The typical bullshit you'll find posted in many comments is this:

"Hey New Calculus, stop promoting your new calculus, all you're doing in your videos is dividing by 0/0 everywhere".

In fact, there is never division by 0 in the New Calculus because m+n can never be zero just as h can never be zero in the mainstream calculus. In the New Calculus, Q(x,m,n) is ALWAYS equal to 0, unlike Q(x,h) which is only equal to 0 if the function being differentiated is a straight line. However, in order to get the derivative in mainstream calculus, one must set Q(x,h)=0, that is equivalent to setting h=0. Thanks to my historic geometric theorem, it is perfectly valid and legal to set h=0 even in the mainstream calculus because it is EQUIVALENT to discarding Q(x,h) which is the difference in slopes (between tangent line and non-parallel secant line). In the New Calculus it is unnecessary to discard Q(x,m,n) because it is always ZERO! Turns out, there was really nothing to rigorise in mainstream calculus - rather the problem is that the fools who came before me NEVER understood. My historic geometric theorem is explained here:

https://www.academia.edu/62358358/My_historic_geometric_theorem_of_January_2020

My historic theorem was realised as a result of the rigorous New Calculus. Humanity would have remained in the dark had I not revealed that neither Newton nor Leibniz were doing anything wrong by setting h=0 because this is equivalent to discarding the term in Q(x,h). This sort of nonsense does not happen in the New Calculus because Q(x,m,n) is ALWAYS 0, not just when f is a straight line.

On 11/5/2022 5:22 AM, Eram semper recta ("I am always a rectum") wrote:

> The typical bullshit you'll find posted

Adios dipshit.