Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

* UNIX is a Trademark of Bell Laboratories.


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Testing Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is like Testing 2+2=5

SubjectAuthor
* Testing Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is like Testing 2+2=5Pentcho Valev
`- Re: Testing Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is like Testing 2+2=5Pentcho Valev

1
Testing Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is like Testing 2+2=5

<2dcfe67f-0c6f-4b4b-affc-2a95bc5ffe5dn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=103630&group=sci.physics.relativity#103630

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1432:b0:702:4c36:2821 with SMTP id k18-20020a05620a143200b007024c362821mr1458939qkj.55.1672451582995;
Fri, 30 Dec 2022 17:53:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:77da:0:b0:670:86a4:463 with SMTP id
w26-20020a9d77da000000b0067086a40463mr2013167otl.14.1672451582709; Fri, 30
Dec 2022 17:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 17:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.27.150.145; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.27.150.145
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2dcfe67f-0c6f-4b4b-affc-2a95bc5ffe5dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Testing Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is like Testing 2+2=5
From: pva...@yahoo.com (Pentcho Valev)
Injection-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 01:53:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1897
 by: Pentcho Valev - Sat, 31 Dec 2022 01:53 UTC

"Doppler effect -- when an observer moves toward a stationary source" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

"Vo is the velocity of an observer moving towards the source. This velocity is independent of the motion of the source. Hence, the velocity of waves relative to the observer is c + Vo. [...] The motion of an observer does not alter the wavelength. The increase in frequency is a result of the observer encountering more wavelengths in a given time." http://a-levelphysicstutor.com/wav-doppler.php

So the speed of light relative to the moving observer is c'=c+Vo, and this is more than obvious. How can one test the obviously absurd alternative, c'=c (constant speed of light), postulated by Einstein's relativity?

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Re: Testing Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is like Testing 2+2=5

<3cb25b7e-2703-470c-93b2-2794bd9688d7n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=103653&group=sci.physics.relativity#103653

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7245:0:b0:39c:df33:c189 with SMTP id l5-20020ac87245000000b0039cdf33c189mr1673051qtp.498.1672491415171;
Sat, 31 Dec 2022 04:56:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:83:b0:35b:d4df:a5e0 with SMTP id
s3-20020a056808008300b0035bd4dfa5e0mr1507952oic.88.1672491414803; Sat, 31 Dec
2022 04:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 04:56:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2dcfe67f-0c6f-4b4b-affc-2a95bc5ffe5dn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.27.150.145; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.27.150.145
References: <2dcfe67f-0c6f-4b4b-affc-2a95bc5ffe5dn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3cb25b7e-2703-470c-93b2-2794bd9688d7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Testing Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is like Testing 2+2=5
From: pva...@yahoo.com (Pentcho Valev)
Injection-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 12:56:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2619
 by: Pentcho Valev - Sat, 31 Dec 2022 12:56 UTC

In a sane science, the Doppler effect (moving observer: https://www.youtube..com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE) would be regarded as a confirmation of two obvious facts:

1. The speed of the light pulses relative to the moving observer is c'=c+v, where v is the speed of the observer relative to the source.

2. The frequency at the moving observer is f'=c'/d, where d is the distance between subsequent light pulses.

In post-sanity (Einsteinian) science the result f'=c'/d is demonstrated explicitly but the result c'=c+v is always implicit when Doppler in LIGHT is discussed, camouflaged additionally by the so-called relativistic corrections.

Example: In explaining the Doppler effect (moving observer), at 6:09 in this video

https://youtu.be/MBuLTzj3CWA?t=369

Brian Greene derives the formula

𝛎_obs = 1/Δt' = γ(c-v)/λ

where 𝛎_obs is the frequency measured by the moving observer, γ is the Lorentz factor, c is the speed of the light relative to the stationary source, v is the speed at which the observer moves away from the source, and λ is the wavelength.

Accordingly, the speed of the light waves relative to the moving observer is

c' = λ(𝛎_obs) = γ(c-v),

in violation of Einstein's relativity.

More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Testing Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is like Testing 2+2=5

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor