:
Existing telecommunications infrastructure could operate as a miniaturized global positioning system, offering submetre resolution in urban areas and indoors, where location information from satellites is often inaccurate.
:

Agglomeration

https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-022-03696-3/d41586-022-03696-3.pdf

#failyfakebyfred

I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote:
> I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones

False.

If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
you presently present.

You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
upon the evidence of your postings here.

Try a more believable lie next time.

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 5:28:43 PM UTC-4, Lie by a a wrote:
> a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> > from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones
> False.
>
> If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
> would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
> you presently present.
>
> You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
> is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
> upon the evidence of your postings here.
>
> Try a more believable lie next time.

I don't know why, but this post really struck me as funny. It's especially so, because the author felt the need to hide his usual posting name, by using the name, "Lie by a a".

LOL, sometimes this group is just too fucking nuts!

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 21:52:31 UTC, Ricky wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 5:28:43 PM UTC-4, Lie by a a wrote:
> > a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> > > from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones
> > False.
> >
> > If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
> > would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
> > you presently present.
> >
> > You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
> > is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
> > upon the evidence of your postings here.
> >
> > Try a more believable lie next time.
> I don't know why, but this post really struck me as funny. It's especially so, because the author felt the need to hide his usual posting name, by using the name, "Lie by a a".
>
> LOL, sometimes this group is just too fucking nuts!
>
I know there isn't much point, but here goes:
- GPS satellite navigation was already well established 20 years ago
- Triangulation based on signal strength from base stations does not give very
useful results because there are so many sources of variable attenuation
- I was able to get good distance measurements from various base stations
on a Nokia phone by reading out the timing advance data. This was available
when the phone was switched into engineering mode and gave results accurate
to a few hundred metres even when the base stations were many miles away.
It didn't need to be invented - it was built into the GSM specifications which were
developed in the 1980s.
- The network operators could do this without you knowing about it if, for example,
the police requested it. For a period of a few weeks around 22 years ago one of
the network operators regularly sent me digital maps showing everywhere I had
been with my phone based on timing advance data as part of a collaboration
with an equipment manufacturer.
It was surprising how good they were. We compared them with GPS data from
a car fitted with mobile phone and GPS navigation systems. It was just over 22
years ago that selective availability was turned off which made GPS useful for
ordinary users.

John

#morongoaway

is your Tesla supercharging fake or can be verified on Twitter by Elon Musk ?

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 6:00:02 PM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 21:52:31 UTC, Ricky wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 5:28:43 PM UTC-4, Lie by a a wrote:
> > > a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> > > > from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones
> > > False.
> > >
> > > If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
> > > would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
> > > you presently present.
> > >
> > > You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
> > > is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
> > > upon the evidence of your postings here.
> > >
> > > Try a more believable lie next time.
> > I don't know why, but this post really struck me as funny. It's especially so, because the author felt the need to hide his usual posting name, by using the name, "Lie by a a".
> >
> > LOL, sometimes this group is just too fucking nuts!
> >
> I know there isn't much point, but here goes:
> - GPS satellite navigation was already well established 20 years ago
> - Triangulation based on signal strength from base stations does not give very
> useful results because there are so many sources of variable attenuation
> - I was able to get good distance measurements from various base stations
> on a Nokia phone by reading out the timing advance data. This was available
> when the phone was switched into engineering mode and gave results accurate
> to a few hundred metres even when the base stations were many miles away.
> It didn't need to be invented - it was built into the GSM specifications which were
> developed in the 1980s.
> - The network operators could do this without you knowing about it if, for example,
> the police requested it. For a period of a few weeks around 22 years ago one of
> the network operators regularly sent me digital maps showing everywhere I had
> been with my phone based on timing advance data as part of a collaboration
> with an equipment manufacturer.
> It was surprising how good they were. We compared them with GPS data from
> a car fitted with mobile phone and GPS navigation systems. It was just over 22
> years ago that selective availability was turned off which made GPS useful for
> ordinary users.

Apparently a lot of hardware and science is being developed to support phone based position location.

From the co-author researchgate page:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hui-Chen-150

>
> John

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:42:52 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>:
>Existing telecommunications infrastructure could operate as a miniaturized global positioning system, offering submetre resolution in urban areas and indoors, where location information from satellites is often inaccurate.
>:
>
>Agglomeration
>
>https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-022-03696-3/d41586-022-03696-3.pdf

We need a single, Gen8 or something, wireless system that replaces
cell phone systems, wi-fi, cable TV, various expensive internet access
systems, street light and stoplight controls, webcams, fire and
security, utility metering, finding stolen cars, GPS location, finding
lost stuff, payments, everything.

It would of course have some side effects, like catching people
speeding and running red lights, and showing who was where when and
bought what.

It's got to happen.

John Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:42:52 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
> <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> :
>> Existing telecommunications infrastructure could operate as a miniaturized global positioning system, offering submetre resolution in urban areas and indoors, where location information from satellites is often inaccurate.
>> :
>>
>> Agglomeration
>>
>> https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-022-03696-3/d41586-022-03696-3.pdf
>
> We need a single, Gen8 or something, wireless system that replaces
> cell phone systems, wi-fi, cable TV, various expensive internet access
> systems, street light and stoplight controls, webcams, fire and
> security, utility metering, finding stolen cars, GPS location, finding
> lost stuff, payments, everything.
>
> It would of course have some side effects, like catching people
> speeding and running red lights, and showing who was where when and
> bought what.
>
> It's got to happen.
>

Thereby setting us up for the 21st C version of the Bronze Age Collapse.

Cheers

Phil "trust and diversify" Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:05:21 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

>John Larkin wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:42:52 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
>> <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> :
>>> Existing telecommunications infrastructure could operate as a miniaturized global positioning system, offering submetre resolution in urban areas and indoors, where location information from satellites is often inaccurate.
>>> :
>>>
>>> Agglomeration
>>>
>>> https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-022-03696-3/d41586-022-03696-3.pdf
>>
>> We need a single, Gen8 or something, wireless system that replaces
>> cell phone systems, wi-fi, cable TV, various expensive internet access
>> systems, street light and stoplight controls, webcams, fire and
>> security, utility metering, finding stolen cars, GPS location, finding
>> lost stuff, payments, everything.
>>
>> It would of course have some side effects, like catching people
>> speeding and running red lights, and showing who was where when and
>> bought what.
>>
>> It's got to happen.
>>
>
>Thereby setting us up for the 21st C version of the Bronze Age Collapse.

How would that happen? A diversified network should be as reliable as
electric or water supplies. The Internet is pretty reliable.

We'd need some laws to limit abuse, like making access to tracking
records need a good reason and a court order.

I just ordered a book about the Bronze Age Collapse. Sounds
interesting.

torsdag den 24. november 2022 kl. 17.38.30 UTC+1 skrev Fred Bloggs:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 6:00:02 PM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 21:52:31 UTC, Ricky wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 5:28:43 PM UTC-4, Lie by a a wrote:
> > > > a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> > > > > from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones
> > > > False.
> > > >
> > > > If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
> > > > would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
> > > > you presently present.
> > > >
> > > > You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
> > > > is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
> > > > upon the evidence of your postings here.
> > > >
> > > > Try a more believable lie next time.
> > > I don't know why, but this post really struck me as funny. It's especially so, because the author felt the need to hide his usual posting name, by using the name, "Lie by a a".
> > >
> > > LOL, sometimes this group is just too fucking nuts!
> > >
> > I know there isn't much point, but here goes:
> > - GPS satellite navigation was already well established 20 years ago
> > - Triangulation based on signal strength from base stations does not give very
> > useful results because there are so many sources of variable attenuation
> > - I was able to get good distance measurements from various base stations
> > on a Nokia phone by reading out the timing advance data. This was available
> > when the phone was switched into engineering mode and gave results accurate
> > to a few hundred metres even when the base stations were many miles away.
> > It didn't need to be invented - it was built into the GSM specifications which were
> > developed in the 1980s.
> > - The network operators could do this without you knowing about it if, for example,
> > the police requested it. For a period of a few weeks around 22 years ago one of
> > the network operators regularly sent me digital maps showing everywhere I had
> > been with my phone based on timing advance data as part of a collaboration
> > with an equipment manufacturer.
> > It was surprising how good they were. We compared them with GPS data from
> > a car fitted with mobile phone and GPS navigation systems. It was just over 22
> > years ago that selective availability was turned off which made GPS useful for
> > ordinary users.
> Apparently a lot of hardware and science is being developed to support phone based position location.
>

haven't 911 et al. not used a mix of GPS and triangulation to locate call for a long time?

On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 17:50:36 UTC, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
> torsdag den 24. november 2022 kl. 17.38.30 UTC+1 skrev Fred Bloggs:
> > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 6:00:02 PM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 21:52:31 UTC, Ricky wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 5:28:43 PM UTC-4, Lie by a a wrote:
> > > > > a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> > > > > > from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones
> > > > > False.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
> > > > > would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
> > > > > you presently present.
> > > > >
> > > > > You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
> > > > > is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
> > > > > upon the evidence of your postings here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try a more believable lie next time.
> > > > I don't know why, but this post really struck me as funny. It's especially so, because the author felt the need to hide his usual posting name, by using the name, "Lie by a a".
> > > >
> > > > LOL, sometimes this group is just too fucking nuts!
> > > >
> > > I know there isn't much point, but here goes:
> > > - GPS satellite navigation was already well established 20 years ago
> > > - Triangulation based on signal strength from base stations does not give very
> > > useful results because there are so many sources of variable attenuation
> > > - I was able to get good distance measurements from various base stations
> > > on a Nokia phone by reading out the timing advance data. This was available
> > > when the phone was switched into engineering mode and gave results accurate
> > > to a few hundred metres even when the base stations were many miles away.
> > > It didn't need to be invented - it was built into the GSM specifications which were
> > > developed in the 1980s.
> > > - The network operators could do this without you knowing about it if, for example,
> > > the police requested it. For a period of a few weeks around 22 years ago one of
> > > the network operators regularly sent me digital maps showing everywhere I had
> > > been with my phone based on timing advance data as part of a collaboration
> > > with an equipment manufacturer.
> > > It was surprising how good they were. We compared them with GPS data from
> > > a car fitted with mobile phone and GPS navigation systems. It was just over 22
> > > years ago that selective availability was turned off which made GPS useful for
> > > ordinary users.
> > Apparently a lot of hardware and science is being developed to support phone based position location.
> >
> haven't 911 et al. not used a mix of GPS and triangulation to locate call for a long time?

Yes, they have. However, the triangulation uses GSM timing advance data rather than
signal strength as that gives much better accuracy. I worked on such systems around
20 years ago. Nowadays GPS and its relatives are preferred because of the much higher
accuracy.

John

On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 19:54:35 UTC+1, John Walliker wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 17:50:36 UTC, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
> > torsdag den 24. november 2022 kl. 17.38.30 UTC+1 skrev Fred Bloggs:
> > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 6:00:02 PM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 21:52:31 UTC, Ricky wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 5:28:43 PM UTC-4, Lie by a a wrote:
> > > > > > a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> > > > > > > from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones
> > > > > > False.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
> > > > > > would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
> > > > > > you presently present.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
> > > > > > is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
> > > > > > upon the evidence of your postings here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Try a more believable lie next time.
> > > > > I don't know why, but this post really struck me as funny. It's especially so, because the author felt the need to hide his usual posting name, by using the name, "Lie by a a".
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL, sometimes this group is just too fucking nuts!
> > > > >
> > > > I know there isn't much point, but here goes:
> > > > - GPS satellite navigation was already well established 20 years ago
> > > > - Triangulation based on signal strength from base stations does not give very
> > > > useful results because there are so many sources of variable attenuation
> > > > - I was able to get good distance measurements from various base stations
> > > > on a Nokia phone by reading out the timing advance data. This was available
> > > > when the phone was switched into engineering mode and gave results accurate
> > > > to a few hundred metres even when the base stations were many miles away.
> > > > It didn't need to be invented - it was built into the GSM specifications which were
> > > > developed in the 1980s.
> > > > - The network operators could do this without you knowing about it if, for example,
> > > > the police requested it. For a period of a few weeks around 22 years ago one of
> > > > the network operators regularly sent me digital maps showing everywhere I had
> > > > been with my phone based on timing advance data as part of a collaboration
> > > > with an equipment manufacturer.
> > > > It was surprising how good they were. We compared them with GPS data from
> > > > a car fitted with mobile phone and GPS navigation systems. It was just over 22
> > > > years ago that selective availability was turned off which made GPS useful for
> > > > ordinary users.
> > > Apparently a lot of hardware and science is being developed to support phone based position location.
> > >
> > haven't 911 et al. not used a mix of GPS and triangulation to locate call for a long time?
> Yes, they have. However, the triangulation uses GSM timing advance data rather than
> signal strength as that gives much better accuracy. I worked on such systems around
> 20 years ago. Nowadays GPS and its relatives are preferred because of the much higher
> accuracy.
>
> John
Google Street applied WiFi based navigation during the global road tour, building databases of fixed WiFi routers for the given geolocation.
So we preferred to switch our WiFi routers off while mobile Google Street scanners approached our region
not to have our Wifi routers included in their databases

On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 19:02:07 UTC, a a wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 19:54:35 UTC+1, John Walliker wrote:
> > On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 17:50:36 UTC, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
> > > torsdag den 24. november 2022 kl. 17.38.30 UTC+1 skrev Fred Bloggs:
> > > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 6:00:02 PM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 21:52:31 UTC, Ricky wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 5:28:43 PM UTC-4, Lie by a a wrote:
> > > > > > > a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> > > > > > > > from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones
> > > > > > > False.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
> > > > > > > would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
> > > > > > > you presently present.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
> > > > > > > is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
> > > > > > > upon the evidence of your postings here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Try a more believable lie next time.
> > > > > > I don't know why, but this post really struck me as funny. It's especially so, because the author felt the need to hide his usual posting name, by using the name, "Lie by a a".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LOL, sometimes this group is just too fucking nuts!
> > > > > >
> > > > > I know there isn't much point, but here goes:
> > > > > - GPS satellite navigation was already well established 20 years ago
> > > > > - Triangulation based on signal strength from base stations does not give very
> > > > > useful results because there are so many sources of variable attenuation
> > > > > - I was able to get good distance measurements from various base stations
> > > > > on a Nokia phone by reading out the timing advance data. This was available
> > > > > when the phone was switched into engineering mode and gave results accurate
> > > > > to a few hundred metres even when the base stations were many miles away.
> > > > > It didn't need to be invented - it was built into the GSM specifications which were
> > > > > developed in the 1980s.
> > > > > - The network operators could do this without you knowing about it if, for example,
> > > > > the police requested it. For a period of a few weeks around 22 years ago one of
> > > > > the network operators regularly sent me digital maps showing everywhere I had
> > > > > been with my phone based on timing advance data as part of a collaboration
> > > > > with an equipment manufacturer.
> > > > > It was surprising how good they were. We compared them with GPS data from
> > > > > a car fitted with mobile phone and GPS navigation systems. It was just over 22
> > > > > years ago that selective availability was turned off which made GPS useful for
> > > > > ordinary users.
> > > > Apparently a lot of hardware and science is being developed to support phone based position location.
> > > >
> > > haven't 911 et al. not used a mix of GPS and triangulation to locate call for a long time?
> > Yes, they have. However, the triangulation uses GSM timing advance data rather than
> > signal strength as that gives much better accuracy. I worked on such systems around
> > 20 years ago. Nowadays GPS and its relatives are preferred because of the much higher
> > accuracy.
> >
> > John
> Google Street applied WiFi based navigation during the global road tour, building databases of fixed WiFi routers for the given geolocation.
> So we preferred to switch our WiFi routers off while mobile Google Street scanners approached our region
> not to have our Wifi routers included in their databases

Good luck with that. They will catch you when you are not looking. They do revisit
previously scanned areas from time to time.

John

On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 22:31:46 UTC+1, John Walliker wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 19:02:07 UTC, a a wrote:
> > On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 19:54:35 UTC+1, John Walliker wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 17:50:36 UTC, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
> > > > torsdag den 24. november 2022 kl. 17.38.30 UTC+1 skrev Fred Bloggs:
> > > > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 6:00:02 PM UTC-5, John Walliker wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, 23 November 2022 at 21:52:31 UTC, Ricky wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 5:28:43 PM UTC-4, Lie by a a wrote:
> > > > > > > > a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I developed GPS navigation based on triangulation of signal strength
> > > > > > > > > from base stations 20 years ago to work for Nokia phones
> > > > > > > > False.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you were intelligent enough to actually have achieved this then you
> > > > > > > > would present here in the group as significantly more intelligent than
> > > > > > > > you presently present.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You present as someone with an IQ of about 50 or less -- therefore it
> > > > > > > > is not possible for you to have achieved what you assert above based
> > > > > > > > upon the evidence of your postings here.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Try a more believable lie next time.
> > > > > > > I don't know why, but this post really struck me as funny. It's especially so, because the author felt the need to hide his usual posting name, by using the name, "Lie by a a".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LOL, sometimes this group is just too fucking nuts!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > I know there isn't much point, but here goes:
> > > > > > - GPS satellite navigation was already well established 20 years ago
> > > > > > - Triangulation based on signal strength from base stations does not give very
> > > > > > useful results because there are so many sources of variable attenuation
> > > > > > - I was able to get good distance measurements from various base stations
> > > > > > on a Nokia phone by reading out the timing advance data. This was available
> > > > > > when the phone was switched into engineering mode and gave results accurate
> > > > > > to a few hundred metres even when the base stations were many miles away.
> > > > > > It didn't need to be invented - it was built into the GSM specifications which were
> > > > > > developed in the 1980s.
> > > > > > - The network operators could do this without you knowing about it if, for example,
> > > > > > the police requested it. For a period of a few weeks around 22 years ago one of
> > > > > > the network operators regularly sent me digital maps showing everywhere I had
> > > > > > been with my phone based on timing advance data as part of a collaboration
> > > > > > with an equipment manufacturer.
> > > > > > It was surprising how good they were. We compared them with GPS data from
> > > > > > a car fitted with mobile phone and GPS navigation systems. It was just over 22
> > > > > > years ago that selective availability was turned off which made GPS useful for
> > > > > > ordinary users.
> > > > > Apparently a lot of hardware and science is being developed to support phone based position location.
> > > > >
> > > > haven't 911 et al. not used a mix of GPS and triangulation to locate call for a long time?
> > > Yes, they have. However, the triangulation uses GSM timing advance data rather than
> > > signal strength as that gives much better accuracy. I worked on such systems around
> > > 20 years ago. Nowadays GPS and its relatives are preferred because of the much higher
> > > accuracy.
> > >
> > > John
> > Google Street applied WiFi based navigation during the global road tour, building databases of fixed WiFi routers for the given geolocation.
> > So we preferred to switch our WiFi routers off while mobile Google Street scanners approached our region
> > not to have our Wifi routers included in their databases
> Good luck with that. They will catch you when you are not looking. They do revisit
> previously scanned areas from time to time.
>
> John
I met Google scan car twice, coming from Holland.
Maps are updated from time to time, every 5-10 years
Interest in street view is below zero.
Street maps don't match satellite view

I early years of Google Maps I joined the team from Ireland to learn how to build maps, maps overlays, layers, vector and scalable objects, as my first hand experience not to hear stupid comments by moron from Sydney in a future.

Satellite view is in practice : airplane's view for better resolution.

Sat view maps should be back projected to sphere to match the grid of geolocated coordinate points from street view maps.

easy cake

a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote:
> I early years of Google Maps I joined the team from Ireland to learn
> how to build maps, maps overlays, layers, vector and scalable
> objects, as my first hand experience not to hear stupid comments by
> moron from Sydney in a future.

Another lie. You are not sufficiently intelligent (based upon your
postings here) to have ever qualified as more than the night-shift
toilet scrubber at anything google related.

Try a more believable lie next time, as it is not possible given your
lack of intelligence for you to have ever worked at google on maps.

Previous lies from the a a troll:

Lie: http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=166924650000
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=166924651800