After all, if the alleged existence of "spacetime" is true, the ripples of the
scalar traversal GW "detected" at Earth SHOULD AFFECT TIME TOO.

But, of course, this is 1,000,000 times CHEAPER than LIGO's hoax.

And this is not the way that "modern physics" should be conducted.

Example:

https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW150914.php
"At 09:51 GMT on 14 September 2015, the LIGO detectors picked up the first
ever direct signature of gravitational waves, coded as GW150914".

As it can be seen, ONE PREDICTED TEMPLATE (out of 250,000 theoretical
solutions of GR) of the waveform at the outputof LIGO's detector MATCHED
(80% correlation) the detected signal.

Such signal spans for about 450 msec, with a strong overshoot during
about 50 msec.

IF 3D space suffered such violent ripple, the COMPANION time of the
SPACETIME FABRIC should have had registered such "chirp".

Does anybody know if such a complementary experiment was conducted?

Or that was more difficult than detecting the travelling 3D space ripple?

I just wonder.

On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 6:25:45 PM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> After all, if the alleged existence of "spacetime" is true, the ripples of the
> scalar traversal GW "detected" at Earth SHOULD AFFECT TIME TOO.
>
> But, of course, this is 1,000,000 times CHEAPER than LIGO's hoax.
>
> And this is not the way that "modern physics" should be conducted.
>
> Example:
>
> https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW150914.php
> "At 09:51 GMT on 14 September 2015, the LIGO detectors picked up the first
> ever direct signature of gravitational waves, coded as GW150914".
>
> As it can be seen, ONE PREDICTED TEMPLATE (out of 250,000 theoretical
> solutions of GR) of the waveform at the outputof LIGO's detector MATCHED
> (80% correlation) the detected signal.
>
> Such signal spans for about 450 msec, with a strong overshoot during
> about 50 msec.
>
> IF 3D space suffered such violent ripple, the COMPANION time of the
> SPACETIME FABRIC should have had registered such "chirp".
>
> Does anybody know if such a complementary experiment was conducted?
>
> Or that was more difficult than detecting the travelling 3D space ripple?
>
> I just wonder.

It seems that relativists don't know shit about their own shit.

On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 1:25:45 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> After all, if the alleged existence of "spacetime" is true, the ripples of the
> scalar traversal GW "detected" at Earth SHOULD AFFECT TIME TOO.
>
> But, of course, this is 1,000,000 times CHEAPER than LIGO's hoax.
>
> And this is not the way that "modern physics" should be conducted.
>
> Example:
>
> https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW150914.php
> "At 09:51 GMT on 14 September 2015, the LIGO detectors picked up the first
> ever direct signature of gravitational waves, coded as GW150914".
>
> As it can be seen, ONE PREDICTED TEMPLATE (out of 250,000 theoretical
> solutions of GR) of the waveform at the outputof LIGO's detector MATCHED
> (80% correlation) the detected signal.
>
> Such signal spans for about 450 msec, with a strong overshoot during
> about 50 msec.
>
> IF 3D space suffered such violent ripple, the COMPANION time of the
> SPACETIME FABRIC should have had registered such "chirp".
>
> Does anybody know if such a complementary experiment was conducted?
>
> Or that was more difficult than detecting the travelling 3D space ripple?
>
> I just wonder.
There are three groups that study this effect.

On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 12:20:21 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 1:25:45 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > After all, if the alleged existence of "spacetime" is true, the ripples of the
> > scalar traversal GW "detected" at Earth SHOULD AFFECT TIME TOO.
> >
> > But, of course, this is 1,000,000 times CHEAPER than LIGO's hoax.
> >
> > And this is not the way that "modern physics" should be conducted.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW150914.php
> > "At 09:51 GMT on 14 September 2015, the LIGO detectors picked up the first
> > ever direct signature of gravitational waves, coded as GW150914".
> >
> > As it can be seen, ONE PREDICTED TEMPLATE (out of 250,000 theoretical
> > solutions of GR) of the waveform at the outputof LIGO's detector MATCHED
> > (80% correlation) the detected signal.
> >
> > Such signal spans for about 450 msec, with a strong overshoot during
> > about 50 msec.
> >
> > IF 3D space suffered such violent ripple, the COMPANION time of the
> > SPACETIME FABRIC should have had registered such "chirp".
> >
> > Does anybody know if such a complementary experiment was conducted?
> >
> > Or that was more difficult than detecting the travelling 3D space ripple?
> >
> > I just wonder.
> There are three groups that study this effect.

Another 20 years, 12 billion USD and 500,000 statistical filtered time templates for best matching over 300 atomic clocks
connected through another 2 billion USD ultra-high speed dedicated mesh network, linked with LIGO and alike.

The cooking algorithm will be the most polemic topic, as they have to invent a theory behind, with enough holes for accountability denial.

On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 8:38:03 AM UTC-3, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 12:20:21 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 1:25:45 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > After all, if the alleged existence of "spacetime" is true, the ripples of the
> > > scalar traversal GW "detected" at Earth SHOULD AFFECT TIME TOO.
> > >
> > > But, of course, this is 1,000,000 times CHEAPER than LIGO's hoax.
> > >
> > > And this is not the way that "modern physics" should be conducted.
> > >
> > > Example:
> > >
> > > https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW150914.php
> > > "At 09:51 GMT on 14 September 2015, the LIGO detectors picked up the first
> > > ever direct signature of gravitational waves, coded as GW150914".
> > >
> > > As it can be seen, ONE PREDICTED TEMPLATE (out of 250,000 theoretical
> > > solutions of GR) of the waveform at the outputof LIGO's detector MATCHED
> > > (80% correlation) the detected signal.
> > >
> > > Such signal spans for about 450 msec, with a strong overshoot during
> > > about 50 msec.
> > >
> > > IF 3D space suffered such violent ripple, the COMPANION time of the
> > > SPACETIME FABRIC should have had registered such "chirp".
> > >
> > > Does anybody know if such a complementary experiment was conducted?
> > >
> > > Or that was more difficult than detecting the travelling 3D space ripple?
> > >
> > > I just wonder.
> > There are three groups that study this effect.
> Another 20 years, 12 billion USD and 500,000 statistical filtered time templates for best matching over 300 atomic clocks
> connected through another 2 billion USD ultra-high speed dedicated mesh network, linked with LIGO and alike.
>
> The cooking algorithm will be the most polemic topic, as they have to invent a theory behind, with enough holes for accountability denial.

I don't mean timing in the Ghz range (or PetaHz in optical clocks). I mean influences on the baseband XO, in the Mhz range, used to
compute time progression with nsec pulses. Random glitches in time measurement?

Paul will be disappointed, it this happens, with his support to 10E-18 accuracy of TAI/UTC.

On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 3:38:03 AM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 12:20:21 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 1:25:45 PM UTC-8, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > After all, if the alleged existence of "spacetime" is true, the ripples of the
> > > scalar traversal GW "detected" at Earth SHOULD AFFECT TIME TOO.
> > >
> > > But, of course, this is 1,000,000 times CHEAPER than LIGO's hoax.
> > >
> > > And this is not the way that "modern physics" should be conducted.
> > >
> > > Example:
> > >
> > > https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW150914.php
> > > "At 09:51 GMT on 14 September 2015, the LIGO detectors picked up the first
> > > ever direct signature of gravitational waves, coded as GW150914".
> > >
> > > As it can be seen, ONE PREDICTED TEMPLATE (out of 250,000 theoretical
> > > solutions of GR) of the waveform at the outputof LIGO's detector MATCHED
> > > (80% correlation) the detected signal.
> > >
> > > Such signal spans for about 450 msec, with a strong overshoot during
> > > about 50 msec.
> > >
> > > IF 3D space suffered such violent ripple, the COMPANION time of the
> > > SPACETIME FABRIC should have had registered such "chirp".
> > >
> > > Does anybody know if such a complementary experiment was conducted?
> > >
> > > Or that was more difficult than detecting the travelling 3D space ripple?
> > >
> > > I just wonder.
> > There are three groups that study this effect.
> Another 20 years, 12 billion USD and 500,000 statistical filtered time templates for best matching over 300 atomic clocks
> connected through another 2 billion USD ultra-high speed dedicated mesh network, linked with LIGO and alike.
>
None of the three groups uses atomic clocks. I knew that you'd rush to eat shit. Bon appetit!