http://www.avertedimagination.com/img_pages/winterrose.html

a a <mentalcase@gmail.com> wrote in news:

snip

Go to some other group and post your off topic horseshit.

CCAD, sonny boy.

On Thursday, 29 September 2022 at 13:47:43 UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
> a a <menta...@gmail.com> wrote in news:
>
> snip
>
> Go to some other group and post your off topic horseshit.
>
> CCAD, sonny boy.
thank you for your interest
Unfortunately, there is no active astronomy groups on Usenet left

https://groups.google.com/search/groups?q=astronomy

https://groups.google.com/g/uk.sci.astronomy

is populated by one guy

I have 1,000+ active web links to solar activity studies to discuss.

https://www.codeproject.com/articles/812896/sunspot-surface-calculation-case-study-on-solving

sunspot surface calculation excellent project

I need electronics, sensors to detect X-ray, UV, IR radiation on-the-fly to generate charts, alerts

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in news:5574cb04-a459-4afe-8e6f-
6a4df407bf01n@googlegroups.com:

> Unfortunately, there is no active astronomy groups on Usenet left
>

You are also a Usenet total retard, obviously

uk.sci.astronomy
free.uk.science.astronomy
cn.bbs.sci.astronomy
alt.astronomy.solar
alt.astronomy

Now got the fuck away and stay the fuck away, child.

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in news:5574cb04-a459-4afe-8e6f-
6a4df407bf01n@googlegroups.com:

> I have 1,000+ active web links to solar activity studies to discuss.
>

AND you need to go do it somewhere else, just like your retarded
bitcoin price posts.

You are deliberately invading this electronics group with your inane
stupidity.

You want to learn a bit of cosmology / astronomy / Earth science...
etc.?

Get out of Usenet, punk. Go watch some YouTube videos. Folks WAY
smarter than your retarded, group spamming punk ass.

<https://youtu.be/JAosOXayma4>

#shutupyoustupiddog

the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old

#whocareslowbrainerfromSydney

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote:
> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old

And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
never reanimates.

Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
electronics design group.

#youaregroupheroatelectronics

Bertrand Sindri wrote:
> a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote:
>> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
>
> And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
> never reanimates.
>
> Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
> and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
> of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
> electronics design group.
>

Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
day or so.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

On 30/09/2022 17:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Bertrand Sindri wrote:
>> a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old

And was most likely a spammer or some well known deranged nutter
shouting about Einstein being *WRONG* OFTEN ALL IN CAPITALS.

>> And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
>> never reanimates.
>>
>> Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
>> and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
>> of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
>> electronics design group.
>>
>
> Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
> day or so.

Please don't encourage him to crap in there.

He's already hit the long dead uk.sci.astro :(

s.a.r is moderated so should be quite safe from his spew.

Wolf's Zurich sunspot number has been going since 1848 and is more than
adequate for the task. Wolf was a formidable statistician as well as
going onto be director of Bern Observatory.

Chatzisterergos (sp?) extended the time series back a further century by
incorporating all known previously recorded sunspot observations.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.06183.pdf

Wolf was prepared to do some incredibly tedious experiments on practical
statistics including 10000 throws of the finest dice he could find and
dropping a needle on a plate to simulate Monte Carlo experiment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Wolf

Ed Jaynes later analysed the Wolf dice data and determined the
systematic defects in the dice that Wolf had originally used. Namely
shifted centre of gravity in relation to the face markings and the die
being cut from a very precisely manufactured rectangular prism.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

On Friday, 30 September 2022 at 18:33:54 UTC+2, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Bertrand Sindri wrote:
> > a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
> >
> > And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
> > never reanimates.
> >
> > Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
> > and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
> > of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
> > electronics design group.
> >
> Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
> day or so.
>
> Cheers
>
> Phil Hobbs
thank you my friend
Google aquired DejaNews = Usenet and rejected to offer tree-like Usenet hierarchy access so Usenet groups on Google Groups just died since fake search engine
generates fake search results

https://groups.google.com/search?q=astronomy

banning access to high-traffic groups, since no such ranking feature has been implemented

On Friday, 30 September 2022 at 19:01:50 UTC+2, Martin Brown wrote:
> On 30/09/2022 17:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> > Bertrand Sindri wrote:
> >> a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
> And was most likely a spammer or some well known deranged nutter
> shouting about Einstein being *WRONG* OFTEN ALL IN CAPITALS.
> >> And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
> >> never reanimates.
> >>
> >> Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
> >> and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
> >> of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
> >> electronics design group.
> >>
> >
> > Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
> > day or so.
> Please don't encourage him to crap in there.
>
> He's already hit the long dead uk.sci.astro :(
>
> s.a.r is moderated so should be quite safe from his spew.
>
> Wolf's Zurich sunspot number has been going since 1848 and is more than
> adequate for the task. Wolf was a formidable statistician as well as
> going onto be director of Bern Observatory.
>
>
> Chatzisterergos (sp?) extended the time series back a further century by
> incorporating all known previously recorded sunspot observations.
>
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.06183.pdf
>
> Wolf was prepared to do some incredibly tedious experiments on practical
> statistics including 10000 throws of the finest dice he could find and
> dropping a needle on a plate to simulate Monte Carlo experiment.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Wolf
>
> Ed Jaynes later analysed the Wolf dice data and determined the
> systematic defects in the dice that Wolf had originally used. Namely
> shifted centre of gravity in relation to the face markings and the die
> being cut from a very precisely manufactured rectangular prism.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Martin Brown
Wolf's sunspot number is low science, old science fake and should replaced
by measure of volcanic activity on the Sun, measure of volcanic energy ejected by the Sun.

Just look at formula used to calculated number of sunspots.

For the same telescope "K" is contant, less than 1.

=====Case 1

Number of sunspots groups = 1
Number of sunspots = 10

=====
R = (10*G + S)*K

10*1 + 10 = 20*K

Case 2

Number of sunspots groups = 2
Number of sunspots in each group = 5

10*2 + 10 = 30*K

But actually, number of sunspots in Case 1 and Case 2 is the same

So I opt for the topological definition of sunspots index, as the sum of the volcanic activity on the Sun, calculating total volcanic energy ejected by every sunspot in total towards the Earth,
since what matters is mass and energy of coronal/coronary plasma ejected toward the Earth ,
since CMEs exactly fluctuate solar activity,
resulting in Short Term Climate Changes
one-month/year Climate Changes

Since pictuire of the Sun is no more 2D
and we can study solar surface activity in 3D
there is no need to calculate number of sunspots, which is fake index, as explained above.

========================The sunspot number is calculated using the simple equation: R = (10*G + S)*K. Where: R = the sunspot number. G = the number of sunspot groups observed.
How do you calculate the n…
edaboard.co.uk
The sunspot number is calculated using the simple equation: R = (10*G + S)*K

On Friday, 30 September 2022 at 19:01:50 UTC+2, Martin Brown wrote:
> On 30/09/2022 17:33, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> > Bertrand Sindri wrote:
> >> a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
> And was most likely a spammer or some well known deranged nutter
> shouting about Einstein being *WRONG* OFTEN ALL IN CAPITALS.
> >> And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
> >> never reanimates.
> >>
> >> Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on topic)
> >> and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the group, instead
> >> of the group retard for posting obviously off topic stuff here in an
> >> electronics design group.
> >>
> >
> > Both sci.astro.amateur and sci.astro.research have posts from the last
> > day or so.
> Please don't encourage him to crap in there.
>
> He's already hit the long dead uk.sci.astro :(
>
> s.a.r is moderated so should be quite safe from his spew.
>
> Wolf's Zurich sunspot number has been going since 1848 and is more than
> adequate for the task. Wolf was a formidable statistician as well as
> going onto be director of Bern Observatory.
>
>
> Chatzisterergos (sp?) extended the time series back a further century by
> incorporating all known previously recorded sunspot observations.
>
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.06183.pdf
>
> Wolf was prepared to do some incredibly tedious experiments on practical
> statistics including 10000 throws of the finest dice he could find and
> dropping a needle on a plate to simulate Monte Carlo experiment.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Wolf
>
> Ed Jaynes later analysed the Wolf dice data and determined the
> systematic defects in the dice that Wolf had originally used. Namely
> shifted centre of gravity in relation to the face markings and the die
> being cut from a very precisely manufactured rectangular prism.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Martin Brown
Sun is no more 2D object and solar activity, sunposts should be studied in 3D since modern technology offers trools to study Sun and solar activity in 3D

https://spaceweather.com/images2022/30sep22/limbactivity.gif

what was studied 100 years ago as a flat, 2D image of the Sun from a telescope, has been today replaced by modern solar lab, Parket solar lab in the space probe.

https://spaceweather.com/images2022/30sep22/limbactivity.gif

'til daddy took the T-bird away.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in news:06322d25-1f9d-4c71-baa0-
4fe1b00f624cn@googlegroups.com:
snipped retarded baby bullshit...

> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old

It matches your mental age.

You are accessing through the web and Google?

Not too bright.

Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:th6u3m$1vn1$1@gioia.aioe.org:

> a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote:
>> the last activity on astronomy usenet groups is 2 years old
>
> And if no one ever posts, because the last post is 2 years old, it
> never reanimates.
>
> Start posting your crap over there (where your crap would be on
> topic) and you just might be a group hero for reanimating the
> group, instead of the group retard for posting obviously off topic
> stuff here in an electronics design group.
>

OMG +1G

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in news:cdf6e5c6-b05b-4f75-831e-
b857bbb00e92n@googlegroups.com:

> #youaregroupheroatelectronics
>

#fuckoffanddiebrittwit

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote in
news:d9b2be34-79ca-42be-9d87-f03f611c0263n@googlegroups.com:

> banning access to high-traffic groups, since no such ranking
> feature has been implemented

You are an abject idiot with absolutely no clue how Google, much less
Google Groups works. YOU are fake, motherfucker.

All you are is a high traffic, off topic group troll and nothing
more.

#shutupstupiddog read:

"What was DejaNews?

The question is what is DejaNews, but the question really is what was DejaNews. DejaNews began as a site that was dedicated to searching and participating in discussion groups found on Usenet. It later changed its name to Deja.com. This change was due in part to the change of focus from general Usenet searching and discussions to consumer product reviews. With this change they also added an area with information on products, such as product descriptions.
What happened to DejaNews?

The consumer review section of Deja.com was later to be sold. It ended up being sold to eBay’s Half.com. This followed a series of layoffs at the company. After the sale of the consumer review section of Deja.com and some more layoffs, they were bought out completely by the number one search engine Google.

By acquiring Deja.com, Google gets their Usenet search technology. They also acquired the Usenet archive, the Deja.com trademarks, the code and operating systems that operate the Usenet service, and other intellectual property. The archive obtained by Google contained nearly 500 million articles.

If you are still looking for quality access to Usenet, the best place to go is FastUsenet.org. They offer 2 million new articles daily, as well as a wide variety of specialized content servers.
Google Usenet Archive

Whenever you are looking for a certain topic in Usenet and don’t know where to find it, the Google archive is a good place to look. Google archives all of the messages that they receive so that when you search for something in a newsgroup you can select the groups’ page on Google and it will show you the article or articles that the subject can be found in. The Google archive is a great tool that every Fast Usenet member should make use of.

The archives in Google are very large, probably several servers to hold all of the information. The messages posted there are only text, but Fast Usenet alone receives and sends over 2 million articles day. So you can only imagine how much information needs to be stored to keep a good archive. The Google archive also needs space so it can have some level of retention, meaning the amount of time that messages can be searched back to. Some articles can be even found to date back to a couple of years ago, and that is some serious storage.

So next time you want to find a subject and don’t know where to begin looking, why not try the Google Archive at www.google.com >> Groups. Then type in your search words into the search field. Google will then search an extensive archive and should return some great matches for your subject.
Related Posts

Jeff Bezos Posts Job Listing on Usenet over 24 Years Ago

https://www.fastusenet.org/blog/what-is-dejanews-where-did-it-go.html