On 5/14/2022 6:52 AM, Audie Mutsu wrote:
> sergio wrote:
>
>>> the mountains. The problem with eastern europe started with the corrupt
>>> capitalist central committees, years before 1989, sending the cheap
>>> food and quality 1st class commodities to export abroad the west. The
>>> lack of cheap food in penurious supermarkets, brought misery and the
>>> whole thing, as not all people were "farmers".
>>
>> that is what happens with commies, they split into two classes the
>> proletariat scum, and the Friends of the Central Committee. Rich and
>> Poor.
>
> This brainfart imbecile wannabe capitalist, named "sergio", still not
> understanding the proletariat are putting food on his table. And that
> there are no "two classes". You fucking idiot.

remember the 5 year plans? where the Gov ordered you what to plant and grow, on land you could not own ?

Summing up the work of the Second Congress, of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party the following conclusions may be drawn:

1) The congress sealed the victory of Marxism over "Economism," over open opportunism.

2) The congress adopted a Program and Rules, created the Social-Democratic Party, and thus built the framework of a *single* party.

3) The congress revealed the existence of grave differences over questions of organization which divided the Party into two sections, the Bolsheviks and
the Mensheviks, of whom the former championed the organizational principles of revolutionary Social-Democracy, while the latter sank into the bog of
organizational looseness and of opportunism.

4) The congress showed that the place of the old opportunists, the "Economists," who had already been defeated by the Party, was being taken by new
opportunists, the Mensheviks.

5) The commies did not prove equal to its task in matters of organization, showed vacillation, and at times even gave the preponderance to the
Mensheviks; and although it corrected its position towards the end, it was nevertheless unable to expose the opportunism of the Mensheviks on matters of
organization and to isolate them in the Party, or even to put such a task before the Party.

On 5/14/2022 8:16 AM, sergio wrote:
> On 5/14/2022 6:52 AM, Audie Mutsu wrote:
>> sergio wrote:
>>
>>>> the mountains. The problem with eastern europe started with the corrupt
>>>> capitalist central committees, years before 1989, sending the cheap
>>>> food and quality 1st class commodities to export abroad the west. The
>>>> lack of cheap food in penurious supermarkets, brought misery and the
>>>> whole thing, as not all people were "farmers".
>>>
>>> that is what happens with commies, they split into two classes the
>>> proletariat scum, and the Friends of the Central Committee. Rich and
>>> Poor.
>>
>> This brainfart imbecile wannabe capitalist, named "sergio", still not
>> understanding the proletariat are putting food on his table. And that
>> there are no "two classes". You fucking idiot.
>
>
> remember the 5 year plans? where the Gov ordered you what to plant and
> grow, on land you could not own ?
>
>
> Summing up the work of the Second Congress, of the Russian
> Social-Democratic Labour Party the following conclusions may be drawn:
>
> 1) The congress sealed the victory of Marxism over "Economism," over
> open opportunism.
>
> 2) The congress adopted a Program and Rules, created the
> Social-Democratic Party, and thus built the framework of a *single* party.
>
> 3) The congress revealed the existence of grave differences over
> questions of organization which divided the Party into two sections, the
> Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks, of whom the former championed the
> organizational principles of revolutionary Social-Democracy, while the
> latter sank into the bog of organizational looseness and of opportunism.
>
> 4) The congress showed that the place of the old opportunists, the
> "Economists," who had already been defeated by the Party, was being
> taken by new opportunists, the Mensheviks.
>
> 5) The commies did not prove equal to its task in matters of
> organization, showed vacillation, and at times even gave the
> preponderance to the Mensheviks; and although it corrected its position
> towards the end, it was nevertheless unable to expose the opportunism of
> the Mensheviks on matters of organization and to isolate them in the
> Party, or even to put such a task before the Party.

Listen to the Professor:

https://youtu.be/k9DO26O6dIg

;^) LOL!

On 5/15/2022 3:13 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 5/14/2022 8:16 AM, sergio wrote:
>> On 5/14/2022 6:52 AM, Audie Mutsu wrote:
>>> sergio wrote:
>>>
>>>>> the mountains. The problem with eastern europe started with the corrupt
>>>>> capitalist central committees, years before 1989, sending the cheap
>>>>> food and quality 1st class commodities to export abroad the west. The
>>>>> lack of cheap food in penurious supermarkets, brought misery and the
>>>>> whole thing, as not all people were "farmers".
>>>>
>>>> that is what happens with commies, they split into two classes the
>>>> proletariat scum, and the Friends of the Central Committee. Rich and
>>>> Poor.
>>>
>>> This brainfart imbecile wannabe capitalist, named "sergio", still not
>>> understanding the proletariat are putting food on his table. And that
>>> there are no "two classes". You fucking idiot.
>>
>>
>> remember the 5 year plans? where the Gov ordered you what to plant and grow, on land you could not own ?
>>
>>
>> Summing up the work of the Second Congress, of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party the following conclusions may be drawn:
>>
>> 1) The congress sealed the victory of Marxism over "Economism," over open opportunism.
>>
>> 2) The congress adopted a Program and Rules, created the Social-Democratic Party, and thus built the framework of a *single* party.
>>
>> 3) The congress revealed the existence of grave differences over questions of organization which divided the Party into two sections, the Bolsheviks
>> and the Mensheviks, of whom the former championed the organizational principles of revolutionary Social-Democracy, while the latter sank into the bog
>> of organizational looseness and of opportunism.
>>
>> 4) The congress showed that the place of the old opportunists, the "Economists," who had already been defeated by the Party, was being taken by new
>> opportunists, the Mensheviks.
>>
>> 5) The commies did not prove equal to its task in matters of organization, showed vacillation, and at times even gave the preponderance to the
>> Mensheviks; and although it corrected its position towards the end, it was nevertheless unable to expose the opportunism of the Mensheviks on matters
>> of organization and to isolate them in the Party, or even to put such a task before the Party.
>
>
> Listen to the Professor:
>
> https://youtu.be/k9DO26O6dIg
>
> ;^) LOL!

remember that movie very funny!