Fair Journalism in reporting Science news-- The New York Times, Google, Wikipedia, NATURE, SCIENCE, magazines// Sociology

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface: This book is about the unfair reporting and the mis-reporting of truth in science. The Atom Totality theory arrived in 1990, yet here in 2022, no major science magazine has given it any coverage. The truth about slant cut in cones, the conic sections arrived in 2016, yet here in 2022, no newspaper or magazine has covered the truth of slant cut in cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. This is science reporting of news at its worst. Science magazines daily pelt the world with fake science of Big Bang, black holes, Standard Model, dark matter and dark energy, yet they have no space or time in their magazine to even say-- in 2016 AP discovered the slant cut of cone is truly a oval, never the ellipse.

The discovery that the real true electron of Atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law with the proton torus, while the 0.5MeV particle is not the electron of Atoms was discovered by AP in 2016-2017, yet here it is 6 years later in 2022, and no newspaper or magazine covering the story. Other than the Atom Totality theory, the discovery of the true electron of atoms are two of the largest science stories in all of human history.

What is the reason for the unfair and ugly reporting of science news? It is a power and money struggle. The New York Times will not publish AP's conic is oval, not ellipse for this newspaper wants never a Gentile to get credit for finding the truth. The science magazines will not publish the truth about conic sections for they --SCIENCE AAAS, Science News, Nature, Scientific American are payed money to keep out anything that upsets the applecart.

The Internet is new to the world, taking off about 1993 and having search engines. These started out as Advertisement companies, but quickly became digital Journalism without the fair practices needed for "good journalism" such as "counterpoint". This means that a Google Search of Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, John Stillwell, Thomas Hales, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall should not be millions and millions of Google search hits, all sugar coated-- "look at the baby boy genius". This is not journalism of science, but propaganda kiosks. A Google search of the above mentioned should have a Counterpoint on their first page saying something like--- in math, too stupid to acknowledge a slant cut in cone is oval, never ellipse. In physics-- should say --- too stupid to ever ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.

When it comes to science journalism, the The New York Times, SCIENCE, Science News, Scientific American, Nature, Google search, Wikipedia are propaganda kiosks and not science truth in reporting.