Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

6 May, 2024: The networking issue during the past two days has been identified and appears to be fixed. Will keep monitoring.

tech / rec.photo.digital / Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

SubjectAuthor
* Twitter violates photographer rightsRichA
+- Re: Twitter violates photographer rightsBill W
+* Re: Twitter violates photographer rightsnospam
|`* Re: Twitter violates photographer rightsRichA
| `* Re: Twitter violates photographer rightsnospam
|  `* Re: Twitter violates photographer rightsIncubus
|   `- Re: Twitter violates photographer rightsnospam
+- Re: Twitter violates photographer rightsIncubus
`- Re: Twitter violates photographer rightsRichA

1
Twitter violates photographer rights

<eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10887&group=rec.photo.digital#10887

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1aa8:: with SMTP id s40mr3427911qtc.381.1638319656232;
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:47:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:490:: with SMTP id 138mr3087448ybe.678.1638319656038;
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:47:34 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=37.19.213.189; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 37.19.213.189
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Twitter violates photographer rights
From: rander3...@gmail.com (RichA)
Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:47:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: RichA - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 00:47 UTC

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

<0001HW.2756FF5F063C9E4230DBED38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10888&group=rec.photo.digital#10888

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!178.20.174.213.MISMATCH!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx29.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: noth...@nowhere.com (Bill W)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.2756FF5F063C9E4230DBED38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>
Subject: Re: Twitter violates photographer rights
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 10
X-Complaints-To: me+support@newsgroup.ninja
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 00:54:55 UTC
Organization: me+support@newsgroup.ninja
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:54:55 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1130
 by: Bill W - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 00:54 UTC

On Nov 30, 2021, RichA wrote
(in article<eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>):

> https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

Which right does that violate? They are not stopping anyone from taking
photos in public places, like one state tried to do, and might have actually
done. I don’t think I agree with their policy, but I don’t see any rights
violation.

Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

<301120212036252414%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10889&group=rec.photo.digital#10889

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Twitter violates photographer rights
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:36:25 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <301120212036252414%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ef73d8c08812d3e7d01f32a6bc2e3416";
logging-data="419"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189siuZSKpb7lUPzUAiFbPp"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YPaGLMtmIn5k/PzkkysORhwa5ic=
 by: nospam - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 01:36 UTC

In article <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

twitter is not violating anyone's rights.

Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

<c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10891&group=rec.photo.digital#10891

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:389:: with SMTP id j9mr7583242qtx.504.1638368580116;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 06:23:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:5c3:: with SMTP id 186mr7940551ybf.505.1638368579977;
Wed, 01 Dec 2021 06:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 06:22:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <301120212036252414%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=37.19.212.88; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 37.19.212.88
References: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com> <301120212036252414%nospam@nospam.invalid>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Twitter violates photographer rights
From: rander3...@gmail.com (RichA)
Injection-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 14:23:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: RichA - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 14:22 UTC

On Tuesday, 30 November 2021 at 20:36:32 UTC-5, nospam wrote:
> In article <eb3623d2-4330-43a7...@googlegroups.com>,
> RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20
>
> twitter is not violating anyone's rights.

Sure they are. Using this as a template, ALL journalistic and other, non-commercial use of a person's image could be prohibited.

Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

<011220210937520952%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10893&group=rec.photo.digital#10893

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Twitter violates photographer rights
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 09:37:52 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <011220210937520952%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com> <301120212036252414%nospam@nospam.invalid> <c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ef73d8c08812d3e7d01f32a6bc2e3416";
logging-data="18670"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vC9K16Ka6bdFYqOKpQ+xN"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EyPZ43j5N5IV2rb555UpNBFqyMQ=
 by: nospam - Wed, 1 Dec 2021 14:37 UTC

In article <c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20
> >
> > twitter is not violating anyone's rights.
>
> Sure they are. Using this as a template, ALL journalistic and other,
> non-commercial use of a person's image could be prohibited.

twitter is a private platform and they get to decide what content they
want to carry. forcing twitter (or any platform) to carry content they
do not want to carry violates *their* rights.

Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

<slrnsqh58l.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10902&group=rec.photo.digital#10902

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: u9536...@gmail.com (Incubus)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Twitter violates photographer rights
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:42:45 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: One with the night
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <slrnsqh58l.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>
References: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:42:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2ee5a951ab6fc6e98453880f8eb617e9";
logging-data="27696"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mcCj7f25eIVH1mTr5I2S+qKg8zXZCPCw="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dtEtX1u4c4S9D6zE3hXt5dd+T0U=
 by: Incubus - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:42 UTC

On 2021-12-01, RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

"Let's unpack what that means".

I really hate the way that woke Leftists speak these days.

Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

<slrnsqh5nc.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10904&group=rec.photo.digital#10904

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: u9536...@gmail.com (Incubus)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Twitter violates photographer rights
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:50:36 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: One with the night
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <slrnsqh5nc.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>
References: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>
<301120212036252414%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com>
<011220210937520952%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:50:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2ee5a951ab6fc6e98453880f8eb617e9";
logging-data="27696"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ND5h0K9jI9VBoPGDlM1qUGd++ehC2gRI="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yy1Yo1Bo5ONtBeg8F9Cq/NGgh8s=
 by: Incubus - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:50 UTC

On 2021-12-01, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> In article <c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com>,
> RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > > https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20
>> >
>> > twitter is not violating anyone's rights.
>>
>> Sure they are. Using this as a template, ALL journalistic and other,
>> non-commercial use of a person's image could be prohibited.
>
> twitter is a private platform and they get to decide what content they
> want to carry. forcing twitter (or any platform) to carry content they
> do not want to carry violates *their* rights.

It's a bit more complicated than that. Twitter and Facebook say they
are carriers but behave like publishers when it suits them. The two
roles have very different legal responsibilities.

Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

<021220210803016851%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10905&group=rec.photo.digital#10905

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Twitter violates photographer rights
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 08:03:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <021220210803016851%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com> <301120212036252414%nospam@nospam.invalid> <c129177f-33b6-4302-a0dd-27587c8f3f21n@googlegroups.com> <011220210937520952%nospam@nospam.invalid> <slrnsqh5nc.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d5f8391d7cd0657aff26cb28a79d4dab";
logging-data="1318"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+D9Jcmh1yjRAZT8mdVT1Wb"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zfudOROQAG+IrBinX4gqkMpwsqA=
 by: nospam - Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:03 UTC

In article <slrnsqh5nc.50h.u9536612@localhost.localdomain>, Incubus
<u9536612@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> > > https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20
> >> >
> >> > twitter is not violating anyone's rights.
> >>
> >> Sure they are. Using this as a template, ALL journalistic and other,
> >> non-commercial use of a person's image could be prohibited.
> >
> > twitter is a private platform and they get to decide what content they
> > want to carry. forcing twitter (or any platform) to carry content they
> > do not want to carry violates *their* rights.
>
> It's a bit more complicated than that.

no, it's not. it's actually quite simple.

> Twitter and Facebook say they
> are carriers but behave like publishers when it suits them.

they do not say they are carriers, nor does that even matter.

> The two
> roles have very different legal responsibilities.

myth.

Re: Twitter violates photographer rights

<2ea4a684-37ac-4815-87e4-b7d06e568785n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=10914&group=rec.photo.digital#10914

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:410:: with SMTP id n16mr43761092qtx.369.1638842837174;
Mon, 06 Dec 2021 18:07:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:a064:: with SMTP id x91mr47036664ybh.607.1638842837013;
Mon, 06 Dec 2021 18:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:07:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=37.19.212.5; posting-account=8Vsz_woAAABQPV3Epo66m_rYvK1EHzOV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 37.19.212.5
References: <eb3623d2-4330-43a7-86d1-550db5f08c32n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2ea4a684-37ac-4815-87e4-b7d06e568785n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Twitter violates photographer rights
From: rander3...@gmail.com (RichA)
Injection-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 02:07:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 6
 by: RichA - Tue, 7 Dec 2021 02:07 UTC

On Tuesday, 30 November 2021 at 19:47:38 UTC-5, RichA wrote:
> https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1465683094581792771?s=20

Twitter's Marxist censor policy backfires on them, horribly:

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-59547353

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor