https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.

So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
times, 20000 times, anything you like.

Thank you, poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
DARE YOU!!!!" like always.

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
> So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
> like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
> the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
> during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
> 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
> times, 20000 times, anything you like.
>
> Thank you, poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.

Maciej, an argument that was idiotic last week (and the week
before, and before, ...) is still an idiotic argument this
week.

On Monday, 20 March 2023 at 11:32:18 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> > As seen, the definition of second loved so
> > much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> > wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> > lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> > 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
> >
> > So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
> > like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
> > the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
> > during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
> > 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
> > times, 20000 times, anything you like.
> >
> > Thank you, poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
> > so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
> > DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
> Maciej, an argument that was idiotic last week (and the week
> before, and before, ...) is still an idiotic argument this
> week.

Python, apart of arm waving and insults you can
oppose nothing to it, samely as a week before, and
before, and before.
Neither your fellow idiots can.

> > so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
> > DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
as expected from relativistic scum.

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Monday, 20 March 2023 at 11:32:18 UTC+1, Python wrote:
>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
>>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
>>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
>>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
>>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
>>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>>>
>>> So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
>>> like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
>>> the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
>>> during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
>>> 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
>>> times, 20000 times, anything you like.
>>>
>>> Thank you, poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
>>> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
>>> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
>> Maciej, an argument that was idiotic last week (and the week
>> before, and before, ...) is still an idiotic argument this
>> week.
>
> Python, apart of arm waving and insults you can
> oppose nothing to it, samely as a week before, and
> before, and before.
> Neither your fellow idiots can.
>
>>> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
>>> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
> as expected from relativistic scum.

Look at your posts, Maciej, you are the one waving, insulting,
raving, spiting and screaming all day long for years here.

On Monday, 20 March 2023 at 12:24:54 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Monday, 20 March 2023 at 11:32:18 UTC+1, Python wrote:
> >> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> >>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> >>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> >>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> >>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> >>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
> >>>
> >>> So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
> >>> like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
> >>> the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
> >>> during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
> >>> 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
> >>> times, 20000 times, anything you like.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you, poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
> >>> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
> >>> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
> >> Maciej, an argument that was idiotic last week (and the week
> >> before, and before, ...) is still an idiotic argument this
> >> week.
> >
> > Python, apart of arm waving and insults you can
> > oppose nothing to it, samely as a week before, and
> > before, and before.
> > Neither your fellow idiots can.
> >
> >>> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
> >>> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
> > as expected from relativistic scum.
> Look at your posts, Maciej, you are the one waving, insulting,

Poor trash, look at your posts yourself.
And The Shit of your idiot guru remains inconsistent, as
proven above.

The shit of life appears consistent.