because it is moving outside the atom.
until it absorbs...

On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> [...]

How silly -- you completely missed it.

Light is invisible most of the time, because it only rarely impinges on
your eyeball -- the only visible light is that which hits your eyeball
and generates a nerve signal to your brain.

This OUGHT to be obvious.

Tom Roberts

On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:01:03 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > [...]
>
> How silly -- you completely missed it.
>
> Light is invisible most of the time, because it only rarely impinges on
> your eyeball -- the only visible light is that which hits your eyeball
> and generates a nerve signal to your brain.
>
> This OUGHT to be obvious.
>
> Tom Roberts
In a vacuum, any sensing device, apparatus, sensor, eyeball, etc., whose sensitive surface's normal is perpendicular to or greater than perpendicular to the Poynting vector is blind to the waves/particles describe by that PV.

On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:01:03 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > [...]
>
> How silly -- you completely missed it.
>
> Light is invisible most of the time, because it only rarely impinges on
> your eyeball -- the only visible light is that which hits your eyeball
> and generates a nerve signal to your brain.
>
> This OUGHT to be obvious.
>
> Tom Roberts

Calm down, Mr. PhD in physics.

Mitch is right. Light ACTUALLY hits ATOMS in the eyeball, which frees valence electrons, hence the electric nerve signal.

On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:31:44 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:01:03 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > [...]
> >
> > How silly -- you completely missed it.
> >
> > Light is invisible most of the time, because it only rarely impinges on
> > your eyeball -- the only visible light is that which hits your eyeball
> > and generates a nerve signal to your brain.
> >
> > This OUGHT to be obvious.
> >
> > Tom Roberts
> Calm down, Mr. PhD in physics.
>
> Mitch is right. Light ACTUALLY hits ATOMS in the eyeball, which frees valence electrons, hence the electric nerve signal.
They've gotcha, Roberts.

On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:48:48 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:31:44 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:01:03 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > > On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > How silly -- you completely missed it.
> > >
> > > Light is invisible most of the time, because it only rarely impinges on
> > > your eyeball -- the only visible light is that which hits your eyeball
> > > and generates a nerve signal to your brain.
> > >
> > > This OUGHT to be obvious.
> > >
> > > Tom Roberts

> > Calm down, Mr. PhD in physics.
> >
> > Mitch is right. Light ACTUALLY hits ATOMS in the eyeball, which frees valence electrons, hence the electric nerve signal.

> They've gotcha, Roberts.

Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time....

On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 11:19:06 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:48:48 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:31:44 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:01:03 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > > > On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > How silly -- you completely missed it.
> > > >
> > > > Light is invisible most of the time, because it only rarely impinges on
> > > > your eyeball -- the only visible light is that which hits your eyeball
> > > > and generates a nerve signal to your brain.
> > > >
> > > > This OUGHT to be obvious.
> > > >
> > > > Tom Roberts
>
> > > Calm down, Mr. PhD in physics.
> > >
> > > Mitch is right. Light ACTUALLY hits ATOMS in the eyeball, which frees valence electrons, hence the electric nerve signal.
>
> > They've gotcha, Roberts.
> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...

Your post is offensive, but nothing less can be expected from a scumbag like you.

Read Mitch contributions in the last 10 years and show some fucking RESPECT, asshole.

On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 9:01:03 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > [...]
>
> How silly -- you completely missed it.

You got got.

DO NOT STROKE THE TROLLS

On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 03:01:03 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > [...]
>
> How silly -- you completely missed it.

And you completely missed that we're FORCED!!! To
THE BEST WAY!!!

On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:48:48 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 6:31:44 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 10:01:03 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote:
> > > > On 7/31/23 12:14 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > How silly -- you completely missed it.
> > > >
> > > > Light is invisible most of the time, because it only rarely impinges on
> > > > your eyeball -- the only visible light is that which hits your eyeball
> > > > and generates a nerve signal to your brain.
> > > >
> > > > This OUGHT to be obvious.
> > > >
> > > > Tom Roberts
>
> > > Calm down, Mr. PhD in physics.
> > >
> > > Mitch is right. Light ACTUALLY hits ATOMS in the eyeball, which frees valence electrons, hence the electric nerve signal.
>
> > They've gotcha, Roberts.
> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...

Your wise faces won't help - the mumble of your idiot guru
was inconsistent, Al.

On 8/1/2023 11:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 11:19:06 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:

>> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...
>
> Your post is offensive, but nothing less can be expected from a scumbag like you.
>
> Read Mitch contributions in the last 10 years and show some fucking RESPECT, asshole.
>
What a hypocrite you are, Richard! You demand that Paul to show respect
to Mitch while you call Paul a scumbag and an asshole in the same sentence.

YOU need to show your betters more respect, Richard!

On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:00:19 AM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
> On 8/1/2023 11:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 11:19:06 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
>
> >> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...
> >
> > Your post is offensive, but nothing less can be expected from a scumbag like you.
> >
> > Read Mitch contributions in the last 10 years and show some fucking RESPECT, asshole.
> >
> What a hypocrite you are, Richard! You demand that Paul to show respect
> to Mitch while you call Paul a scumbag and an asshole in the same sentence.
>
> YOU need to show your betters more respect, Richard!

I have no respect for this cretin. I do have respect for Mitch.

On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:00:19 AM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
> > On 8/1/2023 11:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 11:19:06 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> >
> > >> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...
> > >
> > > Your post is offensive, but nothing less can be expected from a scumbag like you.
> > >
> > > Read Mitch contributions in the last 10 years and show some fucking RESPECT, asshole.
> > >
> > What a hypocrite you are, Richard! You demand that Paul to show respect
> > to Mitch while you call Paul a scumbag and an asshole in the same sentence.
> >
> > YOU need to show your betters more respect, Richard!

> I have no respect for this cretin. I do have respect for Mitch.

You are just a little boy who is angry because someone out there insists that you put your money where your mouth is and provide some evidence for your claims.

You can pound your little fists on the floor and kick your little feet as much as you like, but that will never replace good solid evidence... of which you have none.

In my view, Mitch has not made much in the way of contributions here, but he sure makes some wacky claims... even wackier than yours! I'm sure that Mitch is a nice enough fellow, but he clearly knows no physics. If it is disrespectful to tell him that I can only say that it was only my intention to tell him that he is mostly wrong about his hundreds of claims.

Exactly like Mitch, you don't know what you don't know, and this is obvious to anyone who has actually studied physics, you know, using books and schools and teachers... you know, *studied*. If you ever decide to pull your cranial calculator out from its rectal storage facility you might someday understand.

On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 20:26:00 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:00:19 AM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
> > > On 8/1/2023 11:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 11:19:06 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...
> > > >
> > > > Your post is offensive, but nothing less can be expected from a scumbag like you.
> > > >
> > > > Read Mitch contributions in the last 10 years and show some fucking RESPECT, asshole.
> > > >
> > > What a hypocrite you are, Richard! You demand that Paul to show respect
> > > to Mitch while you call Paul a scumbag and an asshole in the same sentence.
> > >
> > > YOU need to show your betters more respect, Richard!
>
> > I have no respect for this cretin. I do have respect for Mitch.
> You are just a little boy who is angry because someone out there insists that you put your money where your mouth is and provide some evidence for your claims.

Al, poor trash, the only effect of evidence is making
you angry and spitting with Polish jokes or alike.

On 8/3/2023 2:25 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 20:26:00 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
>> On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:00:19 AM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 8/1/2023 11:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 11:19:06 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...
>>>>>
>>>>> Your post is offensive, but nothing less can be expected from a scumbag like you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Read Mitch contributions in the last 10 years and show some fucking RESPECT, asshole.
>>>>>
>>>> What a hypocrite you are, Richard! You demand that Paul to show respect
>>>> to Mitch while you call Paul a scumbag and an asshole in the same sentence.
>>>>
>>>> YOU need to show your betters more respect, Richard!
>>
>>> I have no respect for this cretin.

And that's the problem. You need to show more respect for your betters.

>>> I do have respect for Mitch.

Show more respect for all your betters, not just Mitch.

>> You are just a little boy who is angry because someone out there insists that you put your money where your mouth is and provide some evidence for your claims.
>
> Al, poor trash, the only effect of evidence is making
> you angry and spitting with Polish jokes or alike.

You're the only Polish joke around here. You're constantly raving and
spitting because you're mad that you have no evidence for any of your
claims.

Perhaps you could move to Russia and raise the average IQ of both countries.

On Thursday, 3 August 2023 at 16:14:24 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
> On 8/3/2023 2:25 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 2 August 2023 at 20:26:00 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:00:19 AM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
> >>>> On 8/1/2023 11:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 11:19:06 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Your post is offensive, but nothing less can be expected from a scumbag like you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Read Mitch contributions in the last 10 years and show some fucking RESPECT, asshole.
> >>>>>
> >>>> What a hypocrite you are, Richard! You demand that Paul to show respect
> >>>> to Mitch while you call Paul a scumbag and an asshole in the same sentence.
> >>>>
> >>>> YOU need to show your betters more respect, Richard!
> >>
> >>> I have no respect for this cretin.
> And that's the problem. You need to show more respect for your betters.
> >>> I do have respect for Mitch.
> Show more respect for all your betters, not just Mitch.
> >> You are just a little boy who is angry because someone out there insists that you put your money where your mouth is and provide some evidence for your claims.
> >
> > Al, poor trash, the only effect of evidence is making
> > you angry and spitting with Polish jokes or alike.
> You're the only Polish joke around here. You're constantly raving and
> spitting because you're mad that you have no evidence for any of your
> claims.

See, poor halfbrain - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it
apart of spitting and insulting. So you are spitting and
insulting, together with your fellow idiots.

On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:26:00 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 10:04:47 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:00:19 AM UTC-3, Volney wrote:
> > > On 8/1/2023 11:25 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 11:19:06 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Tom is only conforming to the old adage... "Never stretch the truth beyond the limits of the recipient"... Mitch can only comprehend so much at a time...
> > > >
> > > > Your post is offensive, but nothing less can be expected from a scumbag like you.
> > > >
> > > > Read Mitch contributions in the last 10 years and show some fucking RESPECT, asshole.
> > > >
> > > What a hypocrite you are, Richard! You demand that Paul to show respect
> > > to Mitch while you call Paul a scumbag and an asshole in the same sentence.
> > >
> > > YOU need to show your betters more respect, Richard!
>
> > I have no respect for this cretin. I do have respect for Mitch.
> You are just a little boy who is angry because someone out there insists that you put your money where your mouth is and provide some evidence for your claims.
>
> You can pound your little fists on the floor and kick your little feet as much as you like, but that will never replace good solid evidence... of which you have none.
>
> In my view, Mitch has not made much in the way of contributions here, but he sure makes some wacky claims... even wackier than yours! I'm sure that Mitch is a nice enough fellow, but he clearly knows no physics. If it is disrespectful to tell him that I can only say that it was only my intention to tell him that he is mostly wrong about his hundreds of claims.
>
> Exactly like Mitch, you don't know what you don't know, and this is obvious to anyone who has actually studied physics, you know, using books and schools and teachers... you know, *studied*. If you ever decide to pull your cranial calculator out from its rectal storage facility you might someday understand.

If light energy enters your eye is it not absorbed by a particle in the eye atom?
So does energy build up there? Would it not have to? What about albedo could do it?
How many light waves have entered your eye?