On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 14:52:47 -0700 (PDT), Amine Moulay Ramdane
<aminer68@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Hello,
>
>
>
>More of my philosophy about the jews and about arabs more of my thoughts..
>
>I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
>invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
>
>
>I think i am highly smart, and i have just looked at the following
>video of a black american thinker that is talking about Israel, i invite
>you to look at it:
>
>Cornel West on the complicity of US media in Israeli crimes
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW5WHzcSack
>
>And i have just looked at the following video of how look
>like jews of Israel:
>
>Jewish Life and Learning at Carmel School
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8k7oj90c1s
>
>
>So i think that the black american thinker on the above video
>is not understanding correctly the problematic of jews or arabs, since from the above videos of the jews , i think that the problematic of jews is that they are like "ugly" and they are viewed as ugly and there character is more "ugly", but the western white europeans or black africans or indians or chinese are much more beautiful than jews or arabs, so i think that it is why jews were persecuted by Hitler since they were viewed as "ugly", like arabs are viewed as ugly, and it is why the jews have needed so much a country that is called Israel, but the jews were and are smart, since they have understood this problematic of them being ugly and they have started to be much more educated and much more disciplined so that to be much more smart, and it is why Israel has been and is economically and democratically much more successful than most arab countries.
>
>More of my philosophy about who are white people and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart, and i think that white supremacists and
>neo-nazis define true white people as having blue eyes and having blonde hairs, but i think that it is a big mistake, since look at the following
>webpage of the presidents of united states and you will notice
>that even the white president Ronald Reagan had brown eyes and dark brown hair, and many other white presidents of united states had brown eyes and brown hair, look in the following webpage so that to notice it:
>
>https://list.fandom.com/wiki/United_States_presidents_by_hair_and_eye_color
>
>I am too a "white" arab that has brown eyes and i think i am smart and i am white and it is why i have invented quickly many poems of Love and poems and posted them here, and i have invented quickly many proverbs and posted them here and i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented my thoughts of my philosophy and i have posted them here, and you can take a look at my photo that i have just put here in my website(I am 53 years old):
>
>https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem
>
>
>Also you can read my poems of Love and poems that i have invented
>quickly here in the following web link:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/DkxcwNilFjo
>
>
>More of my philosophy about the welfare and about capitalism and more of my thoughts..
>
>I have just read again the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:
>
>
>Why Capitalism Fails
>
>
>https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/
>
>
>And i am not in accordance with the white supremacist views about capitalism on the above webpage, since they are too much pessimistic about capitalism, since i say that we have to be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, also i am talking below about Progressive Capitalism that explains how to reform capitalism so that to be efficient, and i am not in accordance with the above white supremacist view about the welfare since i think it is too much strict, since i think we need a level of welfare and here is how i am explaining it:
>
>And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
>so i will first ask a philosophical question of:
>
>Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?
>
>I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
>we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
>Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
>logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic
>contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and
>Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
>camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
>comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
>smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
>characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
>this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
>this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
>more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
>competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
>the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
>good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
>efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
>"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
>have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
>resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
>we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
>since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social
>Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
>members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
>we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
>competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
>of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
>society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
>congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
>contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
>the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
>party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
>civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
>so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.
>
>More of my philosophy about white supremacism and about Hitler and about neo-nazism and more of my thoughts..
>
>
>I have just looked at the quotes of Hitler here:
>
>https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/30691.Adolf_Hitler
>
>And notice that he says the following:
>
>“The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature. Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel, and if he does so it is merely because he is of a feebler nature and narrower mind; for if such a law did not direct the process of evolution then the higher development of organic life would not be conceivable at all.”
>? Adolf Hitler
>
>
>But i think this strictness of Hitler is not correct, since he was
>not understanding the disadvantage of when the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover step, since this kind of Elitism in a genetic algorithm can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the population, and you can read more about my below thoughts about the genetic algorithm.
>
>Also Hitler says the following:
>
>“Humanitarianism is the expression of stupidity and cowardice.”
>? Adolf Hitler
>
>So i think that this strictness of Hitler is not correct,
>since we need a level of humanitarianism that also soften morals
>and that makes us less violent.
>
>
>So i think that Hitler is too much strict and too much violent.
>
>
>And now more of my thoughts about capitalism and about National Vanguard..
>
>
>I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:
>
>
>Why Capitalism Fails
>
>
>https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/
>
>
>And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:
>
>
>"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."
>
>
>I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there
>best with there smartness (so that to become rich).
>
>
>And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".
>
>
>And the above article is saying the following:
>
>
>"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."
>
>
>I think it is not true, because read the following:
>
>
>https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/
>
>
>And read the following:
>
>
>Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation:
>
>
>Following are some of the advantages of automation:
>
>
>1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
>the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
>thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.
>
>
>2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
>there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
>production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.
>
>
>3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
>has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
>conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
>be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated
>mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
>examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
>significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
>TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).
>
>
>4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment
>opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
>as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
>Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
>These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
>companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
>needed to use and operate the computers.
>
>
>5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
>through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of
>production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage
>increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
>will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
>increase productivity.
>
>
>More of my philosophy about neo-nazism and white supremacism and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
>video that speaks about how thinks white supremacism and neo-nazism,
>so i invite you to look at it:
>
>Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race: War Against the Weak (2003)
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfPTaBlheGA&t=2557s
>
>
>So i think i am highly smart and i think the best way to answer white
>supremacism and neo-nazism , it is that white supremacism and neo-nazism
>wants to "unite" especially western white europeans and they want to
>destroy or exterminate the others, but this way of thinking is too simplistic, since western white europeans wants also to decentralize and diversify correctly since the being unity under the white supremacism or neo-nazism as systems is not so efficient and it can hurt the system since it is not decentralized and diversified correctly, since it is also like when you say arabs, there is a diversity of views or political views and diversity of genetics of arabs, so you have to know how to "decentralize" and "manage" this diversity so that to be efficient, and of course genetic diversity is also necessary for our world so that to be efficient, so it is why i think we need this genetic diversity of arabs and white europeans etc.
>
>More of my philosophy about materialism and about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville and more of my thoughts..
>
>I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
>invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
>
>
>I think i am highly smart, and i have just taken a look at the
>following web page about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville
>that studied in the École Normale Supérieure and earned a PhD from Panthéon-Sorbonne University:
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_Comte-Sponville
>
>So look carefully at the above web page about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville, and notice that he says that he is a proponent of atheism and materialism, but i think i am not like him, since i say
>that an idea can has an existence in our minds even if it doesn't exist in the reality, i mean for example we can imagine an
>abstract object like a circle into our mind that doesn't exist
>in reality, and then we can say that so that to not be an extremist
>we can say that the fact that an idea can exist in our mind and not exist in reality is a like a logical proof that an idea can has its proper existence even if it depends and it needs materialism. Also the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville is making the same mistake as the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in the following video by saying that human life oscillates between boredom and suffering, and he has also explained it by the fact that when you desire and you are lacking what you want that means you become suffering, and when you have what you are missing you become bored, so look carefully at the following video so that to notice it:
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcNt-r7LDi0
>
>More of my philosophy about the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and about the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..
>
>Today i will talk more about the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and
>about the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts:
>
>
>And here is my new proverb:
>
>
>"When you don't know how to nuance, that's also where the problems begin"
>
>"Quand on ne sait pas nuancer, c'est là aussi que commencent les problèmes"
>
>
>The philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer has said that human life oscillates between boredom and suffering, and he has also explained it by the fact that when you desire and you are lacking what you want that means you become suffering, and when you have what you are missing you become bored, but i think that like in my above new proverb i say that the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer was lacking on knowing how to nuance correctly, since lacking what you want doesn't mean that you are suffering and when you have what you are missing doesn't mean that you are bored. And by logical analogy even the philosopher Albert Camus was lacking on knowing how to nuance correctly, since he has said that when you look at how we are working 8 hours a day or so and when you look how our universe is like meaningless since the absurd is produced via conflict, a conflict between our expectation of a rational, just universe and the actual universe that it is quite indifferent to all of our expectations, so
>then the philosopher Albert Camus says that it like render your life meaningless , but here again working in a job doesn't mean that you are suffering or suffering so much by working in this job and read my below thoughts so that to understand the rest, so i think that the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and the philosopher Albert Camus were too pessimistic, and here is more of my thoughts about existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus:
>
>More of my philosophy about existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart, and i think that existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus is an open problem, since you can notice that
>the philosopher doesn't say how to construct the meaning and
>purpose of human life, and notice how the philosopher Albert Camus says that human life is, objectively speaking, meaningless, since according to Camus, the absurd is produced via conflict, a conflict between our expectation of a rational, just universe and the actual universe that it is quite indifferent to all of our expectations, but i think that Albert Camus was not so right, since i say that the meaning and purpose of human existence of life can be "constructed" as i am doing it below, and i also think that the most important part of my philosophy are the engines that permits you to be self-confidence and that permits you to be a kind of hope and positive energy, but i will now bring more precision to how i am defining the meaning and purpose of human life, so i say that i think that the meaning and the purpose of human existence is to play it smartly, since you have to play it smartly like in a game of chess, i don't mean that we have to be violent, but we have to be this
>satisfaction of playing it smartly as an individual and as a group and as a world, so i think it is how i am doing it, i am playing it smartly so that to also get the satisfaction of playing it smartly, and this satisfaction of playing it smartly is my engine, and i think it is a good purpose and a good meaning of human existence. But notice carefully that in a game of chess there is a winner and there is a loser, but the loser has to play it smartly too so that to "win" the satisfaction of playing it smartly that becomes his engine that pushes him forward with a kind self-confidence and hope, and it is how we have to become smart by playing it smartly so that to get the satisfaction of playing it smartly even if humanity is not able to be successful. So as you notice the how i am constructing the meaning and purpose of human life, that looks by logical analogy, like my following proverb that i am also explaining, since the satisfaction of playing it smartly is the engine even if
>you fail to be successful, this engine of satisfaction of playing it smartly permits you to be self-confidence and hope by continuing to playing it smartly, and notice that the playing smartly in my thoughts is not that it is that you have to have a high IQ, since the playing smartly is also defined by morality that takes into account the societal smartness and not only individual smartness. So here is my new proverb and notice the logical analogy that i am talking about:
>
>"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
>path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
>flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
>have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
>life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
>through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
>learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
>think this conception of life makes you more positive."
>
>And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:
>
>"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
>dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
>chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
>plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
>d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
>ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la
>traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
>et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
>utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."
>
>So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
>trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for
>success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
>and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or
>advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
>even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
>life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
>the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
>global world"
>
>And read the following part of my philosophy in the following web link about self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM
>
>
>More of my philosophy about the simplistic language and more of my thoughts..
>
>
>I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just spoken below about the technical language, and i invite you to look carefully at the following short video of a simplistic language that works in a really useful way:
>
>Spreading the joy of laughter on a train
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydAyvvDQrgY
>
>
>More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Morocco and more of my thoughts..
>
>
>I think i am highly smart, and as you have noticed i am a moroccan that lives in Canada since year 1989, but i will speak more about Morocco my country, so i think that Morocco is a beautiful country, and i think Morocco's debt-to-GDP is not so bad, but i think that so that to enhance much more its economy, Morocco has to do the following:
>
>Morocco is a relatively small internal market, so i think that it has
>to enlarge its market by being high economic "integration" with the other Maghrebis or Maghrebians countries such as Algeria etc. and it has to higher productivity so that to also attract much more efficiently Foreign Direct Investments, and it has to easy much more the administrative burdens that slow down business activities, other than that i think we can be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, also read my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand more my views:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/sw5EarahFo8
>
>
>Also read my following thoughts:
>
>
>More of my philosophy about abstraction and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart and now i will ask an important philosophical question of:
>
>Does the level of abstraction that we use by using a language like english or french or arabic is sufficient and efficient ?
>
>So i think the languages like english and french and arabic are languages that "abstract" the reality of the existence, so they are not
>precise languages that describe reality, but i am smart and i say
>that those languages, like english and french and arabic, have there deficiencies, since they can not describe the technical or scientific thoughts in a more precise and more technical manner , so then the languages like english and french and arabic are not sufficient and are not efficient at expressing those kind of technical or scientific thoughts, this is why we are for example using software programming languages that can be described as technical languages since i say that they describe the thoughts of humans that are more precise and more technical than non-technical or non-scientific thoughts, so i think i am smart and i will say that when you do software programming it is that you describe technical thoughts in a much more precise and technical manner, this is why i say that software programming learns us to be more disciplined and more precise and more technical, since for example a cosine or a sine or other trigonometric functions are part of a technical language that
we
>find in technical languages like software programming languages, but they were added late after to the english dictionary, but notice that they are not part of the english language, and look for example a computer programming register that we use in software programming, notice that is part of technical language and it is not the english language, so look carefully at my following thoughts that i have thought quickly about more of my philosophy about stack memory allocations and about preemptive and non-preemptive timesharing, and notice how i am using both the english language and the technical language so that to be much more precise and technical:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w
>
>More of my philosophy about Germany and the debt-to-GDP ratio and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
>numbers about the budget balance of Germany in around year 2029 so that to compare it with the numbers of Canada below, and here it is:
>
>https://www.statista.com/statistics/624187/germany-budget-balance-in-relation-to-gdp/
>
>So then in around year 2029, Germany, like Canada, will have balanced the Budget, so i think it is good for both Germany and Canada.
>
>And for the debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany, look at it here:
>
>https://www.statista.com/statistics/624193/national-debt-of-germany-in-relation-to-gross-domestic-product-gdp/
>
>So i think the debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany will be in year 2029 at around 40%, and it is around the same number as for Canada, so i think that both Germany and Canada are in a good shape in there debt-to-GDP ratio and the balance of the budget. And as i just said that when government debt-to-GDP exceeds 85%, future economic growth is reduced.
>
>And read my previous thoughts:
>
>Germany: Budget balance between 2017 to 2027 in relation to GDP
>
>More of my philosophy about the debt-to-GDP ratio and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think from the following article that when government debt-to-GDP exceeds 85%, future economic growth is reduced. And the current debt-to-GDP ratio of USA is 127%, which is expected to rise to 277% by 2029, so i think USA is not in a good shape in its debt-to-GDP and i think it will not even balance the budget in 2029 and it is not good, and you can read the following article so that to understand it:
>
>https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2021/05/03/us-national-debt-expected-to-approach-89-trillion-by-2029/?sh=305152295f13
>
>But Canada is in a much better shape in its debt-to-GDP ratio, since its debt-to-GDP will be around 40% in 2029, and Canada will be able to balance the budget in around year 2029, so i think Canada will be in a much better shape in its financial budget and in debt-to-GDP than USA, so i invite you to read the following article so that to notice it:
>
>https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/budget-2022-unveils-billions-in-targeted-new-spending-deficit-projected-at-52-8b-1.5852813
>
>
>Other than that i will talk more about the human identity, so what
>do you think is my human identity? so i think that my human
>identity comes from my playing it smartly as i am explaining above,
>since look at how i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms , and look at how i have invented quickly many proverbs
>and look at how i have invented quickly many poems of Love and poems,
>and look at how i have invented my thoughts of my philosophy, so
>my being this creative and inventive is what makes my human identity.
>
>More of my philosophy about the higher purpose and meaning and more of my thoughts..
>
>I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look
>at it:
>
>Meaning without Higher Meaning - Existentialism
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaAiHwjDAH4
>
>
>Here is my new proverb:
>
>
>"There one type of smartness that is interesting to look at,
>and it is also the one that i have just used by explaining to you what is the truth, read it carefully below, and i will call it smartness of the being "resourceful", since i say that resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill, and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the jobs for you"
>
>
>And read my previous thoughts:
>
>
>More of my philosophy about mathematics and more of my thoughts..
>
>
>I think i am highly smart, and i think that in the truth what is so important is the general rule that i am talking about in my below thoughts below, and it is from where comes the truth, since we can also say that we need the truth since we also exist as humans and consciousness of humans, so it is why we have to make it clear that the general rule that i am talking about is the from where comes the truth, so then i can logically infer that this general rule can be used again and again so that to logically infer the truth, and it is in accordance with the general rule, so then we have to distinguish between the
>truth and the reality of the existence, since being truth is not being reality of the existence, since we can use a general rule that is based on the theoretical that doesn't exist, but i think that the general rule can be based on the reality of the existence, so then from the characteristics that are realistic of the ingredients of general rule you can logically infer some rules that are useful for the reality of the existence, and i think that it is how works mathematics, since for example when you work in topology in mathematics,
>a point is also a concept defined by characteristics that are also reality of the existence, so from a point you can generate a 2d or a 3d object, so then the result of it can still have characteristics that are realistic.
>
>Read my previously thoughts:
>
>More of my philosophy about the Islamic philosophy and more of my thoughts..
>I think i am highly smart and i have just taken a look at the Islamic philosophy here:
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_philosophy
>
>And notice what it is saying about the "truth" in Islamic philosophy:
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_philosophy#Truth
>
>So it for example says the following:
>
>"In his Quodlibeta, Thomas Aquinas wrote a commentary on Avicenna's definition of truth in his Metaphysics and explained it as follows:
>
>The truth of each thing, as Avicenna says in his Metaphysica, is nothing else than the property of its being which has been established in it. So that is called true gold which has properly the being of gold and attains to the established determinations of the nature of gold. Now, each thing has properly being in some nature because it stands under the complete form proper to that nature, whereby being and species in that nature is.[30]"
>
>
>But i think i am highly smart, and i have just thought rapidly of what is the "truth", and here is what i say:
>
>I think the truth needs like a general rule from where you logically infer, and the general rule is like a theorem in mathematics, so i give
>you an example so that you understand my views:
>
>So when i say:
>
>This table in front of us is truth, what does it means ?
>
>So i think that the language of humans is composed of abstractions,
>and the table is also an "abstraction" as a "concept", so i think
>that when we say the table is truth we have to follow like a logical path, in form of a rule, of explaining it, so then we can say that the
>table is truth is decomposed in the following rule:
>
>First we have to say that the "table" is a concept, so "then" is this
>table in front of us correspond to a concept, so we have to
>follow the following rule:
>
>If the table in front of us is truth, so it has to correspond
>to the concept of a table, so we have to "verify" if its existence
>has the characteristics of the concept of the table.
>
>So as you notice that we have to follow like a general rule that
>looks like a theorem in mathematics and that permits us to say if it is the truth. And i think all the possibilities of the being truth have to follow the same general rule of decomposing into a form like of theorem in mathematics so that to prove that it is like logically consistent
>and that makes the truth or not. And of course when we make
>logical proofs, you will notice that we are using rules with Logical implication and that permits also to logically infer and validate the logical proofs such as:
>
>(p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p))
>
>or
>
>(not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p
>
>Note that p and q are logical variables.
>
>
>So then notice that even this possibility adheres to the general rule that i am speaking about.
>
>And I have also searched more on internet the most precise and correct Gödel's First incompleteness theorem, and here it is:
>
>"Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e., there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F"
>
>And in mathematics, a statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false but not both. A statement is sometimes called a proposition. The key is that there must be no ambiguity. To be a statement, a sentence "must" be true or false, and it cannot be both.
>
>So that means that we know that the statement is true or false but it can not be proven true or false, so we then logically infer that
>we can not prove the consistency of the system , so the statement can be that it is like an axiom in mathematics that is true but that we can not prove by such logical inference or deduction, so then the system
>remains really useful even if it's incomplete by Gödel's incompleteness theorems, so i think that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are not so problematic.
>
>More of my philosophy about the exponential progress and about capitalism and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart, and of course i have to talk more about why i am optimistic about capitalism, and here is why , read the following thoughts about the Ramez Naam’s new book so that to understand:
>
>
>The Limits of the Earth, Part 1: Problems
>
>"In my own new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet, I challenge this view. The problem isn’t economic growth, per se. Nor is the problem that our natural resources are too small. While finite, the natural resources the planet supplies are vast and far larger than humanity needs in order to continue to thrive and grow prosperity for centuries to come. The problem, rather, is the types of resources we access, and the manner and efficiency with which we use them.
>
>And the ultimate solution to those problems is innovation – innovation in the science and technology that we use to tap into physical resources, and innovation in the economic system that steers our consumption.
>
>The situation we’re in isn’t a looming wall that we’re doomed to crash into. It’s a race – a race between depletion and pollution of natural resources on one side, and our pace of innovation on the other."
>
>Read more here:
>
>https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-limits-of-the-earth-part-1-problems/
>
>And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee
>of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
>where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
>exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
>humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
>faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:
>
>Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ
>
>
>And you can read my thoughts about artificial intelligence and productivity and about China and its artificial intelligence and computer chips in the following web link:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/UOt_4qTgN8M
>
>And you can read my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about
>Exponential Progress in the following web link:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
>
>
>More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..
>
>The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so notice carefully
>that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities
>that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
>my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive capitalism, so read my below thoughts carefully so that to understand:
>
>
>And I have just looked at many videos on youtube of Joseph Stiglitz and
>i have just understood him well, but i have just quickly found the following interesting video of him that explains well the reforms that we need so that to be progressive capitalism, and he is saying in this video that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his
>progressive capitalism and i think that he is a democrat, so i
>invite you to look at his following interesting video so that
>to understand:
>
>Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profit | Munich Security Conference 2020
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sym4UZOjhJc
>
>
>And more precision about more of my philosophy about progressive capitalism..
>
>I invite you again to look at the following interesting video of Joseph E. Stiglitz that speaks about some thoughts of his interesting book “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”:
>
>Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJksgMIDdI
>
>
>And read his following interesting article in The New York Times so that
>to understand:
>
>Joseph E. Stiglitz is a university professor at Columbia, the 2001 recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a former chief economist of the World Bank and the author, most recently, of “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”, and i invite you to read his following interesting article in The New York Times:
>
>Progressive capitalism is not an oxymoron
>
>Read more here:
>
>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opinion/sunday/progressive-capitalism.html
>
>More of my philosophy about my kind of personality and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart, but i will ask a philosophical question of:
>
>
>How can i explain my kind of personality ?
>
>I think i am like an inventor or creator, since if you look at my below thoughts you will notice that what i like most is inventing thoughts and
>inventing algorithms and inventing a philosophy and inventing poems of Love and poems and inventing proverbs, so as you have just noticed it is
>what i am doing in front of you, so my way of doing is mostly
>about being creative and inventive that permits me to adapt
>efficiently, so look for example how i have quickly invented my following algorithms here as a logical proof of what i am saying to you:
>
>Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references
>
>https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
>
>New variants of Scalable RWLocks
>
>https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/new-variants-of-scalable-rwlocks
>
>Scalable lock that is FIFO fair and starvation-free
>
>https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock
>
>And i have also invented many other algorithms too..
>
>
>And look at my following thoughts so that you notice that
>it is the same pattern, i mean that i am the being inventive and creative:
>
>More of my philosophy about my kind of methodology of learning and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart, and i will explain to you my kind of way of learning much more clearly:
>
>I don't learn like you are learning, since i have to understand
>the architectural ideas more clearly, by inventing them and/or understanding them much more clearly, and after that, i think that
>this gives a form to a high level of intelligence that permits me to understand rapidly and efficiently, so i give you an example, so i have invented many architectural ideas that have given form to my philosophy as a high level intelligence , and this has allowed me to make you understand more the weaknesses of the philosophies of other philosophers, so i am doing it this way for genetic algorithms(read my thoughts about it below) etc., so i give you an example, so read my following thoughts in the following web link that i have rapidly invented, and you will notice how i am doing it by reading them carefully and by noticing my kind of personality, so here is a part of my philosophy about self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM
>
>
>And look here in my following tutorial about Petri Nets how i have invented a methodology as also architectural ideas that permit to rapidly model parallel applications from the logical operators IF and THEN and OR and AND into a Petri Net model, so look at it carefully in my tutorial here , since i think it is interesting too:
>
>https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/how-to-analyse-parallel-applications-with-petri-nets
>
>More of my philosophy about the the importance of randomness in
>the genetic algorithm and in the evolutionary algorithms and more
>of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart, and i will invite you to read my following
>smart thoughts about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that you notice how i am talking about the so important thing that we call "randomness":
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
>
>
>So i think i am highly smart, and notice that i am saying in the above web link the following about evolutionary algorithms:
>
>"I think that Modern trends in solving tough optimization problems tend
>to use evolutionary algorithms and nature-inspired metaheuristic
>algorithms, especially those based on swarm intelligence (SI), two major
>characteristics of modern metaheuristic methods are nature-inspired, and
>a balance between randomness and regularity."
>
>So i think that in the genetic algorithm, there is a part that is hard coded, like selecting the best genes, and i think that it is what
>we call regularity, since it is hard coded like that, but there is
>a so important thing in the genetic algorithm that we call randomness,
>and i think that it is the genetic mutations that happen with a
>probability and that give a kind of diversity, so i think that this
>genetic mutations are really important, since i can for example
>say that if the best genes are the ones that use "reason", so then reason too can make the people that has the tendency to use reason do
>a thing that is against there survival, like going to war when we
>feel that there is too much risk, but this going to war can make
>the members or people that use reason so that to attack the other enemy
>be extinct in a war when they loose a war, and it is the basis of randomness in a genetic algorithm, since even when there is a war
>between for example two Ant colonies, there are some members that do not make war and that can survive if other are extinct by making war, and i say it also comes from randomness of the genetics.
>
>More of my philosophy about the other conditions of the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
>.
>I think i am highly smart, and i think that the genetic algorithm
>is interesting too, but i have to speak about one other most important thing about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask a philosophical question about it:
>
>Since as i just said previously, read it below, that a good genetic algorithm has to efficiently balance between global(exploration) and local(exploitation) search , but how can you be sure that you have found a global optimum ?
>
>I think i am smart, and i will say that it also depends on the kind of problem, so if for example we have a minimization problem, you can
>rerun a number of times the genetic algorithm so that to select the best minimum among all the results and you can also give more time to
>the exploration so that to find the a better result, also you have to know that the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover steps, but i think that this kind of Elitism can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the population, so then it depends on wich problem you want to use the genetic algorithm, also i think that the genetic algorithm is
>a model that explains from where comes humans, since i also think
>that the genetic mutations of humans, that happens with a probability, has also not only come from the inside body from the chromosomes and genes, but they also were the result of solar storms that, as has said NASA, that may have been key to life on Earth, read here so that to notice it:
>
>https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/nasa-solar-storms-may-have-been-key-to-life-on-earth
>
>Read my previous thoughts:
>
>More of my philosophy about the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just talked yesterday about the distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, and i invite you to read it in my below thoughts, and today i will invent more of my thoughts about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask the following philosophical question about the genetic algorithm:
>
>Is the genetic algorithm a brute-force search and if it is
>not, how is it different than the brute-force search ?
>
>so i have just quickly took a look at some example of a minimization problem with a genetic algorithm, and i think that the genetic algorithm is not a brute-force search, since i think that when in a minimization
>problem with a genetic algorithm you do a crossover, also called recombination, that is a genetic operator used to combine the genetic information of two parents to generate new offspring, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to also explore locally and we call it exploitation, and when the genetic algorithm does genetical mutations
>with a level of probability, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to explore globally and we call it exploration, so i think a good genetic algorithm is the one that balance efficiently exploration and exploitation so that to avoid premature convergence, and
>notice that when you explore locally and globally you can do it with
>a bigger population that makes it search faster, so it is is why i think
>the genetic algorithm has this kind of patterns that makes it a much better search than brute-force search. And so that to know more about this kind of artificial intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that to understand more:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
>
>
>More of my philosophy about the analytic queueing-circuit analyzer PDQ and more of my thoughts..
>
>I think i am highly smart, since i have also passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so as you have just noticed i have just talked about timesharing and coroutines in the following link:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/tN_O-AgkGjY
>
>And i have just talked about Markov chains in mathematics and about Petri Nets here:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/LPE4zR-BqHY
>
>Now i will talk about my PDQ for Delphi and Freepascal:
>
>This is a port by Amine Moulay Ramdane of PDQ version 6.2.0 to Delphi
>on Windows and to Freepascal on both Windows and Linux, i have also provided you with two demos, one queuing MM1 demo, and another Jackson network demo. Also i have provided you with my HTML tutorial on how to solve analytically the Jackson network problem provided to you as a PDQ demo.
>
>PDQ is an analytic queueing-circuit analyzer made freely available under MIT/X11 license from: http://www.perfdynamics.com/Tools/PDQ.html
>
>You can download it from my website here:
>
>https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pdq-for-delphi-and-freepascal
>
>And here is an example in Delphi and Freepascal of the Jackson network demo that i have included inside the zip file(and you can look
>at my mathematical modeling of it here in my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem):
>
>---
>
>program test_network;
>
>
>uses pdq64,LinSys;
>
>
>type router1 = array of pansichar;
> servTime1 = array of double;
> visitRatios1 = array of double;
> serviceDemands1 = array of double;
>var
>
>A, b, x : TMatrix;
>arrivRate:double;
>work:pansichar;
>router:router1;
>servTime:servTime1;
>visitRatios:visitRatios1;
>serviceDemands:serviceDemands1;
>i:integer;
>
>begin
>
>setlength(router,3);
>setlength(servTime,3);
>setlength(visitRatios,3);
>setlength(serviceDemands,3);
>
>
>arrivRate := 0.50;
>work:='Traffic';
>
>router[0]:='Router1';
>router[1]:='Router2';
>router[2]:='Router3';
>
>servTime[0]:=1.0;
>servTime[1]:=2.0;
>servTime[2]:=1.0;
>
>A := TMatrix.Create (3,3);
>b := TMatrix.Create (3,1);
>x := TMatrix.Create (3,1);
>
>A[1,1] := 1.0; A[1,2] := 0.0; A[1,3] := -0.2;
>A[2,1] := -0.5; A[2,2] := 1.0; A[2,3] := 0.0;
>A[3,1] := -0.5; A[3,2] := -0.8; A[3,3] := 1.0;
>
>b[1,1] := 0.5; b[2,1] := 0.0; b[3,1] := 0.0;
>
>LinSys.gauss(A, b, x);
>
>visitRatios[0]:=x[1,1]/arrivRate;
>visitRatios[1]:=x[2,1]/arrivRate;
>visitRatios[2]:=x[3,1]/arrivRate;
>
>serviceDemands[0]:=visitRatios[0]*servTime[0];
>serviceDemands[1]:=visitRatios[1]*servTime[1];
>serviceDemands[2]:=visitRatios[2]*servTime[2];
>
>pdq64.PDQ_Init('Delphi Network in PDQ');
>
>pdq64.PDQ_CreateOpen(work,arrivRate);
>
>pdq64.PDQ_SetWUnit('Msgs');
>pdq64.PDQ_SetTUnit('Time');
>
>
>for i:=0 to 2
>do
> begin
> pdq64.PDQ_CreateNode(router[i],pdq64.CEN,pdq64.FCFS);
> pdq64.PDQ_SetDemand(router[i],work,serviceDemands[i]);
> end;
>
>pdq64.PDQ_Solve(pdq64.CANON);
>pdq64.PDQ_Report();
>
>setlength(router,0);
>setlength(servTime,0);
>setlength(visitRatios,0);
>setlength(serviceDemands,0);
>
>A.free;
>b.free;
>x.free;
>
>
>end.
>
>---
>
>
>
>And i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:
>
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/sw5EarahFo8
>
>
>
>
>Thank you,
>Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>