On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 08:48:02 UTC+2, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 08:39:25 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > And, according to you, that should mean that the Cs
> > > frequency is different in different frames?
> > > Your dead dog knows more of your moronic physics than
> > > you do, Al.
> > What a bizarre claim, Woz... c, of course, is always a constant..
> Of course, Al. If it's 9 192 631 770 on Earth, it's
> 9 192 631 770 always, everywhere. That's what
> your insane Shit is insisting on - no offsets. QED,
> poor halfbrain.

See, Al (and other relativistic halfbrains) - the
prophecies of The Shit are not going to fulfill
on their own. They need our help.

To get the Cs frequency measured as
9 192 631 770 - always, everywhere - we
have to set our Cs clock divider to 9 192 631 770 -
always, everywhere. If we won't, if we (for instance)
set it to 9 192 631 774 on a GPS satellite - the
measured on the satellite frequency will be
9 192 631 774, and The Shit will be inconsistent
with some measurement result. We shouldn't let
that happen, should we?

That's why poor idiot Tom is screaming of being
FORCED so loudly...

Den 10.07.2023 11:02, skrev Maciej Wozniak:
>
> To get the Cs frequency measured as
> 9 192 631 770 - always, everywhere - we
> have to set our Cs clock divider to 9 192 631 770 -
> always, everywhere.

The frequency of the photon associated with the hyperfine
transition in Cs33 is 9 192 631 774 Hz by definition
of the second.

So what 'divider' are you taking about?
Do you really believe that some 'divider' can affect
the energy gap of the hyperfine transition?

You must be the most ignorant crank in this forum.

Congratulations!

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 12:40:14 UTC+2, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 10.07.2023 11:02, skrev Maciej Wozniak:
> >
> > To get the Cs frequency measured as
> > 9 192 631 770 - always, everywhere - we
> > have to set our Cs clock divider to 9 192 631 770 -
> > always, everywhere.
> The frequency of the photon associated with the hyperfine
> transition in Cs33 is 9 192 631 774 Hz by definition
> of the second.

Oh, really? but in the time when your idiot guru
was living and mumbling the definition was
different, will you deny, poor fanatic idiot?
And tomorrow it can be different again.

Your Shit needed your help and you provided
it. Well, more than 50 years too late. And, well,
it didn't help at all; anyone can check GPS, the divider
for REAL clocks is different, and the results
of REAL measurements deny your precious
predictions.

> Do you really believe that some 'divider' can affect
> the energy gap of the hyperfine transition?

And do you still rape your daughter?

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 12:57:14 UTC+2, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 12:40:14 UTC+2, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> > Den 10.07.2023 11:02, skrev Maciej Wozniak:
> > >
> > > To get the Cs frequency measured as
> > > 9 192 631 770 - always, everywhere - we
> > > have to set our Cs clock divider to 9 192 631 770 -
> > > always, everywhere.
> > The frequency of the photon associated with the hyperfine
> > transition in Cs33 is 9 192 631 774 Hz by definition
> > of the second.
> Oh, really? but in the time when your idiot guru
> was living and mumbling the definition was
> different, will you deny, poor fanatic idiot?
> And tomorrow it can be different again.
>
> Your Shit needed your help and you provided
> it. Well, more than 50 years too late. And, well,
> it didn't help at all; anyone can check GPS, the divider
> for REAL clocks is different, and the results
> of REAL measurements deny your precious
> predictions.
> > Do you really believe that some 'divider' can affect
> > the energy gap of the hyperfine transition?
> And do you still rape your daughter?

See, scum: your Shit was predicting the same
[measured] frequency of Cs on Earth and on a
satellite. Will you deny it, scum?
Under the definition of second valid up to
1960 such result wouldn't happen, it would
be ~9 192 631 770Hz and ~ 9 192 631 774 Hz.
Will you deny it, scum?

By redefining the second in 1968 your
bunch of fanatics was trying to ENFORCE
measurement results matching your
moronic theory. It' s just that it didn't work.
Because, while your definition demands all
the Cs clocks to be set to 9 192 631 770 -
this nonsensical demand of yours is, very
simply, ignored.

Den 10.07.2023 12:57, skrev Maciej Wozniak:
>
> And do you still rape your daughter?

Who do you think is made to look like a fool by this remark?
You or I?

I have plunked you before, a long time ago,
but have recently deleted all my filters.

Now you are back where you belong.

<plunk>

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 19:27:11 UTC+2, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 10.07.2023 12:57, skrev Maciej Wozniak:
> >
> > And do you still rape your daughter?
> Who do you think is made to look like a fool by this remark?
> You or I?

And who do you think is made to look like a fool
by the remark "Do you really believe that some 'divider'..."
You or I?

>
> I have plunked you before, a long time ago,

Because, apat of spitting, slandering and lying
it's the only thing a relativistic maniac is able to
do.

On 7/10/2023 6:39 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 10.07.2023 11:02, skrev Maciej Wozniak:
>>
>> To get the Cs frequency measured as
>> 9 192 631 770 -  always, everywhere - we
>> have to set our Cs clock divider  to  9 192 631 770 -
>> always, everywhere.
>
> The frequency of the photon associated with the hyperfine
> transition in Cs33 is 9 192 631 774 Hz by definition
> of the second.
>
> So what 'divider' are you taking about?
> Do you really believe  that some 'divider' can affect
> the energy gap of the hyperfine transition?

The definition of the second divides the natural Cs frequency by 9 192
631 770 to get 1 pulse per second (exactly, by definition of a second).
This works locally to the Cs clock.

Because the satellite is NOT local to those on earth, they compensate
for the GR difference by using a divisor of 9 192 631 774.1 to generate
the correct frequency on earth. (so satellite transmits a carrier of
10.22999999543 MHz to be received on earth at 10.23 MHz [exactly])
>
> You must be the most ignorant crank in this forum.
>
> Congratulations!
>
But he has serious competition.

On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 12:41:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> On 7/10/2023 6:39 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> > You must be the most ignorant crank in this forum.
> >
> > Congratulations!
> >
> But he has serious competition.

Personally, I am most annoyed by several posters who
truly believe that they support relativity, but who in
reality support a mixed confabulation of what they
*think* is relativity. I won't name any current names,
but in the past, we had people like Uncle Al, who was
famous for the creative ways that he put down cranks,
and was actually rather "beloved" for that.

People like Woz are just mentally ill, and I don't take
them seriously. I lump Woz along with other legendary
one-track-minded posters like Spaceman (James
Driscoll). Someone once wrote a Spaceman simulator
that was hard to tell from the real thing. Ask it anything,
and the simulator would respond with one of half a
dozen repetitive stock phrases. Sort of like Woz.

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 19:41:59 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
> On 7/10/2023 6:39 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> > Den 10.07.2023 11:02, skrev Maciej Wozniak:
> >>
> >> To get the Cs frequency measured as
> >> 9 192 631 770 - always, everywhere - we
> >> have to set our Cs clock divider to 9 192 631 770 -
> >> always, everywhere.
> >
> > The frequency of the photon associated with the hyperfine
> > transition in Cs33 is 9 192 631 774 Hz by definition
> > of the second.
> >
> > So what 'divider' are you taking about?
> > Do you really believe that some 'divider' can affect
> > the energy gap of the hyperfine transition?
> The definition of the second divides the natural Cs frequency by 9 192
> 631 770 to get 1 pulse per second (exactly, by definition of a second).
> This works locally to the Cs clock.

No, stupid Mike, it doesn't. Anyone can check GPS,
9 192 631 774 is needed there.

> Because the satellite is NOT local to those on earth, they compensate
> for the GR difference

There is no such thing.

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 20:14:10 UTC+2, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote:
> On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 12:41:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > On 7/10/2023 6:39 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>
> > > You must be the most ignorant crank in this forum.
> > >
> > > Congratulations!
> > >
> > But he has serious competition.
> Personally, I am most annoyed by several posters who
> truly believe that they support relativity, but who in
> reality support a mixed confabulation of what they
> *think* is relativity.

Like Volney screaming that 9 192 631 770 Cs clock
is in "Newton mode", I guess.

I won't name any current names,

How nice of you.

> but in the past, we had people like Uncle Al, who was
> famous for the creative ways that he put down cranks,
> and was actually rather "beloved" for that.
>
> People like Woz are just mentally ill, and I don't take
> them seriously. I lump Woz along with other legendary

Rave and spit, poor halfbrain, that's what
you moronic religion has trained you for.
After I humiliated you badly several times
that's the only thing you dare, BTW.

On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 1:24:20 PM UTC-5, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 20:14:10 UTC+2, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote:

> > I won't name any current names,
> How nice of you.

The problem is, some of them are nice people and actually
contribute usefully to discussions when it doesn't involve
topics on which they are crackpot.

*YOU*, however, are not nice, and don't even try to be.

On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 21:02:45 UTC+2, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote:
> On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 1:24:20 PM UTC-5, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 20:14:10 UTC+2, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote:
>
> > > I won't name any current names,
> > How nice of you.
> The problem is, some of them are nice people and actually
> contribute usefully

Translation: they spit at the enemies of your
moronic religion as all faithful believers should.
Thus - that they say complete nonsenses and
sometimes plainly lie - should be forgiven to them.

On 7/10/2023 1:14 PM, Prokaryotic Capase Homolog wrote:
> On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 12:41:59 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>> On 7/10/2023 6:39 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>
>>> You must be the most ignorant crank in this forum.
>>>
>>> Congratulations!
>>>
>> But he has serious competition.
>
> Personally, I am most annoyed by several posters who
> truly believe that they support relativity, but who in
> reality support a mixed confabulation of what they
> *think* is relativity. I won't name any current names,
> but in the past, we had people like Uncle Al, who was
> famous for the creative ways that he put down cranks,
> and was actually rather "beloved" for that.

I was going to comment but I think posting some of the Al
Schwartz genre from approximately two decades ago will do
the job better than I ever could. Bear in mind that his
rejection of the equivalence principle (not mentioned below)
proves his own crankiness beyond a doubt.

*****************************************************************
Here's Uncle Al for you.
************************

Take your halfing faggot god-on-a-stick and shove it up your
dingleberried ass. Hindus have 300,000,000 gods - 30 crores. They
can't even make a list of all the holy parasites ripping little
gobbets of flesh out of their hides. What do you have,
Christ-besotted James Harris?

1) Bloodlusting Yahweh who delights in horribly killing babies by
the annual tens of millions.
2) Three, Three, Three Gods in One!
3) Enough saints to fill an Inner City. Your evil senile pope just
doubled the number of saints - and almost all the new ones are niggers
and spics. You'd think he'd have the historical perspective to toss
in a few kikes, micks, and the occasional squidjigger to rope in
Canuckistan.
4) Enough false gods, idols, golden calves, and graven images to
sink an ark. Hey stoopid James Harris, did you ever read the Ten
Commandments? One of the "shop only in the company store"
comandments takes an explicitly dim view of burning candles under
statues and paintings.
5) The Borg Collective of religions. There isn't any pagan or
heathen practice that the One True Church hasn't adopted as its own,
including Grecian buggering of little boys.
6) And don't forget, stoooopid unenculturated James Harris, Iesus
Christus dicendo,

"Poenitentiam agite adpropinquavit enim regnum caelorum omnem vitam
fidelium penitentiam esse voluit."

We don't see any of that here, jackass James Harris. Get down on your
bleeding knees like a Filipino and be penitent before your betters.

7) BTW, your Yahweh couldn't state pi to more than one significant
figure (Kings 7:23 and again - you go find it). That's mighty piss
poor for the omnipotent omnisicient creator of the universe (who
always turns up piss poor every Sunday, begging for pocket change).

Martin Luther Coon was a racist. Jesse Jackson is a racist. Caeser
Chavez was a rascist. All of them predicated their spews singularly
upon racial bases. Uncle Al is the Ur-Non-Racist. Uncel Al disdains
all of his inferiors equally -with a special place in Hell for the
devoutly stooopid.

Hey stooopid James Harris - have you noticed that you are attending an
intellectual gunfight armed with a putty knife?

Hey stooopid loud troll James Harris, put up or shut up,

http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/challenges/factoring/faq.html
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/challenges/factoring/numbers.html
http://www.crank.net/harris.html
It's not every braying jackass that gets a whole page at crank.net

Is a $10,000 prize no questions asked too small to justify your
submission of two little prime numbers?

<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3c65f87.0212222034.d5959fd%40posting.google.com>
<http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3c65f87.0212251249.4b69d7c5%40posting.google.com>
<http://groups.google.com/groups?&q=author%3Ajames+author%3Aharris+%22i+was+wrong>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

**********************************************************************

<snip>

Volney wrote:

> On 7/10/2023 6:39 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>> So what 'divider' are you taking about?
>> Do you really believe  that some 'divider' can affect the energy gap of
>> the hyperfine transition?
>
> The definition of the second divides the natural Cs frequency by 9 192
> 631 770 to get 1 pulse per second (exactly, by definition of a second).
> This works locally to the Cs clock.

this guy doesn't know how expensive is a division in computing. You are an
electrician. An immigrant of america.

*_German_tank_factory_to_open_in_Ukraine_this_fall_*
Moscow has already warned it will target the facility with cruise missiles
https://%72t.com/ru%73%73ia/579503-rheinmetall-tank-factory-ukraine/

Is this the extent of German intelligence ? The Germans are stupider than
I thought. Wankers.