Demented braindead Polish Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 17:27:17 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>> Le 15/07/2023 à 17:11, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 17:01:53 UTC+2, Python wrote:
>>>> M.D. Richard "Hachel the kook" Lengrand wrote:
>>>>> Le 15/07/2023 à 15:02, Sylvia Else a écrit :
>>>>>> Please note, if you insist on posting in French, then LOL is not
>>>>>> consistent with that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>
>>>>> My dear Sylvia.
>>>>> Is your real name Sylvia Else?
>>>>> I was told that you were a good relativistic theorist like Paul. Is it
>>>>> true?
>>>>> I have difficulty understanding English, and I can't figure it out on my
>>>>> own. Is it true that your level is very good as a speaker pointed out a
>>>>> few days ago?
>>>>>
>>>>> R.H.
>>>> Listen carefully your clock, Richard.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
>>> and trying again to pretend he knows something.
>>> Tell me, poor stinker, have you already read
>>> definition 9 and learnt what a function is?
>>>
>> Cranks Contest 2023, nominated in the "Most Boring" category : Maciej
>
>
> Oh

If you want to participate in another category, Maciej, such as
"worst understanding of French language" or "bullshitting in
mathematical logic" feel free to do so, apply!

Volney wrote:

> Maciej is a computer program. In fact Maciej.exe is the prototype for
> ChatGPT. The difference is, of course, ChatGPT is artificial
> intelligence while Maciej.exe is artificial stupidity.

this guy works in .exe. If you are immigrant in america, move. Proofs:

Top Russian Talk Show Host Soloviev Says Russia Should Nuke Europe -
𝘾𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙨_𝙁𝙤𝙧_𝙒𝙒3_
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/4zuI5Civ6CtR

On 7/15/2023 4:26 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 15.07.2023 00:11, skrev patdolan:
>> Just think of it, Prokary!  You and Dirk and the rest of the Wiki
>> mafia are finished!  Chat has put an end to you all.  Type your damned
>> ass off.  A couple of years from now, no one will ever look at your
>> work product.  Instead, they will self-teach by putting nuanced
>> questions to Chat, right at the spot where they lack specific knowledge.

> From where do you think ChatGPT gets its apparent knowledge?
> From "Procary, Dirk and the rest of the Wiki mafia" of course.
>
> ChatGPT is only repeating what it finds on the net. It is not
> able to generate new knowledge. But be aware, it isn't even able
> to analyse what is nonsense and what is correct, so it is well known
> that you can't really trust the answers it gives. Sometimes nonsense
> written by cranks like patdolan  may sneak into its answers.

Watch cranks and others deliberately try to stack the deck and fill
ChatGPT and other AI with crap. Relativity is bogus, 9/11 was a hoax,
Ukraine is full of Nazis etc. etc.

On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 23:42:56 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Demented braindead Polish Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 17:27:17 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> >> Le 15/07/2023 à 17:11, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 17:01:53 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> >>>> M.D. Richard "Hachel the kook" Lengrand wrote:
> >>>>> Le 15/07/2023 à 15:02, Sylvia Else a écrit :
> >>>>>> Please note, if you insist on posting in French, then LOL is not
> >>>>>> consistent with that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sylvia.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My dear Sylvia.
> >>>>> Is your real name Sylvia Else?
> >>>>> I was told that you were a good relativistic theorist like Paul. Is it
> >>>>> true?
> >>>>> I have difficulty understanding English, and I can't figure it out on my
> >>>>> own. Is it true that your level is very good as a speaker pointed out a
> >>>>> few days ago?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> R.H.
> >>>> Listen carefully your clock, Richard.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
> >>> and trying again to pretend he knows something.
> >>> Tell me, poor stinker, have you already read
> >>> definition 9 and learnt what a function is?
> >>>
> >> Cranks Contest 2023, nominated in the "Most Boring" category : Maciej
> >
> >
> > Oh
> If you want to participate in another category, Maciej, such as

Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying again to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, have you already read
definition 9 and learnt what a function is?

On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 01:21:41 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
> On 7/15/2023 4:26 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> > Den 15.07.2023 00:11, skrev patdolan:
> >> Just think of it, Prokary! You and Dirk and the rest of the Wiki
> >> mafia are finished! Chat has put an end to you all. Type your damned
> >> ass off. A couple of years from now, no one will ever look at your
> >> work product. Instead, they will self-teach by putting nuanced
> >> questions to Chat, right at the spot where they lack specific knowledge.
>
> > From where do you think ChatGPT gets its apparent knowledge?
> > From "Procary, Dirk and the rest of the Wiki mafia" of course.
> >
> > ChatGPT is only repeating what it finds on the net. It is not
> > able to generate new knowledge. But be aware, it isn't even able
> > to analyse what is nonsense and what is correct, so it is well known
> > that you can't really trust the answers it gives. Sometimes nonsense
> > written by cranks like patdolan may sneak into its answers.
> Watch cranks and others deliberately try to stack the deck and fill

And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy
is some "Newton mode"? You're such an amazing idiot,
stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your
moronic religion.

On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 21:54:56 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2023-07-15 19:00:43 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>
> > Athel Cornish-Bowden <athe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2023-07-15 13:01:11 +0000, Sylvia Else said:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> [ … ]
> >>>
> >>> Its output reflects the text it was trained on. Some of that text will
> >>> have made incorrect assertions. ChatGPT cares[*] nothing of that.
> >>>
> >>> And you expect useful and correct answers?
> >>>
> >>> Sylvia.
> >>>
> >>> [*] It's a computer program, of course, and is incapable of caring anyway.
> >>
> >> I would guess that most of Maciej's posts were generated by a computer
> >> if it weren't for the number of mistakes they contain. He isn't able to
> >> transcribe one of his standard phrases from a list on his computer
> >> without getting it wrong.
> >
> > Indeed. 'halfbrain' seems to be about the only English word
> > that he can use reliably,
> > (apart from the technicality that 'halfbrain' isn't an English word)
> I'm reminded of an advertisement that annoys me a lot that is

Oh, be free to rave and spit, poor halfbrains, that's what your
Shit has trained you for. It stays inconsistent, however.

On 7/16/2023 12:55 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 01:21:41 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
>> On 7/15/2023 4:26 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

>>> ChatGPT is only repeating what it finds on the net. It is not
>>> able to generate new knowledge. But be aware, it isn't even able
>>> to analyse what is nonsense and what is correct, so it is well known
>>> that you can't really trust the answers it gives. Sometimes nonsense
>>> written by cranks like patdolan may sneak into its answers.

>> Watch cranks and others deliberately try to stack the deck and fill
>
>
> And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy

I believe that you are a retarded parrot who doesn't understand what the
phrase "not even wrong" means.

On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 07:27:49 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
> On 7/16/2023 12:55 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 01:21:41 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
> >> On 7/15/2023 4:26 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>
> >>> ChatGPT is only repeating what it finds on the net. It is not
> >>> able to generate new knowledge. But be aware, it isn't even able
> >>> to analyse what is nonsense and what is correct, so it is well known
> >>> that you can't really trust the answers it gives. Sometimes nonsense
> >>> written by cranks like patdolan may sneak into its answers.
>
> >> Watch cranks and others deliberately try to stack the deck and fill
> >
> >
> > And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy
> I believe that you are a retarded parrot who doesn't understand what the
> phrase "not even wrong" means.

Of course I do - it's for instance the mumble of
your idiot guru when considered without any time
unit (when considered with the time unit valid when
he was living and mumbling - it's just wrong).

But it's definitely not your case, stupid Mike. You've
stated many times - the clocks set to 9 192 631 770
(which is your ISO idiocy) are in "Newton mode" for
you. You're such an amazing idiot...

Volney wrote:

> Watch cranks and others deliberately try to stack the deck and fill
> ChatGPT and other AI with crap. Relativity is bogus, 9/11 was a hoax,
> Ukraine is full of Nazis etc. etc.

here are two new documentaries, you stinking sack of putrid shit.
Documentaries comes 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺_𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, which is required in physics, by the
𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰_𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱. You don't trust documentation, you immigrant whore.
𝗬𝗼𝘂_𝗯𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁_𝗟𝗚𝗕𝗧𝗤++_𝘁𝗼_𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮.

how cacameria 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗱_𝘂𝗸𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗮. Chemically.

𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆_𝗢𝗻_𝗖𝗜𝗔𝘀_𝗠𝗞_𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗿𝗮_𝗜𝗻_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/G3D8FioEfHRs

𝗔_𝗦𝗰𝗼𝘁𝘁_𝗥𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿_𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻_𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁_𝗭𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆 - Part 1
https://rumble.com/v2zs3r0-a-scott-ritter-investigation-agent-zelensky-
part-1.html

Volney wrote:

>> And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy
>
> I believe that you are a retarded parrot who doesn't understand what the
> phrase "not even wrong" means.

you don't undrestand proofs. Your country works without proofs.

here are two new documentaries, you stinking sack of putrid shit.
Documentaries comes 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺_𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, which is required in physics, by
the 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰_𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱. You don't trust documentation, you immigrant whore.
𝗬𝗼𝘂_𝗯𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁_𝗟𝗚𝗕𝗧𝗤++_𝘁𝗼_𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮.

how a 𝗱𝗲𝗲𝗽_𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹_𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗴 of cacameria 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗱_𝘂𝗸𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗲_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗮. Chemically.

𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆_𝗢𝗻_𝗖𝗜𝗔𝘀_𝗠𝗞_𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗿𝗮_𝗜𝗻_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/G3D8FioEfHRs

𝗔_𝗦𝗰𝗼𝘁𝘁_𝗥𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿_𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻_𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁_𝗭𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆 - Part 1
https://r%75%6dble.com/embed/v2x6olu/?pub=4

On July 14, patdolan wrote:
> Chat has put an end to you all. Type your damned ass off. A couple of years from now,
> no one will ever look at your work product. Instead, they will self-teach by putting
> nuanced questions to Chat, right at the spot where they lack specific knowledge. Why would anyone
> ever want to spend the time to read through an entire section of your drivel.
> Same goes for public education--at all levels.

In physics, perhaps, but not economics...

https://www.thebigquestions.com/2023/04/05/gpt-4-fails-economics/

Landsburg's Web log is one of the few I follow.

--
Rich

On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 12:26:19 PM UTC-7, RichD wrote:
> On July 14, patdolan wrote:
> > Chat has put an end to you all. Type your damned ass off. A couple of years from now,
> > no one will ever look at your work product. Instead, they will self-teach by putting
> > nuanced questions to Chat, right at the spot where they lack specific knowledge. Why would anyone
> > ever want to spend the time to read through an entire section of your drivel.
> > Same goes for public education--at all levels.
>
> In physics, perhaps, but not economics...
>
> https://www.thebigquestions.com/2023/04/05/gpt-4-fails-economics/
>
> Landsburg's Web log is one of the few I follow.
>
> --
> Rich
Point taken RichD. I have been patiently instructing ChatGPT as regards the Big Ben Paradox. What Dirk Vdm is to Wiki Relativity, Dolan shall be wrt ChatGPT Relativity. Eat it, Dirk!

On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 1:41:28 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote:
> On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 12:26:19 PM UTC-7, RichD wrote:
> > On July 14, patdolan wrote:
> > > Chat has put an end to you all. Type your damned ass off. A couple of years from now,
> > > no one will ever look at your work product. Instead, they will self-teach by putting
> > > nuanced questions to Chat, right at the spot where they lack specific knowledge. Why would anyone
> > > ever want to spend the time to read through an entire section of your drivel.
> > > Same goes for public education--at all levels.
> >
> > In physics, perhaps, but not economics...
> >
> > https://www.thebigquestions.com/2023/04/05/gpt-4-fails-economics/
> >
> > Landsburg's Web log is one of the few I follow.
> >
> > --
> > Rich
> Point taken RichD. I have been patiently instructing ChatGPT as regards the Big Ben Paradox. What Dirk Vdm is to Wiki Relativity, Dolan shall be wrt ChatGPT Relativity. Eat it, Dirk!
AI do not take instructions from a patented imbecile like you

On 7/17/2023 4:41 PM, patdolan wrote:

> Point taken RichD. I have been patiently instructing ChatGPT as regards the Big Ben Paradox. What Dirk Vdm is to Wiki Relativity, Dolan shall be wrt ChatGPT Relativity. Eat it, Dirk!

As I recently posted:

>> Watch cranks and others deliberately try to stack the deck and fill ChatGPT and other AI with crap. Relativity is bogus, 9/11 was a hoax, Ukraine is full of Nazis etc. etc.