Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith. -- Albert Einstein


tech / sci.physics.relativity / How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to remain synchronized within limits of accuracy?

SubjectAuthor
* How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to remaingehan.am...@gmail.com
+- Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as toDono.
`* Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as tomitchr...@gmail.com
 `- Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as togehan.am...@gmail.com

1
How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to remain synchronized within limits of accuracy?

<ead25252-b3b7-40a3-a165-9aa83a41db8an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114523&group=sci.physics.relativity#114523

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1ba5:b0:3f3:64cd:7c60 with SMTP id bp37-20020a05622a1ba500b003f364cd7c60mr1575868qtb.3.1683218028187;
Thu, 04 May 2023 09:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a86:b0:74d:fd99:ab32 with SMTP id
bl6-20020a05620a1a8600b0074dfd99ab32mr70100qkb.8.1683218027888; Thu, 04 May
2023 09:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 09:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.215.35.226; posting-account=sVBCDQoAAAADe-Ogi2R38m91EmLrcIgt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.215.35.226
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ead25252-b3b7-40a3-a165-9aa83a41db8an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to remain
synchronized within limits of accuracy?
From: gehan.am...@gmail.com (gehan.am...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 16:33:48 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3259
 by: gehan.am...@gmail.co - Thu, 4 May 2023 16:33 UTC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein synchronisation (or Poincaré–Einstein synchronisation) is a convention for synchronising clocks at different places by means of signal exchanges. This synchronisation method was used by telegraphers in the middle 19th century, but was popularized by Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein, who applied it to light signals and recognized its fundamental role in relativity theory. Its principal value is for clocks within a single inertial frame.

Poincare's description was quite clear:

"In 1904 Poincaré illustrated the same procedure in the following way:

Imagine two observers who wish to adjust their timepieces by optical signals; they exchange signals, but as they know that the transmission of light is not instantaneous, they are careful to cross them. When station B perceives the signal from station A, its clock should not mark the same hour as that of station A at the moment of sending the signal, but this hour augmented by a constant representing the duration of the transmission. Suppose, for example, that station A sends its signal when its clock marks the hour 0, and that station B perceives it when its clock marks the hour

t. The clocks are adjusted if the slowness equal to t represents the duration of the transmission, and to verify it, station B sends in its turn a signal when its clock marks 0; then station A should perceive it when its clock marks

t. The timepieces are then adjusted. And in fact they mark the same hour at the same physical instant, but on the one condition, that the two stations are fixed. Otherwise the duration of the transmission will not be the same in the two senses, since the station A, for example, moves forward to meet the optical perturbation emanating from B, whereas the station B flees before the perturbation emanating from A. The watches adjusted in that way will not mark, therefore, the true time; they will mark what may be called the local time, so that one of them will be slow of the other.[12]

"

Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to remain synchronized within limits of accuracy?

<f5f3d659-4b02-49b4-a21b-404ec49df675n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114526&group=sci.physics.relativity#114526

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:8f0:b0:61b:5841:cf10 with SMTP id dr16-20020a05621408f000b0061b5841cf10mr2061281qvb.1.1683218922726;
Thu, 04 May 2023 09:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:598d:0:b0:3df:bda6:6931 with SMTP id
e13-20020ac8598d000000b003dfbda66931mr1410733qte.2.1683218922447; Thu, 04 May
2023 09:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 09:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ead25252-b3b7-40a3-a165-9aa83a41db8an@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:79b3:2800:1c5b:f77c:2886:4163;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:79b3:2800:1c5b:f77c:2886:4163
References: <ead25252-b3b7-40a3-a165-9aa83a41db8an@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f5f3d659-4b02-49b4-a21b-404ec49df675n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to
remain synchronized within limits of accuracy?
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 16:48:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Dono. - Thu, 4 May 2023 16:48 UTC

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:33:49 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> Einstein synchronisation (or Poincaré–Einstein synchronisation) is a convention for synchronising clocks at different places by means of signal exchanges. This synchronisation method was used by telegraphers in the middle 19th century, but was popularized by Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein, who applied it to light signals and recognized its fundamental role in relativity theory. Its principal value is for clocks within a single inertial frame.
>
> Poincare's description was quite clear:
>
> "In 1904 Poincaré illustrated the same procedure in the following way:
>
> Imagine two observers who wish to adjust their timepieces by optical signals; they exchange signals, but as they know that the transmission of light is not instantaneous, they are careful to cross them. When station B perceives the signal from station A, its clock should not mark the same hour as that of station A at the moment of sending the signal, but this hour augmented by a constant representing the duration of the transmission. Suppose, for example, that station A sends its signal when its clock marks the hour 0, and that station B perceives it when its clock marks the hour
>
> t. The clocks are adjusted if the slowness equal to t represents the duration of the transmission, and to verify it, station B sends in its turn a signal when its clock marks 0; then station A should perceive it when its clock marks
>
> t. The timepieces are then adjusted. And in fact they mark the same hour at the same physical instant, but on the one condition, that the two stations are fixed. Otherwise the duration of the transmission will not be the same in the two senses, since the station A, for example, moves forward to meet the optical perturbation emanating from B, whereas the station B flees before the perturbation emanating from A. The watches adjusted in that way will not mark, therefore, the true time; they will mark what may be called the local time, so that one of them will be slow of the other.[12]
>
> "
This is an easy exercise for someone willing to learn relativity . This excludes you, Gehan

Let's say that you wand to move the clocks apart by a distance D. The movement is made at a constant speed v. Initially, the clocks were side by side.. After a time T=D/v they are D meters apart. By how much did the clocks get de-synchronize? What needs to be the speed v such the de-synch is less than "epsilon"? Instead of us spoonfeeding you answers, try to solve this simple exercise.

Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to remain synchronized within limits of accuracy?

<3ab63145-81da-43be-a48a-df5f15694ac6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114534&group=sci.physics.relativity#114534

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4008:b0:754:fdbf:cb31 with SMTP id h8-20020a05620a400800b00754fdbfcb31mr142109qko.14.1683222162623;
Thu, 04 May 2023 10:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5894:0:b0:3e4:ed8e:6dd8 with SMTP id
t20-20020ac85894000000b003e4ed8e6dd8mr1634687qta.6.1683222162431; Thu, 04 May
2023 10:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.1d4.us!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 10:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ead25252-b3b7-40a3-a165-9aa83a41db8an@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:1c0:c803:ab80:e096:631c:44df:507d;
posting-account=Dg6LkgkAAABl5NRBT4_iFEO1VO77GchW
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:1c0:c803:ab80:e096:631c:44df:507d
References: <ead25252-b3b7-40a3-a165-9aa83a41db8an@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3ab63145-81da-43be-a48a-df5f15694ac6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to
remain synchronized within limits of accuracy?
From: mitchrae...@gmail.com (mitchr...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 17:42:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3662
 by: mitchr...@gmail.com - Thu, 4 May 2023 17:42 UTC

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:33:49 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> Einstein synchronisation (or Poincaré–Einstein synchronisation) is a convention for synchronising clocks at different places by means of signal exchanges. This synchronisation method was used by telegraphers in the middle 19th century, but was popularized by Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein, who applied it to light signals and recognized its fundamental role in relativity theory. Its principal value is for clocks within a single inertial frame.
>
> Poincare's description was quite clear:
>
> "In 1904 Poincaré illustrated the same procedure in the following way:
>
> Imagine two observers who wish to adjust their timepieces by optical signals; they exchange signals, but as they know that the transmission of light is not instantaneous, they are careful to cross them. When station B perceives the signal from station A, its clock should not mark the same hour as that of station A at the moment of sending the signal, but this hour augmented by a constant representing the duration of the transmission. Suppose, for example, that station A sends its signal when its clock marks the hour 0, and that station B perceives it when its clock marks the hour
>
> t. The clocks are adjusted if the slowness equal to t represents the duration of the transmission, and to verify it, station B sends in its turn a signal when its clock marks 0; then station A should perceive it when its clock marks
>
> t. The timepieces are then adjusted. And in fact they mark the same hour at the same physical instant, but on the one condition, that the two stations are fixed. Otherwise the duration of the transmission will not be the same in the two senses, since the station A, for example, moves forward to meet the optical perturbation emanating from B, whereas the station B flees before the perturbation emanating from A. The watches adjusted in that way will not mark, therefore, the true time; they will mark what may be called the local time, so that one of them will be slow of the other.[12]
>
> "

The fastest separation would give the clocks the greatest difference.

Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to remain synchronized within limits of accuracy?

<448770a4-e219-44ed-8fd5-8712c7df33afn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114598&group=sci.physics.relativity#114598

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4105:b0:74d:764f:cda3 with SMTP id j5-20020a05620a410500b0074d764fcda3mr708810qko.1.1683254321674;
Thu, 04 May 2023 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:199a:b0:3f2:1441:3c21 with SMTP id
u26-20020a05622a199a00b003f214413c21mr93360qtc.1.1683254321396; Thu, 04 May
2023 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3ab63145-81da-43be-a48a-df5f15694ac6n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.215.35.226; posting-account=sVBCDQoAAAADe-Ogi2R38m91EmLrcIgt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.215.35.226
References: <ead25252-b3b7-40a3-a165-9aa83a41db8an@googlegroups.com> <3ab63145-81da-43be-a48a-df5f15694ac6n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <448770a4-e219-44ed-8fd5-8712c7df33afn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: How slowly do atomic clocks have to be moved apart so as to
remain synchronized within limits of accuracy?
From: gehan.am...@gmail.com (gehan.am...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 02:38:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 4393
 by: gehan.am...@gmail.co - Fri, 5 May 2023 02:38 UTC

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 10:42:44 PM UTC+5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:33:49 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
> > Einstein synchronisation (or Poincaré–Einstein synchronisation) is a convention for synchronising clocks at different places by means of signal exchanges. This synchronisation method was used by telegraphers in the middle 19th century, but was popularized by Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein, who applied it to light signals and recognized its fundamental role in relativity theory. Its principal value is for clocks within a single inertial frame.
> >
> > Poincare's description was quite clear:
> >
> > "In 1904 Poincaré illustrated the same procedure in the following way:
> >
> > Imagine two observers who wish to adjust their timepieces by optical signals; they exchange signals, but as they know that the transmission of light is not instantaneous, they are careful to cross them. When station B perceives the signal from station A, its clock should not mark the same hour as that of station A at the moment of sending the signal, but this hour augmented by a constant representing the duration of the transmission. Suppose, for example, that station A sends its signal when its clock marks the hour 0, and that station B perceives it when its clock marks the hour
> >
> > t. The clocks are adjusted if the slowness equal to t represents the duration of the transmission, and to verify it, station B sends in its turn a signal when its clock marks 0; then station A should perceive it when its clock marks
> >
> > t. The timepieces are then adjusted. And in fact they mark the same hour at the same physical instant, but on the one condition, that the two stations are fixed. Otherwise the duration of the transmission will not be the same in the two senses, since the station A, for example, moves forward to meet the optical perturbation emanating from B, whereas the station B flees before the perturbation emanating from A. The watches adjusted in that way will not mark, therefore, the true time; they will mark what may be called the local time, so that one of them will be slow of the other.[12]
> >
> > "
> The fastest separation would give the clocks the greatest difference.

ChatGPT
Q: According to relativity, what is the time difference between two clocks moved 1 million kilometers apart at 1 metre per second, in nano seconds, and show working.

A:So the time difference between the two clocks is 0.1 nanoseconds.

Q:How long will an atomic clock take to go out of synch by 0.1 nano second
A:So for an atomic clock with a fractional frequency stability of 1.157 x 10^11 ppb, it would take one day (or 24 hours) for the clock to go out of sync by 0.1 nanoseconds.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor