Chris Thomasson,Sarah Köster,Reiner Kree,Metin Tolan,Peter Bloechl ,Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education & Research, why does Germany keep flooding sci.math with WM math bs of dark numbers that fill up the front pages of sci.math with his insane bs going on for 3 decades now????

A SPAM PLAY ACT that hogs the front page of sci.math by a team of bozos and a few with fake names.

Chris Thomasson 40 "Three proofs of dark numbers.."
Apparently Gus Gassmann and Fritz Feldhase are just WM posts under a pseudoname

> Chris Thomasson 318 "Three awkward..."
> Gus Gassmann 290 "Three awkward..."
> Jim Burns 791 "Three proofs..."
> Feldhase 289 "Three awkward and ..."




> Sergi_o 790, 10:43 spam one liners
> WM...Jim Burns spamming morons "Three proofs of dark numbers 782 spams with spam idiot replies like Jim Burns with his daily 1 liner spammettes...
> 
>
> > > > > > Brigitta Wolff, is this some type of German comedy show, WM daily spamming sci.math and have a team of comedians-- Chris Thomasson, Jim Burns, TheRafters, Sergi_o, day after day after day keep this WM imbecile with dark numbers as the first 5 post threads on the top of the leader board.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a German word for this Spamming behavior-- Shitligkeitzitter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WM is a insane poster who cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, so insane is WM that he floods sci.math with his mindless dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > He cannot admit the truth of math, so he should not be posting in sci.math.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why, Anja, WM is so insane, the fruitcake cannot even understand Boole logic is wrong with 2 OR 1 = 3 and WM has AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So mindless is WM, he cannot even ask the question,-- is the muon the true electron of atoms and the 0.5MeV particle the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yet this German shitturd WM floods the front page of sci.math every day for 3 decades with his never ending insane bullshit of dark numbers.
> > > > > > Gus Gassmann,Thorsten Theobald,Yury Person, Wolfgang Mueckenheim ever admit slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse, ever do a geometry proof of FTC, no all failures of mathematics, and idling away.
> > > > > > Germany's Muck the Puke taking up oxygen out of sci.math with his endless and mindless dark numbers, ellipse a conic when that is an oval, and the failure of all of Germany-- never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > siren Sergio,Laura Covi,Andreas Dillmann,Gottingen no one in Gottingen Germany can admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, all they seem to do is play with WM dark numbers KuhscheiBe. Nor can anyone do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Germany spends its time on Muck the Puck "dark numbers" please, need your help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > stir-crazy-W.Mueckenheim-the fool still thinks slant cut of cone is ellipse when in truth it is an oval, and the failure of logic WM believes in Boole's AND as TFFF when in truth it is TTTF to avoid what the nitwit WM has as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. WM is a math failure for the idiot never knew calculus was geometry and therefore never sought a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > > > > Augsburg- Friedrich Pukelsheim-Gottingen,Metin Tolin,Ariane Frey, Wolfgang Glatzel why does Wolfgang Mueckenheim the idiot with "dark numbers" & Dr. Tao fail geometry so so badly,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The idiots of math never knew calculus was geometry, erst, they would provide a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, why they are so banal stupid in math, they still believe slant cut in cone is an ellipse, when in reality it is a oval.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > They are not mathematicians but mindless fuckdogs of math.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe they wear glasses and cannot see properly. Maybe WM & Tao were never good in math, for they cannot even tell apart a ellipse from oval. They cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Univ Augsburg Germany math-- Hello-- Wolfgang Mueckenheim the fool of math wasting everybodies time -- for WM is a math failure with his slant cut in cone as ellipse when in truth it is a Oval. And now, that fool of math with his "dark numbers". Can you whisk him off to a "shrink in Germany and put him on medications"??
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Kai Cieliebak, Urs Frauenfelder, Jennifer Gruber, Yannis Bahni, Zhen Gao, Sungho Kim, Shuaipeng Liu, Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr, Kevin Ruck, Evgeny Volkov, Frederic Wagner
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3) arsehole WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Metin Tolin,Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt, please, need you help to get WM and his mindless "dark numbers bullshit" moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) fool WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet, every day the fool WM pollutes sci.math with his dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > math
> > > > > > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > > > > > Yury Person
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
> 
> > > > > > 3rd published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > •
> > > > > > •
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #12-2, 11th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Sergi_o,Sarah Köster,Reiner Kree,Metin Tolan,Peter Bloechl ,Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education & Research, why does Germany keep flooding sci.math with WM math bs of dark numbers that fill up the front pages of sci.math with his insane bs going on for 3 decades now????

A SPAM PLAY ACT that hogs the front page of sci.math by a team of bozos and a few with fake names.

Sergi_o 27 "Proof of the existence of dark...."
Chris Thomasson 40 "Three proofs of dark numbers.."
Apparently Gus Gassmann and Fritz Feldhase are just WM posts under a pseudoname

> Chris Thomasson 318 "Three awkward..."
> Gus Gassmann 290 "Three awkward..."
> Jim Burns 791 "Three proofs..."
> Feldhase 289 "Three awkward and ..."




> Sergi_o 790, 10:43 spam one liners
> WM...Jim Burns spamming morons "Three proofs of dark numbers 782 spams with spam idiot replies like Jim Burns with his daily 1 liner spammettes...
> 
>
> > > > > > Brigitta Wolff, is this some type of German comedy show, WM daily spamming sci.math and have a team of comedians-- Chris Thomasson, Jim Burns, TheRafters, Sergi_o, day after day after day keep this WM imbecile with dark numbers as the first 5 post threads on the top of the leader board.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a German word for this Spamming behavior-- Shitligkeitzitter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WM is a insane poster who cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, so insane is WM that he floods sci.math with his mindless dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > He cannot admit the truth of math, so he should not be posting in sci.math.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why, Anja, WM is so insane, the fruitcake cannot even understand Boole logic is wrong with 2 OR 1 = 3 and WM has AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So mindless is WM, he cannot even ask the question,-- is the muon the true electron of atoms and the 0.5MeV particle the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yet this German shitturd WM floods the front page of sci.math every day for 3 decades with his never ending insane bullshit of dark numbers.
> > > > > > Gus Gassmann,Thorsten Theobald,Yury Person, Wolfgang Mueckenheim ever admit slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse, ever do a geometry proof of FTC, no all failures of mathematics, and idling away.
> > > > > > Germany's Muck the Puke taking up oxygen out of sci.math with his endless and mindless dark numbers, ellipse a conic when that is an oval, and the failure of all of Germany-- never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > siren Sergio,Laura Covi,Andreas Dillmann,Gottingen no one in Gottingen Germany can admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, all they seem to do is play with WM dark numbers KuhscheiBe. Nor can anyone do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Germany spends its time on Muck the Puck "dark numbers" please, need your help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > stir-crazy-W.Mueckenheim-the fool still thinks slant cut of cone is ellipse when in truth it is an oval, and the failure of logic WM believes in Boole's AND as TFFF when in truth it is TTTF to avoid what the nitwit WM has as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. WM is a math failure for the idiot never knew calculus was geometry and therefore never sought a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > > > > Augsburg- Friedrich Pukelsheim-Gottingen,Metin Tolin,Ariane Frey, Wolfgang Glatzel why does Wolfgang Mueckenheim the idiot with "dark numbers" & Dr. Tao fail geometry so so badly,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The idiots of math never knew calculus was geometry, erst, they would provide a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, why they are so banal stupid in math, they still believe slant cut in cone is an ellipse, when in reality it is a oval.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > They are not mathematicians but mindless fuckdogs of math.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe they wear glasses and cannot see properly. Maybe WM & Tao were never good in math, for they cannot even tell apart a ellipse from oval. They cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Univ Augsburg Germany math-- Hello-- Wolfgang Mueckenheim the fool of math wasting everybodies time -- for WM is a math failure with his slant cut in cone as ellipse when in truth it is a Oval. And now, that fool of math with his "dark numbers". Can you whisk him off to a "shrink in Germany and put him on medications"??
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Kai Cieliebak, Urs Frauenfelder, Jennifer Gruber, Yannis Bahni, Zhen Gao, Sungho Kim, Shuaipeng Liu, Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr, Kevin Ruck, Evgeny Volkov, Frederic Wagner
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3) arsehole WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Metin Tolin,Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt, please, need you help to get WM and his mindless "dark numbers bullshit" moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) fool WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet, every day the fool WM pollutes sci.math with his dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > math
> > > > > > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > > > > > Yury Person
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
> 
> > > > > > 3rd published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > •
> > > > > > •
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #12-2, 11th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Chris Thomasson,Sarah Köster,Reiner Kree,Metin Tolan,Peter Bloechl ,Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education & Research, why does Germany keep flooding sci.math with WM math bs of dark numbers that fill up the front pages of sci.math with his insane bs going on for 3 decades now????

A SPAM PLAY ACT that hogs the front page of sci.math by a team of bozos and a few with fake names.

Chris Thomasson 70 "Three proofs of dark..."
Sergi_o 27 "Proof of the existence of dark...."
Chris Thomasson 40 "Three proofs of dark numbers.."
Apparently Gus Gassmann and Fritz Feldhase are just WM posts under a pseudoname

> Chris Thomasson 318 "Three awkward..."
> Gus Gassmann 290 "Three awkward..."
> Jim Burns 791 "Three proofs..."
> Feldhase 289 "Three awkward and ..."




> Sergi_o 790, 10:43 spam one liners
> WM...Jim Burns spamming morons "Three proofs of dark numbers 782 spams with spam idiot replies like Jim Burns with his daily 1 liner spammettes...
> 
>
> > > > > > Brigitta Wolff, is this some type of German comedy show, WM daily spamming sci.math and have a team of comedians-- Chris Thomasson, Jim Burns, TheRafters, Sergi_o, day after day after day keep this WM imbecile with dark numbers as the first 5 post threads on the top of the leader board.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a German word for this Spamming behavior-- Shitligkeitzitter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WM is a insane poster who cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, so insane is WM that he floods sci.math with his mindless dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > He cannot admit the truth of math, so he should not be posting in sci.math.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why, Anja, WM is so insane, the fruitcake cannot even understand Boole logic is wrong with 2 OR 1 = 3 and WM has AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So mindless is WM, he cannot even ask the question,-- is the muon the true electron of atoms and the 0.5MeV particle the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yet this German shitturd WM floods the front page of sci.math every day for 3 decades with his never ending insane bullshit of dark numbers.
> > > > > > Gus Gassmann,Thorsten Theobald,Yury Person, Wolfgang Mueckenheim ever admit slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse, ever do a geometry proof of FTC, no all failures of mathematics, and idling away.
> > > > > > Germany's Muck the Puke taking up oxygen out of sci.math with his endless and mindless dark numbers, ellipse a conic when that is an oval, and the failure of all of Germany-- never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > siren Sergio,Laura Covi,Andreas Dillmann,Gottingen no one in Gottingen Germany can admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, all they seem to do is play with WM dark numbers KuhscheiBe. Nor can anyone do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Germany spends its time on Muck the Puck "dark numbers" please, need your help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > stir-crazy-W.Mueckenheim-the fool still thinks slant cut of cone is ellipse when in truth it is an oval, and the failure of logic WM believes in Boole's AND as TFFF when in truth it is TTTF to avoid what the nitwit WM has as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. WM is a math failure for the idiot never knew calculus was geometry and therefore never sought a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > > > > Augsburg- Friedrich Pukelsheim-Gottingen,Metin Tolin,Ariane Frey, Wolfgang Glatzel why does Wolfgang Mueckenheim the idiot with "dark numbers" & Dr. Tao fail geometry so so badly,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The idiots of math never knew calculus was geometry, erst, they would provide a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, why they are so banal stupid in math, they still believe slant cut in cone is an ellipse, when in reality it is a oval.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > They are not mathematicians but mindless fuckdogs of math.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe they wear glasses and cannot see properly. Maybe WM & Tao were never good in math, for they cannot even tell apart a ellipse from oval. They cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Univ Augsburg Germany math-- Hello-- Wolfgang Mueckenheim the fool of math wasting everybodies time -- for WM is a math failure with his slant cut in cone as ellipse when in truth it is a Oval. And now, that fool of math with his "dark numbers". Can you whisk him off to a "shrink in Germany and put him on medications"??
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Kai Cieliebak, Urs Frauenfelder, Jennifer Gruber, Yannis Bahni, Zhen Gao, Sungho Kim, Shuaipeng Liu, Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr, Kevin Ruck, Evgeny Volkov, Frederic Wagner
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3) arsehole WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Metin Tolin,Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt, please, need you help to get WM and his mindless "dark numbers bullshit" moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) fool WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet, every day the fool WM pollutes sci.math with his dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > math
> > > > > > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > > > > > Yury Person
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
> 
> > > > > > 3rd published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > •
> > > > > > •
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #12-2, 11th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

tisdag 22 november 2022 kl. 09:17:40 UTC+1 skrev Archimedes Plutonium:
> WM came in my ass!

I am glad you finally got your relief

Jim Burns,Sarah Köster,Reiner Kree,Metin Tolan,Peter Bloechl ,Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education & Research, why does Germany keep flooding sci.math with WM math bs of dark numbers that fill up the front pages of sci.math with his insane bs going on for 3 decades now????

A SPAM PLAY ACT that hogs the front page of sci.math by a team of bozos and a few with fake names.

Jim Burns 76 "Three proofs of dark..."
Chris Thomasson 70 "Three proofs of dark..."
Sergi_o 27 "Proof of the existence of dark...."
Chris Thomasson 40 "Three proofs of dark numbers.."
Apparently Gus Gassmann and Fritz Feldhase are just WM posts under a pseudoname

> Chris Thomasson 318 "Three awkward..."
> Gus Gassmann 290 "Three awkward..."
> Jim Burns 791 "Three proofs..."
> Feldhase 289 "Three awkward and ..."




> Sergi_o 790, 10:43 spam one liners
> WM...Jim Burns spamming morons "Three proofs of dark numbers 782 spams with spam idiot replies like Jim Burns with his daily 1 liner spammettes...
> 
>
> > > > > > Brigitta Wolff, is this some type of German comedy show, WM daily spamming sci.math and have a team of comedians-- Chris Thomasson, Jim Burns, TheRafters, Sergi_o, day after day after day keep this WM imbecile with dark numbers as the first 5 post threads on the top of the leader board.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there a German word for this Spamming behavior-- Shitligkeitzitter
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WM is a insane poster who cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, so insane is WM that he floods sci.math with his mindless dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > He cannot admit the truth of math, so he should not be posting in sci.math.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why, Anja, WM is so insane, the fruitcake cannot even understand Boole logic is wrong with 2 OR 1 = 3 and WM has AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So mindless is WM, he cannot even ask the question,-- is the muon the true electron of atoms and the 0.5MeV particle the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yet this German shitturd WM floods the front page of sci.math every day for 3 decades with his never ending insane bullshit of dark numbers.
> > > > > > Gus Gassmann,Thorsten Theobald,Yury Person, Wolfgang Mueckenheim ever admit slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse, ever do a geometry proof of FTC, no all failures of mathematics, and idling away.
> > > > > > Germany's Muck the Puke taking up oxygen out of sci.math with his endless and mindless dark numbers, ellipse a conic when that is an oval, and the failure of all of Germany-- never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > siren Sergio,Laura Covi,Andreas Dillmann,Gottingen no one in Gottingen Germany can admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, all they seem to do is play with WM dark numbers KuhscheiBe. Nor can anyone do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Germany spends its time on Muck the Puck "dark numbers" please, need your help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > stir-crazy-W.Mueckenheim-the fool still thinks slant cut of cone is ellipse when in truth it is an oval, and the failure of logic WM believes in Boole's AND as TFFF when in truth it is TTTF to avoid what the nitwit WM has as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. WM is a math failure for the idiot never knew calculus was geometry and therefore never sought a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > > > > Augsburg- Friedrich Pukelsheim-Gottingen,Metin Tolin,Ariane Frey, Wolfgang Glatzel why does Wolfgang Mueckenheim the idiot with "dark numbers" & Dr. Tao fail geometry so so badly,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The idiots of math never knew calculus was geometry, erst, they would provide a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, why they are so banal stupid in math, they still believe slant cut in cone is an ellipse, when in reality it is a oval.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > They are not mathematicians but mindless fuckdogs of math.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe they wear glasses and cannot see properly. Maybe WM & Tao were never good in math, for they cannot even tell apart a ellipse from oval. They cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Univ Augsburg Germany math-- Hello-- Wolfgang Mueckenheim the fool of math wasting everybodies time -- for WM is a math failure with his slant cut in cone as ellipse when in truth it is a Oval. And now, that fool of math with his "dark numbers". Can you whisk him off to a "shrink in Germany and put him on medications"??
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Kai Cieliebak, Urs Frauenfelder, Jennifer Gruber, Yannis Bahni, Zhen Gao, Sungho Kim, Shuaipeng Liu, Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr, Kevin Ruck, Evgeny Volkov, Frederic Wagner
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 3) arsehole WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Metin Tolin,Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt, please, need you help to get WM and his mindless "dark numbers bullshit" moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) fool WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet, every day the fool WM pollutes sci.math with his dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > math
> > > > > > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > > > > > Yury Person
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
> 
> > > > > > 3rd published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > •
> > > > > > •
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #12-2, 11th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Gus Gassmann,Sarah Köster,Reiner Kree,Metin Tolan,Peter Bloechl ,Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education & Research, why does Germany keep flooding sci.math with WM math bs of dark numbers that fill up the front pages of sci.math with his insane bs going on for 3 decades now????
>
> A SPAM PLAY ACT that hogs the front page of sci.math by a team of bozos and a few with fake names.

Gassmann 59 "Proof of existence..."

> Jim Burns 76 "Three proofs of dark..."
> Chris Thomasson 70 "Three proofs of dark..."
> Sergi_o 27 "Proof of the existence of dark...."
> Chris Thomasson 40 "Three proofs of dark numbers.."
> Apparently Gus Gassmann and Fritz Feldhase are just WM posts under a pseudoname
> 
> > Chris Thomasson 318 "Three awkward..."
> > Gus Gassmann 290 "Three awkward..."
> > Jim Burns 791 "Three proofs..."
> > Feldhase 289 "Three awkward and ..."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Sergi_o 790, 10:43 spam one liners
> > WM...Jim Burns spamming morons "Three proofs of dark numbers 782 spams with spam idiot replies like Jim Burns with his daily 1 liner spammettes...
> > 
> >
> > > > > > > Brigitta Wolff, is this some type of German comedy show, WM daily spamming sci.math and have a team of comedians-- Chris Thomasson, Jim Burns, TheRafters, Sergi_o, day after day after day keep this WM imbecile with dark numbers as the first 5 post threads on the top of the leader board..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a German word for this Spamming behavior-- Shitligkeitzitter
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > WM is a insane poster who cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, so insane is WM that he floods sci.math with his mindless dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > He cannot admit the truth of math, so he should not be posting in sci.math.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Why, Anja, WM is so insane, the fruitcake cannot even understand Boole logic is wrong with 2 OR 1 = 3 and WM has AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So mindless is WM, he cannot even ask the question,-- is the muon the true electron of atoms and the 0.5MeV particle the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yet this German shitturd WM floods the front page of sci.math every day for 3 decades with his never ending insane bullshit of dark numbers.
> > > > > > > Gus Gassmann,Thorsten Theobald,Yury Person, Wolfgang Mueckenheim ever admit slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse, ever do a geometry proof of FTC, no all failures of mathematics, and idling away.
> > > > > > > Germany's Muck the Puke taking up oxygen out of sci.math with his endless and mindless dark numbers, ellipse a conic when that is an oval, and the failure of all of Germany-- never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > siren Sergio,Laura Covi,Andreas Dillmann,Gottingen no one in Gottingen Germany can admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, all they seem to do is play with WM dark numbers KuhscheiBe. Nor can anyone do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Germany spends its time on Muck the Puck "dark numbers" please, need your help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > stir-crazy-W.Mueckenheim-the fool still thinks slant cut of cone is ellipse when in truth it is an oval, and the failure of logic WM believes in Boole's AND as TFFF when in truth it is TTTF to avoid what the nitwit WM has as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. WM is a math failure for the idiot never knew calculus was geometry and therefore never sought a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Augsburg- Friedrich Pukelsheim-Gottingen,Metin Tolin,Ariane Frey, Wolfgang Glatzel why does Wolfgang Mueckenheim the idiot with "dark numbers" & Dr. Tao fail geometry so so badly,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The idiots of math never knew calculus was geometry, erst, they would provide a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, why they are so banal stupid in math, they still believe slant cut in cone is an ellipse, when in reality it is a oval.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > They are not mathematicians but mindless fuckdogs of math.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe they wear glasses and cannot see properly.. Maybe WM & Tao were never good in math, for they cannot even tell apart a ellipse from oval. They cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Univ Augsburg Germany math-- Hello-- Wolfgang Mueckenheim the fool of math wasting everybodies time -- for WM is a math failure with his slant cut in cone as ellipse when in truth it is a Oval. And now, that fool of math with his "dark numbers". Can you whisk him off to a "shrink in Germany and put him on medications"??
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Kai Cieliebak, Urs Frauenfelder, Jennifer Gruber, Yannis Bahni, Zhen Gao, Sungho Kim, Shuaipeng Liu, Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr, Kevin Ruck, Evgeny Volkov, Frederic Wagner
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) arsehole WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Metin Tolin,Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt, please, need you help to get WM and his mindless "dark numbers bullshit" moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) fool WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet, every day the fool WM pollutes sci.math with his dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > > > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > > > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > > > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > > > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > > > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > > > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > > > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > math
> > > > > > > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > > > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > > > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > > > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > > > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > > > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > > > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > > > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > > > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > > > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > > > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > > > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > > > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > > > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > > > > > > Yury Person
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
> > 
> > > > > > > 3rd published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > •
> > > > > > > •
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > > > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #12-2, 11th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something".. As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > > > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

JimBurns,Hans Christian Hofsäss,Andreas Janshoff,Metin Tolan,Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education & Research, why does Germany keep flooding sci.math with WM math bs of dark numbers that fill up the front pages of sci.math with his insane bs going on for 3 decades now????
>
> A SPAM PLAY ACT that hogs the front page of sci.math by a team of bozos and a few with fake names.

Jim Burns, 96 "Three proofs...."
Gassmann 59 "Proof of existence..."
> Jim Burns 76 "Three proofs of dark..."
> Chris Thomasson 70 "Three proofs of dark..."
> Sergi_o 27 "Proof of the existence of dark...."
> Chris Thomasson 40 "Three proofs of dark numbers.."
> Apparently Gus Gassmann and Fritz Feldhase are just WM posts under a pseudoname
> 
> > Chris Thomasson 318 "Three awkward..."
> > Gus Gassmann 290 "Three awkward..."
> > Jim Burns 791 "Three proofs..."
> > Feldhase 289 "Three awkward and ..."
> Florentin Wörgötter,Annette Zippelius,Gottingen no one in Gottingen Germany can admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, all they seem to do is play with WM dark numbers KuhscheiBe. Nor can anyone do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Germany spends its time on Muck the Puck "dark numbers" please, need your help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > 
> > > > On Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 3:08:10 AM UTC-5, Kristjan Robam wrote:
> > > > > You like the melody of this video --------->
> > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > >
> > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > 3) arsehole WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > >
> > > > Yet, every day the arsewipe WM pollutes sci.math with his dark numbers bullshit.
> > > >
> > > > My 3rd published book
> > > >
> > > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > •
> > > > •
> > > >
> > > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > > >
> > > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > > >
> > > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > > #12-2, 11th published book
> > > >
> > > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > > Preface:
> > > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > > >
> > > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> > > >
> > > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My 5th published book
> > > >
> > > > Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> > > > Preface:
> > > > First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
> > > >
> > > > The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
> > > >
> > > > My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > File Size: 773 KB
> > > > Print Length: 72 pages
> > > > Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > Language: English
> > > > ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> > > > X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

> > > > Word Wise: Not Enabled
> > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > Screen Reader: Supported 
> > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > Sep 4, 2022, 3:54:34 PM (2 days ago)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > 
> > > > > stir-crazy-W.Mueckenheim-the fool still thinks slant cut of cone is ellipse when in truth it is an oval, and the failure of logic WM believes in Boole's AND as TFFF when in truth it is TTTF to avoid what the nitwit WM has as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. WM is a math failure for the idiot never knew calculus was geometry and therefore never sought a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
> > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > Augsburg- Friedrich Pukelsheim-Gottingen,Metin Tolin,Ariane Frey, Wolfgang Glatzel why does Wolfgang Mueckenheim the idiot with "dark numbers" & Dr. Tao fail geometry so so badly,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The idiots of math never knew calculus was geometry, erst, they would provide a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, why they are so banal stupid in math, they still believe slant cut in cone is an ellipse, when in reality it is a oval.
> > > > > > They are not mathematicians but mindless fuckdogs of math.
> > > >
> > > > > > Maybe they wear glasses and cannot see properly. Maybe WM & Tao were never good in math, for they cannot even tell apart a ellipse from oval. They cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Univ Augsburg Germany math-- Hello-- Wolfgang Mueckenheim the fool of math wasting everybodies time -- for WM is a math failure with his slant cut in cone as ellipse when in truth it is a Oval. And now, that fool of math with his "dark numbers". Can you whisk him off to a "shrink in Germany and put him on medications"??
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Kai Cieliebak, Urs Frauenfelder, Jennifer Gruber, Yannis Bahni, Zhen Gao, Sungho Kim, Shuaipeng Liu, Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr, Kevin Ruck, Evgeny Volkov, Frederic Wagner
> > > >
> > > > Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt,Metin Tolin, please, need you help to get WM moved over to sci.logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > >
> > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > 3) arsehole WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > >
> > > > Metin Tolin,Julius Natrup, Marian Poppr,B. Schmidt, please, need you help to get WM and his mindless "dark numbers bullshit" moved over to sci..logic and out of sci.math with his crazy postings-- dark numbers. He is a fool, not a scientist.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wolfgang Mueckenheim math-mindless-fuckdog with his mindless "dark numbers"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Scoot him over to sci.logic-- for he fails math.
> > > > > > Germany's insane WM fails math
> > > > > > 1) he cannot accept slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse
> > > > > > 2) he accepts Boole logic of AND truth table is TFFF which leads to 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
> > > > > > 3) fool WM, never understood calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > > > 4) WM cannot even read a proof of math-- for the 7 Circle Theorem of 1974 is false and invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yet, every day the fool WM pollutes sci.math with his dark numbers bullshit.
> > > > > Sarah Friedrich please help shuffle insane WM to sci.logic with his mindless dark-numbers.
> > > > > > Stefan Grobkinsky, Sarah Friedrich, of Augsburg Germany, why does the USA have to have piped in turds from Wolfgang Mueckenheim of his crazy "dark numbers". So Russia cuts gas to Germany, yet Germany pipes the turds of WM into the USA. That is not fair.
> > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> >
> > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > Gottingen Univ math
> >
> > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> >
> > Eternal-September.org
> > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > Berliner Strasse
> > Bad Homburg
> >
> > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> >
> > Brigitta Wolff president
> >
> > Jurgen Habermass
> > Horst Stocker
> > Gerd Binnig
> > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > Peter Grunberg
> >
> > math
> > Alex Kuronya
> > Martin Moller
> > Jakob Stix
> > Annette Werner
> > Andreas Bernig
> > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > Hans Crauel
> > Thomas Gerstner
> > Bastian von Harrach
> > Thomas Mettler
> > Tobias Weth
> > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > Raman Sanyal
> > Thorsten Theobald
> > Yury Person
> >
> >
> > Gottingen Univ physics
> > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
>
>
> Dude, have some modesty!

AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".

Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.

Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim

Gottingen Univ math

Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu

Eternal-September.org
Wolfgang M. Weyand
Berliner Strasse
Bad Homburg

Goethe Universitat Physics dept

Brigitta Wolff president

Jurgen Habermass
Horst Stocker
Gerd Binnig
Horst Ludwig Stormer  
Peter Grunberg

math
Alex Kuronya
Martin Moller
Jakob Stix
Annette Werner
Andreas Bernig
Esther Cabezas-Rivas
Hans Crauel
Thomas Gerstner
Bastian von Harrach
Thomas Mettler
Tobias Weth
Amin Coja-Oghlan
Raman Sanyal
Thorsten Theobald
Yury Person            

Gottingen Univ physics
Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

Putin with his stolen OUTER MANCHURIA of Over 1 million km^2 area, yet Taiwan is a mere 35,808 square kilometers.

And the wise Mao Zedong impressed upon the young and growing up Xi Jinping.

Mao taught the young growing up Xi, that 1 million Km^2 was so so much more than 35,808, and the precious Outer Manchuria with its beautiful rivers and Vladivostok all stolen by the Russian nazis of V. Putin.

Mao taught Xi, that the Russian bear would be crazy and let his eyes drift West, and that is the time Mao told his young growing up accolade Xi Jinping-- take back Outer Manchuria, while the nazi bear is looking West, you get back what is ours, our Red China of the great dynasties of

Tang

of

Liao

of

Jin

of

Eastern Xia

of

Yuan

of

Northern Yuan

of

Ming

of

Later Jin

of

Qing

The Russians stole OUTER MANCHURIA, taught Chairman Mao, and now Xi Jinping the student of Mao will save and rescue and REGAIN outer manchuria for the Chairman Mao taught well and was wise, and now his wise student Xi will follow through.

Taiwan is not going anywhere, but the Russian Nazi bear is crazy and now is the time to regain the beloved Outer Manchuria.

Do it before Christmass, Chairman Xi, do it before Christmass to give all of China a Christmass present.

AP

Zhao Lijian: Our dear Chairman Xi will deliver on regaining all of OUTER MANCHURIA from the Russian Nazis of Putin by Christmass, we ask that you obey Covid lockdown so that we can repopulate Outer Manchuria with young vibrant new Chinese in our stolen lands. And again take the virginal bathe in the Ussuri and Amur rivers that Chairman Xi was blessed in by Mao Zedong.

Wolfgang Mueckenheim and Sergi_o puppet: 267 Three proofs of dark numbers contd 5PM 1Dec, Divide 1 million by 35,808, and Taiwan is not going anywhere, is it.

Chairman Xi: Mao whispered in my ear as I was blessed in the Amur River, return this sacred land of Manchuria back to us.

Mao: When you see the Russian Nazi attack the West, then is the time to REGAIN all of Outer Manchuria.

> Putin with his stolen OUTER MANCHURIA of Over 1 million km^2 area, yet Taiwan is a mere 35,808 square kilometers.
>
> And the wise Mao Zedong impressed upon the young and growing up Xi Jinping.
>
> Mao taught the young growing up Xi, that 1 million Km^2 was so so much more than 35,808, and the precious Outer Manchuria with its beautiful rivers and Vladivostok all stolen by the Russian nazis of V. Putin.
>
> Mao taught Xi, that the Russian bear would be crazy and let his eyes drift West, and that is the time Mao told his young growing up accolade Xi Jinping-- take back Outer Manchuria, while the nazi bear is looking West, you get back what is ours, our Red China of the great dynasties of
>
> Tang
>
> of
>
> Liao
>
> of
>
> Jin
>
> of
>
> Eastern Xia
>
> of
>
> Yuan
>
> of
>
> Northern Yuan
>
> of
>
> Ming
>
> of
>
> Later Jin
>
>
> of
>
> Qing
>
> The Russians stole OUTER MANCHURIA, taught Chairman Mao, and now Xi Jinping the student of Mao will save and rescue and REGAIN outer manchuria for the Chairman Mao taught well and was wise, and now his wise student Xi will follow through.
>
> Taiwan is not going anywhere, but the Russian Nazi bear is crazy and now is the time to regain the beloved Outer Manchuria.
>
> Do it before Christmass, Chairman Xi, do it before Christmass to give all of China a Christmass present.
>
> AP

Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz,Prof. Laura Covi, PhD,Ben Bacarisse 33 "Two similar properties..."
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> >
> >
> > Dude, have some modesty!
>
> AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
>
> Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
>
> Gottingen Univ math
>
> Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
>
> Eternal-September.org
> Wolfgang M. Weyand
> Berliner Strasse
> Bad Homburg
>
> Goethe Universitat Physics dept
>
> Brigitta Wolff president
>
> Jurgen Habermass
> Horst Stocker
> Gerd Binnig
> Horst Ludwig Stormer
> Peter Grunberg
>
> math
> Alex Kuronya
> Martin Moller
> Jakob Stix
> Annette Werner
> Andreas Bernig
> Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> Hans Crauel
> Thomas Gerstner
> Bastian von Harrach
> Thomas Mettler
> Tobias Weth
> Amin Coja-Oghlan
> Raman Sanyal
> Thorsten Theobald
> Yury Person
>
>
> Gottingen Univ physics
> Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

ChrisThomasson,Prof. Laura Covi, PhD,Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann, Chris Thomasson 269 "Three proofs of dark numbers..."
> > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > >
> > >
> > > Dude, have some modesty!
> >
> > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> >
> > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> >
> > Gottingen Univ math
> >
> > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> >
> > Eternal-September.org
> > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > Berliner Strasse
> > Bad Homburg
> >
> > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> >
> > Brigitta Wolff president
> >
> > Jurgen Habermass
> > Horst Stocker
> > Gerd Binnig
> > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > Peter Grunberg
> >
> > math
> > Alex Kuronya
> > Martin Moller
> > Jakob Stix
> > Annette Werner
> > Andreas Bernig
> > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > Hans Crauel
> > Thomas Gerstner
> > Bastian von Harrach
> > Thomas Mettler
> > Tobias Weth
> > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > Raman Sanyal
> > Thorsten Theobald
> > Yury Person
> >
> >
> > Gottingen Univ physics
> > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

fredag 2 december 2022 kl. 05:03:49 UTC+1 skrev Archimedes Plutonium:
> ChrisThomasson,Prof. Laura Covi, PhD,Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann, Chris Thomasson 269 "Three proofs of dark numbers..."
> > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > >
> > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > >
> > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > >
> > > Gottingen Univ math
> > >
> > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > >
> > > Eternal-September.org
> > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > Berliner Strasse
> > > Bad Homburg
> > >
> > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > >
> > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > >
> > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > Horst Stocker
> > > Gerd Binnig
> > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > Peter Grunberg
> > >
> > > math
> > > Alex Kuronya
> > > Martin Moller
> > > Jakob Stix
> > > Annette Werner
> > > Andreas Bernig
> > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > Hans Crauel
> > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > Thomas Mettler
> > > Tobias Weth
> > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > Raman Sanyal
> > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > Yury Person
> > >
> > >
> > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
why are you so gay?

BenBacarisse, Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann, Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry.

And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
......../\E
....../ c.\
F / .......\

entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.

4>No wonder WM,Ben Bacarisse, Gottingen Uni and Germany cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse or that Boole logic is error filled with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Gottingen and Germany are too busy with Gay pick up bars

The fools of Gottingen Uni Germany can not understand slant cut in cylinder cone simultaneously cannot yield two ellipses.

|/\|

The cut enters near the apex of cone is smaller in distance in area and cannot be a ellipse, rather instead is a Oval.

> >
> > WM,...Sergi_o
> > unread,
> > Three proofs of dark numbers contd
> > On 11/30/2022 3:44 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > Michael Moroney brought next idea : >> On 11/
> > 8:15 PM
> > 
> > Buck Futter's profile photo
> > Buck Futter
> > ,
> > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > >
> > >
> > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > >
> > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > >
> > > Gottingen Univ math
> > >
> > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > >
> > > Eternal-September.org
> > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > Berliner Strasse
> > > Bad Homburg
> > >
> > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > >
> > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > >
> > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > Horst Stocker
> > > Gerd Binnig
> > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > Peter Grunberg
> > >
> > > math
> > > Alex Kuronya
> > > Martin Moller
> > > Jakob Stix
> > > Annette Werner
> > > Andreas Bernig
> > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > Hans Crauel
> > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > Thomas Mettler
> > > Tobias Weth
> > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > Raman Sanyal
> > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > Yury Person
> > >
> > >
> > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

C.Thomasson,Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon,Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry.

And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
......../\E
....../ c.\
F / .......\

entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.

Chris Thomasson 72 "Two similar properties..."
Is Ben actually a person or just a alias of WM, spamming each and every day Ben Bacarisse 69, "Two similar properties...."

4>No wonder WM,Ben Bacarisse, Gottingen Uni and Germany cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse or that Boole logic is error filled with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Gottingen and Germany are too busy with Gay pick up bars

The fools of Gottingen Uni Germany can not understand slant cut in cylinder cone simultaneously cannot yield two ellipses.

|/\|

The cut enters near the apex of cone is smaller in distance in area and cannot be a ellipse, rather instead is a Oval.

> >
> > WM,...Sergi_o
> > unread,
> > Three proofs of dark numbers contd
> > On 11/30/2022 3:44 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > Michael Moroney brought next idea : >> On 11/
> > 8:15 PM
> > 
> > Buck Futter's profile photo
> > Buck Futter
> > ,

> > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > >
> > >
> > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > >
> > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > >
> > > Gottingen Univ math
> > >
> > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > >
> > > Eternal-September.org
> > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > Berliner Strasse
> > > Bad Homburg
> > >
> > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > >
> > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > >
> > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > Horst Stocker
> > > Gerd Binnig
> > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > Peter Grunberg
> > >
> > > math
> > > Alex Kuronya
> > > Martin Moller
> > > Jakob Stix
> > > Annette Werner
> > > Andreas Bernig
> > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > Hans Crauel
> > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > Thomas Mettler
> > > Tobias Weth
> > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > Raman Sanyal
> > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > Yury Person
> > >
> > >
> > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

JimBurns,Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon,Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry.

And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
......../\E
....../ c.\
F / .......\

entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.

Jim Burns 85, "Two similar properties...." yet these two fools cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.
Is Ben actually a person or just a alias of WM, spamming each and every day Ben Bacarisse 69, "Two similar properties...."


4>No wonder WM,Ben Bacarisse, Gottingen Uni and Germany cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse or that Boole logic is error filled with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Gottingen and Germany are too busy with Gay pick up bars

The fools of Gottingen Uni Germany can not understand slant cut in cylinder cone simultaneously cannot yield two ellipses.

|/\|

The cut enters near the apex of cone is smaller in distance in area and cannot be a ellipse, rather instead is a Oval.

> >
> > WM,...Sergi_o
> > unread,
> > Three proofs of dark numbers contd
> > On 11/30/2022 3:44 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > Michael Moroney brought next idea : >> On 11/
> > 8:15 PM
> > 
> > Buck Futter's profile photo
> > Buck Futter
> > ,

> > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > >
> > >
> > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > >
> > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > >
> > > Gottingen Univ math
> > >
> > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > >
> > > Eternal-September.org
> > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > Berliner Strasse
> > > Bad Homburg
> > >
> > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > >
> > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > >
> > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > Horst Stocker
> > > Gerd Binnig
> > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > Peter Grunberg
> > >
> > > math
> > > Alex Kuronya
> > > Martin Moller
> > > Jakob Stix
> > > Annette Werner
> > > Andreas Bernig
> > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > Hans Crauel
> > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > Thomas Mettler
> > > Tobias Weth
> > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > Raman Sanyal
> > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > Yury Person
> > >
> > >
> > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

C.Thomasson,Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon,Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry.
> And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> ......./\E
> ...../ c.\
> F / .......\
>
> entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.

Chris Thomasson 99, "Two similar properties..." Is Chris here for math or for gay pick up bar
> Jim Burns 85, "Two similar properties...." yet these two fools cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.
> Is Ben actually a person or just a alias of WM, spamming each and every day Ben Bacarisse 69, "Two similar properties...."
> 
> 
> 4>No wonder WM,Ben Bacarisse, Gottingen Uni and Germany cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse or that Boole logic is error filled with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Gottingen and Germany are too busy with Gay pick up bars
>
> The fools of Gottingen Uni Germany can not understand slant cut in cylinder cone simultaneously cannot yield two ellipses.
>
> |/\|
>
> The cut enters near the apex of cone is smaller in distance in area and cannot be a ellipse, rather instead is a Oval.
>
>
> > >
> > > WM,...Sergi_o
> > > unread,
> > > Three proofs of dark numbers contd
> > > On 11/30/2022 3:44 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > Michael Moroney brought next idea : >> On 11/
> > > 8:15 PM
> > > 
> > > Buck Futter's profile photo
> > > Buck Futter
> > > ,
> 
> > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > >
> > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > >
> > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > >
> > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > >
> > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > Bad Homburg
> > > >
> > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > >
> > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > >
> > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > >
> > > > math
> > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > Martin Moller
> > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > Annette Werner
> > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > Yury Person
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 2:39:25 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> > ......./\E
> > ...../ c.\
> > F / .......\

If you are thinking your cone is symmetric around the z axis and the point c is on the z axis
then you claim that Ec is less than cF is true.
And that means absolutely nothing about whether the intersection of the cone and plane is an ellipse.

The fundamental crank mistake you made a decade ago is thinking that the point c on the z axis
has ANYTHING to do with whether the intersection is an ellipse or not.

As I clearly showed a couple of days ago, the algebra CLEARLY shows that your point c needs to be
exactly half way between the point E and the point F. Then the distances Ec and cF are equal.
BUT, far more important, all the widths of the intersection in that plane for any distance d to the left
and the distance d to the right of that point c are then precisely equal and that is the definition
of a plane of symmetry and the intersection is an ellipse.

But you have screeched your false claim out your crank hole for long enough and you DESPERATELY
need to imagine that you are right and everyone else in the history of the world is wrong... that you
probably can't ever admit that you made this mistake and just keep screeching it.

Go out in your yard and scream it loud and proud:
RETARDED, RETARDED, ARCHIE IS RETARDED
and keep crank screaming that until they call the cops on you.

C.Thomasson,Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey,apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry.
> > And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> > ......./\E
> > ...../ c.\
> > F / .......\
> >
> > entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.
> Chris Thomasson 99, "Two similar properties..." Is Chris here for math or for gay pick up bar
> > Jim Burns 85, "Two similar properties...." yet these two fools cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.
> > Is Ben actually a person or just a alias of WM, spamming each and every day Ben Bacarisse 69, "Two similar properties...."
> > 
> > 
> > 4>No wonder WM,Ben Bacarisse, Gottingen Uni and Germany cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse or that Boole logic is error filled with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Gottingen and Germany are too busy with Gay pick up bars
> >
> > The fools of Gottingen Uni Germany can not understand slant cut in cylinder cone simultaneously cannot yield two ellipses.
> >
> > |/\|
> >
> > The cut enters near the apex of cone is smaller in distance in area and cannot be a ellipse, rather instead is a Oval.
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > WM,...Sergi_o
> > > > unread,
> > > > Three proofs of dark numbers contd
> > > > On 11/30/2022 3:44 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > Michael Moroney brought next idea : >> On 11/
> > > > 8:15 PM
> > > > 
> > > > Buck Futter's profile photo
> > > > Buck Futter
> > > > ,
> > 
> > > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > > > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > >
> > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > >
> > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > >
> > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > >
> > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > >
> > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > >
> > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > >
> > > > > math
> > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > Yury Person
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

On 12/4/2022 5:52 PM, bwr fml wrote:
> On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 2:39:25 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>> And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
>>> ......./\E
>>> ...../ c.\
>>> F / .......\
>
> If you are thinking your cone is symmetric around the z axis and the point c is on the z axis
> then you claim that Ec is less than cF is true.
> And that means absolutely nothing about whether the intersection of the cone and plane is an ellipse.
>
> The fundamental crank mistake you made a decade ago is thinking that the point c on the z axis
> has ANYTHING to do with whether the intersection is an ellipse or not.
>
> As I clearly showed a couple of days ago, the algebra CLEARLY shows that your point c needs to be
> exactly half way between the point E and the point F. Then the distances Ec and cF are equal.
> BUT, far more important, all the widths of the intersection in that plane for any distance d to the left
> and the distance d to the right of that point c are then precisely equal and that is the definition
> of a plane of symmetry and the intersection is an ellipse.
>
> But you have screeched your false claim out your crank hole for long enough and you DESPERATELY
> need to imagine that you are right and everyone else in the history of the world is wrong... that you
> probably can't ever admit that you made this mistake and just keep screeching it.
>
> Go out in your yard and scream it loud and proud:
> RETARDED, RETARDED, ARCHIE IS RETARDED
> and keep crank screaming that until they call the cops on you.

bwr is correct, Archie. Let's try again with your little diagram, fixed.
>>> .......A
>>> ....../.\E
>>> ...../.C.\
>>> ..../B....\
>>> .../.......\
>>> .F/....G....\

You chose point C to be the intersection of line segment EF and the axis
of the cone AG. As you say segment EC is smaller than CF. Not in
dispute. But that doesn't show that the intersecting curve isn't
symmetric around EF. C is not the center of EF. To see if the
intersection figure is symmetric around EF, you obviously have to start
at the center, the halfway point of EF. Here I called it B, and the
length BE = length BF. Now you need to show that the curve is or is not
symmetric around B. That the width at B+d is or is not = the width at
B-d, as bwr stated. Not quite as simple.

C.Thomasson,apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel,Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry..

> > And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> > ......./\E
> > ...../ c.\
> > F / .......\
> >
> > entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.
> Chris Thomasson 99, "Two similar properties..." Is Chris here for math or for gay pick up bar
> > Jim Burns 85, "Two similar properties...." yet these two fools cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.
> > Is Ben actually a person or just a alias of WM, spamming each and every day Ben Bacarisse 69, "Two similar properties...."
> > 
> > 
> > 4>No wonder WM,Ben Bacarisse, Gottingen Uni and Germany cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse or that Boole logic is error filled with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Gottingen and Germany are too busy with Gay pick up bars
> >
> > The fools of Gottingen Uni Germany can not understand slant cut in cylinder cone simultaneously cannot yield two ellipses.
> >
> > |/\|
> >
> > The cut enters near the apex of cone is smaller in distance in area and cannot be a ellipse, rather instead is a Oval.
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > WM,...Sergi_o
> > > > unread,
> > > > Three proofs of dark numbers contd
> > > > On 11/30/2022 3:44 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > Michael Moroney brought next idea : >> On 11/
> > > > 8:15 PM
> > > > 
> > > > Buck Futter's profile photo
> > > > Buck Futter
> > > > ,
> > 
> > > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > > > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > >
> > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > >
> > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > >
> > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > >
> > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > >
> > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > >
> > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > >
> > > > > math
> > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > Yury Person
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

5-C.Thomasson,Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner,Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry.
5> > > And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
6-
> > > ......./\E
> > > ...../ c.\
> > > F / .......\
7-
> > > entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.
> > Chris Thomasson 99, "Two similar properties..." Is Chris here for math or for gay pick up bar
> > > Jim Burns 85, "Two similar properties...." yet these two fools cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.
> > > Is Ben actually a person or just a alias of WM, spamming each and every day Ben Bacarisse 69, "Two similar properties...."
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 4>No wonder WM,Ben Bacarisse, Gottingen Uni and Germany cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse or that Boole logic is error filled with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Gottingen and Germany are too busy with Gay pick up bars
> > >
> > > The fools of Gottingen Uni Germany can not understand slant cut in cylinder cone simultaneously cannot yield two ellipses.
> > >
> > > |/\|
> > >
> > > The cut enters near the apex of cone is smaller in distance in area and cannot be a ellipse, rather instead is a Oval.
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > WM,...Sergi_o
> > > > > unread,
> > > > > Three proofs of dark numbers contd
> > > > > On 11/30/2022 3:44 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > Michael Moroney brought next idea : >> On 11/
> > > > > 8:15 PM
> > > > > 
> > > > > Buck Futter's profile photo
> > > > > Buck Futter
> > > > > ,
> > > 
> > > > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > > > > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > > >
> > > > > > math
> > > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > > Yury Person
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

8-JimBurns,Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner,Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry.
9> > > And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
10-
> > > > ......./\E
> > > > ...../ c.\
> > > > F / .......\
11-
> > > > entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.
> > > Chris Thomasson 99, "Two similar properties..." Is Chris here for math or for gay pick up bar
> > > > Jim Burns 85, "Two similar properties...." yet these two fools cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.
> > > > Is Ben actually a person or just a alias of WM, spamming each and every day Ben Bacarisse 69, "Two similar properties...."
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 4>No wonder WM,Ben Bacarisse, Gottingen Uni and Germany cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse or that Boole logic is error filled with its 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Gottingen and Germany are too busy with Gay pick up bars
> > > >
> > > > The fools of Gottingen Uni Germany can not understand slant cut in cylinder cone simultaneously cannot yield two ellipses.
> > > >
> > > > |/\|
> > > >
> > > > The cut enters near the apex of cone is smaller in distance in area and cannot be a ellipse, rather instead is a Oval.

Jim Burns 129 "Two similar properties.."

> > > > > > WM,...Sergi_o
> > > > > > unread,
> > > > > > Three proofs of dark numbers contd
> > > > > > On 11/30/2022 3:44 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: > Michael Moroney brought next idea : >> On 11/
> > > > > > 8:15 PM
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Buck Futter's profile photo
> > > > > > Buck Futter
> > > > > > ,
> > > > 
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 4:11:51 AM UTC-6, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Is WM ever going to let me suck his cock?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dude, have some modesty!
> > > > > > > AP writes: Zelos, is this why Gottingen University professors cannot admit the truth of science-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse. And Boole switched his OR with AND, causing 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Is because professors of Gottingen have "cum in their mouth according to Zelos".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > > > > Bad Homburg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > math
> > > > > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > > > > Martin Moller
> > > > > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > > > > Annette Werner
> > > > > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > > > > Yury Person
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

2- BenBacarisse,Anja Karliczek,Sabine Doering-Manteuffel,Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi,Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry. And is Ben B and WM keep spamming sci.math as a Gay pick up bar, is that what they want for Germany, Gottingen Univ, no math but gay pick up bar????

> And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> ......./\E
> ...../ c.\
> F / .......\
>
> entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.

Ben Bacarisse 285 "Three proofs of dark numbers..."
Ben Bacarisse 135, "Two similar properties..."
>
>
>
> WM turning Gottingen Germany into geometry failures.
> Kibo chasing corpses in WM gay pick up bar, for Kibo sure does not know the difference between Oval and ellipse as seen in his latest stupidity-- a revolving axis as Kibo the moron and BWR describes it--
>
> Let's try again with your little diagram, fixed.
> > > >>> .......A
> > > >>> ....../.\E
> > > >>> ...../.C.\
> > > >>> ..../B....\
> > > >>> .../.......\
> > > >>> .F/....G....\
> > >
> > > You chose point C to be the intersection of line segment EF and the axis
> > > of the cone AG. As you say segment EC is smaller than CF. Not in
> > > dispute. But that doesn't show that the intersecting curve isn't
> > > symmetric around EF. C is not the center of EF. To see if the
> > > intersection figure is symmetric around EF, you obviously have to start
> > > at the center, the halfway point of EF. Here I called it B, and the
> > > length BE = length BF. Now you need to show that the curve is or is not
> > > symmetric around B. That the width at B+d is or is not = the width at
> > > B-d, as bwr stated. Not quite as simple.
> >
>
> On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 1:48:16 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On 12/5/2022 12:22 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 12/4/2022 8:19 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >> On 12/4/2022 7:43 PM, Mathin3D wrote:
> > >>> Serious Question:
>
>
> Kibo Parry M on Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Imp of Math"
> On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
>
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Court Jester of Math"
>
> Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
>
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 12:43:52 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"bozo"
> > fails at math and science:
> >"psychoceramic"
>
> On Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 10:40:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"physics hater"
> > tarded:
> > Drag Queen of Science, especially Physics
>
> AP no longer tolerates 30 year nonstop stalker shitheads like Kibo Parry M.
> > No wonder Dr.Tao is a failed mathematician who cannot see that |/\| planar cut simultaneously through cylinder and cone has to yield a Oval in cone, a ellipse in cylinder. Tao fails fails fails math, and no wonder the nitwit cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
> >
> > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 6:19:00 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > On 12/4/2022 5:52 PM, bwr fml wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 2:39:25 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > >>> And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> > > >>> ......./\E
> > > >>> ...../ c.\
> > > >>> F / .......\
> > > >
> > > > If you are thinking your cone is symmetric around the z axis and the point c is on the z axis
> > > > then you claim that Ec is less than cF is true.
> > > > And that means absolutely nothing about whether the intersection of the cone and plane is an ellipse.
> > > >
> > > > The fundamental crank mistake you made a decade ago is thinking that the point c on the z axis
> > > > has ANYTHING to do with whether the intersection is an ellipse or not.
> > > >
> > > > As I clearly showed a couple of days ago, the algebra CLEARLY shows that your point c needs to be
> > > > exactly half way between the point E and the point F. Then the distances Ec and cF are equal.
> > > > BUT, far more important, all the widths of the intersection in that plane for any distance d to the left
> > > > and the distance d to the right of that point c are then precisely equal and that is the definition
> > > > of a plane of symmetry and the intersection is an ellipse.
> > > >
> > > > But you have screeched your false claim out your crank hole for long enough and you DESPERATELY
> > > > need to imagine that you are right and everyone else in the history of the world is wrong... that you
> > > > probably can't ever admit that you made this mistake and just keep screeching it.
> > > >
> > > > Go out in your yard and scream it loud and proud:
> > > > RETARDED, RETARDED, ARCHIE IS RETARDED
> > > > and keep crank screaming that until they call the cops on you.
> > > bwr is correct, Archie. Let's try again with your little diagram, fixed.
> > > >>> .......A
> > > >>> ....../.\E
> > > >>> ...../.C.\
> > > >>> ..../B....\
> > > >>> .../.......\
> > > >>> .F/....G....\
> > >
> > > You chose point C to be the intersection of line segment EF and the axis
> > > of the cone AG. As you say segment EC is smaller than CF. Not in
> > > dispute. But that doesn't show that the intersecting curve isn't
> > > symmetric around EF. C is not the center of EF. To see if the
> > > intersection figure is symmetric around EF, you obviously have to start
> > > at the center, the halfway point of EF. Here I called it B, and the
> > > length BE = length BF. Now you need to show that the curve is or is not
> > > symmetric around B. That the width at B+d is or is not = the width at
> > > B-d, as bwr stated. Not quite as simple.
> >
> > AP comments: so look at the moron Moroney (Kibo Parry) being a spokesperson for failed Dr. Tao with his "move around axis of the cone-- say Kibo and Tao is there a witch flying around on a broomstick in that cone also???

Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education & Research
> > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > >
> > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > >
> > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > >
> > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > >
> > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > Bad Homburg
> > > >
> > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > >
> > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > >
> > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > >
> > > > math
> > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > Martin Moller
> > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > Annette Werner
> > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > Yury Person
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

3-Sergi_o,Anja Karliczek,Metin Tolan,Sabine Doering-Manteuffel,Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi,Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math especially geometry. And is Ben B and WM keep spamming sci.math as a Gay pick up bar, is that what they want for Germany, Gottingen Univ, no math but gay pick up bar????

> And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> ......./\E
> ...../ c.\
> F / .......\
>
> entrance E of planar cut, and "c" the center axis, and F the exit of planar cut, cF is far larger than Ec.

Sergi_o 150 "Two similar..."
Ben Bacarisse 285 "Three proofs of dark numbers..."
Ben Bacarisse 135, "Two similar properties..."
>
>
>
> WM turning Gottingen Germany into geometry failures.
> Kibo chasing corpses in WM gay pick up bar, for Kibo sure does not know the difference between Oval and ellipse as seen in his latest stupidity-- a revolving axis as Kibo the moron and BWR describes it--
>
> Let's try again with your little diagram, fixed.
> > > >>> .......A
> > > >>> ....../.\E
> > > >>> ...../.C.\
> > > >>> ..../B....\
> > > >>> .../.......\
> > > >>> .F/....G....\
> > >
> > > You chose point C to be the intersection of line segment EF and the axis
> > > of the cone AG. As you say segment EC is smaller than CF. Not in
> > > dispute. But that doesn't show that the intersecting curve isn't
> > > symmetric around EF. C is not the center of EF. To see if the
> > > intersection figure is symmetric around EF, you obviously have to start
> > > at the center, the halfway point of EF. Here I called it B, and the
> > > length BE = length BF. Now you need to show that the curve is or is not
> > > symmetric around B. That the width at B+d is or is not = the width at
> > > B-d, as bwr stated. Not quite as simple.
> >
>
> On Monday, December 5, 2022 at 1:48:16 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On 12/5/2022 12:22 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 12/4/2022 8:19 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >> On 12/4/2022 7:43 PM, Mathin3D wrote:
> > >>> Serious Question:
>
>
> Kibo Parry M on Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Imp of Math"
> On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
>
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>
> On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Court Jester of Math"
>
> Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
>
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 12:43:52 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"bozo"
> > fails at math and science:
> >"psychoceramic"
>
> On Tuesday, September 13, 2022 at 10:40:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"physics hater"
> > tarded:
> > Drag Queen of Science, especially Physics
>
> AP no longer tolerates 30 year nonstop stalker shitheads like Kibo Parry M.
> > No wonder Dr.Tao is a failed mathematician who cannot see that |/\| planar cut simultaneously through cylinder and cone has to yield a Oval in cone, a ellipse in cylinder. Tao fails fails fails math, and no wonder the nitwit cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
> >
> > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 6:19:00 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > On 12/4/2022 5:52 PM, bwr fml wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 2:39:25 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > >>> And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> > > >>> ......./\E
> > > >>> ...../ c.\
> > > >>> F / .......\
> > > >

> > AP comments: so look at the moron Moroney (Kibo Parry) being a spokesperson for failed Dr. Tao with his "move around axis of the cone-- say Kibo and Tao is there a witch flying around on a broomstick in that cone also???

Anja Karliczek head of Germany Federal Ministry of Education & Research

> > > > Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> > > > Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
> > > >
> > > > Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> > > >
> > > > Gottingen Univ math
> > > >
> > > > Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
> > > >
> > > > Eternal-September.org
> > > > Wolfgang M. Weyand
> > > > Berliner Strasse
> > > > Bad Homburg
> > > >
> > > > Goethe Universitat Physics dept
> > > >
> > > > Brigitta Wolff president
> > > >
> > > > Jurgen Habermass
> > > > Horst Stocker
> > > > Gerd Binnig
> > > > Horst Ludwig Stormer
> > > > Peter Grunberg
> > > >
> > > > math
> > > > Alex Kuronya
> > > > Martin Moller
> > > > Jakob Stix
> > > > Annette Werner
> > > > Andreas Bernig
> > > > Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> > > > Hans Crauel
> > > > Thomas Gerstner
> > > > Bastian von Harrach
> > > > Thomas Mettler
> > > > Tobias Weth
> > > > Amin Coja-Oghlan
> > > > Raman Sanyal
> > > > Thorsten Theobald
> > > > Yury Person
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gottingen Univ physics
> > > > Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> > > > Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> > > > Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> > > > Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> > > > Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> > > > Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> > > > Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> > > > Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> > > > Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> > > > Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> > > > Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> > > > Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> > > > Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> > > > Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> > > > Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> > > > Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> > > > Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> > > > Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> > > > Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> > > > Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> > > > Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> > > > Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> > > > apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> > > > Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> > > > Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> > > > Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> > > > Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> > > > Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius