novaBBS - rec.photo.digital - Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean

Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean

<3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10892&group=rec.photo.digital#10892

copy link Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital

X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:4007:: with SMTP id kd7mr6303533qvb.52.1638368839069;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 06:27:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d188:: with SMTP id i130mr8074926ybg.475.1638368838882;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 06:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 06:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=37.19.212.88; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 37.19.212.88
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean
From: rander3...@gmail.com (RichA)
Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 14:27:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

by: RichA - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 14:27 UTC

Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean

<q7qdnSE7CZvIbjr8nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10898&group=rec.photo.digital#10898

copy link Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:12:36 -0600
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 11:12:29 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
Subject: Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean
Content-Language: en-NZ
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>
From: geo...@nospamgeoffwood.org (geoff)
In-Reply-To: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <q7qdnSE7CZvIbjr8nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 13
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-xYGMC5mdiyvmY3ro3tWBgskY2xro08wxf4quFWQmJrDmfwD+uzVk/1XNz/4XO2vUYx14Dd5opZOrIwP!eKXpCzNwPF85LOQld9vuKd3exYcfbwniij0H41Z6ihTZWAbAeZw6Pr5tKfj9UlfL26C832Hn
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1688

by: geoff - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:12 UTC

On 2/12/2021 3:27 am, RichA wrote:
> That body texture is a big mistake.
>
> https://petapixel.com/2021/11/30/canon-eos-r3-review-blazing-speed-meets-robust-body/
>

Yes, looks a bit of a dust/grime-trap.

General question, not just this, but with shutter-free mirrorless
cameras, it there usually a definitive visual and/or audible (selectable
?) indication confirming that a shot (or series) has actually been taken ?

geoff

Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean

<2e63703c-dad8-41ab-9d0b-6934147baf1bn@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10899&group=rec.photo.digital#10899

copy link Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:14a3:: with SMTP id x3mr9775101qkj.286.1638403514607;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:4f4:: with SMTP id w20mr11361701ybs.421.1638403514444;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:05:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <q7qdnSE7CZvIbjr8nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=37.19.212.90; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 37.19.212.90
References: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com> <q7qdnSE7CZvIbjr8nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2e63703c-dad8-41ab-9d0b-6934147baf1bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean
From: rander3...@gmail.com (RichA)
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:05:14 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

by: RichA - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 00:05 UTC

On Wednesday, 1 December 2021 at 17:12:56 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
> On 2/12/2021 3:27 am, RichA wrote:
> > That body texture is a big mistake.
> >
> > https://petapixel.com/2021/11/30/canon-eos-r3-review-blazing-speed-meets-robust-body/
> >
> Yes, looks a bit of a dust/grime-trap.
>
> General question, not just this, but with shutter-free mirrorless
> cameras, it there usually a definitive visual and/or audible (selectable
> ?) indication confirming that a shot (or series) has actually been taken ?
>
> geoff

For that one, I don't know.

Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean

<176cf889-d821-46e2-8356-d22ae63ab961n@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10900&group=rec.photo.digital#10900

copy link Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4051:: with SMTP id i17mr9978450qko.333.1638406774195;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:59:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:ced1:: with SMTP id x200mr11824933ybe.211.1638406773931;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:59:33 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:59:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2e63703c-dad8-41ab-9d0b-6934147baf1bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=49.191.248.121; posting-account=3ZTaFwoAAADsXCzxPh2WAi41N81sIjDj
NNTP-Posting-Host: 49.191.248.121
References: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>
<q7qdnSE7CZvIbjr8nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <2e63703c-dad8-41ab-9d0b-6934147baf1bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <176cf889-d821-46e2-8356-d22ae63ab961n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean
From: cdsr...@gmail.com (Magani)
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:59:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

by: Magani - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 00:59 UTC

On Thursday, 2 December 2021 at 10:05:16 am UTC+10, RichA wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 December 2021 at 17:12:56 UTC-5, geoff wrote:
> > On 2/12/2021 3:27 am, RichA wrote:
> > > That body texture is a big mistake.
> > >
> > > https://petapixel.com/2021/11/30/canon-eos-r3-review-blazing-speed-meets-robust-body/
> > >
> > Yes, looks a bit of a dust/grime-trap.
> >
> > General question, not just this, but with shutter-free mirrorless
> > cameras, it there usually a definitive visual and/or audible (selectable
> > ?) indication confirming that a shot (or series) has actually been taken ?
> >
> > geoff

On my Canon EOS RP, there's a definite, if quiet, 'click' accompanied by the viewfinder/external screen 'blinking' as it refreshes. Not sure if this is the case across the range, but it would be strange if it isn't. I've never dived deep enough into the menu to see if it can be turned off. However, in the manual there is a section headed 'Shooting Quiet Scenes' that says :"Where silence is needed, you can shoot without beeps such as shutter release sounds."

Cheers,
Magani

Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean

<soa3q0$lrv$1@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10901&group=rec.photo.digital#10901

copy link Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: david-ta...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid (David Taylor)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:31:44 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <soa3q0$lrv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>
<q7qdnSE7CZvIbjr8nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:31:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1209d6389f9fbe8b78fad1bae83649db";
logging-data="22399"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19A9SAhB+FWETlm95kIPRNiezJOrFx+hcM="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.3.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MbK59cio70bvfhqdXEcJyklpLPY=
In-Reply-To: <q7qdnSE7CZvIbjr8nZ2dnUU7-V3NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-GB

by: David Taylor - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:31 UTC

On 01/12/2021 22:12, geoff wrote:
> General question, not just this, but with shutter-free mirrorless
> cameras, it there usually a definitive visual and/or audible (selectable
> ?) indication confirming that a shot (or series) has actually been taken ?
>
> geoff

With my MFT GX7 in electronic shutter mode, it is completely silent, but you
can enable a sound if you wish (default is enabled), and you may get a
viewfinder flash.

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean

<slrnsqh5g8.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10903&group=rec.photo.digital#10903

copy link Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: u9536...@gmail.com (Incubus)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:46:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: One with the night
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <slrnsqh5g8.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>
References: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:46:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2ee5a951ab6fc6e98453880f8eb617e9";
logging-data="27696"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4wusSinoe+v1+a1fQkMV7KRu+QugH0IU="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9qZXzP0lWEkQVqvrz34FGN2uSbA=

by: Incubus - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:46 UTC

On 2021-12-01, RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
> That body texture is a big mistake.
>
> https://petapixel.com/2021/11/30/canon-eos-r3-review-blazing-speed-meets-robust-body/

petapixel are basically owned by Canon. There are numerous inaccuracies
in that article in favour of Canon.

Have you held that camera?

Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is a functional tool that is easy to keep clean

<C5MqJ.48586$1d1.32610@fx99.iad>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10907&group=rec.photo.digital#10907

copy link Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx99.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:91.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Subject: Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is a functional tool that is easy to keep
clean
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>
From: bitbuc...@blackhole.com (Alan Browne)
In-Reply-To: <3548b373-9c38-4728-9636-14f7e3c28775n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <C5MqJ.48586$1d1.32610@fx99.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 15:48:50 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:48:50 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1775

by: Alan Browne - Sat, 4 Dec 2021 15:48 UTC

On 2021-12-01 09:27, RichA wrote:
> That body texture is a big mistake.
>
> https://petapixel.com/2021/11/30/canon-eos-r3-review-blazing-speed-meets-robust-body/

As usual you need to hunt for anything to moan about.

The texture is likely to make it less likely to slip from your hands and
ruin all your fine lenses and the camera ...

I have cameras with similar textures and they're easily kept clean with
a very mild soapy solution on a soft cloth. Any 'harder' crud gets the
alcohol, usually with Q-tip / toothpick in deeper nooks and crannies.

As to looks, it's a tool, and it looks like a very well designed tool at
that.

--
"...there are many humorous things in this world; among them the white
man's notion that he is less savage than the other savages."
-Samuel Clemens

<< WAIT >>

tech / rec.photo.digital / Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean

Subject	Author
Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean	RichA
Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean	geoff
Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean	RichA
Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean	Magani
Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean	David Taylor
Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is ugly, will be hard to keep clean	Incubus
Re: Canon's pro EOS R3 is a functional tool that is easy to keep	Alan Browne