Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

You have junk mail.


tech / sci.math / Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th published book

SubjectAuthor
* Succulent & wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes ofArchimedes Plutonium
`* Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes andMichael Moroney
 +- Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes andHarry Soga
 `- Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes andArchimedes Plutonium

1
Succulent & wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th published book Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing//

<6e131a96-d762-4f9d-a8dc-df210a5a0dfan@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=100230&group=sci.math#100230

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:31a2:b0:6a0:1d82:8907 with SMTP id bi34-20020a05620a31a200b006a01d828907mr12787263qkb.408.1652716846218;
Mon, 16 May 2022 09:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:c884:0:b0:2f9:2a69:5b25 with SMTP id
k126-20020a0dc884000000b002f92a695b25mr20683658ywd.509.1652716845909; Mon, 16
May 2022 09:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 09:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=107.115.239.133; posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 107.115.239.133
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6e131a96-d762-4f9d-a8dc-df210a5a0dfan@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Succulent & wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of
Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th published
book Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to
prevent and combat stealing//
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:00:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Mon, 16 May 2022 16:00 UTC

Succulent & wonderful MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th published book Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing//

160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1155 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 70 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th published book

<t5ufrr$6ji$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=100248&group=sci.math#100248

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Uh3cGLv3BUP05xA/L7flqA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and
mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th
published book
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 17:31:48 -0400
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t5ufrr$6ji$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <6e131a96-d762-4f9d-a8dc-df210a5a0dfan@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="6770"; posting-host="Uh3cGLv3BUP05xA/L7flqA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.8.1
Content-Language: en-US
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Michael Moroney - Mon, 16 May 2022 21:31 UTC

🐒 of Math and 🦍 of Physics Archimedes "Meckling's Village Idiot"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
> by Archimedes Plutonium
>
1) Ludwig Poehlmann
2) Ludwig Hansen
3) Ludwig van Ludvig
4) Ludwig Plutonium
5) Archimedes Plutonium
6) Archimedes Plutonium
7) Archimedes Plutonium
....
82) Archimedes Plutonium

Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th published book

<t5ugls$97r$1@gioia.aioe.org>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=100255&group=sci.math#100255

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!Abxdy1V43JMQ8bktyRcaZA.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hrs...@syyayrss.yh (Harry Soga)
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and
mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th
published book
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 21:45:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <t5ugls$97r$1@gioia.aioe.org>
References: <6e131a96-d762-4f9d-a8dc-df210a5a0dfan@googlegroups.com>
<t5ufrr$6ji$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="9467"; posting-host="Abxdy1V43JMQ8bktyRcaZA.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
User-Agent: Chrome/82.0.3496.87 Mobile Safari/632.24
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
 by: Harry Soga - Mon, 16 May 2022 21:45 UTC

Michael Moroney wrote:

> 🐒 of Math and 🦍 of Physics Archimedes "Meckling's Village Idiot"
> Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics &
>> logic by Archimedes Plutonium
>>
> 1) Ludwig Poehlmann 2) Ludwig Hansen 3) Ludwig van Ludvig

Good point. Me too. Io sono communisto, and I'm proud of it.

Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th published book

<60026a1f-b4a6-4cd1-b3e3-dddc1a47bae3n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=100263&group=sci.math#100263

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:c86:b0:69f:c7cb:935a with SMTP id q6-20020a05620a0c8600b0069fc7cb935amr14246592qki.229.1652740277692;
Mon, 16 May 2022 15:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:70c3:0:b0:2fe:c68c:aa1d with SMTP id
l186-20020a8170c3000000b002fec68caa1dmr17004154ywc.431.1652740277480; Mon, 16
May 2022 15:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 15:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t5ufrr$6ji$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:387:f:5512:0:0:0:4;
posting-account=fsC03QkAAAAwkSNcSEKmlcR-W_HNitEd
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:387:f:5512:0:0:0:4
References: <6e131a96-d762-4f9d-a8dc-df210a5a0dfan@googlegroups.com> <t5ufrr$6ji$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <60026a1f-b4a6-4cd1-b3e3-dddc1a47bae3n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Devilish and nauseating MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and
mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic by Archimedes Plutonium // 88th
published book
From: plutoniu...@gmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 22:31:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Archimedes Plutonium - Mon, 16 May 2022 22:31 UTC

Kibo Parry M says 🐒 of Math Cynthia Larive, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz
_UC Riverside, why not admit the truth Oval is the slant cut in single cone, never the ellipse. John Baez certainly cannot admit the truth, for when confronted, the churly imp tried to get out of admitting the truth by saying the oval was a general ellipse as if those two were the same. I call this being dishonest in science and a churlish imp of science. UC Riverside -- __truth always wins__ and your actions of hiring or __complacent with__ hate-stalker criminals of Kibo Parry M. or Jan Burse or Dan Christensen or their dozen allies of hatred, only shows that UC Riverside is no longer in the business of science and truth but has gone corrupt.

On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 10:56:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"physics hater"
>"not one single marble of commonsense in my entire brain"

Not much difference between the corrupt Donald Trump and his mindless "big lie" and UC Riverside with their mindless big lie of ellipse a conic section.
>
>
> No point in asking any UC Riverside professor which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle when the bozo the clowns cannot even tell apart a ellipse from oval.
>
> 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> •
> •
>
> Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
>
> Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
>
> In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.
>
> Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
> • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
> #11-2, 11th published book
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis".. And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
>
> To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
>
>
> UC Riverside-- why not tell the truth of science instead of being complacent or hiring a moron paid for hate-stalker like Kibo Parry M. You must know, truth always wins.

> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 4:59:49 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >why do you have to be such a crybaby about the ellipse being a conic
> > section?

>

UC Riverside Math Dept, provost: Cynthia Larive- chemist,
Mark Alber, John Baez, Mei-Chu Chang, Vyjayanthi Chari, Kevin Costello, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz, Jacob Greenstein, Jose Gonzalez, Zhuang-dan Guan, Jim Kelliher, Sara Lapan, Michel Lapidus, Carl Mautner, Amir Moradifam, Yat Sun Poon, Ziv Ran, David Rush, Reinhard Schultz, Stefano Vidussi, David Weisbart, Fred Wilhelm, Bun Wong, Yulong Xing, Feng Xu, Qi Zhang

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor