https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.

So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
times, 20000 times, anything you like.

Thank you, poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
DARE YOU!!!!" like always.

Raving lunatic Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>
> So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
> like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
> the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
> during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
> 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
> times, 20000 times, anything you like.
>
> Thank you,

This has been already addressed.

> poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.

This was not addressed that way. You're lying Maciej.

On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 15:19:34 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Raving lunatic Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> > As seen, the definition of second loved so
> > much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> > wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> > lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> > 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
> >
> > So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
> > like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
> > the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
> > during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
> > 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
> > times, 20000 times, anything you like.
> >
> > Thank you,
> This has been already addressed.
> > poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
> > so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
> > DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
> This was not addressed that way. You're lying Maciej.

Yes, it was, google keeps record. Have you, BTW,
already learnt what kinds of measurement errors
are there?

Convicted liar, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 15:19:34 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>> Raving lunatic Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
>>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
>>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
>>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
>>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
>>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>>>
>>> So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
>>> like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
>>> the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
>>> during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
>>> 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
>>> times, 20000 times, anything you like.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>> This has been already addressed.
>>> poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
>>> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
>>> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
>> This was not addressed that way. You're lying Maciej.
>
> Yes, it was, google keeps record.

Exactly.

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/qcRpF0gB8ys/m/8vpeP5gkCQAJ

On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 17:48:46 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Convicted liar, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 15:19:34 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> >> Raving lunatic Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> >>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> >>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> >>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> >>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> >>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
> >>>
> >>> So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
> >>> like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
> >>> the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
> >>> during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
> >>> 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
> >>> times, 20000 times, anything you like.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you,
> >> This has been already addressed.
> >>> poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
> >>> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
> >>> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
> >> This was not addressed that way. You're lying Maciej.
> >
> > Yes, it was, google keeps record.
> Exactly.
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/qcRpF0gB8ys/m/8vpeP5gkCQAJ

Anyone can see - usual set of insults
and arm waving.
BTW, have you already learnt what
kinds of measurement error are there?
And what a function is? And so on?

Impudent liar, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 17:48:46 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>> Convicted liar, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>> On Friday, 5 May 2023 at 15:19:34 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>>>> Raving lunatic Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
>>>>> As seen, the definition of second loved so
>>>>> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
>>>>> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
>>>>> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
>>>>> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, how did the mumble of Giant Guru look
>>>>> like up to 1960: "from the point of view" of
>>>>> the travelling twins of the famous paradox -
>>>>> during, let's say, 864Ms (i.e. by definition
>>>>> 10000 Earth turns) - Earth turned more, 15000
>>>>> times, 20000 times, anything you like.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>> This has been already addressed.
>>>>> poor halfbrains. Now it's your turn,
>>>>> so rave, spit and scream "UUUUUUUUU!!! HOW
>>>>> DARE YOU!!!!" like always.
>>>> This was not addressed that way. You're lying Maciej.
>>>
>>> Yes, it was, google keeps record.
>> Exactly.
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/qcRpF0gB8ys/m/8vpeP5gkCQAJ
>
> Anyone can see

Right.