Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Whenever people agree with me, I always think I must be wrong. -- Oscar Wilde


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology

SubjectAuthor
* Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's IdeologyPentcho Valev
+* Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's IdeologyPentcho Valev
|`- Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's IdeologyPentcho Valev
`- Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideologycarl eto

1
Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology

<0386edaa-824f-4311-96b4-edff54151444n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=115150&group=sci.physics.relativity#115150

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3949:b0:757:87f7:750e with SMTP id qs9-20020a05620a394900b0075787f7750emr1116307qkn.7.1683622381820;
Tue, 09 May 2023 01:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:444a:b0:753:1209:3c0a with SMTP id
w10-20020a05620a444a00b0075312093c0amr4933549qkp.8.1683622381568; Tue, 09 May
2023 01:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 01:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.27.150.145; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.27.150.145
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0386edaa-824f-4311-96b4-edff54151444n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology
From: pva...@yahoo.com (Pentcho Valev)
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 08:53:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2342
 by: Pentcho Valev - Tue, 9 May 2023 08:53 UTC

That the speed of light is variable, not constant, is obvious, but in Doppler effect (moving observer)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

it is even more than obvious. Yet physicists don't see it. Conclusion: Einstein's ideology, being non-violent, is immeasurably more efficient than Big Brother's ideology where violence plays an essential role.

George Orwell: "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?"

Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology

<06512762-f4eb-4259-ad5b-2ae1e37fbe14n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=115190&group=sci.physics.relativity#115190

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:138a:b0:3f3:7869:d2d2 with SMTP id o10-20020a05622a138a00b003f37869d2d2mr6215883qtk.12.1683671284842;
Tue, 09 May 2023 15:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:372c:b0:755:b6b8:a893 with SMTP id
de44-20020a05620a372c00b00755b6b8a893mr4595666qkb.7.1683671284327; Tue, 09
May 2023 15:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 15:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0386edaa-824f-4311-96b4-edff54151444n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.27.150.145; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.27.150.145
References: <0386edaa-824f-4311-96b4-edff54151444n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <06512762-f4eb-4259-ad5b-2ae1e37fbe14n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology
From: pva...@yahoo.com (Pentcho Valev)
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 22:28:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3587
 by: Pentcho Valev - Tue, 9 May 2023 22:28 UTC

If the speed of light is constant as per Einstein, then ANY frequency shift entails an inversely proportional wavelength shift, in accordance with the formula

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

In the Doppler-moving-observer scenario, there is frequency shift without wavelength shift, which unequivocally proves that the speed of light is variable, not constant:

"Thus, the moving observer sees a wave possessing the same wavelength...but a different frequency...to that seen by the stationary observer." http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/Waveshtml/node41.html

Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics: "You can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, the distances between subsequent pulses are not affected, but still there is a frequency shift." https://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlight/doppler/

"Vo is the velocity of an observer moving towards the source. This velocity is independent of the motion of the source. Hence, the velocity of waves relative to the observer is c + Vo...The motion of an observer does not alter the wavelength. The increase in frequency is a result of the observer encountering more wavelengths in a given time." http://a-levelphysicstutor.com/wav-doppler.php

"The Doppler effect is the shift in frequency of a wave that occurs when the wave source, or the detector of the wave, is moving. Applications of the Doppler effect range from medical tests using ultrasound to radar detectors and astronomy (with electromagnetic waves)...Moving Observer. Let's say you, the observer, now move toward the source with velocity Vo. You encounter more waves per unit time than you did before. Relative to you, the waves travel at a higher speed: V' = V+Vo. The frequency of the waves you detect is higher, and is given by: f' = V'/λ = (V+Vo)/λ." http://physics.bu.edu/~redner/211-sp06/class19/class19_doppler.html

"The wavelength is staying the same in this [moving observer] case." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHepfIIsKcE

Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology

<b4580918-399f-4b28-bb74-fae38c6acfdfn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=115235&group=sci.physics.relativity#115235

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:911:b0:61b:5dd8:e623 with SMTP id dj17-20020a056214091100b0061b5dd8e623mr3246576qvb.3.1683704129116;
Wed, 10 May 2023 00:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:170e:b0:3f3:6708:c7c1 with SMTP id
h14-20020a05622a170e00b003f36708c7c1mr6144384qtk.0.1683704128864; Wed, 10 May
2023 00:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 00:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <06512762-f4eb-4259-ad5b-2ae1e37fbe14n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.27.150.145; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.27.150.145
References: <0386edaa-824f-4311-96b4-edff54151444n@googlegroups.com> <06512762-f4eb-4259-ad5b-2ae1e37fbe14n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b4580918-399f-4b28-bb74-fae38c6acfdfn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology
From: pva...@yahoo.com (Pentcho Valev)
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 07:35:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 11152
 by: Pentcho Valev - Wed, 10 May 2023 07:35 UTC

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887...The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

"Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether." Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roots, p.92 https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Its-Roots-Banesh-Hoffmann/dp/0486406768

Deciphering the above quotations: Originally ("without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations"), the Michelson-Morley experiment was compatible with Newton's variable speed of light, c'=c±v, and incompatible with the constant speed of light, c'=c. By introducing suitable fudge factors ("contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations"), FitzGerald, Lorentz and Einstein made the experiment incompatible with Newton's variable speed of light, c'=c±v, and compatible with the constant speed of light, c'=c.

In 1921 Einstein, already a deity, declared: "Michelson showed that relative to the moving co-ordinate system K1, the light traveled with the same velocity as relative to K". This was tantamount to saying that the Michelson-Morley experiment had proved the constancy of the speed of light:

The New York Times, April 19, 1921: "The special relativity arose from the question of whether light had an invariable velocity in free space, he [Einstein] said. The velocity of light could only be measured relative to a body or a co-ordinate system. He sketched a co-ordinate system K to which light had a velocity C. Whether the system was in motion or not was the fundamental principle. This has been developed through the researches of Maxwell and Lorentz, the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light having been based on many of their experiments. But did it hold for only one system? he asked. He gave the example of a street and a vehicle moving on that street. If the velocity of light was C for the street was it also C for the vehicle? If a second co-ordinate system K was introduced, moving with the velocity V, did light have the velocity of C here? When the light traveled the system moved with it, so it would appear that light moved slower and the principle apparently did not hold. Many famous experiments had been made on this point. Michelson showed that relative to the moving co-ordinate system K1, the light traveled with the same velocity as relative to K, which is contrary to the above observation. How could this be reconciled? Professor Einstein asked." https://ebay.com/itm/ALBERT-EINSTEIN-Lecture-on-SPEED-OF-LIGHT-Time-1st-Visit-to-US-1921-Newspaper/373400655156

Einstein's 1921 blatant lie has been universally taught ever since:

Sabine Hossenfelder: "How fast do you see the light of Bob's laser? You'd expect this to be faster than the light that comes out of your laser pointer by the speed of the train, but not so. It moves with the exact same speed as yours. Because the speed of light is always the same. This is what was confirmed with the famous Michelson-Morley experiment." https://youtu.be/9-jIplX6Wjw?t=207

"The conclusion of the Michelson-Morley experiment was that the speed of light was a constant c in any inertial frame. Why is this result so surprising? First, it invalidates the Galilean coordinate transformation. Note that with the frames as defined in the previous section, if light is travelling in the x' direction in frame O' with velocity c, then its speed in the O frame is, by the Galilean transform, c+v, not c as measured. This invalidates two thousand years of understanding of the nature of time and space. The only comparable discovery is the discovery that the earth isn't flat! The Michelson Morley experiment has inevitably brought about a profound change in our understanding of the world." http://www.berkeleyscience.com/relativity..htm

Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light: "A missile fired from a plane moves faster than one fired from the ground because the plane's speed adds to the missile's speed. If I throw something forward on a moving train, its speed with respect to the platform is the speed of that object plus that of the train. You might think that the same should happen to light: Light flashed from a train should travel faster. However, what the Michelson-Morley experiments showed was that this was not the case: Light always moves stubbornly at the same speed. This means that if I take a light ray and ask several observers moving with respect to each other to measure the speed of this light ray, they will all agree on the same apparent speed!" https://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Speed-Light-Speculation/dp/0738205257

Philip Ball: "Michelson and Morley set out to detect the ether by recording the velocity of beams of light travelling in different directions. They expected to see different speeds for each beam, caused by the motion of Earth through the ether. To their surprise, they saw nothing of the sort — the speed of light remained constant in all directions." https://www.nature.com/articles/427482a

Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Chapter 2: "The special theory of relativity was very successful in explaining that the speed of light appears the same to all observers (as shown by the Michelson-Morley experiment)...." http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Time-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553380168

Brian Cox, p. 91: "...Maxwell's brilliant synthesis of the experimental results of Faraday and others strongly suggested that the speed of light should be the same for all observers. This conclusion was supported by the experimental result of Michelson and Morley, and taken at face value by Einstein.." http://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-mc2-Should-Care/dp/0306817586

Ethan Siegel: "The speed of light doesn't change when you boost your light source. Imagine throwing a ball as fast as you can. Depending on what sport you're playing, you might get all the way up to 100 miles per hour (~45 meters/second) using your hand-and-arm alone. Now, imagine you're on a train (or in a plane) moving incredibly quickly: 300 miles per hour (~134 m/s). If you throw the ball from the train, moving in the same direction, how fast does the ball move? You simply add the speeds up: 400 miles per hour, and that's your answer. Now, imagine that instead of throwing a ball, you emit a beam of light instead. Add the speed of the light to the speed of the train... and you get an answer that's completely wrong. Really, you do! This was the central idea of Einstein's theory of special relativity, but it wasn't Einstein who made this experimental discovery; it was Albert Michelson, who's pioneering work in the 1880s demonstrated that this was the case." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/10/27/five-discoveries-in-fundamental-physics-that-came-as-total-surprises/

Joe Wolfe: "At this stage, many of my students say things like "The invariance of the speed of light among observers is impossible" or "I can't understand it". Well, it's not impossible. It's even more than possible, it is true. This is something that has been extensively measured, and many refinements to the Michelson and Morley experiment, and complementary experiments have confirmed this invariance to very great precision. As to understanding it, there isn't really much to understand. However surprising and weird it may be, it is the case. It's the law in our universe. The fact of the invariance of c doesn't take much understanding." https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module3_weird_logic.htm

Neil deGrasse Tyson: "Beginning in 1905, investigations into the behavior of light got positively spooky. That year, Einstein published his special theory of relativity, in which he ratcheted up M & M's null result to an audacious level. The speed of light in empty space, he declared, is a universal constant, no matter the speed of the light-emitting source or the speed of the person doing the measuring." https://www.amazon.fr/Death-Black-Hole-Cosmic-Quandaries/dp/039335038X

Edward Witten on modern physics https://youtu.be/fnzLpyDsn3M?t=77

Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology

<4a4a0bbe-68b9-4c38-87be-aee1b879cb01n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=115273&group=sci.physics.relativity#115273

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7f0d:0:b0:3e6:2fab:675 with SMTP id f13-20020ac87f0d000000b003e62fab0675mr6433872qtk.9.1683753376053;
Wed, 10 May 2023 14:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:590e:0:b0:5c4:b994:5220 with SMTP id
ez14-20020ad4590e000000b005c4b9945220mr3819019qvb.4.1683753375780; Wed, 10
May 2023 14:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 14:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0386edaa-824f-4311-96b4-edff54151444n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.150.101.179; posting-account=z_5qVAoAAADOvemVnEuW_CANfuLqMNwO
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.150.101.179
References: <0386edaa-824f-4311-96b4-edff54151444n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <4a4a0bbe-68b9-4c38-87be-aee1b879cb01n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Efficiency of Einstein's Ideology and Big Brother's Ideology
From: ccarleto...@gmail.com (carl eto)
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 21:16:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1309
 by: carl eto - Wed, 10 May 2023 21:16 UTC

he is using time-space to justify Maxwell's equations

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor