La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.

A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.

This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.

http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
>
>A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
>
>This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
>
>http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf

That's not science, it's politics.

Doomsday predictions are ever popular and always wrong.

Design something. You'll feel better.

On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 1:48:47 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
> >
> >A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
> >
> >This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
> >
> >http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf
> That's not science, it's politics.
>
> Doomsday predictions are ever popular and always wrong.
>
> Design something. You'll feel better.

Doomsday predictions are the 30-years-from-now variety. When they start talking about right now and the next year, and the next, they are near term scientific forecasts, which the record of such forecasts shows to be very accurate.

#fakebyclimatefakers

On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 1:58:54 PM UTC-4, a a wrote:
> #fakebyclimatefakers

You're the only fake around here:

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/solar-events-news/Does-the-Solar-Cycle-Affect-Earths-Climate.html

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:52:38 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 1:48:47 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
>> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
>> >
>> >A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
>> >
>> >This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
>> >
>> >http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf
>> That's not science, it's politics.
>>
>> Doomsday predictions are ever popular and always wrong.
>>
>> Design something. You'll feel better.
>
>Doomsday predictions are the 30-years-from-now variety. When they start talking about right now and the next year, and the next, they are near term scientific forecasts, which the record of such forecasts shows to be very accurate.

Of course short-term climate predictions are accurate: next year will
be a lot like this year.

> https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/solar-events-news/Does-the-Solar-Cycle-Affect-Earths-Climate.html

I respect popular science comments by NASA, as above
but we study
One-month/One-year Short-Term Climate Changes due to fluctuations in solar activity
to win Nobel Prize

What we call 2D sunspots are in fact massive, active 3D volcanoes, ejecting billions of tonnes of hot plasma,
and when ejected towards Earth, affecting the thermosphere, the magnetosphere, resulting in short term Climate Changes.

To study solar activity better visit
Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope
https://nso.edu/press-release/u-s-national-science-foundation-celebrates-the-inauguration-of-its-daniel-k-inouye-solar-telescope/

http://parkersolarprobe.jhuapl.edu/The-Sun/index.php#Sun-Earth-Connections

Sun-Earth Connections
From there to here...Billions of tons of solar material are hurled from the Sun at millions of miles an hour. When the material reaches Earth it interacts with our protective magnetic field.

There is no more a need to count the number of sunspots
since individual sunspots should be identified by size, activity, duration of individual volcanic activity, mass of ejected plasma.

Today we have tools to study volcanic activity of an individual sunspot in 3D
and what matters is mass of plasma ejected by an individual sunspot, especially plasma directed to the Earth.

So we rename
Coronal/Coronary Mass Ejections to Volcanic Mass Ejections
classified by
geolocation, size, mass of ejected plasma, activity term

Large number of small sunspots has no volcanic potential to affect Short-Term Climate Changes on the Earth
but a single, powerful volcanic sunspot, ejecting plasma directed to the Earth
clocks Short Term Climate Changes on the Earth

It's obvious and can be studied on-line.

So we need to move from 2D sunspots studied by number count
to 3D volcanic sunspots, identified by size, potential of volcanic activity, activity term, geolocation,
studied individually.

Easy cake

On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 6:20:53 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:52:38 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 1:48:47 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
> >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
> >> >
> >> >A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
> >> >
> >> >This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
> >> >
> >> >http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf
> >> That's not science, it's politics.
> >>
> >> Doomsday predictions are ever popular and always wrong.
> >>
> >> Design something. You'll feel better.
> >
> >Doomsday predictions are the 30-years-from-now variety. When they start talking about right now and the next year, and the next, they are near term scientific forecasts, which the record of such forecasts shows to be very accurate.
> Of course short-term climate predictions are accurate: next year will
> be a lot like this year.

They say slightly warmer, and you can expect a repeat of droughts, water restrictions, wildfires, torrential monsoons, and flooding, with lots and lots of economic damage and shortages of essential produce. If all that catastrophe is even as frequent as a 10 year event, it is survivable, but as an annual occurrence it's not. The planet has problems.

On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 6:40:37 PM UTC-4, a a wrote:
> > https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/solar-events-news/Does-the-Solar-Cycle-Affect-Earths-Climate.html
>
> I respect popular science comments by NASA, as above
> but we study
> One-month/One-year Short-Term Climate Changes due to fluctuations in solar activity
> to win Nobel Prize
>
> What we call 2D sunspots are in fact massive, active 3D volcanoes, ejecting billions of tonnes of hot plasma,
> and when ejected towards Earth, affecting the thermosphere, the magnetosphere, resulting in short term Climate Changes.
>
> To study solar activity better visit
> Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope
> https://nso.edu/press-release/u-s-national-science-foundation-celebrates-the-inauguration-of-its-daniel-k-inouye-solar-telescope/
>
> http://parkersolarprobe.jhuapl.edu/The-Sun/index.php#Sun-Earth-Connections
>
> Sun-Earth Connections
> From there to here...Billions of tons of solar material are hurled from the Sun at millions of miles an hour. When the material reaches Earth it interacts with our protective magnetic field.
>
> There is no more a need to count the number of sunspots
> since individual sunspots should be identified by size, activity, duration of individual volcanic activity, mass of ejected plasma.
>
> Today we have tools to study volcanic activity of an individual sunspot in 3D
> and what matters is mass of plasma ejected by an individual sunspot, especially plasma directed to the Earth.
>
> So we rename
> Coronal/Coronary Mass Ejections to Volcanic Mass Ejections
> classified by
> geolocation, size, mass of ejected plasma, activity term
>
> Large number of small sunspots has no volcanic potential to affect Short-Term Climate Changes on the Earth
> but a single, powerful volcanic sunspot, ejecting plasma directed to the Earth
> clocks Short Term Climate Changes on the Earth
>
> It's obvious and can be studied on-line.
>
> So we need to move from 2D sunspots studied by number count
> to 3D volcanic sunspots, identified by size, potential of volcanic activity, activity term, geolocation,
> studied individually.
>
> Easy cake

No one gives a damn about that minutiae. Higher life forms in the scientific community study the whole irradiance cycle.

On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 10:35:48 AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
> La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
>
> A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
>
> This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
>
> http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf

As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible effect on global temperatures.

On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 9:18:58 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:

> As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible effect on global temperatures.

For one person, during one hour or year, that's true. Billions of persons and centuries, different
answer.

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
news:0snpih1rssmsdiet3gq1rsuhg4m8mdls02@4ax.com:

> Of course short-term climate predictions are accurate: next year will
> be a lot like this year.
>

Now you prove that you have no grasp of chaos. Damn, you're stupid,
boy.

What are the odds on a ten coin tosses being all heads or all tails?

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in
news:a15c5fda-97aa-42a8-8ff4-16444ab126e7n@googlegroups.com:

> What we call 2D sunspots are in fact massive, active 3D volcanoes,
> ejecting billions of tonnes of hot plasma,

Uh oh... "Mr aa" here let's out a secret.

This fucktard is that same brit (tonnes) that used to post stupid
shit here, and I'll bet it is the old man who posted his stupid shit
under the nym of "Cursitor Doom" or as I liked to refer to him
"Turdsipper Dumb".

One seemed to leave the scene as the other appeared. Regardless, we
have a brit twit spouting stupid shit... yet again, because his grasp
of electronics rests firmly at nil.

His stupidity is off the charts.

On Friday, 23 September 2022 at 14:30:55 UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:a15c5fda-97aa-42a8...@googlegroups.com:
---What we call 2D sunspots are in fact massive, active 3D volcanoes,
---ejecting billions of tonnes of hot plasma,

thank you for your interest and support and promotion
to help us win Nobel Prize

you are free to join

Artificial Intelligence + Origin of Life Prize, $10 Million USD
Where did life and the genetic code come from? Can the answer build superior AI? The #1 mystery in science now has a $10 million prize.
Data Science Engineering Healthcare Technology Powered By HeroX
stage:
Enter
prize:
$10,000,000

Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:82f4f5b8-3f40-4383-bc7d-ac52e71d2a8cn@googlegroups.com:

> As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible
> effect on global temperatures.

You are an abject idiot, and you "pointed out" no such thing,
dumbfuck.

All you do is prove that you are clueless as to IR absorbtion of said
gasses.

Good thing that you have a NIL effect on the members of this group.

On Friday, 23 September 2022 at 14:47:09 UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:82f4f5b8-3f40-4383...@googlegroups.com:
> > As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible
> > effect on global temperatures.

exactly
#GreenhouseEffect is political agenda to make $Bs selling fake CO2 emission certificates

one month/one year Short-Term Climate Changes are clocked by fluctuations in solar activity, in activity of solar volcanoes, earlier called sunspots, which can be easily studied at Solar Parker Lab or
https://spaceweather.com/

Number of solarspots is irrelevant to anything since what matters are highly active solar volcanoes, called sunspots in the past, ejecting Bs tones of plasma toward the Earth.

If volcanoes are large in number, i.e. 100 - 150 sunspots but activity is low, so Earth is covered with rainy clouds and temperatures at the surface are low.

If solar volcanoes are small in number , i.e. 50 sunspots but activity is high, so Earth is exposed to so called Twin-Sun-Effect since mass plasma ejected toward the Earth, doubles solar enregy directed to the Earth and rainy clouds turn into no rain high altitude clouds and doubled value of thermal energy from the Sun reaches the surface of the Earth , rising surface temperatures by 5-10-15 degrees C

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in news:ad2d8d99-408e-450b-ae80-
bb704071fd41n@googlegroups.com:

> thank you for your interest and support and promotion
> to help us win Nobel Prize

You are a fucking bloody retard.

Were we all to ignore you, it would hurt your feewins so bad you
would likely kill yourself.

One can hope.

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in
news:8d4b5905-1931-4797-90ed-8b077c6124a0n@googlegroups.com:

> Subject: Re: Year 2024 Temperature Predicted To Be "Off The
> Charts" From: a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
>
> On Friday, 23 September 2022 at 14:47:09 UTC+2,
> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>> Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:82f4f5b8-3f40-4383...@googlegroups.com:
>> > As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible
>> > effect on global temperatures.
>
> exactly

You are a fucking total retard. Blatantly obvious as such too, so no
real need to point it out, since you do such a fine job of showing the
world how abjectly stupid you are all by yourself.

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:41:17 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 6:20:53 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:52:38 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
>> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 1:48:47 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
>> >> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
>> >> >
>> >> >A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
>> >> >
>> >> >This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
>> >> >
>> >> >http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf
>> >> That's not science, it's politics.
>> >>
>> >> Doomsday predictions are ever popular and always wrong.
>> >>
>> >> Design something. You'll feel better.
>> >
>> >Doomsday predictions are the 30-years-from-now variety. When they start talking about right now and the next year, and the next, they are near term scientific forecasts, which the record of such forecasts shows to be very accurate.
>> Of course short-term climate predictions are accurate: next year will
>> be a lot like this year.
>
>They say slightly warmer, and you can expect a repeat of droughts, water restrictions, wildfires, torrential monsoons, and flooding, with lots and lots of economic damage and shortages of essential produce. If all that catastrophe is even as frequent as a 10 year event, it is survivable, but as an annual occurrence it's not. The planet has problems.

Lifespans are up. Crop yields are way up. Nutrition is up. Literacy is
up. PPM deaths from weather extremes are down over 90% in the last
hundred years. CO2 is greening the planet.

Sorry to disappoint you, but Earth is going great.

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 21:18:54 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
<soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 10:35:48 AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
>> La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
>>
>> A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
>>
>> This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
>>
>> http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf
>
>As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible effect on global temperatures.

CO2 increases are having one major effect: greening the planet,
feeding plants and making them more water efficient.

Too much CO2 has been sequestered in the last few hundred million
years. Plants were starving themselves to death.

Maybe a lot of CO2 will moderate the next ice age too.

On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 12:18:58 AM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
> On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 10:35:48 AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
> > La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
> >
> > A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
> >
> > This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
> >
> > http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf
> As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible effect on global temperatures.

You're saying that because you never read or study anything. All you know is a bunch deceptive climate denial verbiage you hear on the radio, and that verbiage is spouted by a bunch of low IQ types like Tucker Carlson who lack the ability to acquire an understanding of anything.

Read this and then explain to Usenet the error in its thesis:

https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/02/25/carbon-dioxide-cause-global-warming/

On Friday, 23 September 2022 at 18:58:01 UTC+2, John Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 21:18:54 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
> <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 10:35:48 AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
> >> La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
> >>
> >> A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
> >>
> >> This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
> >>
> >> http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf
> >
> >As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible effect on global temperatures.
> CO2 increases are having one major effect: greening the planet,
> feeding plants and making them more water efficient.
>
> Too much CO2 has been sequestered in the last few hundred million
> years. Plants were starving themselves to death.
>
> Maybe a lot of CO2 will moderate the next ice age too.
exactly
We all love CO2, we all love carbon, plant's food

On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 12:18:58 AM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
>> On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 10:35:48 AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
>> > La Nina is very not likely to continue for a fourth consecutive year into 2024, which believe it or not, made 2022 much cooler than without it.
>> >
>> > A super hot 2024 will happen because of record setting GHG emissions increasing the Earth energy imbalance without bound, reduction of human caused aerosols and their beneficial shading effect, and a rising phase of the solar irradiance cycle.
>> >
>> > This plain English summary accessible to anyone with a high school education and intelligence level somewhat warmer than a rock is in the latest James Hansen communication.
>> >
>> > http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2022/AugustTemperatureUpdate.22September2022.pdf
>> As I have already pointed out, GHG emissions have a negligible effect on global temperatures.
>
>You're saying that because you never read or study anything. All you know is a bunch deceptive climate denial verbiage you hear on the radio, and that verbiage is spouted by a bunch of low IQ types like Tucker Carlson who lack the ability to acquire an understanding of anything.
>
>Read this and then explain to Usenet the error in its thesis:
>
>https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/02/25/carbon-dioxide-cause-global-warming/

Google half life co2 atmosphere

Sources cite half-lives of 5 years to "infinite."

The annual down-slope at Mauna Loa is pretty steep.

China and India and Africa and Germany will burn all the coal they can
get. Get used to it. Design some electronics.

On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 9:58:01 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:

> Too much CO2 has been sequestered in the last few hundred million
> years.

That's an incomprehensible claim.

> Plants were starving themselves to death.

Huh? Evidence for this? Plants have a good idea how much
breathing they want to do, and at appropriate seasons grow leaves
to do that, and open pores when required. When they've had
enough gas, they close the pores, and in winter typically discard leaves.

They'd just breathe more if there was real deficiency in their 'diet'.