Message-ID:

"All language designers are arrogant. Goes with the territory..." (By Larry Wall)

tech / sci.physics.relativity / An erroneneous measurement?

An erroneneous measurement?

<438b0fb7-a105-49c5-8d36-9df5f9039f81n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=105026&group=sci.physics.relativity#105026

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:3b0c:b0:532:2644:864d with SMTP id nm12-20020a0562143b0c00b005322644864dmr735934qvb.36.1674459605774;
Sun, 22 Jan 2023 23:40:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6656:0:b0:684:ce55:6f3 with SMTP id
q22-20020a9d6656000000b00684ce5506f3mr1153790otm.258.1674459605376; Sun, 22
Jan 2023 23:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 23:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <438b0fb7-a105-49c5-8d36-9df5f9039f81n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: An erroneneous measurement?
From: maluwozn...@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 07:40:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1799

by: Maciej Wozniak - Mon, 23 Jan 2023 07:40 UTC

On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 18:30:46 UTC+1, Tom Roberts wrote:

> > physical contraction when it gives rise to internal stresses/strains
> > inside the object.
> No! "Length contraction" never induces "internal stresses/strains inside
> the object", for the simple reason that the object itself is UNCHANGED
> -- it is only MEASUREMENT BY SOME OTHER INERTIAL FRAME THAT IS AFFECTED.
>
> This ought to be obvious: when an observer moves inertially past the
> object while making a measurement, that measurement is affected by
> "length contraction". How could some other observer making a measurement
> possibly affect the object itself????

Tell me, Tom, poor idiot - how do you call a situation
where the result of a measurement doesn't match the
real value of the measured parameter?

Re: An erroneneous measurement?

<d9a04a46-45dc-47e5-a3f5-69f3e1fdc461n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=105032&group=sci.physics.relativity#105032

copy link Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:318f:b0:532:2005:dcb9 with SMTP id lb15-20020a056214318f00b005322005dcb9mr755600qvb.15.1674470626203;
Mon, 23 Jan 2023 02:43:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:4f90:0:b0:4cb:6451:45f4 with SMTP id
c138-20020a4a4f90000000b004cb645145f4mr998843oob.41.1674470625948; Mon, 23
Jan 2023 02:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 02:43:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <438b0fb7-a105-49c5-8d36-9df5f9039f81n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=181.84.180.93; posting-account=blnzJwoAAAA-82jKM1F-uNmKbbRkrU6D
NNTP-Posting-Host: 181.84.180.93
References: <438b0fb7-a105-49c5-8d36-9df5f9039f81n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d9a04a46-45dc-47e5-a3f5-69f3e1fdc461n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: An erroneneous measurement?
From: hertz...@gmail.com (Richard Hertz)
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:43:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2329

by: Richard Hertz - Mon, 23 Jan 2023 10:43 UTC

On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 4:40:07 AM UTC-3, maluw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 18:30:46 UTC+1, Tom Roberts wrote:
>
> > > physical contraction when it gives rise to internal stresses/strains
> > > inside the object.
> > No! "Length contraction" never induces "internal stresses/strains inside
> > the object", for the simple reason that the object itself is UNCHANGED
> > -- it is only MEASUREMENT BY SOME OTHER INERTIAL FRAME THAT IS AFFECTED.
> >
> > This ought to be obvious: when an observer moves inertially past the
> > object while making a measurement, that measurement is affected by
> > "length contraction". How could some other observer making a measurement
> > possibly affect the object itself????
>
> Tell me, Tom, poor idiot - how do you call a situation
> where the result of a measurement doesn't match the
> real value of the measured parameter?

I'd call it a scam, if they're trying to steal money from what you purchase, OR a relativistic moment,
where an imbecile is trying to convince you about his "perceptual, einstenian based" reality, where
he sees things that others don't (early signs of schizophrenia).

Subject	Author
An erroneneous measurement?	Maciej Wozniak
Re: An erroneneous measurement?	Richard Hertz