal is a publicity stunt. And his banks in Texas probably are also just publicity stunts.
> >
> > Science needs no prizes, for it is its own reward. And we must cast aside any outside hypocrite offering a prize to do science.
> >
> > 6th published book
> >
> > World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.
> >
> > Preface:
> > Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.
> >
> > Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.
> >
> > Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.
> >
> > As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQKGW4M
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1503 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 156 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> > AP is going to charge Andrew Beal compound interest for his 1 million prize, starting 2015, yearly compound interest of 10% yearly.
> >
> > 2014 = $1 million
> > 2015 = $1.1million
> > 2016 = $1.21 million
> > 2017 = $1.331 million
> > 2018 = $1.4641 million
> > 2019 = $1.61051 million
> > 2020 = $1.771561 million
> > 2021 = $1.9487171 million
> > 2022 = $2.14358881 million
> >
> > Andrew, it is conceivable that the Plutonium Atom Foundation will take control of all your banks, due to you not taking due diligence care of offering a prize with never the intention of a payout.
> >
> > No point in asking the failure Kibo Parry M, who cannot even do a math percentage.
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> Kibo Parry M hiding under his fake name and hate spew address
> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:32:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Putin's lackey"
> > fails at math and science:

Old Math is dogma, New Math is reasoning// MATHOPEDIA-- List of 77 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor by Archimedes Plutonium Last revision was 14Jan2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science. Preface: A Mathopedia is
1 view
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:00 AM (2 hours ago)



to

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 77 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor
by Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 14Jan2022. And this is AP's 160th book of Science.

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

----------------------------
Table of Contents
----------------------------

1) Introduction

2) List of 77 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.

3) Appendix

---------
Text
---------

1) Introduction

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the errors of Math in general and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in partial form in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erstwhile, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

2) List of 77 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trash-pile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

Where is that stupid thread in sci.math, poising as a puzzle problem when it had no functions only pretend functions?

A few days back, 11Aug2021 appeared a stupid puzzle problem here in sci.math. Of someone pretending he had 3, 4 even 5 or 6 functions and wanting to prove equality.

Then I stepped into the conversation saying he had no functions at all, until they are converted into polynomials over a specified interval, then you can do calculus on those true real functions.

So, the world wide math community has got to begin to learn, no function is a function, until, and unless they are polynomials. This is an axiom of math and is proven true by the geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. You cannot have a FTC, if you have functions that are not polynomials.

So there is a trade off-- does math want calculus or no calculus? If you want calculus, all your functions have to be polynomials. This has to do with the concept of discrete geometry, not a continuum, for polynomials are discrete.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash-pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person. Analyzing something is not the same as proving "that something".

-Beijing targeted with 77 of Russia's 5977 nuclear missiles. Kibo, is that not overkill??? Why so many Kibo???
On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 12:56:23 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 77)

Can Univ Victoria Jon Willis, Kim Venn please confirm.

Univ of Victoria physics dept
Justin Albert, Arif Babul, Devika Chithrani, Byoung-Chul Choi, Rogerio de Sousa, Ruobing Dong, Sara L. Ellison, Falk Herwig, Dean Karlen, Richard K. Keeler, Jody Klymak, Pavel Kovtun, Robert V. Kowalewski, Mark Laidlaw, Michel Lefebvre, Travis Martin, Julio Navarro, Maxim Pospelov, Adam Ritz, J.Michael Roney, Geoffrey M. Steeves, Kim Venn, Jon Willis
Message-ID: <8b571e84-4acb-4e42...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Tell you about Dad's camp? Ok - matrix
From: rick_s...@yahoo.ca

AP writes: why spam, when you could be confirming that the real proton is 840MeV, not 938

Chancellor
Shelagh Rogers
President
Jamie Cassels, QC
Provost
Dr. Valerie Kuehne, PhD
Academic staff

James Kibo Parry M. what do you think of Xi compared to Putin?
> >"one marble illogical brain"
> >flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> James Kibo Parry weighing in on Beijing targeted with 77 of Russia's 5977 nuclear missiles. Kibo, is that not overkill???
>
> China's Xi thinks that when Putin pushes nuclear button that all 5977 Russian missiles will hit the West and none of those 5977 will land on Beijing.. Putin is a lawyer, Xi is a chemical engineer, and is Xi a patsy when it comes to logistics?
>
> But what if Xi realized that half of those 5977 are targeting China. Would Xi act and behave differently????
> I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.
>
> --- quoting BBC ---
> Experts estimate around 1,500 Russian warheads are currently "deployed", meaning sited at missile and bomber bases or on submarines at sea.
> How does this compare with other countries?
> Nine countries have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the US and the UK.
>
>
> Russia 5,977
>
> NATO 5,943, US 5,428, France 290, UK 225
>
> China 350
>
> Pakistan 165
>
> India 160
>
> Israel 90
>
> North Korea 20
>
> Source-- Federation of American Scientists
>
> *** How many of the India and Pakistan nuclear missiles are targeted at Peking for its Uyghur genocide? Perhaps all 165+160 are aimed at Chinese cities.

Kibo Parry, why such a low opinion of Mr. Beal, at least he can do a percentage correctly, not your insane 938 is 12% short of 945.

On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 12:15:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"antimath"
>"barking fuckdog"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

On Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 12:14:06 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"

Kibo Parry M calls Andrew Beal a spamtard, probably because Beal has a prize money for proving "Generalized FLT" but never intending to payout the $1 million, just use it as free advertisement.
>
> On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 4:36:26 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "spamtard"
> > tarded:
>
> But AP proved Beal's conjecture, in 2014 and to this day, Andrew Beal has corruptly not paid AP. And this is the reason that AP is insistent in the future going forward we put a stop to these corrupt charlatans like Andrew Beal, offering a prize that never existed and gaining decades of free publicity. Beal is a publicity stunt. And his banks in Texas probably are also just publicity stunts.
>
> Science needs no prizes, for it is its own reward. And we must cast aside any outside hypocrite offering a prize to do science.
>
> 6th published book
>
> World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.
>
> Preface:
> Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.
>
> Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.
>
> Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.
>
> As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQKGW4M
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1503 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 156 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
> AP is going to charge Andrew Beal compound interest for his 1 million prize, starting 2015, yearly compound interest of 10% yearly.
>
> 2014 = $1 million
> 2015 = $1.1million
> 2016 = $1.21 million
> 2017 = $1.331 million
> 2018 = $1.4641 million
> 2019 = $1.61051 million
> 2020 = $1.771561 million
> 2021 = $1.9487171 million
> 2022 = $2.14358881 million
>
> Andrew, it is conceivable that the Plutonium Atom Foundation will take control of all your banks, due to you not taking due diligence care of offering a prize with never the intention of a payout.
>
> No point in asking the failure Kibo Parry M, who cannot even do a math percentage.
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Kibo Parry M. singing > Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war > > Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore >
On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 3:59:19 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Kibo song "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills Planet Earth" sung in school and work with a rapp beat.
> On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 8:51:51 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Much better to burn worthless Rubles to boil your water!
>
> Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth-- poem ballad by James Kibo Parry Moron of Rensselaer Polytech claim on a Nick Thompson's Wired magazine fame.
> >
> > Kibo Parry recites Poem ballad "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth"
> >
> > Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself and wants to join the Portugal-- forgiv me, i sick i cry---
> > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> > > In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > > >
>
> Famous poem ballad of "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth".
>
> And since this was written, Senator Lindsey Graham has popped up in support of the idea, likening the history to Brutus of Ancient Rome or of Claus von Stauffenberg failed attempt on the insane Hitler. Sorry, Lindsey your several weeks too late with this idea.
>
> On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 4:58:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "spamtard"
> >"barking fuckdog"
> >flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > General Nakasone a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails
> > math.
> >cannot understand the slant cut in single
> > cone is an Oval, always the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic he
> > believes of 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither
> >can do a geometry proof
> > Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
>
> 1
> Kill Putin, before he kills our planet Earth
>
> Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
>
> Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
>
> Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a shit
>
> A shit in France's woods run through with a sword bit
>
> Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a piss
>
> A piss on the plains of Turkey dismounting his horse
>
> Does it really matter how the megalomaniac is dissed
>
> Sun shines from Faraday law, not from fusion
>
> That goonclod physicist professors confusion
>
> It shines from Faraday law you mindless shit for brains
>
> Kill Putin with stinger missile on a boat, car, train or plane
>
> Xi has another Winter Olympic competition, fly in Putin on a plane
>
> But before landing blow it to smithereens from the slalom train
>
> The Chinese Communist Party was watching from the curling rink
>
> Saying, good riddance to you Putin you mindless dink
>
> And blame it on a engine failure, not made-in-China, but NK stink
>
> The Sun gone Red Giant, needs humanity to colonize Europa
>
> Not look at the idiot Putin or Xi navel belly button and scrota
>
> 2
>
> Kibo kill Putin stink at NSA Winter Olympics toboggan run
>
> Yes, kibo Parry Moron ordered by General Nakasone says Sun
>
> Sun gone Red Giant phase while fool Putin wants Ukraine
>
> Fool Xi with Chinese Communist Party wants Taiwan
>
> Fool Kim of North Korea wants rockets to reach Sea of Japan
>
> While the world needs rockets to reach Io, Europa and Ganymede
>
> Kibo Parry eats a kilometer of Trump shit just to see where it comes from
>
> Trump eats a kilometer of shit of Putin just to see where it comes from
>
> Putin eats a kilometer of shit by Xi just to see where it comes from
>
> Xi eats a kilometer of shit of Kibo, just to see where it comes from
>
> Andrew Wiles proves that Terence Tao in Fermat Last Theorem prom
>
> The ice skating Olympic gold medal is not given to Russian GazProm
>
> Too many falls on the ice with the overdrugged skaters, drunk on vodka
>
> When what is truly needed is a colony on Callisto, Io, Ganymede and Europa
>
> Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
>
> Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
>
> 3
>
> Sun gone Red Giant Initiation phase, while idiots chase after Ukraine, Taiwan
>
> Kibo Parry cut out Putin's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney cut out Xi's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one
>
> Kibo Parry Moron eat a kilometer of Trump's shit just to see where it came from
>
> Mama sang bass, Xi sang tenor, Putin joined Communist Party in awe
>
> When humanity needed to colonize Mars, Io, Ganymede, Callisto, Europa
>
> How did you do it Kibo Parry Moron, a James Bond poisoned dagger walking cane
>
> Or was it the stinger missile aimed at Putin brain
>
> Or was it a Livia Caesar, poisoned chocolate bar
>
> Or was it the traditional Texas housewife method of running over in the car
>
> Or was it the Putin textbook method of polonium in the tea
>
> Or the Godfather method of using eyeglass frame to stab in the temple
>
> Or was it the expeditious Xi method of blowing up his plane as example
>
> Pray tell, Kibo, which was it, Mama sang bass, father sang tenor and all joined in awe
>
> Sadly, humanity cannot colonize Europa because of the babies on Earth Putin and Xi
>
> Chasing after mindless idiotic dreams of conquering lands on Earth
>
> Even though the Sun gone Red Giant is making all of Earth worthless as a shit pee
>
> Idiots Putin and Xi cannot see Europa is where we need to go to live, live, life
>
> With Putin's Ukraine and Xi's mindless land grab strife
>
> Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war
>
> Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore
>
>
> > On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 1:15:17 PM UTC-5, Troy Matsuda wrote:
> >
> > Give Ukraine missiles that can reach both Moscow and Stalingrad
> >
> > >Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> >
> > Or send in an assassination squad like that of bin Laden, after Putin.
> > > "barking fuckdog" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > >
> > Or both.
> >
> > >"spamtard"
> >
> > >>List of 133
> >
> >
> > China's Xi thinks that when Putin pushes nuclear button that all 5977 Russian missiles will hit the West and none of those 5977 will land on Beijing. Putin is a lawyer, Xi is a chemical engineer, and is Xi a patsy when it comes to logistics?
> >
> > But what if Xi realized that half of those 5977 are targeting China. Would Xi act and behave differently????
> > I need some kind of numbers data on number missiles present in the world today.
> >
> > --- quoting BBC ---
> > Experts estimate around 1,500 Russian warheads are currently "deployed", meaning sited at missile and bomber bases or on submarines at sea.
> > How does this compare with other countries?
> > Nine countries have nuclear weapons: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the US and the UK.
> >
> > Russia 5,977
> >
> > NATO 5,943, US 5,428, France 290, UK 225
> >
> > China 350
> >
> > Pakistan 165
> >
> > India 160
> >
> > Israel 90
> >
> > North Korea 20
> >
> > Source-- Federation of American Scientists
> >
> > *** How many of the India and Pakistan nuclear missiles are targeted at Peking for its Uyghur genocide? Perhaps all 165+160 are aimed at Chinese cities.
> >
> > >> Student teaches professor
> > >>
> > >www.bitchute.com/video/0cTw2n6zPQWu/
> >
> > >www.bitchute.com/video/msr2L1dZ62cX/
> >
> > This menace that is Putin, threatens the entire planet Earth, and never before has one insane man threatened the planet Earth, like this.
> >
> > He is undoubtedly insane as evinced with his polonium poisoning of Litvinenko in 2006. And Putin should have been eliminated in 2006.
> > On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 1:15:17 PM UTC-5, Troy Matsuda wrote:
> > > "barking fuckdog" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > >
> > The West has to eliminate Putin for he will push the buttons of nuclear war, that is how insane he has become.
> > >> Student teaches professor
> > >>
> > >www.bitchute.com/video/0cTw2n6zPQWu/
> >
> > >www.bitchute.com/video/msr2L1dZ62cX/
> >
> > His insanity is such, that on his deathbed, he wants to take out the world with his own dying.
> >
> > Russia has always been a primitive nation in political power, a backward nation, at least 100 years behind the times of modern nations. Russia today is more like Caesar's Rome of 2,000 years ago, of poisoning constant killing of political rivals. Russia does not know how to govern. Its people do not know what civilized politics is, or means, or does.
> >
> > Imagine that, the Russian state polonium poisoning Litvinenko in 2006 in London, and a hit man in Germany. Russia politics is killing anyone anytime anywhere.
> > Or send in an assassination squad like that of bin Laden, after Putin.
> >
> > Or both.
> > >Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > >"spamtard"

Kibo Parry M on Andrew Beal's dishonesty in math "silly boy, that's off by more than.." I am sure Mr. Beal can do a percentage correctly but not Kibo Parry M. who spends 30 years stalking those who succeed in science while Kibo fails. But Mr. Beal does need a Counterpoint on his first page Google search hits, for it is not honesty of science when you offer a prize for a problem and it was proven 5 years ago, yet Mr. Beal refuses to make the payout. The same dishonesty that Mr. Beal still believes a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, but that is wrong-- it is a oval.

Jan Burse on Terence Tao dishonesty in math, for he knows a cone has one axis of symmetry, oval one axis of symmetry and ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry, yet dishonest Tao can not admit to his lifelong mistake, yet expects students at UCLA to admit to their mistakes. Why remain dishonest Terry?

On Saturday, June 9, 2018 at 6:35:36 PM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> And in case somebody thinks curved, watch out,
> it will be oval, never ellipse. LoL

Kibo says Andrew Wiles a math failure and physics failures Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss. Why Kibo? Because they think the electron of atoms is the 0.5MeV particle when in truth it is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law.

Physics failures Dr.Panchanathan, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Harry Cliff says Kibo Parry M, the 30 year stalker, who says 938 is 12% short of 945.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Kibo says failures Ken Ribet, John Stillwell,Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, SAYS stalker Kibo Parry M. of 30 years nonstop.
>
> Why Kibo, because Tao, Wiles, Hales, Stillwell, Ribet, believes a single cone with 1 axis of symmetry the same as a oval, yet a ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry and the above failures of math still brainwashing the world with their ellipse a conic section. Or is it that they preach Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3, with AND as subtraction, being brain dead in logic reasoning to understand the truth table of AND has to be TTTF and not the absurd (throw the baby out in the bathe water) of TFFF. Or is it that they fail to ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
>
> Why do you call them failures of math and logic Kibo Parry M, with your failure at Rensselaer Polytech with your 938 is 12% short of 945.

Kibo why do you have this open hate channel--
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 11:59:50 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 4:53:13 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Putin's minion"
> On Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 10:37:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"AnalButtfuckManure"
> > fails at math and science:
> Kibo, I see you still use your famous invented word of 2017 "analbuttfuckmanure" as your frustrations in failing science, and now living on stalking those that succeed in science.
>
>
>
186th published book

Proof the Muon is true real electron of Atoms, and 0.5MeV particle is the magnetic monopole// physics research

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition

Preface: In April of 2022, AP notices a anomaly of battery life of operation and of power output of radioactive element plutonium compared to commonplace batteries such as lithium. And almost instantly, I realized this could be a proof that the muon stuck inside of every proton doing the Faraday law with the proton is the cause of this "extra electricity" and "long life longevity". When each proton inside a atom is an electrical generator producing electricity, means the heaviest elements in Nature are going to be the best batteries. Lithium atom has 3 protons+ 3muons while plutonium atom has 94 protons + 94muons, so that when divided, 94/3 we can expect that the plutonium battery is 31 times more electricity than lithium battery.

Well, in doing this book, I could only find evidence that the plutonium battery is 10 times better than a lithium battery, not 31 times. So maybe that is an anomaly for future research to work out. But for now, I have proven the muon is the real true electron of Atoms and that the 0.5MeV particle, although the unit particle of electricity, the 0.5MeV particle is not the atom's electron but is the Dirac magnetic monopole, produced by the muon thrusting through the proton torus in Faraday law.

Old Physics was really dumb physics, with their elementary particles doing nothing, but relaxing on a beach. Whereas in New Physics, every particle in Nature has a task and function to perform, such as the Faraday law. And that makes commonsense, while Old Physics is kook physics, no logical thinking.

Cover Picture: My iphone photograph picture of a Google search for when Caltech scientists Neddermeyer and Anderson discovered the muon particle of physics in 1936.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09YLLKWBX
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 20, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 366 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 36 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, my marbles are lost Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock says Kibo Parry M. in his 30th year of hate stalking

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:27:44 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"my bag of marbles has this really big hole in it"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

MIT math dept.

Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman, Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan

President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)

MIT physics dept
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark, Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins, Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young

Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales can't find their marbles Rensselaer Polytech Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw,
On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:50:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs,Roger Penrose can't find their marbles Rensselaer Polytech Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt so says Kibo Parry M.

Why James Kibo Parry M? Is it because one of 4 reasons or all four combined that they lost their marbles?
1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse
2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Kibo, did they not lose their marbles way back in 1993 when AP started posting to sci.math and sci.physics, at about the time NSF and NSA hired you Kibo to stalk nonstop, and how much do they pay you to hate-stalk, kibo? Is it $100 per post so you can afford geothermal house and all electric cars??

The absurdity of Mr. Beal having a math prize for generalized FLT, yet Andrew still believes the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a Oval. Andrew Beal, like Andrew Wiles cannot add 1 plus 1 for a cone has 1 axis is symmetry, a oval has 1 axis of symmetry and ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry. I guess the late bank hours Andrew puts in, keeps him away from actually hands on true geometry of placing a Kerr lid inside a paper cone and having Andrew Beal see for himself the truth.

At least Mr. Beal is not a spammer of math like the below kooks are wasteful spammers.

Socratis T.n.p.
6 unread,
It's not my fault...
==> 30i *30i = 900i^2 = 9m^2 1i *30i * 30i = 900i^3 = 900kg. ==> 20i *20i = 400i^2 = 4m^2 1i *
4:09 PM

Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
, …
Anton Moto
33
unread,
My Axiom of Functional Equality does not work
Mostowski Collapse wrote: > 3 category mistakes in one MSE question. > Congratulations Dan
4:05 PM

This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.
Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
, …
Anton Moto
55
unread,
How to formally construct a function in DC Proof
Dan Christensen wrote: > On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 4:02:03 AM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
3:49 PM

olcott's profile photo
olcott
unread,
Re: On the halting problem (reprise #2)
On 4/29/2022 3:17 PM, Mr Flibble wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:42:49 -0400 > Richard Damon
3:26 PM

This conversation has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.

2
MIT Gilbert Strang needs a 1st page Counterpoint in his Google Search hits, instead of this 100% sugar coated gloss, when Gilbert is a scatterbrain in math and writes mindless calculus textbooks. Kids need a warning of imp authors.
1:48 PM

olcott's profile photo
olcott
unread,
Re: On the halting problem (reprise #2) [ truth bearers ]
On 4/29/2022 9:07 AM, Mr Flibble wrote: > A proof of an erroneous theory is, by implication, also
1:40 PM


, …
Mostowski Collapse
12
Thomas Hales, why does Google Search have sugar coated boutique shops for your failures of math, when Google Search needs Balanced Journalism with A COUNTERPOINT entry on your first page.

Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, imps of math Rensselaer Polytech Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw,

On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 10:26:34 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Imp of Math"
>"wasting everyone's time with his mindless, endless spam"

Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, can't find their marbles Rensselaer Polytech Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw,
On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:50:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs,Roger Penrose can't find their marbles Rensselaer Polytech Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt so says Kibo Parry M.

Why James Kibo Parry M? Is it because one of 4 reasons or all four combined that they lost their marbles?
1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse
2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Kibo, did they not lose their marbles way back in 1993 when AP started posting to sci.math and sci.physics, at about the time NSF and NSA hired you Kibo to stalk nonstop, and how much do they pay you to hate-stalk, kibo? Is it $100 per post so you can afford geothermal house and all electric cars??

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 12:35:25 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Putin's Stooge"
> fails at math and science:


>can't find my marbles

Panchanathan,Cordova,Suresh,NSF,Nakasone NSA looking for lost marbles of Rensselaer Polytech Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, with their 30 year nonstop hate stalk of Kibo

Kibo Parry--NSA,NSF hate stalkers looking for Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, lost marbles On Thursday, April 28, 2022 Kibo Parry M,General Nakasone,NSF France Anne Cordova,Subra Suresh,Arden Lee Bement Jr.,Rita R. Colwell,Neal Francis Lane,John Howard Gibbons wrote: "I*still* can't find my marbles".
Kibo Parry Moron blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997, where was General Nakasone?
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Kibo, 30 year nonstop stalker, even if you do find Rensselaer Polytech marbles, do you honestly think they will admit the truth-- Oval is slant cut in single cone, not the ellipse, or give a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or ask the simple question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle.
Dr. Panchanathan NSF, General Nakasone, Kibo Parry M on math failures Philip J. Hanlon, Thomas Hales. Why Kibo, because he is too dumb in math to do a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Or is it because he is still deluded with a slant cut in single cone as ellipse when it is in truth a Oval, see AP proof below.

Kibo, why is Dr. Hanlon so dumb in math that he cannot even add 1 and 1, for a single cone has 1 axis of symmetry, oval 1 axis of symmetry yet ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry, yet the fools Hanlon, Hales, Wiles, Tao still teach ellipse is a conic section when it the Oval at slant cut.

The 30 year payed for attack stalker Kibo Parry M.
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 1:59:04 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"I *still* can't find my marbles" "math hater"
> 77)

Kibo Parry M on Donald Schwendeman and Harry Cliff-- why kibo? Because he cannot ask the simple question which is the atoms real electron -- muon or 0..5MeV particle?
>
> More to the point Rensselaer losing its accreditation for graduating a moron like Kibo Parry M. who still thinks 938 is 12% short of 945. Talk about failure, here Rensselaer graduates a so called engineer who cannot even do proper percentage problems.
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 2:15:25 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "math hater"
> > fails at math and science:
> >Village Idiot"
> > fails at math and science:
>


> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>

Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM

Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM

Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM

Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM

Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM

Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM

Re: _Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer,Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, is the reason you failed to confirm .5MeV was not the atom's electron but Dirac's monopole because you failed science like kibo
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Apr 25, 2019, 12:08:26 PM

Re: a second forgery post by Jan Burse-- time to pull the plug on him
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Feb 24, 2017, 6:00:53 AM

Re: 4-Andrew Wiles and his fake FLT proof, so dumb on FLT he could not even spot Euler's flaw of exp 3 FLT, and so dumb as a mathematician, he never could do a geometry proof of calculus, FTC.
by Blake Studdard Jul 12, 2021, 10:51 AM

On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 5:28:46 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote:
> Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles...

When will you learn, Archie Poo???

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Students Beware: Dont be victim of DC Proofs fake math

Dan Christensen schrieb am Freitag, 6. Mai 2022 um 03:05:17 UTC+2:
> On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 5:28:46 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote:

After sniffing too much cocain, the dumbo Dan Christensen
now claims -1 e n. Just a new low in his DC poop nonsense.

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Freitag, 6. Mai 2022 um 09:01:40 UTC+2:
> Students Beware: Dont be victim of DC Proofs fake math
> Dan Christensen schrieb am Freitag, 6. Mai 2022 um 03:05:17 UTC+2:
> > On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 5:28:46 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote:

Is the Beal Bank as corrupt as Andrew Beal-- still teaches a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when in truth that is a oval. Of what does it profit Andrew Beal for a Generalized FLT when Andrew cannot even tell the difference between a ellipse and a oval.

AP has to charge interest on Beal's prize 10% compound yearly interest. Starting 2015-16.

Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz
Caltech Univ, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. Caltech -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with__ hate-stalker criminals of Kibo Parry M. or Jan Burse or Dan Christensen only shows that Caltech is no longer in the business of science and truth but has gone corrupt.

Not much difference between the corrupt Donald Trump and his mindless "big lie" and Caltech Univ with their mindless big lie of ellipse a conic section.

No point in asking any Caltech professor which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle when the bozo the clowns cannot even tell apart a ellipse from oval.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Caltech and other schools hiring or complacent with hate-stalker criminals such as kibo Parry M of 30 years stalker hatred with their 938 is 12% short of 945:
On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 4:59:49 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>why do you have to be such a crybaby about the ellipse being a conic
> section?

CalTech math dept

Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,

Caltech Physics Dept

Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin

On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 8:05:17 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 5:28:46 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote:
> > Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles...
>
> When will you learn, Archie Poo???
>
> AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.
>
> In AP's OWN WORDS here:
>
> “Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
> --June 29, 2020
>
> “The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
> --June 3, 2015
>
> “0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
> --June 9, 2015
>
> “0/0 must be equal to 1.”
> -- June 9, 2015
>
> “0 is an infinite irrational number.”
> --June 28, 2015
>
> “No negative numbers exist.”
> --December 22, 2018
>
> “Rationals are not numbers.”
> --May 18, 2019
>
> According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
> --December 11, 2019
>
> Which could explain...
>
> “The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
> --May 31, 2019
>
> AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:
>
> “New Logic
> AND
> T & T = T
> T & F = T
> F & T = T
> F & F = F”
> --November 9, 2019
>
> AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:
>
> "Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
> --November 9, 2017
>
>
> And if that wasn't weird enough...
>
> “The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
> --April 4, 1994
>
> “The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
> --November 14, 2019
>
> AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???
>
> “Since God-Pu is marching on.
> Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
> Its truth is marching on.
> It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
> It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
> Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
> Our God-Pu is marching on.”
> --December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)
> Dan
>
> Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
> Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com