Dan Christensen & University Western Ontario Arsewipe FAX of sci.math to save you from headaches in math. Such as Dan's 2 OR 1=3, with AND as subtraction; his slant cut of cone a ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and his never a geometry proof of calculus ..

Jan Burse, I need your help in getting the propaganda idiot Dan Christensen out of sci.math. Can you immediately reply to this post before the crazed fool DC, for he is worse than WM in sci.math. If WM is a 9 out of 10 in math idiocy, then Dan is a full 10 out of 10.

Dan Christensen & UWO Arsewipe FAX of sci.math to save you from headaches in math. Such as Dan's 2 OR 1=3, with AND as subtraction; his slant cut of cone a ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and his never a geometry proof of calculus ..

Never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Yet here he is, him and Jan Burse, spamming sci.mathe each and every day, with worthless mind rot. His banal and anal DC Proof.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#12-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:00 PM (11 hours ago)



to
Is Dan Christensen a turd living up the arse of Jan Burse, waiting to be shitted out??? I mean, well, the idiot believes AND truth table is TFFF which causes AND to be subtraction and OR to be addition as 2 OR 1 = 3.

Mehram Maleki is it visual representation that Dan and Jan fail?? How stupid can they be that if you have AND truth table be TTTF you have AND as addition, not subtraction. I mean is Dan Christensen a turd living up the arse of Jan Burse, waiting to be shitted out???

Dan Christensen & Jan Burse arsewipes of sci.math, with their error filled Boole logic of 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction because Boole screwed up-- AND truth table is TTTF, not TFFF. And these 2 idiots of logic never belonged in sci.math.

> Mehram Maleki (Clutterfreak) why is Dan too dumb to see, that if Truth table of AND were TTTF then AND would be addition in math, not subtraction? Why? Is it the visuals or the lack of brains??
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 10:37:51 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim


> > On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 11:08:20 PM UTC-5, hanson wrote:
> > > ______ A full week has passed and yet still not getting it...
> > > the Persian Neo-Nazi Mehram Maleki "ClutterFreak Incarnate"
> > > <Clu...@FakeAddress.com> still clutters & stutters after:
> > > [trim]
>
>
> > Clutterfreak writes:
> > Note:
> > - Stuff I've listed here are based on my past interactions with the named individuals in this forum.
> > - The "brain type"s I've used employs the definitions I described in my ACOB blog in this forum.
> >
> >
> > #1
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: undergraduate
> > * Notes:
> > - Einstein nut
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Mar 17, 2016
> >
> > #2
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 98% (max for human)
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: comprehensive
> > * Notes:
> > - could initiate threads
> > - had a physics tutorial zip file on web:
> >
> > * Status: inactive since Sep 8, 2014
> >
> >
> >
> > #3
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited and problematic
> > * Maturity: 65%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 2 autistic (major criminals)
> > * Notes:
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since Mar 12, 2007
> >
> >
> > #4
> >
> > Visual representation:
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 98% (max for human)
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: comprehensive
> > * Notes:
> > - electrical engineer turned physicist
> > - built and used microtrons in 1950s and 60s:
> > * 4.5 MeV: (completed 1953 - cannot find an image of that)
> > * 29 MeV: (completed 1958)
> > - soon after CERN was operational began working there
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since March 17, 2005
> >
> > #5
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: 1st semester college freshman
> > * Notes:
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Aug 21, 2011
> >
> > #6
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: problematic
> > * Maturity: 80% (max for Aspergers)
> > * IQ: high (above 145)
> > * Brain type: type 5 autistic (Aspergers)
> > * True physics background: strong (self-taught) but not comprehensive
> > * Notes:
> > - click-jockey (preferred giving a link rather than the use of language to communicate)
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * the only thread I know that he initiated was his last ("river of shit") post as well
> > * Status: inactive since Nov 11, 2013
> >
> > #6
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: comprehensive
> > * Notes:
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since May 20, 2007
> >
> >
> > #8
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: ok (self-taught)
> > * Notes:
> > - medical background
> > - hustled snake oil on the side
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Jan 22, 2019
> >
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 85%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: one physics course in community college
> > * Notes:
> > - click-jockey (preferred giving a link rather than the use of language to communicate)
> > - may have had technical training in military or something.
> > - evidence nut
> > * "evidence nut": sit on your ass, ask others to show "evidence" to you (a web link!), see if everybody else around says "yay yay" or "nay nay"
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since Jun 12, 2016
> >
> > #9
> >
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 85%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: physics examples in an introductory computer programming book
> > * Notes:
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: inactive since Jan 19, 2018
> >
> >
> > #10
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: college freshman
> > * Notes:
> > - had authored ebooks to hustle "Whodat" type readers
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Nov 26, 2011
> >
> > #11
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: college freshman
> > * Notes:
> > - Einstein nut (was trying to write a bio on Einstein)
> > - believed that "Ignorance is just a placeholder for knowledge"
> > - gave his reason to leave this forum as, "psycopaths are still busily engaged in soiling this group", while not a single post from him actually had anything to do with physics
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Mar 10, 2004
> >
> > #12
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 55%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: Schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: Omni magazine
> > * Notes:
> > - only talked to himself
> > - if same dude behind Rick123456 alias then:
> > * pedophile
> > * OCD
> > * multiple personality disorder
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active under Rick123456 alias. inactive since Dec 30, 2011 under OsherD alias
> >
> >
> > #12
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited and problematic
> > * Maturity: 65%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 4 autistic (petty criminals)
> > * True physics background: The Oprah Winfrey Show
> > * Notes:
> > - thicko
> > - see "Whodat"
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since May 18, 2011
> >
> > #13
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 85%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 1 autistic (major depression, artists)
> > * True physics background: relativity books for the laymen
> > * Notes:
> > - Einstein nut
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> >
> > #14
> >
> > ≪ Physfitfreak ≫
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 80% (max for Aspergers)
> > * IQ: 134 (minimum - tests were conducted in a foreign language)
> > * Brain type: type 5 autistic (Aspergers)
> > * True physics background: ok
> > * Notes:
> > - uses sci.physics mainly as a censor-free blog tool
> > - can initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #15
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 35%
> > * IQ: below 70 (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: Annie Oakley tv show
> > * Notes:
> > - spoke English like an early AI project
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Dec 19, 2019
> >
> > #16
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 4 autistic (petty criminals)
> > * True physics background: high school
> > * Notes:
> > - smart aleck
> > - OCD
> > - nymshifter
> > - McGinn exposed his limits of understanding simple physics
> > - evidence nut
> > * "evidence nut": sit on your ass, ask others to show you "evidence" (a web link!), see if everybody else around says "yay yay" or "nay nay"
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #17
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 60%
> > * IQ: low (below 85)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: high school freshman
> > * Notes:
> > - spammer
> > - OCD
> > - hustled ebooks he'd written for other schizos
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #18
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 45%
> > * IQ: low (below 85)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: Quran
> > * Notes:
> > - without meds would be heard on world news
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #19
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 30%
> > * IQ: below 70 (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: popsicle labels
> > * Notes:
> > - spammer
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #20
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 75%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 1 autistic (major depression, artists)
> > * True physics background: high school
> > * Notes:
> > - Hustled snake oil
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #21
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 4 autistic (petty criminals)
> > * True physics background: high school and one physics course in college which he dropped before first exam
> > * Notes:
> > - Bonghead
> > - nymshifter
> > - click-jockey (preferred giving a link rather than the use of language to communicate)
> > - enjoyed playing "full of shit" games in this forum
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #22
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 80% (max for Aspergers)
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 5 autistic (Aspergers)
> > * True physics background: ok
> > * Notes:
> > - exposed lack of physics understanding of many smart aleck "engineers" frequenting this forum
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> >
> > #23
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited
> > * Maturity: 80%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 6 autistic (scientists)
> > * True physics background: undergraduate
> > * Notes:
> > - Couldn't initiate threads (only reacted to others' posts)
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #24
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 25%
> > * IQ: below 70 (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: med bottles' labels
> > * Notes:
> > - spammer
> > - OCD
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> >
> > #25
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 80% (max for Aspergers)
> > * IQ: 134 (mean value of 3 online IQ tests in span of past 20 years, all three between 130 and 140)
> > - if there were an online IQ test conducted in Persian language he would score higher, so the above IQ is the minimum
> > * Brain type: type 5 autistic (Aspergers)
> > * True physics background: ok
> > * Notes:
> > - used sci.physics mainly as a censor-free blog tool
> > - believed at least two different human species exist today:
> > 1- Modern Human (MH) comprising Jews, Arabs, Iranians, Indians, Chinese, American Natives, Hispanics
> > 2- Cro-Magnon Human (CH) comrising northern European transparent-skinned people
> > - believed CH is an earlier human species compared to MH, possessing inferior ACOB allotments, and fathered by Iranians and mothered by Neanderthal Europeans during past 40k - 24k years
> > - did not know anything about African Blacks
> > - believed major behavioral differences between individuals can be explained adequately enough just by consideration of brain's extent of wiring allotments to the three major brain centers: (see his ACOB blog)
> > 1- Analytical Compartments Of Brain (ACOB - prefrontal, temporal, prietal cortices)
> > 2- Fight Or Flight Compartments of brain (hypothalamus, autonomic system)
> > 3- Emotional Compartments of brain (Amygdala - fear, anger, love, grief, euphoria)
> > - believed humans left apes behind only as a result of two main factors: (see his ACOB blog)
> > 1- women cause evolutionary jumps (forward or backward in analytical thinking) at the time of choosing the fathers of their future children
> > 2- men give the good genes in earlier humans a chance to survive at the time of fucking the earlier human women.
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since 9/24/2022
> >
> > #26
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: limited and problematic
> > * Maturity: 70%
> > * IQ: below average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 1 autistic (major depression, artists)
> > * True physics background: high school
> > * Notes:
> > - Bonghead
> > - writes bad programs and refuses to correct their bugs when others point to them
> > - when his physics remark got corrected, he repeated his remark verbatim in response
> > - "semi-retired" in his 20s
> > - believed he was hated here and outside cyberspace both
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #28
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 75%
> > * IQ: average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: type 4 autistic (petty criminals)
> > * True physics background: comics magazines
> > * Notes:
> > - Einstein nut
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #29
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: flawed
> > * Maturity: 25%
> > * IQ: below 70 (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: schizophrenic (missing and/or nonsensical brain allotments)
> > * True physics background: sci.physics posts of "Whodat"
> > * Notes:
> > - hallucinating
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: active
> >
> > #30
> >
> >
> > Visual representation:
> >
> > Stats:
> > =====
> > * Deportment: ok
> > * Maturity: 90%
> > * IQ: above average (average being 100)
> > * Brain type: normal
> > * True physics background: community college
> > * Notes:
> > - could initiate threads
> > * Status: inactive since Sep 3, 2020
> >

Jan Burse, need your help here