Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"You can't get very far in this world without your dossier being there first." -- Arthur Miller


tech / sci.math / Pope Francis-- Putin's Stooge no marble brain says Kibo Parry M the 30 year nonstop bully-stalker who is likely paid for by the Catholic church to bully stalk On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 5:46:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Putin's Stooge"

SubjectAuthor
* Pope Francis-- Putin's Stooge no marble brain says Kibo Parry M theArchimedes Plutonium
`* STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and scienceDan Christensen
 `* Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and scienceMostowski Collapse
  `- Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and scienceMostowski Collapse

1
Pope Francis-- Putin's Stooge no marble brain says Kibo Parry M the 30 year nonstop bully-stalker who is likely paid for by the Catholic church to bully stalk On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 5:46:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Putin's Stooge"

<9e201c1a-ef54-4ae6-a8e9-eabc4bebc7c1n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=100175&group=sci.math#100175

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:54d:b0:2f3:ce29:234a with SMTP id m13-20020a05622a054d00b002f3ce29234amr13007821qtx.559.1652657634943;
Sun, 15 May 2022 16:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:541:0:b0:64d:2b8:9122 with SMTP id 62-20020a250541000000b0064d02b89122mr9678982ybf.545.1652657634786;
Sun, 15 May 2022 16:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 16:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:f:e15:0:0:0:4;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:f:e15:0:0:0:4
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9e201c1a-ef54-4ae6-a8e9-eabc4bebc7c1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Pope Francis-- Putin's Stooge no marble brain says Kibo Parry M the
30 year nonstop bully-stalker who is likely paid for by the Catholic church
to bully stalk On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 5:46:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney
wrote: >"Putin's Stooge"
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 23:33:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 13974
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Sun, 15 May 2022 23:33 UTC

Pope Francis Putin's Stooge no marble brain says Kibo Parry M the 30 year nonstop bully-stalker who is likely paid for by the Catholic church to bully stalk
On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 5:46:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"

Chancellor Gene Block you worked in biology, can you convey to Pope Francis a Zika pandemic of microbrains would ensue.

Kibo Parry M. describing Catholic church, Supreme Court as satanic, demonic, evil// While AP describes abortion in purely biological terms-- we need it for viral pandemics such as Zika, and now Covid-19.

Catholic church, Supreme Court as satanic, demonic, evil// While AP describes abortion in purely biological terms-- we need it for viral pandemics such as Zika, and now Covid-19.

Re: satanic MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math//Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science by Archimedes Plutonium
by Michael Moroney May 14, 2022, 11:46 AM

Re: demonic PHYSICSOPEDIA-- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics 1 view Skip to first unread message Subscribe  Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo Archimedes Plutonium 9:23 AM (6 hours ago)    to I say wonderful, for after cancer
by Michael Moroney May 14, 2022, 11:45 AM

Re: evil MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math//Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science by Archimedes Plutonium
by Michael Moroney May 14, 2022, 11:44 AM

Kibo Parry M on evil Pope Francis, head of Catholic church with Kibo Parry M 30 year nonstop stalking. As a Naval Officer I pledged to "not lie,cheat, or steal, and not tolerate those that do". In modern times with Internet and stalkers like Kibo...

Evil Neil Gorsuch so says the hate spew stalker Kibo Parry M with his 30 years of nonstop character assassination of AP doing science and math on Usenet. On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:44:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > AutisticPlutonium

Satanic Brett Kavanaugh so says the 30 year nonstop hate spew stalker Kibo Parry M and his hate channel from Boston, where you telephone in your hate spew to character assassinate AP for 30 years nonstop On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:46:50 AM UTC-5

Satanic Amy Coney Barrett so says the 30 year nonstop stalker channel of Kibo Parry M set up in 1993 to stalk and harass every post and thread of AP On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:46:50 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

Re: demonic MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium// Science &Technology Supreme Court involving science, not manmade laws but Natural laws of Science by Archimedes Plutonium
by Michael Moroney May 15, 2022, 12:32 AM
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
1:40 AM (7 minutes ago)



to
Chancellor Gene Block you worked in biology, can you convey to Pope Francis a Zika pandemic of microbrains would ensue.

UCLA,Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori,
UCLA, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. UCLA -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with__ hate-stalker criminals of Kibo Parry M. or Jan Burse or Dan Christensen or their dozen allies of hatred, only shows that UCLA is no longer in the business of science and truth, truthful education, but has gone corrupt.

Not much difference between the corrupt Donald Trump and his mindless "big lie" and UCLA with their mindless big lie of ellipse a conic section.

No point in asking anyone on UCLA professor staff of which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle, for bozo the clowns of science who cannot tell the difference between ellipse and oval, could never be worthy of the question of atom's true electron.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?


Click here to read the complete article
STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

<08cf00ed-d1c0-4ce4-9b6d-8538e612450en@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=100178&group=sci.math#100178

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5b96:0:b0:2f8:af64:a0bd with SMTP id a22-20020ac85b96000000b002f8af64a0bdmr2853875qta.463.1652666817584;
Sun, 15 May 2022 19:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:8cf:0:b0:2f4:da59:9eef with SMTP id
198-20020a8108cf000000b002f4da599eefmr17748270ywi.78.1652666817353; Sun, 15
May 2022 19:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 19:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9e201c1a-ef54-4ae6-a8e9-eabc4bebc7c1n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=163.182.226.42; posting-account=OWfgwwgAAADQpH2XgMDMe2wuQ7OFPXlE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.182.226.42
References: <9e201c1a-ef54-4ae6-a8e9-eabc4bebc7c1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <08cf00ed-d1c0-4ce4-9b6d-8538e612450en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science
From: Dan_Chri...@sympatico.ca (Dan Christensen)
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 02:06:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Dan Christensen - Mon, 16 May 2022 02:06 UTC

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 7:34:00 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium (AP) wrote:
> Pope Francis ...

When will you learn, Archie Poo?

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

<838f1f9b-b84f-4a32-a46a-80b23dd1282fn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=100258&group=sci.math#100258

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:528e:b0:45a:95ff:337f with SMTP id kj14-20020a056214528e00b0045a95ff337fmr17426241qvb.78.1652738265353;
Mon, 16 May 2022 14:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:994:0:b0:2ff:224e:1809 with SMTP id
142-20020a810994000000b002ff224e1809mr1944054ywj.368.1652738265171; Mon, 16
May 2022 14:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 14:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <08cf00ed-d1c0-4ce4-9b6d-8538e612450en@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <9e201c1a-ef54-4ae6-a8e9-eabc4bebc7c1n@googlegroups.com> <08cf00ed-d1c0-4ce4-9b6d-8538e612450en@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <838f1f9b-b84f-4a32-a46a-80b23dd1282fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 21:57:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2262
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Mon, 16 May 2022 21:57 UTC

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensens fake math
and science. This formula is also not provable from your axioms here:
https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm

~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(a)]]

On the same reason that your axioms are also satisfied
by Z, the set of positive and negative integers.

There is not a single axiom that would prevent interpreting
<n=N, +> as <n=Z, +> in your axioms. The other signs - and < are
anyway derived. Because of these many possible

interpretations, the above formula cannot be proved,
although it holds for the even natural numbers, but
it does not hold for the even positive and negative integers,

and since <n=Z, +> satisfies your axioms, the logic
will not decide in favor of one of the models, and leave
the formula unprovable. You can also view <n=Z, +>

as a counter model to the above formula.

Dan Christensen schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 04:07:02 UTC+2:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

<5c48a898-d6af-4db1-b369-897c53e1a36fn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=100260&group=sci.math#100260

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4208:0:b0:461:d262:7842 with SMTP id k8-20020ad44208000000b00461d2627842mr4330216qvp.113.1652738419082;
Mon, 16 May 2022 15:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:c0c6:0:b0:2ff:bb2:1065 with SMTP id
b189-20020a0dc0c6000000b002ff0bb21065mr5522241ywd.512.1652738418933; Mon, 16
May 2022 15:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 15:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <838f1f9b-b84f-4a32-a46a-80b23dd1282fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.57.53.70; posting-account=UjEXBwoAAAAOk5fiB8WdHvZddFg9nJ9r
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.57.53.70
References: <9e201c1a-ef54-4ae6-a8e9-eabc4bebc7c1n@googlegroups.com>
<08cf00ed-d1c0-4ce4-9b6d-8538e612450en@googlegroups.com> <838f1f9b-b84f-4a32-a46a-80b23dd1282fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5c48a898-d6af-4db1-b369-897c53e1a36fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science
From: burse...@gmail.com (Mostowski Collapse)
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 22:00:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2650
 by: Mostowski Collapse - Mon, 16 May 2022 22:00 UTC

Corr.: The unprovable formula, that is satisfied in N, is this here,
there was a slight typo in the second Even predicate occurence:

~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(b)]]

Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 23:57:50 UTC+2:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensens fake math
> and science. This formula is also not provable from your axioms here:
> https://dcproof.com/EvenNextOdd.htm
>
> ~ALL(a):[a e n & Even(a) => EXIST(b):[b e n & b < a & Even(a)]]
>
> On the same reason that your axioms are also satisfied
> by Z, the set of positive and negative integers.
>
> There is not a single axiom that would prevent interpreting
> <n=N, +> as <n=Z, +> in your axioms. The other signs - and < are
> anyway derived. Because of these many possible
>
> interpretations, the above formula cannot be proved,
> although it holds for the even natural numbers, but
> it does not hold for the even positive and negative integers,
>
> and since <n=Z, +> satisfies your axioms, the logic
> will not decide in favor of one of the models, and leave
> the formula unprovable. You can also view <n=Z, +>
>
> as a counter model to the above formula.
> Dan Christensen schrieb am Montag, 16. Mai 2022 um 04:07:02 UTC+2:
> > STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor