Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Why won't sharks eat lawyers? Professional courtesy.


tech / rec.photo.digital / Photoshopped ?

SubjectAuthor
* Photoshopped ?geoff
+* Re: Photoshopped ?Paul Carmichael
|`- Re: Photoshopped ?Bill W
+* Re: Photoshopped ?RJH
|`- Re: Photoshopped ?geoff
`* Re: Photoshopped ?Whisky-dave
 `* Re: Photoshopped ?Whisky-dave
  `- Re: Photoshopped ?newshound

1
Photoshopped ?

<DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=11330&group=rec.photo.digital#11330

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 18:08:45 -0600
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 13:08:24 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.5.1
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Content-Language: en-NZ
From: geo...@nospamgeoffwood.org (geoff)
Subject: Photoshopped ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 12
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-S6qYdAURCRRuhDRqxKJp7Mj7T8Ro+r0XN+n+qXFApE7rQeGNCIX10nmxDMHgVl1MC1+z9HBWQ3ZMxu5!okQYXLHiEngrWOEbLbtNPtxwBXhmJrjguKC4mxJ9y351QIkRkbJ5ChMD44LnQaLRbH2S4twA3mUr
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1589
 by: geoff - Tue, 8 Feb 2022 00:08 UTC

I
couldn't give a toss (so to speak) about Andrew, but I'm amazed that
there hasn't been prominent conjecture that this image was photo-shopped
to include all 'interested parties'.

The outlines and shadows around each person and feature just don't look
normal to me. Granted, it's only a low-res copy several generations from
the original ...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/fbzpdfd6ssrsmht/4_21386594-0-image-a-56_1574548719828.jpg?dl=0

geoff

Re: Photoshopped ?

<pan$1cfd6$3312ed8a$1ac61078$432b0bc2@gmail.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=11331&group=rec.photo.digital#11331

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news.uzoreto.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: wibbleyp...@gmail.com (Paul Carmichael)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Photoshopped ?
Date: 8 Feb 2022 10:31:14 GMT
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <pan$1cfd6$3312ed8a$1ac61078$432b0bc2@gmail.com>
References: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net EtDNXeKTP9Ug4ZQLi7Qkug0voFZ8soK9M4qmXEyfUYP5gh6LU=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0Xpt84DEwG+P62IeNGzaBG6ROZI=
User-Agent: Pan/0.147 (Sweet Solitude; 97d1711 github.com/GNOME/pan.git)
 by: Paul Carmichael - Tue, 8 Feb 2022 10:31 UTC

El Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:08:24 +1300, geoff escribió:

> I
> couldn't give a toss (so to speak) about Andrew, but I'm amazed that
> there hasn't been prominent conjecture that this image was photo-shopped
> to include all 'interested parties'.
>
> The outlines and shadows around each person and feature just don't look
> normal to me. Granted, it's only a low-res copy several generations from
> the original ...
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/fbzpdfd6ssrsmht/4_21386594-0-image-
a-56_1574548719828.jpg?dl=0
>

The girl on the right was the only subject not pasted in.

--
Paul.

https://paulc.es/elpatio

Re: Photoshopped ?

<stthf6$d0r$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=11332&group=rec.photo.digital#11332

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: patchmo...@gmx.com (RJH)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Photoshopped ?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 10:42:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <stthf6$d0r$1@dont-email.me>
References: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 10:42:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fbb16c4827dba4bf8e06d9c6e1e17016";
logging-data="13339"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+pFVvZcZLpii6670yZ/cJf"
User-Agent: Usenapp/1.17/l for MacOS - Full License
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C3EENAW+ifjFCQFCBjWfw2CZ0DM=
 by: RJH - Tue, 8 Feb 2022 10:42 UTC

On 8 Feb 2022 at 00:08:24 GMT, "geoff" <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:

>
>
>
> I
> couldn't give a toss (so to speak) about Andrew, but I'm amazed that
> there hasn't been prominent conjecture that this image was photo-shopped
> to include all 'interested parties'.
>
> The outlines and shadows around each person and feature just don't look
> normal to me. Granted, it's only a low-res copy several generations from
> the original ...
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/fbzpdfd6ssrsmht/4_21386594-0-image-a-56_1574548719828.jpg?dl=0
>
> geoff

That was my initial thought, but I'd assume any editing to that extent has
been ruled out by now.
--
Cheers, Rob

Re: Photoshopped ?

<b2b02866-676d-4f4e-807f-03835c2ae78bn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=11333&group=rec.photo.digital#11333

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5aa2:: with SMTP id u2mr3141329qvg.127.1644327050629;
Tue, 08 Feb 2022 05:30:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1148:: with SMTP id p8mr4645104ybu.553.1644327050322;
Tue, 08 Feb 2022 05:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 05:30:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.177.231; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.177.231
References: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b2b02866-676d-4f4e-807f-03835c2ae78bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Photoshopped ?
From: whisky.d...@gmail.com (Whisky-dave)
Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:30:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 19
 by: Whisky-dave - Tue, 8 Feb 2022 13:30 UTC

On Tuesday, 8 February 2022 at 00:08:58 UTC, geoff wrote:
> I
> couldn't give a toss (so to speak) about Andrew, but I'm amazed that
> there hasn't been prominent conjecture that this image was photo-shopped
> to include all 'interested parties'.
>
> The outlines and shadows around each person and feature just don't look
> normal to me. Granted, it's only a low-res copy several generations from
> the original ...
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/fbzpdfd6ssrsmht/4_21386594-0-image-a-56_1574548719828.jpg?dl=0
>
> geoff

Either of the pictures shown could have been edited or both to prove a point although
I don;t know what point. But he has sex with a 17 year-old so what.
Wonder why in the country that seems to think it is the free'est in the world a 17 year old can't decide who to have sex with,
but can buy a gun.

Re: Photoshopped ?

<8261f9e9-0da5-46e0-bcb0-c726de8d3eadn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=11334&group=rec.photo.digital#11334

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e889:: with SMTP id a131mr2525131qkg.771.1644327120095;
Tue, 08 Feb 2022 05:32:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:c104:: with SMTP id f4mr4758339ywi.131.1644327119815;
Tue, 08 Feb 2022 05:31:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 05:31:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <b2b02866-676d-4f4e-807f-03835c2ae78bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=138.37.177.231; posting-account=Fal3rgoAAABua4brvRuRwdmPfigIDi6x
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.37.177.231
References: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <b2b02866-676d-4f4e-807f-03835c2ae78bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8261f9e9-0da5-46e0-bcb0-c726de8d3eadn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Photoshopped ?
From: whisky.d...@gmail.com (Whisky-dave)
Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:32:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 21
 by: Whisky-dave - Tue, 8 Feb 2022 13:31 UTC

On Tuesday, 8 February 2022 at 13:30:59 UTC, Whisky-dave wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 February 2022 at 00:08:58 UTC, geoff wrote:
> > I
> > couldn't give a toss (so to speak) about Andrew, but I'm amazed that
> > there hasn't been prominent conjecture that this image was photo-shopped
> > to include all 'interested parties'.
> >
> > The outlines and shadows around each person and feature just don't look
> > normal to me. Granted, it's only a low-res copy several generations from
> > the original ...
> >
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/fbzpdfd6ssrsmht/4_21386594-0-image-a-56_1574548719828.jpg?dl=0
> >
> > geoff
> Either of the pictures shown could have been edited or both to prove a point although

yeah forgot to add the link.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrews-ex-questions-infamous-26121633

> I don;t know what point. But he has sex with a 17 year-old so what.
> Wonder why in the country that seems to think it is the free'est in the world a 17 year old can't decide who to have sex with,
> but can buy a gun.

Re: Photoshopped ?

<0001HW.27B2CF9000D4821830F5FA38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=11335&group=rec.photo.digital#11335

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx22.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: noth...@nowhere.com (Bill W)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.27B2CF9000D4821830F5FA38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>
Subject: Re: Photoshopped ?
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <pan$1cfd6$3312ed8a$1ac61078$432b0bc2@gmail.com>
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: me+support@newsgroup.ninja
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 16:19:29 UTC
Organization: me+support@newsgroup.ninja
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 10:19:28 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1519
 by: Bill W - Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:19 UTC

On Feb 8, 2022, Paul Carmichael wrote
(in article<pan$1cfd6$3312ed8a$1ac61078$432b0bc2@gmail.com>):

> El Tue, 08 Feb 2022 13:08:24 +1300, geoff escribió:
>
> > I
> > couldn't give a toss (so to speak) about Andrew, but I'm amazed that
> > there hasn't been prominent conjecture that this image was photo-shopped
> > to include all 'interested parties'.
> >
> > The outlines and shadows around each person and feature just don't look
> > normal to me. Granted, it's only a low-res copy several generations from
> > the original ...
> >
> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/fbzpdfd6ssrsmht/4_21386594-0-image-
> a-56_1574548719828.jpg?dl=0
>
> The girl on the right was the only subject not pasted in.

Maybe, but she is also the only one in that room, so different lighting.

Re: Photoshopped ?

<stu8oh$gah$1@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=11336&group=rec.photo.digital#11336

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: sradclif...@gmail.com (newshound)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Photoshopped ?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 17:20:19 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <stu8oh$gah$1@dont-email.me>
References: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<b2b02866-676d-4f4e-807f-03835c2ae78bn@googlegroups.com>
<8261f9e9-0da5-46e0-bcb0-c726de8d3eadn@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 17:20:18 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a038aab49127cb74816e995cf03809d1";
logging-data="16721"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qvqtWK6gKBWVbZt7TZyOT/XB8mB+2TYE="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.5.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rxqO7VVhe5DuAGvKT+TgVmGfMmg=
In-Reply-To: <8261f9e9-0da5-46e0-bcb0-c726de8d3eadn@googlegroups.com>
 by: newshound - Tue, 8 Feb 2022 17:20 UTC

On 08/02/2022 13:31, Whisky-dave wrote:

>
>> I don;t know what point. But he has sex with a 17 year-old so what.
>> Wonder why in the country that seems to think it is the free'est in the world a 17 year old can't decide who to have sex with,
>> but can buy a gun.

Actually, no.

https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/does-customer-have-be-certain-age-buy-firearms-or-ammunition-licensee

Re: Photoshopped ?

<5NednUrnp7mKS5__nZ2dnUU7-IfNnZ2d@giganews.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=11337&group=rec.photo.digital#11337

 copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 14:44:07 -0600
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:43:46 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.5.1
Subject: Re: Photoshopped ?
Content-Language: en-NZ
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <DvidncZRPagQKZz_nZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com>
<stthf6$d0r$1@dont-email.me>
From: geo...@nospamgeoffwood.org (geoff)
In-Reply-To: <stthf6$d0r$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <5NednUrnp7mKS5__nZ2dnUU7-IfNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 31
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Orbgvq3b8U83D98A00QFcmBUSGCbtOFzlibEsQmBOkk0EQON1vNRjqWcXrcYxgE1QLIzF2fFpRjN5y+!uEnqvOyWIC4AJMKV4Uv69lRa4pSMVknyUTFJTg5GYZGg4y46D7S2X8XDgzpDWvNhJUjj9f94eDU=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2484
 by: geoff - Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:43 UTC

On 8/02/2022 11:42 pm, RJH wrote:
> On 8 Feb 2022 at 00:08:24 GMT, "geoff" <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> I
>> couldn't give a toss (so to speak) about Andrew, but I'm amazed that
>> there hasn't been prominent conjecture that this image was photo-shopped
>> to include all 'interested parties'.
>>
>> The outlines and shadows around each person and feature just don't look
>> normal to me. Granted, it's only a low-res copy several generations from
>> the original ...
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/fbzpdfd6ssrsmht/4_21386594-0-image-a-56_1574548719828.jpg?dl=0
>>
>> geoff
>
> That was my initial thought, but I'd assume any editing to that extent has
> been ruled out by now.

You'd think. But just looks 'wrong' to me. The different colour
balances bewteen 'subjects', the edges and shadowsaround the outlines,
etc.

What look like anomolies possibly an artefact of flash-lighting ?

If it's faked, then it's a pretty poor job at that !

geoff

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor