Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Those who can't write, write manuals.


tech / sci.physics.relativity / ChatGPT vs. 1 = -1

SubjectAuthor
* ChatGPT vs. 1 = -1patdolan
`- Re: ChatGPT vs. 1 = -1Chris M. Thomasson

1
ChatGPT vs. 1 = -1

<800243c1-5596-4b2d-9e95-f1f914e2bb64n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=120525&group=sci.physics.relativity#120525

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:393:b0:403:996b:1390 with SMTP id j19-20020a05622a039300b00403996b1390mr85099qtx.11.1689710249947;
Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:98a5:b0:1b3:f0af:da1c with SMTP id
eg37-20020a05687098a500b001b3f0afda1cmr15724461oab.8.1689710249742; Tue, 18
Jul 2023 12:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:602:9b00:7c40:b828:3290:87e7:3cc;
posting-account=9sfziQoAAAD_UD5NP4mC4DjcYPHqoIUc
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:602:9b00:7c40:b828:3290:87e7:3cc
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <800243c1-5596-4b2d-9e95-f1f914e2bb64n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: ChatGPT vs. 1 = -1
From: patdo...@comcast.net (patdolan)
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:57:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2438
 by: patdolan - Tue, 18 Jul 2023 19:57 UTC

I apologize for the confusion, but there is still an error in the reasoning.. Let's go through it step by step:

The imaginary number (i) raised to the 4th power: i^4 = (i * i * i * i) = 1.
The imaginary number (i) raised to the 8th power: i^8 = (i * i * i * i * i * i * i * i) = 1.
Here, both i^4 and i^8 equal 1.
Taking the square root of both sides:
√(i^4) = √(i^8)
√1 = √1
1 = 1
Based on this step, we can conclude that 1 equals 1, not -1.

The error lies in the statement that the square root of i^4 equals the imaginary number squared, which is -1. In fact, the square root of a positive number like 1 has two possible solutions: +1 and -1. Both values satisfy the equation when squared, resulting in 1. Similarly, the square root of i^8 is also 1.

In your argument, you have incorrectly stated that the square root of i^8 equals the imaginary number raised to the 4th power, which is 1. However, the square root of i^8 is actually 1 itself, not i^4.

Again, it's important to note that the equation -1 = 1 is not mathematically accurate. The steps in your argument contain errors or misinterpretations of mathematical principles. It's crucial to follow valid mathematical reasoning and principles to avoid reaching incorrect or contradictory conclusions.

Re: ChatGPT vs. 1 = -1

<u96r3c$1p4oa$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=120526&group=sci.physics.relativity#120526

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chris.m....@gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: ChatGPT vs. 1 = -1
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:01:47 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <u96r3c$1p4oa$1@dont-email.me>
References: <800243c1-5596-4b2d-9e95-f1f914e2bb64n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:01:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4968e6fd90b76b2c9a43bd670dd5aa43";
logging-data="1872650"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1905I+bqFGNr2pJW+jWQAvx+5OcSPVe0SE="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oiKqkcFVnINGVu6bwnJTkH1xfyk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <800243c1-5596-4b2d-9e95-f1f914e2bb64n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Chris M. Thomasson - Tue, 18 Jul 2023 20:01 UTC

On 7/18/2023 12:57 PM, patdolan wrote:
>
>
> I apologize for the confusion, but there is still an error in the reasoning. Let's go through it step by step:
>
> The imaginary number (i) raised to the 4th power: i^4 = (i * i * i * i) = 1.
> The imaginary number (i) raised to the 8th power: i^8 = (i * i * i * i * i * i * i * i) = 1.
> Here, both i^4 and i^8 equal 1.
> Taking the square root of both sides:
> √(i^4) = √(i^8)
> √1 = √1
> 1 = 1
> Based on this step, we can conclude that 1 equals 1, not -1.
>
> The error lies in the statement that the square root of i^4 equals the imaginary number squared, which is -1. In fact, the square root of a positive number like 1 has two possible solutions: +1 and -1. Both values satisfy the equation when squared, resulting in 1. Similarly, the square root of i^8 is also 1.
>
> In your argument, you have incorrectly stated that the square root of i^8 equals the imaginary number raised to the 4th power, which is 1. However, the square root of i^8 is actually 1 itself, not i^4.
>
> Again, it's important to note that the equation -1 = 1 is not mathematically accurate. The steps in your argument contain errors or misinterpretations of mathematical principles. It's crucial to follow valid mathematical reasoning and principles to avoid reaching incorrect or contradictory conclusions.

Try to make some pretty images via:

http://paulbourke.net/fractals/multijulia/

Read all!

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor