https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/graphics_at4.shtml?start#contents

On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:00:40 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/graphics_at4.shtml?start#contents

Gosh, people in Florida might die. Enjoy.

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:967d2e9b-7d0a-4f1a-8888-59bfaa1e8b40n@googlegroups.com:

> On Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 AM UTC+10, John Larkin
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:00:40 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
>> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/graphics_at4.shtml?start#contents
>>
>> Gosh, people in Florida might die. Enjoy.
>
> If they are silly enough to stay in Florida when a hurricane looks
> likely to hit, they'd qualify for a Darwin Award.
>
> That's fewer Gnatguys and John Larkins in the next generation.
> Better education might be a kinder, gentler way to get there, but
> Americans don't seem to want to pay for that.
>

There are plenty of storms. GnatTurd is clueless. But tha fact was
established in this group years ago. We (the globe)just saw the
biggest typhoon ever.

On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

>Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
>news:967d2e9b-7d0a-4f1a-8888-59bfaa1e8b40n@googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 10:25:48 AM UTC+10, John Larkin
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:00:40 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
>>> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/graphics_at4.shtml?start#contents
>>>
>>> Gosh, people in Florida might die. Enjoy.
>>
>> If they are silly enough to stay in Florida when a hurricane looks
>> likely to hit, they'd qualify for a Darwin Award.
>>
>> That's fewer Gnatguys and John Larkins in the next generation.
>> Better education might be a kinder, gentler way to get there, but
>> Americans don't seem to want to pay for that.
>>
>
>There are plenty of storms. GnatTurd is clueless. But tha fact was
>established in this group years ago. We (the globe)just saw the
>biggest typhoon ever.

Ever? How can you know?

On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

> >... We (the globe)just saw the
> >biggest typhoon ever.
> Ever? How can you know?

Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.

The 'how can you know' question is too big for
this tiny example of language ambiguity.

On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>
>> >... We (the globe)just saw the
>> >biggest typhoon ever.
>> Ever? How can you know?
>
>Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>
>The 'how can you know' question is too big for
>this tiny example of language ambiguity.

Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.

"Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.

On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
> <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>
>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
>>> Ever? How can you know?
>>
>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>>
>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny example of
>> language ambiguity.
>
> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>
> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.

Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.

On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <bl@ckb.ird> wrote:

>On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
>> <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>>
>>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
>>>> Ever? How can you know?
>>>
>>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>>>
>>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny example of
>>> language ambiguity.
>>
>> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>>
>> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
>
>Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.

How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time span
"ever" ?

It's improbable that "the biggest typhoon ever" happened recently.

On 2022/09/25 5:52 p.m., John Larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <bl@ckb.ird> wrote:
>
>> On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
>>> <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>>>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
>>>>> Ever? How can you know?
>>>>
>>>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>>>>
>>>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny example of
>>>> language ambiguity.
>>>
>>> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>>>
>>> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
>>
>> Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.
>
> How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time span
> "ever" ?
>
> It's improbable that "the biggest typhoon ever" happened recently.
>
>

I read (and of course now can't find) an article on a storm in the UK
about 1,000 years ago that washed away several square miles of
shoreline. The write up was very interesting in terms of damage done to
the country at the time.

I've hunted for it for a while with no luck - can't think of core words
from the article that would separate it from all the other stories of
storm damage.

John :-#(#

On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 4:29:02 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

> >The 'how can you know' question is too big for
> >this tiny example of language ambiguity.
> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>
> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.

No, we don't infer climate change because of inaccurate records of
old weather; we do it because of accurate records of old weather.

.... like an ice pond that produced four-foot thick blocks a couple of centuries ago,
now staying ice-free through winter
....and plants that bloomed at dates which do not match current crop observations

You'd be hard pressed to rival the time and temperature precision of
a daffodil deciding when it's time to bloom.

On 26/09/2022 02:44, John Robertson wrote:
> On 2022/09/25 5:52 p.m., John Larkin wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <bl@ckb.ird> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
>>>> <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>>>>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
>>>>>> Ever? How can you know?
>>>>>
>>>>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>>>>>
>>>>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny example of
>>>>> language ambiguity.
>>>>
>>>> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>>>>
>>>> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
>>>
>>> Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.
>>
>> How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time span
>> "ever" ?
>>
>> It's improbable that "the biggest typhoon ever" happened recently.

Biggest in the historical record seems to be a better way to describe it
and what is scary is that we will continue to break the records again
and again with increasing frequency and ferocity of storms.

A warmer atmosphere carrier more water vapour and more power with it.

> I read (and of course now can't find) an article on a storm in the UK
> about 1,000 years ago that washed away several square miles of
> shoreline. The write up was very interesting in terms of damage done to
> the country at the time.
>
> I've hunted for it for a while with no luck - can't think of core words
> from the article that would separate it from all the other stories of
> storm damage.

Is this the one you mean in 1287 that did for some of the Cinque ports?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_England_flood_of_February_1287
https://web.archive.org/web/20120106090117/http://villagenet.co.uk/history/1287-storms.html

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 8:52:24 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <b...@ckb.ird> wrote:
>
> >On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
> >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
> >> <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
> >>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
> >>>> Ever? How can you know?
> >>>
> >>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
> >>>
> >>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny example of
> >>> language ambiguity.
> >>
> >> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
> >>
> >> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
> >
> >Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.
> How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time span
> "ever" ?
>
> It's improbable that "the biggest typhoon ever" happened recently.

When the extent of the storm spans the entire Pacific Ocean, that's kinda a hint the storm is maximal. How could it possibly get any bigger?

There are various forms of life on this plant that imprint in their DNA every bit of sensory experience throughout their lifetime. One day science will be able to mine this prehistoric DNA to recreate images of the environment exactly as these creatures saw it.

On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 10:34:35 AM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
> On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 11:25:22 PM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 8:52:24 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
> > > On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <b...@ckb.ird> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
> > > >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
> > > >> <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
> > > >>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
> > > >>>> Ever? How can you know?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny example of
> > > >>> language ambiguity.
> > > >>
> > > >> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
> > > >>
> > > >> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
> > > >
> > > >Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.
> > > How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time span
> > > "ever" ?
> > >
> > > It's improbable that "the biggest typhoon ever" happened recently.
> > When the extent of the storm spans the entire Pacific Ocean, that's kinda a hint the storm is maximal. How could it possibly get any bigger?
> >
> > There are various forms of life on this plant that imprint in their DNA every bit of sensory experience throughout their lifetime. One day science will be able to mine this prehistoric DNA to recreate images of the environment exactly as these creatures saw it.
> But what if one of them was an a a or a Gnatguy? They misunderstand everything they think they see.

They're just descendants of lizards, so what can be expected of them?

>
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:37:10 +0100, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:

>On 26/09/2022 02:44, John Robertson wrote:
>> On 2022/09/25 5:52 p.m., John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <bl@ckb.ird> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
>>>>> <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>>>>>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
>>>>>>> Ever? How can you know?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny example of
>>>>>> language ambiguity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
>>>>
>>>> Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.
>>>
>>> How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time span
>>> "ever" ?
>>>
>>> It's improbable that "the biggest typhoon ever" happened recently.
>
>Biggest in the historical record seems to be a better way to describe it
>and what is scary is that we will continue to break the records again
>and again with increasing frequency and ferocity of storms.
>
>A warmer atmosphere carrier more water vapour and more power with it.
>
>> I read (and of course now can't find) an article on a storm in the UK
>> about 1,000 years ago that washed away several square miles of
>> shoreline. The write up was very interesting in terms of damage done to
>> the country at the time.
>>
>> I've hunted for it for a while with no luck - can't think of core words
>> from the article that would separate it from all the other stories of
>> storm damage.
>
>Is this the one you mean in 1287 that did for some of the Cinque ports?
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_England_flood_of_February_1287
>https://web.archive.org/web/20120106090117/http://villagenet.co.uk/history/1287-storms.html

Deaths from hurricanes are way down from historical levels, because we
have better warning and transport. Property damage is up because we
have so many luxury beachfront homes and hotels that have insurance.

The biggest killer in US history was the great Galveston storm of
1900. There are a couple of good books, like Isaacs Storm and A
Weekend in September.

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/outreach/history/#galveston

Galveston now has a enormous ugly concrete seawall. Nice town
otherwise, but has the usual dreadful gulf coast climate, with lots of
bugs.

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 06:25:18 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 8:52:24 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <b...@ckb.ird> wrote:
>>
>> >On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
>> >> <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>> >>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
>> >>>> Ever? How can you know?
>> >>>
>> >>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>> >>>
>> >>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny example of
>> >>> language ambiguity.
>> >>
>> >> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>> >>
>> >> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
>> >
>> >Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.
>> How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time span
>> "ever" ?
>>
>> It's improbable that "the biggest typhoon ever" happened recently.
>
>When the extent of the storm spans the entire Pacific Ocean, that's kinda a hint the storm is maximal. How could it possibly get any bigger?
>
>There are various forms of life on this plant that imprint in their DNA every bit of sensory experience throughout their lifetime. One day science will be able to mine this prehistoric DNA to recreate images of the environment exactly as these creatures saw it.

Crazy concept.

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:07:11 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 4:29:02 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
>> >The 'how can you know' question is too big for
>> >this tiny example of language ambiguity.
>> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>>
>> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
>
>No, we don't infer climate change because of inaccurate records of
>old weather; we do it because of accurate records of old weather.

Funny. Where the accurate records of storm intensity, like peak wind
speed and mimimum pressure and size? Time span = "ever."

In ice cores? Fossilized flowers?

The first reliable thermometer was apparently invented in 1714.
Accurate worldwide measurement and record keeping came a lot later.
But 24/7 RTD measurement and logging is pretty recent.

On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 8:57:31 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:07:11 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 4:29:02 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
> >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> >The 'how can you know' question is too big for
> >> >this tiny example of language ambiguity.
> >> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
> >>
> >> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
> >
> >No, we don't infer climate change because of inaccurate records of
> >old weather; we do it because of accurate records of old weather.

> Funny. Where the accurate records of storm intensity, like peak wind
> speed and mimimum pressure and size? Time span = "ever."

Modern records? Just do a Google search!

> The first reliable thermometer was apparently invented in 1714.
> Accurate worldwide measurement and record keeping came a lot later.

That confusion serves you right, for clipping my references to garden
records; folk have been noting the blossom events in writing for centuries,
they really CARE about their plants. They've also noted (business records)
ice productivity on ponds, and lots of other weather-related data.

> But 24/7 RTD measurement and logging is pretty recent.

RTD is convenient if you do electronics, but it's not gonna beat the
blooming daffodil at climate monitoring. Plant biochemistry is sophisticated stuff,
and even your backside has an accurate 98.6 F degree reference; that
doesn't have a resistive temperature detector, does it?

Temperature in particular, is VERY effective; it shows up in everything, every
written record or tree ring has a story to tell, if you pay attention.

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
news:rto1jhtvihti7dq8o0e7tke0g3b1bsm0bj@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
<whit3rd@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>
>>> >... We (the globe)just saw the
>>> >biggest typhoon ever.
>>> Ever? How can you know?
>>
>>Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>>
>>The 'how can you know' question is too big for
>>this tiny example of language ambiguity.
>
> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>
> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.

You are truly an idiot for getting an education years ago and then
tossing it out the outhouse window for stupid decisions about what to
believe from the scientific community. A community you abviously do
not belong to.

Millions of tone of polar ice ar melting that were NOT melting in
decades AND centuries past. The mat of ice sitting on Greenland is
two miles thick. Antarctica has square mile chunks shedding off from
its "shores".

You could not be more abjectly stupid or self impotent if you
tried.

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
news:imt1jhh9hepk4q3jh9aeppg02v3s8god7o@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:06:11 -0700, corvid <bl@ckb.ird> wrote:
>
>>On 9/25/22 16:28, John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:55:19 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
>>> <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, September 25, 2022 at 1:46:45 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2022 20:30:01 -0000 (UTC),
>>>>> DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> ... We (the globe)just saw the biggest typhoon ever.
>>>>> Ever? How can you know?
>>>>
>>>> Biggest ever :== biggest ever known.
>>>>
>>>> The 'how can you know' question is too big for this tiny
>>>> example of language ambiguity.
>>>
>>> Satellites and storm chaser planes are pretty recent gadgets.
>>>
>>> "Climate change" is mostly instrumentation change.
>>
>>Geological records haven't been changed by the recent gadgets.
>
> How do geological records quantify typhoon intensity over time
> span "ever" ?
>
> It's improbable that "the biggest typhoon ever" happened recently.

Pedantic semantical dipshit, Larkin. That's what you are.

"ever known", you stupid fucktard.

Of course there were events prior to recorded hidstory that were
more turbulent.

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:81cdc572-a942-439b-98f6-cf5f0a160085n@googlegroups.com:

> Mammals split from other tetrapod vertebrates about 220 millions
> years ago. A a and Gnatguy may be on a devolving branch, but the
> reversion back to the mean won't have got back to the lizards yet.
> And their problem isn't that their perceptions are primitive, it's
> that they perceive what they want to see, rather than anything
> that has anything much to do with reality. It's an evolutionary
> dead end, but they aren't dying out quite as fast as one would
> wish.
>

This chick has put together some good videos decsribing past era and
epochs.
<https://youtu.be/g2Ygd2LEOqs>