IRT is described in Chapter 4 of my book "Model Mechanics: The Final Theory"
An IRT observer does not assumed that he is at rest and that the observed object is in a state of relative motion. Therefore, he has two sets of equations
predict the rate of a moving clock:
1. One set to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate......this is the same as SRT predicts.
2. The other set is to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a faster rate than the observer's clock.

IRT predictions has no time dilation. The rate of a clock accumulating clock seconds is dependent on its state of absolute motion. IOW, a clock second of a clock will represent a specific amount of time but not the same amount of time in different frames.

Ken Seto wrote:
> IRT is described in Chapter 4 of my book "Model Mechanics: The Final Theory"
> An IRT observer does not assumed that he is at rest and that the observed object is in a state of relative motion. Therefore, he has two sets of equations
> predict the rate of a moving clock:
> 1. One set to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate......this is the same as SRT predicts.
> 2. The other set is to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a faster rate than the observer's clock.
>
> IRT predictions has no time dilation. The rate of a clock accumulating clock seconds is dependent on its state of absolute motion. IOW, a clock second of a clock will represent a specific amount of time but not the same amount of time in different frames.

Your link does not work.

On Tuesday, 28 March 2023 at 15:59:48 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Ken Seto wrote:
> > IRT is described in Chapter 4 of my book "Model Mechanics: The Final Theory"
> > An IRT observer does not assumed that he is at rest and that the observed object is in a state of relative motion. Therefore, he has two sets of equations
> > predict the rate of a moving clock:
> > 1. One set to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate......this is the same as SRT predicts.
> > 2. The other set is to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a faster rate than the observer's clock.
> >
> > IRT predictions has no time dilation. The rate of a clock accumulating clock seconds is dependent on its state of absolute motion. IOW, a clock second of a clock will represent a specific amount of time but not the same amount of time in different frames.
> Your link does not work.

And your Shit is inconsistent.

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 March 2023 at 15:59:48 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>> Ken Seto wrote:
>>> IRT is described in Chapter 4 of my book "Model Mechanics: The Final Theory"
>>> An IRT observer does not assumed that he is at rest and that the observed object is in a state of relative motion. Therefore, he has two sets of equations
>>> predict the rate of a moving clock:
>>> 1. One set to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate......this is the same as SRT predicts.
>>> 2. The other set is to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a faster rate than the observer's clock.
>>>
>>> IRT predictions has no time dilation. The rate of a clock accumulating clock seconds is dependent on its state of absolute motion. IOW, a clock second of a clock will represent a specific amount of time but not the same amount of time in different frames.
>> Your link does not work.
>
> And your Shit is inconsistent.

You couldn't recognize consistency if it kicked you in the ass, Maciej.

On Tuesday, 28 March 2023 at 16:50:48 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 28 March 2023 at 15:59:48 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> >> Ken Seto wrote:
> >>> IRT is described in Chapter 4 of my book "Model Mechanics: The Final Theory"
> >>> An IRT observer does not assumed that he is at rest and that the observed object is in a state of relative motion. Therefore, he has two sets of equations
> >>> predict the rate of a moving clock:
> >>> 1. One set to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate......this is the same as SRT predicts.
> >>> 2. The other set is to predict that the observed clock is accumulating clock seconds at a faster rate than the observer's clock.
> >>>
> >>> IRT predictions has no time dilation. The rate of a clock accumulating clock seconds is dependent on its state of absolute motion. IOW, a clock second of a clock will represent a specific amount of time but not the same amount of time in different frames.
> >> Your link does not work.
> >
> > And your Shit is inconsistent.
> You couldn't recognize consistency if it kicked you in the ass, Maciej.

I've proven what I said, you can only spit
and bark. As expected from a relativistic
halfbrain, of course.

Le 28/03/2023 à 16:50, Python a écrit :
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:

> You couldn't recognize consistency if it kicked you in the ass, Maciej.

In th ass, in the ass...

Des promesses, Jean-Pierre, des promesses...

Même Richard-Hubert n'oserait pas...

R.H.