=The Dan Christensen & Jan Burse Arsewipe FAX of sci.math to save you from headaches in math. Such as Dan's 2 OR 1=3, with AND as subtraction; his slant cut of cone a ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and his never a geometry proof of calculus ..
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Sep 28, 2022, 11:03:18 PM (1 hour ago)



to
The Dan Christensen & Jan Burse Arsewipe FAX of sci.math to save you from headaches in math. Such as Dan's 2 OR 1=3, with AND as subtraction; his slant cut of cone a ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and his never a geometry proof of calculus ...
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:41 AM (22 hours ago)



to
Never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Yet here he is, him and Jan Burse, spamming sci.mathe each and every day, with worthless mind rot. His banal and anal DC Proof.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#12-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:00 PM (11 hours ago)



to
Is Dan Christensen a turd living up the arse of Jan Burse, waiting to be shitted out??? I mean, well, the idiot believes AND truth table is TFFF which causes AND to be subtraction and OR to be addition as 2 OR 1 = 3.

Mehram Maleki is it visual representation that Dan and Jan fail?? How stupid can they be that if you have AND truth table be TTTF you have AND as addition, not subtraction. I mean is Dan Christensen a turd living up the arse of Jan Burse, waiting to be shitted out???

Dan Christensen & Jan Burse arsewipes of sci.math, with their error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction because Boole screwed up-- AND truth table is TTTF, not TFFF. And these 2 idiots of logic never belonged in sci.math.

> Mehram Maleki (Clutterfreak) why is Dan too dumb to see, that if Truth table of AND were TTTF then AND would be addition in math, not subtraction? Why? Is it the visuals or the lack of brains??
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 10:37:51 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim


> > On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 11:08:20 PM UTC-5, hanson wrote:
> > > ______ A full week has passed and yet still not getting it...
> > > the Persian Neo-Nazi Mehram Maleki "ClutterFreak Incarnate"
> > > <Clu...@FakeAddress.com> still clutters & stutters after:
> > > [trim]
>
>
> > Clutterfreak writes:
> > Note:
> > - Stuff I've listed here are based on my past interactions with the named individuals in this forum.
> > - The "brain type"s I've used employs the definitions I described in my ACOB blog in this forum.
> >
> >
> > #1
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: undergraduate
> > * Notes:
> > - Einstein nut
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Mar 17, 2016
> >
> > #2
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 98% (max for human)
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: comprehensive
> > * Notes:
> > - could initiate threads
> > - had a physics tutorial zip file on web:
> >
> > * Status: inactive since Sep 8, 2014
> >
> >
> >
> > #3
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited and problematic
> > * Maturity: 65%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 2 autistic (major criminals)
> > * Notes:
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since Mar 12, 2007
> >
> >
> > #4
> >
> > Visual representation:
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 98% (max for human)
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: comprehensive
> > * Notes:
> > - electrical engineer turned physicist
> > - built and used microtrons in 1950s and 60s:
> > * 4.5 MeV: (completed 1953 - cannot find an image of that)
> > * 29 MeV: (completed 1958)
> > - soon after CERN was operational began working there
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since March 17, 2005
> >
> > #5
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: 1st semester college freshman
> > * Notes:
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Aug 21, 2011
> >
> > #6
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: problematic
> > * Maturity: 80% (max for Aspergers)
> > * IQ: high (above 145)
> > * Brain type: type 5 autistic (Aspergers)
> > * True physics background: strong (self-taught) but not comprehensive
> > * Notes:
> > - click-jockey (preferred giving a link rather than the use of language to communicate)
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * the only thread I know that he initiated was his last ("river of shit") post as well
> > * Status: inactive since Nov 11, 2013
> >
> > #6
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: comprehensive
> > * Notes:
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since May 20, 2007
> >
> >
> > #8
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: ok (self-taught)
> > * Notes:
> > - medical background
> > - hustled snake oil on the side
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Jan 22, 2019
> >
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 85%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: one physics course in community college
> > * Notes:
> > - click-jockey (preferred giving a link rather than the use of language to communicate)
> > - may have had technical training in military or something.
> > - evidence nut
> > * "evidence nut": sit on your ass, ask others to show "evidence" to you (a web link!), see if everybody else around says "yay yay" or "nay nay"
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since Jun 12, 2016
> >
> > #9
> >
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 85%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: physics examples in an introductory computer programming book
> > * Notes:
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since Jan 19, 2018
> >
> >
> > #10
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: college freshman
> > * Notes:
> > - had authored ebooks to hustle "Whodat" type readers
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Nov 26, 2011
> >
> > #11
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: college freshman
> > * Notes:
> > - Einstein nut (was trying to write a bio on Einstein)
> > - believed that "Ignorance is just a placeholder for knowledge"
> > - gave his reason to leave this forum as, "psycopaths are still busily engaged in soiling this group", while not a single post from him actually had anything to do with physics
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Mar 10, 2004
> >
> > #12
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 55%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: Schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: Omni magazine
> > * Notes:
> > - only talked to himself
> > - if same dude behind Rick123456 alias then:
> > * pedophile
> > * OCD
> > * multiple personality disorder
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active under Rick123456 alias. inactive since Dec 30, 2011 under OsherD alias
> >
> >
> > #12
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited and problematic
> > * Maturity: 65%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 4 autistic (petty criminals)
> > * True physics background: The Oprah Winfrey Show
> > * Notes:
> > - thicko
> > - see "Whodat"
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since May 18, 2011
> >
> > #13
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 85%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 1 autistic (major depression, artists)
> > * True physics background: relativity books for the laymen
> > * Notes:
> > - Einstein nut
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> >
> > #14
> >
> > ≪ Physfitfreak ≫
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 80% (max for Aspergers)
> > * IQ: 134 (minimum - tests were conducted in a foreign language)
> > * Brain type: type 5 autistic (Aspergers)
> > * True physics background: ok
> > * Notes:
> > - uses sci.physics mainly as a censor-free blog tool
> > - can initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #15
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 35%
> > * IQ: below 70 (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: Annie Oakley tv show
> > * Notes:
> > - spoke English like an early AI project
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Dec 19, 2019
> >
> > #16
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 4 autistic (petty criminals)
> > * True physics background: high school
> > * Notes:
> > - smart aleck
> > - OCD
> > - nymshifter
> > - McGinn exposed his limits of understanding simple physics
> > - evidence nut
> > * "evidence nut": sit on your ass, ask others to show you "evidence" (a web link!), see if everybody else around says "yay yay" or "nay nay"
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #17
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 60%
> > * IQ: low (below 85)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: high school freshman
> > * Notes:
> > - spammer
> > - OCD
> > - hustled ebooks he'd written for other schizos
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #18
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 45%
> > * IQ: low (below 85)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: Quran
> > * Notes:
> > - without meds would be heard on world news
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #19
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 30%
> > * IQ: below 70 (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: popsicle labels
> > * Notes:
> > - spammer
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #20
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 75%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 1 autistic (major depression, artists)
> > * True physics background: high school
> > * Notes:
> > - Hustled snake oil
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #21
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 4 autistic (petty criminals)
> > * True physics background: high school and one physics course in college which he dropped before first exam
> > * Notes:
> > - Bonghead
> > - nymshifter
> > - click-jockey (preferred giving a link rather than the use of language to communicate)
> > - enjoyed playing "full of shit" games in this forum
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #22
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 80% (max for Aspergers)
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 5 autistic (Aspergers)
> > * True physics background: ok
> > * Notes:
> > - exposed lack of physics understanding of many smart aleck "engineers" frequenting this forum
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> >
> > #23
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: undergraduate
> > * Notes:
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #24
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 25%
> > * IQ: below 70 (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: med bottles' labels
> > * Notes:
> > - spammer
> > - OCD
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> >
> > #25
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 80% (max for Aspergers)
> > * IQ: 134 (mean value of 3 online IQ tests in span of past 20 years, all three between 130 and 140)
> > - if there were an online IQ test conducted in Persian language he would score higher, so the above IQ is the minimum
> > * Brain type: type 5 autistic (Aspergers)
> > * True physics background: ok
> > * Notes:
> > - used sci.physics mainly as a censor-free blog tool
> > - believed at least two different human species exist today:
> > 1- Modern Human (MH) comprising Jews, Arabs, Iranians, Indians, Chinese, American Natives, Hispanics
> > 2- Cro-Magnon Human (CH) comrising northern European transparent-skinned people
> > - believed CH is an earlier human species compared to MH, possessing inferior ACOB allotments, and fathered by Iranians and mothered by Neanderthal Europeans during past 40k - 24k years
> > - did not know anything about African Blacks
> > - believed major behavioral differences between individuals can be explained adequately enough just by consideration of brain's extent of wiring allotments to the three major brain centers: (see his ACOB blog)
> > 1- Analytical Compartments Of Brain (ACOB - prefrontal, temporal, prietal cortices)
> > 2- Fight Or Flight Compartments of brain (hypothalamus, autonomic system)
> > 3- Emotional Compartments of brain (Amygdala - fear, anger, love, grief, euphoria)
> > - believed humans left apes behind only as a result of two main factors: (see his ACOB blog)
> > 1- women cause evolutionary jumps (forward or backward in analytical thinking) at the time of choosing the fathers of their future children
> > 2- men give the good genes in earlier humans a chance to survive at the time of fucking the earlier human women.
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since 9/24/2022
> >
> > #26
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited and problematic
> > * Maturity: 70%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 1 autistic (major depression, artists)
> > * True physics background: high school
> > * Notes:
> > - Bonghead
> > - writes bad programs and refuses to correct their bugs when others point to them
> > - when his physics remark got corrected, he repeated his remark verbatim in response
> > - "semi-retired" in his 20s
> > - believed he was hated here and outside cyberspace both
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #28
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 75%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 4 autistic (petty criminals)
> > * True physics background: comics magazines
> > * Notes:
> > - Einstein nut
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #29
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 25%
> > * IQ: below 70 (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: sci.physics posts of "Whodat"
> > * Notes:
> > - hallucinating
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #30
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: community college
> > * Notes:
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Sep 3, 2020
> >

🕷 of Math and 🦂 of Physics Archimedes "Kim Jong Un's stooge" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> =The Dan Christensen & Jan Burse Arsewipe FAX of sci.math to sav
Why do you still insult your superiors like that?

Why do you spam your insults, again and again and again?

Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse
On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Kibo Parry M.30 year stalker--> I want to fuck her corpse//Kate Heinzelman question-- is it legal for the CIA to pay for stalkers like Kibo to stalk private USA citizens, and 30 years on... nonstop for 30 years. Should not Kibo be in Guantanamo, not in a desk-job spamming and stalking Usenet.

On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 12:43:52 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"bozo"
> fails at math and science:
>"psychoceramic"

Kate must have something well going for her to be the CIA General Counsel. The only big time loser around here is you Kibo Parry M., why you even hate your own mother.

Who Kibo? CIA Kate Heinzelman; I thought she is just new on the job?
On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse
> You are a very sick man

Who, Kibo Parry M; William J. Burns for scolding you on blowing your cover, the same day you entered the CIA?

On Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 10:40:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"physics hater"
> tarded:
> Drag Queen of Science, especially Physics

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates 30 year nonstop stalker shitheads like Kibo Parry M.

Time that stalker shitheads like Kibo Parry Moron did physics in sci.physics and math in sci.math.

148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.

Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.

Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.

Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
Length: 329 pages

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08T82M2LP
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 16, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 872 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 329 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #203,710 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #289 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,716 in Physics (Books)
•

#1-2, 48th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) A visual image of a Atom Totality

2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.

3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.

4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.

5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?

6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.

7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.

8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.

9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.

10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.

11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages

Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07SW87BF5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-3, 74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)



Michael Moroney wrote:

> 🕷 of Math and 🦂 of Physics Archimedes "Kim Jong Un's stooge" Plutonium
> <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
>> =The Dan Christensen & Jan Burse Arsewipe FAX of sci.math to sav
> Why do you still insult your superiors like that?
>
> Why do you spam your insults, again and again and again?

capitalist nasa lands again softly on the moon.

NASA crashes spacecraft into asteroid
https://www.bitchute.com/video/26bSwoBMjUtT/

Washington DC is now officially a Terrorist State
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JN3shyMw9ybp/