Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

I've looked at the listing, and it's right! -- Joel Halpern

tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

SubjectAuthor
* The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.gehan.am...@gmail.com
+* Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.Dono.
|`* Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.Dono.
| `* Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.gehan.am...@gmail.com
|  `- Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.Dono.
+- Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.Volney
`* Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.JanPB
 +- Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.carl eto
 `* Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.gehan.am...@gmail.com
  `* Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.Dono.
   `- Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.gehan.am...@gmail.com

1
The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114615&group=sci.physics.relativity#114615

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:17a4:b0:74d:f96b:6724 with SMTP id ay36-20020a05620a17a400b0074df96b6724mr22639qkb.3.1683260374988;
Thu, 04 May 2023 21:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4512:b0:74d:f227:d25a with SMTP id
t18-20020a05620a451200b0074df227d25amr17696qkp.2.1683260374688; Thu, 04 May
2023 21:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 21:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.215.35.226; posting-account=sVBCDQoAAAADe-Ogi2R38m91EmLrcIgt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.215.35.226
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: gehan.am...@gmail.com (gehan.am...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 04:19:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1917
 by: gehan.am...@gmail.co - Fri, 5 May 2023 04:19 UTC

An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity

Ed Lake
362 Views
28 Pages
1 File ▾
Physics
An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.

https://www.academia.edu/33891959/An_Analysis_of_Einsteins_Second_Postulate_to_his_Theory_of_Special_Relativity

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<27a2b3f2-d1b8-462e-ab8a-ab65fe319d75n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114616&group=sci.physics.relativity#114616

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1823:b0:3ef:3541:4352 with SMTP id t35-20020a05622a182300b003ef35414352mr155811qtc.4.1683260716999;
Thu, 04 May 2023 21:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:430b:b0:74e:362b:2f94 with SMTP id
u11-20020a05620a430b00b0074e362b2f94mr16893qko.3.1683260716717; Thu, 04 May
2023 21:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 21:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:79b3:2800:14ff:4c8c:46c7:8abc;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:79b3:2800:14ff:4c8c:46c7:8abc
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <27a2b3f2-d1b8-462e-ab8a-ab65fe319d75n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 04:25:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1546
 by: Dono. - Fri, 5 May 2023 04:25 UTC

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> snip cretinisms<

Ed Lake is an idiot. Just like you, Gehan.

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<21258f75-17f7-4b92-ae51-69d978e76ee1n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114617&group=sci.physics.relativity#114617

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2815:b0:753:2f4b:f5b6 with SMTP id f21-20020a05620a281500b007532f4bf5b6mr367467qkp.3.1683261233583;
Thu, 04 May 2023 21:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2815:b0:753:2f4b:f5b6 with SMTP id
f21-20020a05620a281500b007532f4bf5b6mr367463qkp.3.1683261233282; Thu, 04 May
2023 21:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 21:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <27a2b3f2-d1b8-462e-ab8a-ab65fe319d75n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:79b3:2800:14ff:4c8c:46c7:8abc;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:79b3:2800:14ff:4c8c:46c7:8abc
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com> <27a2b3f2-d1b8-462e-ab8a-ab65fe319d75n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <21258f75-17f7-4b92-ae51-69d978e76ee1n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 04:33:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1760
 by: Dono. - Fri, 5 May 2023 04:33 UTC

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:18 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> > snip cretinisms<
>
> Ed Lake is an idiot. Just like you, Gehan.

Instead of digging out crank garbage why don't you study a decent book like https://www.academia.edu/24640043/Special_Relativity ? It might get you out of the lunatic asylum. May not be too late....

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<b47eab19-6046-4d5d-8f9a-1479cdaf2a85n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114645&group=sci.physics.relativity#114645

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1b89:b0:3ef:3510:7c3f with SMTP id bp9-20020a05622a1b8900b003ef35107c3fmr358046qtb.12.1683283264870;
Fri, 05 May 2023 03:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a06:b0:3f0:a9a0:45e3 with SMTP id
f6-20020a05622a1a0600b003f0a9a045e3mr362875qtb.12.1683283264613; Fri, 05 May
2023 03:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 03:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <21258f75-17f7-4b92-ae51-69d978e76ee1n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.215.35.226; posting-account=sVBCDQoAAAADe-Ogi2R38m91EmLrcIgt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.215.35.226
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
<27a2b3f2-d1b8-462e-ab8a-ab65fe319d75n@googlegroups.com> <21258f75-17f7-4b92-ae51-69d978e76ee1n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b47eab19-6046-4d5d-8f9a-1479cdaf2a85n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: gehan.am...@gmail.com (gehan.am...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 10:41:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2056
 by: gehan.am...@gmail.co - Fri, 5 May 2023 10:41 UTC

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:33:55 AM UTC+5, Dono. wrote:
> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:18 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > snip cretinisms<
> >
> > Ed Lake is an idiot. Just like you, Gehan.
> Instead of digging out crank garbage why don't you study a decent book like https://www.academia.edu/24640043/Special_Relativity ? It might get you out of the lunatic asylum. May not be too late....

Thank you, I liked the nuclear bomb explosion on the cover it is a warning to cretin, I guess.

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<u33b8s$2dtuv$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114674&group=sci.physics.relativity#114674

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: vol...@invalid.invalid (Volney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 12:35:45 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <u33b8s$2dtuv$2@dont-email.me>
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 16:35:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d658abb587a8c68b3f603dd836ba1fdd";
logging-data="2553823"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199CvA/ImT5HEP6hn6bxTl0"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nnZehP1D4+xN/1X7tlyA/0GC8a0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
 by: Volney - Fri, 5 May 2023 16:35 UTC

On 5/5/2023 12:19 AM, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity
>
> Ed Lake
> 362 Views
> 28 Pages
> 1 File ▾
> Physics
> An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.
>
> https://www.academia.edu/33891959/An_Analysis_of_Einsteins_Second_Postulate_to_his_Theory_of_Special_Relativity

Ed Lake? Ed Lake? THAT Ed Lake?

Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<4c2cf271-5c0d-4cd9-a5f1-b32613b9d3cbn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114675&group=sci.physics.relativity#114675

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3182:b0:74e:e9a:bebe with SMTP id bi2-20020a05620a318200b0074e0e9abebemr477593qkb.14.1683304877464;
Fri, 05 May 2023 09:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7f0d:0:b0:3e6:2fab:675 with SMTP id
f13-20020ac87f0d000000b003e62fab0675mr521595qtk.9.1683304877152; Fri, 05 May
2023 09:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 09:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b47eab19-6046-4d5d-8f9a-1479cdaf2a85n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:79b3:2800:90dd:98e:b519:9e8e;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:79b3:2800:90dd:98e:b519:9e8e
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
<27a2b3f2-d1b8-462e-ab8a-ab65fe319d75n@googlegroups.com> <21258f75-17f7-4b92-ae51-69d978e76ee1n@googlegroups.com>
<b47eab19-6046-4d5d-8f9a-1479cdaf2a85n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4c2cf271-5c0d-4cd9-a5f1-b32613b9d3cbn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 16:41:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2250
 by: Dono. - Fri, 5 May 2023 16:41 UTC

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 3:41:06 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:33:55 AM UTC+5, Dono. wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:25:18 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> > > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > snip cretinisms<
> > >
> > > Ed Lake is an idiot. Just like you, Gehan.
> > Instead of digging out crank garbage why don't you study a decent book like https://www.academia.edu/24640043/Special_Relativity ? It might get you out of the lunatic asylum. May not be too late....
> Thank you, I liked the nuclear bomb explosion on the cover it is a warning to cretin, I guess.

I didn't see it as a warning to you but if you want to take it this way, be my guest.

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<2b62d5b7-f997-4fed-9eae-878d407b8683n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114695&group=sci.physics.relativity#114695

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1627:b0:61a:4ab3:227d with SMTP id e7-20020a056214162700b0061a4ab3227dmr368130qvw.2.1683318636428;
Fri, 05 May 2023 13:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7d12:0:b0:3e6:55b2:35f with SMTP id
g18-20020ac87d12000000b003e655b2035fmr812906qtb.5.1683318636094; Fri, 05 May
2023 13:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 13:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=148.64.18.93; posting-account=Y2v6DQoAAACGpOrX04JGhSdsTevCdArN
NNTP-Posting-Host: 148.64.18.93
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2b62d5b7-f997-4fed-9eae-878d407b8683n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: film...@gmail.com (JanPB)
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 20:30:36 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2311
 by: JanPB - Fri, 5 May 2023 20:30 UTC

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity
>
> Ed Lake
> 362 Views
> 28 Pages
> 1 File ▾
> Physics
> An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.

No, they are the same. Modern textbooks use a bit different derivation logic but
the theory ends up equivalent. But it's true IMHO that modern textbook
treatment of SR is pedagogically inferior and seems unnecessary puzzling and
whimsical to the student.

--
Jan

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<c7116d2d-deb6-4327-8a9d-1b1d45f3c1f6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114707&group=sci.physics.relativity#114707

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:a52:b0:5ef:5302:9cb with SMTP id ee18-20020a0562140a5200b005ef530209cbmr440026qvb.2.1683328253307;
Fri, 05 May 2023 16:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4107:b0:751:3875:b433 with SMTP id
j7-20020a05620a410700b007513875b433mr739875qko.11.1683328252982; Fri, 05 May
2023 16:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 16:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2b62d5b7-f997-4fed-9eae-878d407b8683n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.150.105.205; posting-account=z_5qVAoAAADOvemVnEuW_CANfuLqMNwO
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.150.105.205
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com> <2b62d5b7-f997-4fed-9eae-878d407b8683n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c7116d2d-deb6-4327-8a9d-1b1d45f3c1f6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: ccarleto...@gmail.com (carl eto)
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 23:10:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1329
 by: carl eto - Fri, 5 May 2023 23:10 UTC

The question back then was Maxwell's theory and the ether. You guys are a bunch of stupid mother fucker

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<b164a357-f205-4a1f-ae1e-9f523eb4dcd6n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114781&group=sci.physics.relativity#114781

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a03:b0:742:9e15:3e0 with SMTP id bk3-20020a05620a1a0300b007429e1503e0mr1598230qkb.5.1683385266984;
Sat, 06 May 2023 08:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a20:b0:74e:4f4e:2fe2 with SMTP id
bk32-20020a05620a1a2000b0074e4f4e2fe2mr1173399qkb.9.1683385266681; Sat, 06
May 2023 08:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 08:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2b62d5b7-f997-4fed-9eae-878d407b8683n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.215.33.40; posting-account=sVBCDQoAAAADe-Ogi2R38m91EmLrcIgt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.215.33.40
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com> <2b62d5b7-f997-4fed-9eae-878d407b8683n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b164a357-f205-4a1f-ae1e-9f523eb4dcd6n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: gehan.am...@gmail.com (gehan.am...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 15:01:06 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 37
 by: gehan.am...@gmail.co - Sat, 6 May 2023 15:01 UTC

On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 1:30:37 AM UTC+5, JanPB wrote:
> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> > An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity
> >
> > Ed Lake
> > 362 Views
> > 28 Pages
> > 1 File ▾
> > Physics
> > An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.
> No, they are the same. Modern textbooks use a bit different derivation logic but
> the theory ends up equivalent. But it's true IMHO that modern textbook
> treatment of SR is pedagogically inferior and seems unnecessary puzzling and
> whimsical to the student.
>
> --
> Jan

There are two textbooks I am looking at at the moment.

https://www.amazon.com/Special-Relativity-Enthusiastic-David-Morin/dp/1542323517

And

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity

Any concerns?

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<3a573e90-c52b-4763-a379-904a1d94b2c7n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114784&group=sci.physics.relativity#114784

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2f8a:b0:5ef:4436:ef38 with SMTP id ob10-20020a0562142f8a00b005ef4436ef38mr2811140qvb.4.1683385707360;
Sat, 06 May 2023 08:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4107:b0:751:3875:b433 with SMTP id
j7-20020a05620a410700b007513875b433mr1412329qko.11.1683385707058; Sat, 06 May
2023 08:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 08:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b164a357-f205-4a1f-ae1e-9f523eb4dcd6n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:79b3:2800:f948:a894:3fa3:4b77;
posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:79b3:2800:f948:a894:3fa3:4b77
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
<2b62d5b7-f997-4fed-9eae-878d407b8683n@googlegroups.com> <b164a357-f205-4a1f-ae1e-9f523eb4dcd6n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3a573e90-c52b-4763-a379-904a1d94b2c7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: eggy2001...@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 15:08:27 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3111
 by: Dono. - Sat, 6 May 2023 15:08 UTC

On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 8:01:08 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 1:30:37 AM UTC+5, JanPB wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity
> > >
> > > Ed Lake
> > > 362 Views
> > > 28 Pages
> > > 1 File ▾
> > > Physics
> > > An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.
> > No, they are the same. Modern textbooks use a bit different derivation logic but
> > the theory ends up equivalent. But it's true IMHO that modern textbook
> > treatment of SR is pedagogically inferior and seems unnecessary puzzling and
> > whimsical to the student.
> >
> > --
> > Jan
> There are two textbooks I am looking at at the moment.
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Special-Relativity-Enthusiastic-David-Morin/dp/1542323517
>
> And
>
> https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity
>
> Any concerns?

Just read them, learn and stop wasting your time posting imbecilities on this forum (or any other forum)

Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.

<87fa98e6-f293-4aea-a105-37e37b6f6a96n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=114854&group=sci.physics.relativity#114854

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1823:b0:3ef:47d1:70f6 with SMTP id t35-20020a05622a182300b003ef47d170f6mr2324130qtc.0.1683423557598;
Sat, 06 May 2023 18:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2588:b0:757:7627:d06a with SMTP id
x8-20020a05620a258800b007577627d06amr130129qko.15.1683423557343; Sat, 06 May
2023 18:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 18:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3a573e90-c52b-4763-a379-904a1d94b2c7n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.215.33.40; posting-account=sVBCDQoAAAADe-Ogi2R38m91EmLrcIgt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.215.33.40
References: <5de11551-48eb-4c25-8c0e-9344c174932fn@googlegroups.com>
<2b62d5b7-f997-4fed-9eae-878d407b8683n@googlegroups.com> <b164a357-f205-4a1f-ae1e-9f523eb4dcd6n@googlegroups.com>
<3a573e90-c52b-4763-a379-904a1d94b2c7n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <87fa98e6-f293-4aea-a105-37e37b6f6a96n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The claim that texbooks are wrong about the Special Theory.
From: gehan.am...@gmail.com (gehan.am...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 01:39:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 49
 by: gehan.am...@gmail.co - Sun, 7 May 2023 01:39 UTC

On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 8:08:28 PM UTC+5, Dono. wrote:
> On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 8:01:08 AM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 1:30:37 AM UTC+5, JanPB wrote:
> > > On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 9:19:36 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > An Analysis of Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity
> > > >
> > > > Ed Lake
> > > > 362 Views
> > > > 28 Pages
> > > > 1 File ▾
> > > > Physics
> > > > An analysis of books, presentations and scientific papers about Albert Einstein's Second Postulate to his Theory of Special Relativity shows that there is a fundamental disagreement between what Einstein wrote and how what he wrote is being interpreted by mathematician-physicists and taught in colleges and universities around the world. An analysis of the evidence shows that Einstein was correct and the vast majority of interpretations and teachings are incorrect.
> > > No, they are the same. Modern textbooks use a bit different derivation logic but
> > > the theory ends up equivalent. But it's true IMHO that modern textbook
> > > treatment of SR is pedagogically inferior and seems unnecessary puzzling and
> > > whimsical to the student.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jan
> > There are two textbooks I am looking at at the moment.
> >
> > https://www.amazon.com/Special-Relativity-Enthusiastic-David-Morin/dp/1542323517
> >
> > And
> >
> > https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity
> >
> > Any concerns?
> Just read them, learn and stop wasting your time posting imbecilities on this forum (or any other forum)

It is all relative, from my frame of reference, I am not wasting any of my time. For you, of course time passes very slowly for me since the rate of my mental clock is in the MHz range. By the time I understand it all, millions of years would have passed.

It could be worse, what if you were the cretin and I was the intellictual?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor