How Cantor's delusions lead to paradoxes galore:

https://www.academia.edu/78740399/Georg_Cantor_the_father_of_all_mainstream_mathematical_cranks

On Sunday, 28 August 2022 at 13:56:50 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> How Cantor's delusions lead to paradoxes galore:
>
> https://www.academia.edu/78740399/Georg_Cantor_the_father_of_all_mainstream_mathematical_cranks

Cantor was not only a little delusional, he was insane. He was institutionalised because he lost his marbles.

On Sunday, 28 August 2022 at 13:58:37 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 August 2022 at 13:56:50 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > How Cantor's delusions lead to paradoxes galore:
> >
> > https://www.academia.edu/78740399/Georg_Cantor_the_father_of_all_mainstream_mathematical_cranks
> Cantor was not only a little delusional, he was insane. He was institutionalised because he lost his marbles.

“What good your beautiful proof on the transcendence of Pi: Why investigate such problems, given that irrational numbers do not even exist?” -- Leopold Kronecker

“All results of the profoundest mathematical investigation must ultimately be expressible in the simple form of properties of numbers.” -- Leopold Kronecker

"I don't know what predominates in Cantor's theory - philosophy or theology, but I am sure that there is no mathematics there." -- Leopold Kronecker

Cantor also believed in the absolute truth of his set theory because it had been revealed to him, as he once told Mittag-Leffler, from God directly. If anyone said anything like this today, he would be laughed to scorn! But no, thousands of morons in the mainstream zealously follow Cantor's feverish deliriums.

On Sunday, 28 August 2022 at 14:08:02 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 August 2022 at 13:58:37 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Sunday, 28 August 2022 at 13:56:50 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > How Cantor's delusions lead to paradoxes galore:
> > >
> > > https://www.academia.edu/78740399/Georg_Cantor_the_father_of_all_mainstream_mathematical_cranks
> > Cantor was not only a little delusional, he was insane. He was institutionalised because he lost his marbles.
> “What good your beautiful proof on the transcendence of Pi: Why investigate such problems, given that irrational numbers do not even exist?” -- Leopold Kronecker
>
> “All results of the profoundest mathematical investigation must ultimately be expressible in the simple form of properties of numbers.” -- Leopold Kronecker
>
> "I don't know what predominates in Cantor's theory - philosophy or theology, but I am sure that there is no mathematics there." -- Leopold Kronecker
>
> Cantor also believed in the absolute truth of his set theory because it had been revealed to him, as he once told Mittag-Leffler, from God directly. If anyone said anything like this today, he would be laughed to scorn! But no, thousands of morons in the mainstream zealously follow Cantor's feverish deliriums.

"I entertain no doubts as to the truth of the transfinites, which I have recognized with God's help and which, in their diversity, I have studied for more than twenty years; every year, and almost every day brings me further in this science." - Father of all mathematical cranks - Georg Cantor.

On Sunday, August 28, 2022 at 7:08:02 PM UTC+1, Eram semper recta wrote:

> Cantor also believed in the absolute truth of his set theory because it had been revealed to him, as he once told Mittag-Leffler, from God directly. If anyone said anything like this today, he would be laughed to scorn! But no, thousands of morons in the mainstream zealously follow Cantor's feverish deliriums.

Not true. Cantor's theory is considered a clever start, with some good arguments in his work, such as the brilliant, and beautiful, diagonal argument; but his set theory on the whole is considered flawed, and is sometimes labelled naive set theory as a consequence. It was replaced....generations ago.. Also not all mainstream mathematicians think of set theory as an ultimate foundation: some think of it as a useful book keeping device that yields genuine and valuable insights, but isn't the last word. I seem to remember Fields Medalist Richard Borcherds expressing views roughly along those lines for instance.

Are you sure you actually attended a university maths degree JG 115? You didn't just dream it did you? That would explain the misconceptions you have about academia after all...

Speaking of things that might have happened in a dream, do you have any evidence of a 'genius level IQ' in the form of an official proctored Mensa test result? Admittedly such a result would only establish an IQ 130+ , (and IQ 130 is hardly genius level), but it would at least be some evidence. All we are seeing from you lately (or much earlier in fact) is the same old sub-115 level stuff.

(No offense intended to those with IQ 115, which is a respectable score, as they are generally far more sensible and rational than to believe they have seen above and beyond the community of expert mathematicians on their own areas of specialty).

Regards

QB 133

Remain Calm and Keep Loving Real Analysis