Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible amount
of garbage accumulated in only 20 years. More than 18 million papers, half of
them only read by the authors (like Adrian Sfarti, AKA Dono) since 2010.

Smithsonian Magazine
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/half-academic-studies-are-never-read-more-three-people-180950222/

The number of articles published every year in all the physics increased a thousandfold from 200 papers in 1900 to about 200,000 in 2010. It means
that no less than 4 million papers on PHYSICS ALONE were written in the
last 20 years.

Roughly 500,000 academic papers in chemistry and chemistry-related fields appearing each year. This means 10 million papers on CHEMISTRY were
written in the last 20 years.

Who read this giant amount of crappy use of mathematical approach to the
behavior of nature, which is 80% EXCLUSIVELY THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS, without ANY SINGLE experimental support?

This is WHY modern hard sciences are ROTTEN TO THE CORE, since
Einstein's epoch.

Not accounting papers from medical sciences and mathematics, which
easily DOUBLE the 14 million papers on physics and chemistry since 2010.

A polynomial expression exists to show the increase in papers since 1970.
It correlates with the increase in the amount of students, faculty departments,
publishing magazines and houses, and (mostly) the increase in gross
revenues from academia AND BANKS on these issues.

Worldwide S&E publication output continues to grow on average at nearly 4% per year; from 2008 to 2018, output grew from 1.8 million to 2.6 million articles. In 2018, China (with a share of 21%) and the United States (with a share of 17%) were the main sources.

About relativity, it accounts for about 3% of the total, or more than 120,000
papers in the last 20 years, accounting only known publishing journals and
houses. Informal reservoirs, like vixra.com and similar store more than
3 million documents.

All this SIGNALS that REASON, RATIONALISM AND LOGICAL BEHAVIOR
are lost forever, and that what was known as science 100 years ago
IS DEATH. The pollution of material, due to the known "publish or perish"
LUST for fame has killed ANY CONCEIVABLE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.

Not only relativity is an ILLUSION, a FICTION sustained by rela-addicts,
but the DISEASE of disinformation has spread to every other field.

It would be required a COLOSSAL EFFORT to clean out this wasteland,
and compile, filter and isolate each ISLAND of knowledge.

Not a task that even a human organization could do (political biases).

I trust that AUTONOMOUS AI, in the future, could do this job for the sake
of the future of the mankind.

Otherwise, IDIOCRACY (like the movie) is the future to expect.

Also, a STRONG RESTRICTION to the access to key careers.
Just too many people, and getting worse and worse.

El domingo, 1 de enero de 2023 a las 13:48:12 UTC-3, Richard Hertz escribió:
> Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible amount
> of garbage accumulated in only 20 years. More than 18 million papers, half of
> them only read by the authors (like Adrian Sfarti, AKA Dono) since 2010.
>

You should research a little bit more. The success of a given paper is measured by the number of cites the paper has. For instance (see scholar.google..com), the paper "Wegener granulomatosis: an analysis of 158 patients GS Hoffman, GS Kerr, RY Leavitt, CW Hallahan, RS Lebovics, WD Travis, ... Annals of internal medicine 116 (6), 488-498" has 3515 cites, meaning that at least 3515 authors have read that paper and found it relevant enough to cite it in their own papers.

Actually, one of the authors of that paper is Anthony Fauci (who has 233664 accumulated cites during his career).

Another respected source of citations is Web of Science. It is a paid-access platform that provides (typically via the internet) access to multiple databases that provide reference and citation data from academic journals, conference proceedings, and other documents in various academic disciplines.

Most researchers' works are evaluated by some of these data bases.

El domingo, 1 de enero de 2023 a las 14:37:06 UTC-3, Paparios escribió:
> El domingo, 1 de enero de 2023 a las 13:48:12 UTC-3, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible amount
> > of garbage accumulated in only 20 years. More than 18 million papers, half of
> > them only read by the authors (like Adrian Sfarti, AKA Dono) since 2010..
> >
> You should research a little bit more. The success of a given paper is measured by the number of cites the paper has. For instance (see scholar.google.com), the paper "Wegener granulomatosis: an analysis of 158 patients GS Hoffman, GS Kerr, RY Leavitt, CW Hallahan, RS Lebovics, WD Travis, ... Annals of internal medicine 116 (6), 488-498" has 3515 cites, meaning that at least 3515 authors have read that paper and found it relevant enough to cite it in their own papers.
>
> Actually, one of the authors of that paper is Anthony Fauci (who has 233664 accumulated cites during his career).
>
> Another respected source of citations is Web of Science. It is a paid-access platform that provides (typically via the internet) access to multiple databases that provide reference and citation data from academic journals, conference proceedings, and other documents in various academic disciplines..
>
> Most researchers' works are evaluated by some of these data bases.

Actually, Albert Einstein has (according to scholar.google.com) 155008 cites!!!
Richard Feynman has 110735 cites!!!
Paul Dirac has 79002 cites!!!

On 2023-01-01 16:48:10 +0000, Richard Hertz said:

> Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible amount
> of garbage accumulated in only 20 years. More than 18 million papers, half of
> them only read by the authors
> (like Adrian Sfarti, AKA Dono) since 2010.
>
> Smithsonian Magazine
> https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/half-academic-studies-are-never-read-more-three-people-180950222/
>

That's certainly not true of my papers (not in physics, admittedly)
from 2002 to 2022: out of 53, 47 have been cited by people other than
me or a co-author, 6 have not. That's a lot more than half (89%, if
your mathematical skills can't cope with such a difficult calculation).
>
> The number of articles published every year in all the physics
> increased a thousandfold from 200 papers in 1900 to about 200,000 in
> 2010. It means
> that no less than 4 million papers on PHYSICS ALONE were written in the
> last 20 years.

....

I haven't bothered with the rubbish in the rest of your post.

--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36+ years; mainly
in England until 1987.

On 1/1/2023 12:45 PM, Paparios wrote:
> El domingo, 1 de enero de 2023 a las 14:37:06 UTC-3, Paparios escribió:

>> Most researchers' works are evaluated by some of these data bases.
>
> Actually, Albert Einstein has (according to scholar.google.com) 155008 cites!!!
> Richard Feynman has 110735 cites!!!
> Paul Dirac has 79002 cites!!!

Cool. My brother has 9300 cites.

On 2023-01-01 17:37:03 +0000, Paparios said:

> El domingo, 1 de enero de 2023 a las 13:48:12 UTC-3, Richard Hertz escribió:
>> Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible
>> amount> of garbage accumulated in only 20 years. More than 18 million
>> papers, half of> them only read by the authors (like Adrian Sfarti, AKA
>> Dono) since 2010.>
> You should research a little bit more. The success of a given paper is
> measured by the number of cites the paper has. For instance (see
> scholar.google.com), the paper "Wegener granulomatosis: an analysis of
> 158 patients GS Hoffman, GS Kerr, RY Leavitt, CW Hallahan, RS Lebovics,
> WD Travis, ... Annals of internal medicine 116 (6), 488-498" has 3515
> cites, meaning that at least 3515 authors have read that paper and
> found it relevant enough to cite it in their own papers.
> Actually, one of the authors of that paper is Anthony Fauci (who has
> 233664 accumulated cites during his career).
>
> Another respected source of citations is Web of Science. It is a
> paid-access platform that provides (typically via the internet) access
> to multiple databases that provide reference and citation data from
> academic journals, conference proceedings, and other documents in
> various academic disciplines.
> Most researchers' works are evaluated by some of these data bases.

Yes, I'd pay far more attention to these than to an article by a
journalist in a semi-popular magazine.

--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36+ years; mainly
in England until 1987.

https://dl.acm.org/profile/81498655415
Adrian Sfarti (A.K.A. Dono)
University of California, Berkeley

Most frequent co-Author: Alex Kozlowski
Most cited colleague: Brian Andrew Barsky
Brian Andrew Barsky

Top subject
Parametric curve and surface models

Most frequent Affiliation: University of California, Berkeley, 2 Papers

Average Citation per Article: 1
Publication Years: 2005-2006
Average Downloads per Article: 1

Colleague Collaboration

Alex Kozlowski: 2
Alex Perelman: 2
Brian Andrew Barsky: 2
Egon Pasztor: 2
Eric Roman: 2
Todd Jerome Kosloff:2

*******************************************

Curiously, like Einstein, all the "friends" have the same ethnicity. Only they can stand Dono.

But, as Berkeley was a huge fail, Dono started at ResearchGate in 2010. Some pathetic examples:

1) The equivalent invariant mass of closed systems of massive particles
March 2011 - International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology 6(1):48 - 54
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264440884_The_equivalent_invariant_mass_of_closed_systems_of_massive_particles

2) A big cheat in Mathematics and physics by Adrian Sfarti
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317664135_A_big_cheat_in_Mathematics_and_physics_by_Arian_Sfarti
June 2017, Authors: Azzam K Almosallami
"Adrian Sfarti used a big cheat in physics by using wrong mathematics in his paper entitled “Application of the Euler–Lagrange
method in determination of the coordinate acceleration which was published in European Journal of Physics 37(3):032001"
WOOPS, SORRY. THIS IS ABOUT DONO CHEATING.

3) QED-Based Derivation of the General Forms of the Relativistic Doppler Effect and of the Relativistic Aberration
December 2022. DOI:10.24018/ejphysics.2022.4.6.225
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366266014_QED-Based_Derivation_of_the_General_Forms_of_the_Relativistic_Doppler_Effect_and_of_the_Relativistic_Aberration

4) HERE YOU CAN SEE 100+ SHIT PAPERS SINCE 2010. I TOLD YOU ALL THAT THERE IS POLLUTION, BUT THIS IS PURE SHIT.

https://www.researchgate.net/search/publication?q=ADRIAN+sfarti

SOME EXAMPLES:

* Relativistic Dynamics and Electrodynamics in Uniformly Accelerated and in Uniformly Rotating Frames—the Proper Time Expressions
* Proiectarea automată a sistemelor lineare multivariabile compensate
* 5,528,738 Method and apparatus for antialiasing raster scanned, polygonal shaped images
* Application of particle accelerators for the experimental measurement of relativity of simultaneity
* Electrodynamics in Accelerated Frames as Viewed from an Inertial Frame
* 6,219,070 System and method for adjusting pixel parameters by subpixel positioning
* How to Rebut Professional Antirelativists
* How to debunk incorrect theories
* Massive Particle Reflection from Moving Mirrors
* THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR DETECTING THE CHARGE OF CHARGED BLACK HOLES
* Light Speed Anisotropy Constraints via Measurement of Relativistic Light Aberration
* The trajectories of charged particles moving at relativistic speeds inside particle separators - A fully symbolic solution

I ALMOST FORGET TO TELL THAT, WITHIN RG, Dono (Adrian Sfarti) has gained a reputation of a CHEATER, PLAGIARIST AND LIAR.

IMAGINE WHAT COULD BE IF YOU ACCESS TO TOM ROBERT'S PUBLICATIONS. I DIDN'T EVEN TRY.

POLLUTION, I TOLD YOU.

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 1:48:12 PM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:

<snip>

> Just too many people, and getting worse and worse.

It's A New Era
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/its-new-era

Eras may last decades, and only those who've lived long enough to recall previous eras have experienced the transition from one era to the next. The era of financialization, globalization and low-cost, abundant oil/natural gas began over 40 years ago in 1981.

The era of digital / Internet technologies took off about 30 years ago. All of these dynamics accelerated in the early 2000s, roughly 20 years ago.

Only those 60 and older experienced working in a previous era (pre-1981).

All of these dynamics are entering a phase of nonlinear turbulence as the changes are outpacing these highly streamlined / optimized systems' ability to self-correct.

This nonlinear instability is being accelerated by doing more of what worked in the previous era, in the mistaken belief that the 2020s are simply an extension of the eras that began 40 and 30 years ago.

The fixes that worked in the past won't resolve the nonlinear instability because all these dynamics have reached saturation: adding more debt no longer generates organic expansion of productivity, all it does is inflate an even larger and more unstable credit-asset bubble.

Globalization has been optimized to the point of saturation: the potential downsides to national security outweigh any remaining marginal gains in corporate profitability.

Financialization has so distorted the economy that gambling on useless speculations is now viewed as the best (or only) way to get ahead.

When a system has absorbed all it can absorb, adding more is just a waste of resources.

We've entered a new era, and so the fixes and incentives that worked in the past 40 years no longer work.

The idea that the past 30 years were not a permanent era but an anomaly that's come to an end doesn't compute for everyone who has only experienced the "glorious 30" years of cheap energy, soaring assets and falling prices due to hyper-globalization and hyper-financialization.

The idea that this new era may evolve unpredictably is also anathema to a technocratic culture and economy that prides itself on forecasting and controlling everything with credit and money.

The previous 40 years of material abundance has nurtured a belief that the solution to any scarcity is to create more money, as some of this new money will inevitably flow into eliminating the scarcity.

The idea that some scarcities cannot be fixed by creating more money doesn't compute.

It may turn out that all the lessons we learned in the past 40 years will not only be useless in this new era, they will be disastrously counter-productive.

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible amount
> of garbage accumulated in only 20 years.

Translation: "despite my being a genius, I don't understand those papers, so I'm
declaring them garbage".

While you are at it, see a doctor. There is something seriously malfunctioning with
your reasoning faculties.

--
Jan

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:49:06 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:

> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: Scientific papers, scientific method, science community:
>> An incredible amount of garbage accumulated in only 20 years.

Retarded polish: It includes the 180 papers that Dono wrote in 12 years, and the CRAP that you wrote since 2010.

Piotr, you can lie, but you can't hide, little disgusting piece of shit. I'm bored reading your judgmental posts, with the same arguments
every time: "don't understand", "not even wrong", "this is not for you", "see a doctor", "take your medications", etc.

Now you just stop reasoning, and switched to Dono's mode of replying: Impersonating me changing what I wrote as self-deprecatory,
or trying to understand how my mind work and where are my limits.

I try to be soft with you because I can feel how fragile are you, based on your history of replies. Always on the defensive mode.

But, for being a little pet with no character, you tend to abuse from other people good will, like in this case. You have the attitude
a little bitch: you bite, you're kicked, and keep returning for more. Some kind of masochism, I guess.

Your need to reply some posts with ad-hominem attacks is pathetic, and make evident that you don't know what to do with your
fucking life. I NEVER read an OP of yours with original topics. Always jumping to bite your selected targets, like a bitch (as I said).

Had you reading the OP and use your fucking rational being, you should agree that such huge amount of papers from ten of thousand
of authors contain a Gaussian distribution of IQ (from retarded level, like Dono, to brightness). But, even being bright, the NEED to
publish forces choices and content that are mainly stupid or useless.

Plus, NOBODY can read 100,000 papers on relativity (in 10 years), and process their contents to create cohesive threads. And, IF you
don't read ALL OF THEM, you are dismissing the chances of cross-fertilization in your fucking mind.

Do you understand the above paragraph?. Should I translate it to Polish, imbecile?

If you have a personal problem with me, I suggest a visit to a shrink, in order to know what is wrong with you. Too much hate, Jan.
It's killing you from inside out.

> Translation: "despite my being a genius, I don't understand those papers, so I'm
> declaring them garbage".
>
> While you are at it, see a doctor. There is something seriously malfunctioning with
> your reasoning faculties.
>
> --
> Jan

El lunes, 2 de enero de 2023 a las 20:03:53 UTC-3, Richard Hertz escribió:
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:49:06 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: Scientific papers, scientific method, science community:
> >> An incredible amount of garbage accumulated in only 20 years.
> Retarded polish: It includes the 180 papers that Dono wrote in 12 years, and the CRAP that you wrote since 2010.
>
> Piotr, you can lie, but you can't hide, little disgusting piece of shit. I'm bored reading your judgmental posts, with the same arguments
> every time: "don't understand", "not even wrong", "this is not for you", "see a doctor", "take your medications", etc.
>
> Now you just stop reasoning, and switched to Dono's mode of replying: Impersonating me changing what I wrote as self-deprecatory,
> or trying to understand how my mind work and where are my limits.
>
> I try to be soft with you because I can feel how fragile are you, based on your history of replies. Always on the defensive mode.
>
> But, for being a little pet with no character, you tend to abuse from other people good will, like in this case. You have the attitude
> a little bitch: you bite, you're kicked, and keep returning for more. Some kind of masochism, I guess.
>
> Your need to reply some posts with ad-hominem attacks is pathetic, and make evident that you don't know what to do with your
> fucking life. I NEVER read an OP of yours with original topics. Always jumping to bite your selected targets, like a bitch (as I said).
>
> Had you reading the OP and use your fucking rational being, you should agree that such huge amount of papers from ten of thousand
> of authors contain a Gaussian distribution of IQ (from retarded level, like Dono, to brightness). But, even being bright, the NEED to
> publish forces choices and content that are mainly stupid or useless.
>
> Plus, NOBODY can read 100,000 papers on relativity (in 10 years), and process their contents to create cohesive threads. And, IF you
> don't read ALL OF THEM, you are dismissing the chances of cross-fertilization in your fucking mind.
>
> Do you understand the above paragraph?. Should I translate it to Polish, imbecile?
>
> If you have a personal problem with me, I suggest a visit to a shrink, in order to know what is wrong with you. Too much hate, Jan.
> It's killing you from inside out.

What a load of crap you write every day.....
We are still waiting for one example of your patents and publications.....

On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible amount
> of garbage accumulated in only 20 years. More than 18 million papers, half of
> them only read by the authors (like Adrian Sfarti, AKA Dono) since 2010.
>
> Smithsonian Magazine
> https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/half-academic-studies-are-never-read-more-three-people-180950222/
>
> The number of articles published every year in all the physics increased a thousandfold from 200 papers in 1900 to about 200,000 in 2010. It means
> that no less than 4 million papers on PHYSICS ALONE were written in the
> last 20 years.
>
> Roughly 500,000 academic papers in chemistry and chemistry-related fields appearing each year. This means 10 million papers on CHEMISTRY were
> written in the last 20 years.
>
> Who read this giant amount of crappy use of mathematical approach to the
> behavior of nature, which is 80% EXCLUSIVELY THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS, without ANY SINGLE experimental support?
>
> This is WHY modern hard sciences are ROTTEN TO THE CORE, since
> Einstein's epoch.
>
> Not accounting papers from medical sciences and mathematics, which
> easily DOUBLE the 14 million papers on physics and chemistry since 2010.
>
> A polynomial expression exists to show the increase in papers since 1970.
> It correlates with the increase in the amount of students, faculty departments,
> publishing magazines and houses, and (mostly) the increase in gross
> revenues from academia AND BANKS on these issues.
>
> Worldwide S&E publication output continues to grow on average at nearly 4% per year; from 2008 to 2018, output grew from 1.8 million to 2.6 million articles. In 2018, China (with a share of 21%) and the United States (with a share of 17%) were the main sources.
>
> About relativity, it accounts for about 3% of the total, or more than 120,000
> papers in the last 20 years, accounting only known publishing journals and
> houses. Informal reservoirs, like vixra.com and similar store more than
> 3 million documents.
>
> All this SIGNALS that REASON, RATIONALISM AND LOGICAL BEHAVIOR
> are lost forever, and that what was known as science 100 years ago
> IS DEATH. The pollution of material, due to the known "publish or perish"
> LUST for fame has killed ANY CONCEIVABLE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
>
> Not only relativity is an ILLUSION, a FICTION sustained by rela-addicts,
> but the DISEASE of disinformation has spread to every other field.
>
> It would be required a COLOSSAL EFFORT to clean out this wasteland,
> and compile, filter and isolate each ISLAND of knowledge.
>
> Not a task that even a human organization could do (political biases).
>
> I trust that AUTONOMOUS AI, in the future, could do this job for the sake
> of the future of the mankind.
>
> Otherwise, IDIOCRACY (like the movie) is the future to expect.
>
> Also, a STRONG RESTRICTION to the access to key careers.
> Just too many people, and getting worse and worse.

Thank you Richard. Very interesting research, as always. You reveal an academic system which is basically a forerunner of the Facebook "friending" system. And just as meaningless.

I note that my eponymous dilemma has had hundreds more reads than all of Dono's papers combined--probably more reads than the vast majorities of all physics papers.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/posts/580388/timeline#history_f8d5f49d-3b86-4eb0-a83f-cd9f6f8b533b.

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 9:26:09 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> El lunes, 2 de enero de 2023 a las 20:03:53 UTC-3, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:49:06 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: Scientific papers, scientific method, science community:
> > >> An incredible amount of garbage accumulated in only 20 years.
> > Retarded polish: It includes the 180 papers that Dono wrote in 12 years, and the CRAP that you wrote since 2010.
> >
> > Piotr, you can lie, but you can't hide, little disgusting piece of shit.. I'm bored reading your judgmental posts, with the same arguments
> > every time: "don't understand", "not even wrong", "this is not for you", "see a doctor", "take your medications", etc.
> >
> > Now you just stop reasoning, and switched to Dono's mode of replying: Impersonating me changing what I wrote as self-deprecatory,
> > or trying to understand how my mind work and where are my limits.
> >
> > I try to be soft with you because I can feel how fragile are you, based on your history of replies. Always on the defensive mode.
> >
> > But, for being a little pet with no character, you tend to abuse from other people good will, like in this case. You have the attitude
> > a little bitch: you bite, you're kicked, and keep returning for more. Some kind of masochism, I guess.
> >
> > Your need to reply some posts with ad-hominem attacks is pathetic, and make evident that you don't know what to do with your
> > fucking life. I NEVER read an OP of yours with original topics. Always jumping to bite your selected targets, like a bitch (as I said).
> >
> > Had you reading the OP and use your fucking rational being, you should agree that such huge amount of papers from ten of thousand
> > of authors contain a Gaussian distribution of IQ (from retarded level, like Dono, to brightness). But, even being bright, the NEED to
> > publish forces choices and content that are mainly stupid or useless.
> >
> > Plus, NOBODY can read 100,000 papers on relativity (in 10 years), and process their contents to create cohesive threads. And, IF you
> > don't read ALL OF THEM, you are dismissing the chances of cross-fertilization in your fucking mind.
> >
> > Do you understand the above paragraph?. Should I translate it to Polish, imbecile?
> >
> > If you have a personal problem with me, I suggest a visit to a shrink, in order to know what is wrong with you. Too much hate, Jan.
> > It's killing you from inside out.
> What a load of crap you write every day.....
> We are still waiting for one example of your patents and publications......

I'm sorry, Miguelito. I forgot to mention the crap that you've published, inventing the wheel many times. DiffServ! Virtual Token Bus!!

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 10:21:23 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible amount
> > of garbage accumulated in only 20 years. More than 18 million papers, half of
> > them only read by the authors (like Adrian Sfarti, AKA Dono) since 2010..
> >
> > Smithsonian Magazine
> > https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/half-academic-studies-are-never-read-more-three-people-180950222/
> >
> > The number of articles published every year in all the physics increased a thousandfold from 200 papers in 1900 to about 200,000 in 2010. It means
> > that no less than 4 million papers on PHYSICS ALONE were written in the
> > last 20 years.
> >
> > Roughly 500,000 academic papers in chemistry and chemistry-related fields appearing each year. This means 10 million papers on CHEMISTRY were
> > written in the last 20 years.
> >
> > Who read this giant amount of crappy use of mathematical approach to the
> > behavior of nature, which is 80% EXCLUSIVELY THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS, without ANY SINGLE experimental support?
> >
> > This is WHY modern hard sciences are ROTTEN TO THE CORE, since
> > Einstein's epoch.
> >
> > Not accounting papers from medical sciences and mathematics, which
> > easily DOUBLE the 14 million papers on physics and chemistry since 2010..
> >
> > A polynomial expression exists to show the increase in papers since 1970.
> > It correlates with the increase in the amount of students, faculty departments,
> > publishing magazines and houses, and (mostly) the increase in gross
> > revenues from academia AND BANKS on these issues.
> >
> > Worldwide S&E publication output continues to grow on average at nearly 4% per year; from 2008 to 2018, output grew from 1.8 million to 2.6 million articles. In 2018, China (with a share of 21%) and the United States (with a share of 17%) were the main sources.
> >
> > About relativity, it accounts for about 3% of the total, or more than 120,000
> > papers in the last 20 years, accounting only known publishing journals and
> > houses. Informal reservoirs, like vixra.com and similar store more than
> > 3 million documents.
> >
> > All this SIGNALS that REASON, RATIONALISM AND LOGICAL BEHAVIOR
> > are lost forever, and that what was known as science 100 years ago
> > IS DEATH. The pollution of material, due to the known "publish or perish"
> > LUST for fame has killed ANY CONCEIVABLE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
> >
> > Not only relativity is an ILLUSION, a FICTION sustained by rela-addicts,
> > but the DISEASE of disinformation has spread to every other field.
> >
> > It would be required a COLOSSAL EFFORT to clean out this wasteland,
> > and compile, filter and isolate each ISLAND of knowledge.
> >
> > Not a task that even a human organization could do (political biases).
> >
> > I trust that AUTONOMOUS AI, in the future, could do this job for the sake
> > of the future of the mankind.
> >
> > Otherwise, IDIOCRACY (like the movie) is the future to expect.
> >
> > Also, a STRONG RESTRICTION to the access to key careers.
> > Just too many people, and getting worse and worse.
> Thank you Richard. Very interesting research, as always. You reveal an academic system which is basically a forerunner of the Facebook "friending" system. And just as meaningless.
>
> I note that my eponymous dilemma has had hundreds more reads than all of Dono's papers combined--probably more reads than the vast majorities of all physics papers.
>
> https://physics.stackexchange.com/posts/580388/timeline#history_f8d5f49d-3b86-4eb0-a83f-cd9f6f8b533b.

Dono's paper with the highest count of unique readings (56, Researchgate, Adrian Sfarti) is the one where he exchanged bites with
two muslim professionals. And we all know that Dono is a fucking kazharian racist. For him/it every muslim is a "towelhead", because
Dono is a SON OF A BITCH, without any chance to be cured of a rotten brain (and soul)!

El lunes, 2 de enero de 2023 a las 22:22:09 UTC-3, Richard Hertz escribió:
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 9:26:09 PM UTC-3, Paparios wrote:
> > El lunes, 2 de enero de 2023 a las 20:03:53 UTC-3, Richard Hertz escribió:
> > > On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:49:06 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:

> > What a load of crap you write every day.....
> > We are still waiting for one example of your patents and publications......
> I'm sorry, Miguelito. I forgot to mention the crap that you've published, inventing the wheel many times. DiffServ! Virtual Token Bus!!

Much better than the crap you say you wrote, without any evidence. Must probably your real name is not even Richard Hertz.

The real Richard Hertz who has patents is listed here (https://patents.justia.com/inventor/richard-hertz) which correspond to Richard Hertz Tech Lead at A2C Cloud.

On Monday, 2 January 2023 at 21:49:06 UTC+1, JanPB wrote:
> On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > Scientific papers, scientific method, science community: An incredible amount
> > of garbage accumulated in only 20 years.
> Translation: "despite my being a genius, I don't understand those papers, so I'm
> declaring them garbage".

Not any translation, just a baseless lie and slander - typical for a relativistic idiot.

On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:03:53 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:49:06 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: Scientific papers, scientific method, science community:
> >> An incredible amount of garbage accumulated in only 20 years.
> Retarded polish: It includes the 180 papers that Dono wrote in 12 years, and the CRAP that you wrote since 2010.

You are w2asting your life away pursuing an Einstein-based fixation and
monomania. See a doctor.

> Piotr, you can lie, but you can't hide,

That's not my name. And I'm not lying, you are.

> little disgusting piece of shit. I'm bored reading your judgmental posts, with the same arguments

The arguments are the same because truth is the same and what's established in
science changes slowly.

> every time: "don't understand", "not even wrong", "this is not for you", "see a doctor", "take your medications", etc.

See a doctor. You write virtually 100% nonsense on this group. This is not normal,
trust me on this.

> Now you just stop reasoning, and switched to Dono's mode of replying: Impersonating me changing what I wrote as self-deprecatory,
> or trying to understand how my mind work and where are my limits.
>
> I try to be soft with you because I can feel how fragile are you, based on your history of replies. Always on the defensive mode.

Stop fantasising about your opponents. It will get you nowhere. Look in the mirror,
admit you have nothing to show for your idiotic "arguments". The sooner you do it, the
better for your mental health.

--
Jan

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 5:19:08 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:03:53 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:49:06 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: Scientific papers, scientific method, science community:
> > >> An incredible amount of garbage accumulated in only 20 years.
> > Retarded polish: It includes the 180 papers that Dono wrote in 12 years, and the CRAP that you wrote since 2010.
> You are w2asting your life away pursuing an Einstein-based fixation and
> monomania. See a doctor.
> > Piotr, you can lie, but you can't hide,
> That's not my name. And I'm not lying, you are.
> > little disgusting piece of shit. I'm bored reading your judgmental posts, with the same arguments
> The arguments are the same because truth is the same and what's established in
> science changes slowly.
> > every time: "don't understand", "not even wrong", "this is not for you", "see a doctor", "take your medications", etc.
> See a doctor. You write virtually 100% nonsense on this group. This is not normal,
> trust me on this.
> > Now you just stop reasoning, and switched to Dono's mode of replying: Impersonating me changing what I wrote as self-deprecatory,
> > or trying to understand how my mind work and where are my limits.
> >
> > I try to be soft with you because I can feel how fragile are you, based on your history of replies. Always on the defensive mode.
> Stop fantasising about your opponents. It will get you nowhere. Look in the mirror,
> admit you have nothing to show for your idiotic "arguments". The sooner you do it, the
> better for your mental health.
>
> --
> Jan

Jan, you have a problem with doctors. Maybe because you don't want to be the only one forced to take 15 pills a day to
slow down your irreversible mental decline.

I'm a drug free person, and enjoy every moment when I mock you. But, as you're a drooling imbecile, you are not even aware of it.

I picture you writing these shitty replies, and I sincerely pity you.

Poor Jan, so stupid and alone.

On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 4:42:29 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 5:19:08 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:
> > On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:03:53 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:49:06 PM UTC-3, JanPB wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 8:48:12 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote: Scientific papers, scientific method, science community:
> > > >> An incredible amount of garbage accumulated in only 20 years.
> > > Retarded polish: It includes the 180 papers that Dono wrote in 12 years, and the CRAP that you wrote since 2010.
> > You are w2asting your life away pursuing an Einstein-based fixation and
> > monomania. See a doctor.
> > > Piotr, you can lie, but you can't hide,
> > That's not my name. And I'm not lying, you are.
> > > little disgusting piece of shit. I'm bored reading your judgmental posts, with the same arguments
> > The arguments are the same because truth is the same and what's established in
> > science changes slowly.
> > > every time: "don't understand", "not even wrong", "this is not for you", "see a doctor", "take your medications", etc.
> > See a doctor. You write virtually 100% nonsense on this group. This is not normal,
> > trust me on this.
> > > Now you just stop reasoning, and switched to Dono's mode of replying: Impersonating me changing what I wrote as self-deprecatory,
> > > or trying to understand how my mind work and where are my limits.
> > >
> > > I try to be soft with you because I can feel how fragile are you, based on your history of replies. Always on the defensive mode.
> > Stop fantasising about your opponents. It will get you nowhere. Look in the mirror,
> > admit you have nothing to show for your idiotic "arguments". The sooner you do it, the
> > better for your mental health.
> >
> > --
> > Jan
> Jan, you have a problem with doctors.

Why? Because I'm suggesting you consult one? Why is it my problem?

> Maybe because you don't want to be the only one forced to take 15 pills a day to
> slow down your irreversible mental decline.
>
> I'm a drug free person, and enjoy every moment when I mock you. But, as you're a drooling imbecile, you are not even aware of it.

Your posts are just lunatic ravings, that's all. You can mock me all you want,
it won't change anything in the real world.

> I picture you writing these shitty replies, and I sincerely pity you.
>
> Poor Jan, so stupid and alone.

You keep fantasising about people you cannot argue with.

--
Jan

On Wednesday, 4 January 2023 at 04:14:25 UTC+1, JanPB wrote:

> Your posts are just lunatic ravings, that's all. You can mock me all you want,
> it won't change anything in the real world.

Where forbidden by your bunch of idiots GPS and TAI keep measuring
t'=t in forbidden by your bunch of idiots old seconds.

>
> > I picture you writing these shitty replies, and I sincerely pity you.
> >
> > Poor Jan, so stupid and alone.
>
> You keep fantasising about people you cannot argue with.

How to argue with an idiot screaming "Syntax shmyntax!!"?

JanPB wrote:

> On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 4:42:29 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> Jan, you have a problem with doctors.
>
> Why? Because I'm suggesting you consult one? Why is it my problem?

because in a normal world, polakia wouldn't even exist on the european
map. Just wait. Germany will never forget what you did with their gas
energy pipelines. The polakians are fucking satans. Shameless satans.

On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 8:18:32 AM UTC-8, Braydon Germano wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 4:42:29 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> >> Jan, you have a problem with doctors.
> >
> > Why? Because I'm suggesting you consult one? Why is it my problem?
> because in a normal world, polakia wouldn't even exist on the european
> map. Just wait. Germany will never forget what you did with their gas
> energy pipelines. The polakians are fucking satans. Shameless satans.

Meanwhile at the Polybahn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPvlAPiSO9A

--
Jan

JanPB wrote:

> On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 8:18:32 AM UTC-8, Braydon Germano
> wrote:
>> JanPB wrote:
>>
>> > On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 4:42:29 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> >> Jan, you have a problem with doctors.
>> >
>> > Why? Because I'm suggesting you consult one? Why is it my problem?
>> because in a normal world, polakia wouldn't even exist on the european
>> map. Just wait. Germany will never forget what you did with their gas
>> energy pipelines. The polakians are fucking satans. Shameless satans.
>
> M̶e̶a̶n̶w̶h̶i̶l̶e̶ a̶t̶ t̶h̶e̶ P̶o̶l̶y̶b̶a̶h̶n̶: h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://w̶w̶w̶.y̶o̶u̶t̶u̶b̶e̶.c̶o̶m̶/w̶a̶t̶c̶h̶?v̶=p̶P̶v̶l̶A̶P̶i̶S̶O̶9A̶

shut the fuck up, you */_dirty_terrorist_/*. Soon you'll have no
*_nazi_country_* to hide in. You disgusting dirty, shit eating, pigs.

UK Column News - 6th January 2023 - Full
https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/9jOyuxYPOqKn

read it carefully, *_you_fucking_mass_murderer_*.

On Friday, January 6, 2023 at 5:34:26 PM UTC-8, Everrett Barzetti wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 8:18:32 AM UTC-8, Braydon Germano
> > wrote:
> >> JanPB wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tuesday, January 3, 2023 at 4:42:29 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> >> >> Jan, you have a problem with doctors.
> >> >
> >> > Why? Because I'm suggesting you consult one? Why is it my problem?
> >> because in a normal world, polakia wouldn't even exist on the european
> >> map. Just wait. Germany will never forget what you did with their gas
> >> energy pipelines. The polakians are fucking satans. Shameless satans.
> >
> > M̶e̶a̶n̶w̶h̶i̶l̶e̶ a̶t̶ t̶h̶e̶ P̶o̶l̶y̶b̶a̶h̶n̶: h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶://w̶w̶w̶.y̶o̶u̶t̶u̶b̶e̶.c̶o̶m̶/w̶a̶t̶c̶h̶?v̶=p̶P̶v̶l̶A̶P̶i̶S̶O̶9A̶
>
> shut the fuck up, you */_dirty_terrorist_/*. Soon you'll have no
> *_nazi_country_* to hide in. You disgusting dirty, shit eating, pigs.
>
> UK Column News - 6th January 2023 - Full
> https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/9jOyuxYPOqKn
>
> read it carefully, *_you_fucking_mass_murderer_*.

Nevertheless https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLkl3SpScps

--
Jan