We will try to show that there is a red shift if an electromagnetic source
moves away,
and we will show that there is a blue shift if it approaches.
We then set λ'=λ.sqrt[(1+v/c)/(1-v/c)] if the body leaks in the
terrestrial reference frame.
and λ'=λ.sqrt[(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)] if the body is approaching.
And we put:
ν'=ν.sqrt[(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)] if the body leaks.
and ν'=ν.sqrt[(1+v/c)/(1-v/c)] if the body is approaching.
Nothing very difficult.
These equations are obviously taken from a more general equation.
What is the formula to use when giving µ as the angle made by the
direction of the displacement of the electromagnetic source with the sight
of the subject in the terrestrial frame of reference?
ν is the proper electromagnetic frequency.
ν' is the electromagnetic frequency perceived by the terrestrial
observer.
Who can answer?

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?fyVBwtaJvC77IV0nr1LzCt5bW-4@jntp/Data.Media:1>

R.H.

Richard Hachel wrote:

> And we put: ν'=ν.sqrt[(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)] if the body leaks.
> and ν'=ν.sqrt[(1+v/c)/(1-v/c)] if the body is approaching.
> Nothing very difficult.

yes sure, But who is commanding the Ukrainian forces? No Zaluzhny, and Syrskyi hasn't been seen since that May attack on command center. And the fucking khazar gay actor zelenske is not there, long ago. There are Telegram messages but anyone can type those.

NATO chief comments on Russia countering Ukrainian offensive
Kiev’s troops *_are_facing_a_“well-prepared”_Russian_defense_*, Jens Stolenburg has said, promising more equipment for Ukraine
https://%72t.com/news/578362-nato-stoltenberg-russia-ukrainian-offensive/

"The Russians somehow knew all our plans. We must find the traitors," says the Secretary after months of running his mouth. He talks engilsh like my dick.

He looks very sick! Looks worried. *_Reality_starting_to_dawn_on_this_Nazi_loving_doofus_*.

"The long-anticipated Ukrainian counteroffensive has effectively stalled, and they continue to take heavy casualties, heavy attrition. Ukrainian troops bleed and die still ten, fifteen kilometers away from Russia's first defensive line. All this fighting is taking place in the “throwaway zone”: an area before the actual Russian defensive lines, which the Russian troops deemed unsuitable for static, heavy defenses, defensive lines with trenches and fortifications. Most of the Kiev regime’s troops who perished in this counteroffensive died without ever really seeing the enemy, not to mention that they lost a lot more men than the Russian defenders." (Security Analyst Mark Sleboda)

*_stolenburg_should_be_tried_for_war_crimes_*. Only for planing and blowing up energy pipelines *_is_a_terrorist_action_*, a severe crime.

*_BALTOPS22_* (aka *_Baltic_Operations_year_2022_*)
These countries will exercise a *_myriad_of_capabilities_*, demonstrating the *_inherent_flexibility_of_maritime_forces_*. Exercise scenarios include amphibious, gunnery, *_anti-submarine_*, air defense, and *_mine_clearance_operations_*, as well as *_explosive_ordnance_disposal_*, *_unmanned_underwater_* and *_surface_vehicle_exercises_*, and medical responses.
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/06/baltops-2023-exercise-kicks-off-in-the-baltic-sea/

Le 20/06/2023 à 23:21, Richard Hachel a écrit :
> We will try to show that there is a red shift if an electromagnetic source moves
> away,
> and we will show that there is a blue shift if it approaches.
>
> We then set λ'=λ.sqrt[(1+v/c)/(1-v/c)] if the body leaks in the terrestrial
> reference frame.
> and λ'=λ.sqrt[(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)] if the body is approaching.
>
> And we put:
> ν'=ν.sqrt[(1-v/c)/(1+v/c)] if the body leaks.
> and ν'=ν.sqrt[(1+v/c)/(1-v/c)] if the body is approaching.
>
> Nothing very difficult.
>
> These equations are obviously taken from a more general equation.
>
> What is the formula to use when giving µ as the angle made by the direction
> of the displacement of the electromagnetic source with the sight of the subject in
> the terrestrial frame of reference?
>
> ν is the proper electromagnetic frequency.
>
> ν' is the electromagnetic frequency perceived by the terrestrial observer.
>
> Who can answer?
>
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?fyVBwtaJvC77IV0nr1LzCt5bW-4@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>
> R.H.

Apparently no one

R.H.