On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 12:25:56 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>fails at math and science:

Far too difficult for UCLA to teach the truth about Logic, Math and Physics, than it was for the USA to send a spaceship to the Moon, land on Moon, and return the astronauts to Earth.

The USSR in April 1961 sent the first human up into Space, in the Space Race, forcing President Kennedy to declare in May 1961 that the USA will send a human to the Moon and back before the "end of the decade". The Moon walk did occur in 1969.

UCLA has a tougher time of acknowledging that truth table of AND is TTTF, and not TFFF (UCLA teaches TFFF). For TTTF as AND yields addition, rather than subtraction. And that computers stop spitting out addition as OR, such as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. For Boole and Jevons in late 1800s simply made the mistake of mixing up truth tables of AND with OR. Boole and Jevons were failures of logic for every one of their 4 main connectors are in error. Yet UCLA is much a brain dead school upon learning of these errors in AP posts of 1990s from posts to the Internet sci.math and sci.physics by Archimedes Plutonium, UCLA still teaches the profoundly dumbarse logic of a mixed up AND with OR truth table. In fact, so idiotic is UCLA in Logic, that the miserable professors there that teach logic have no qualm in thinking OR logic connector can have two different classes of OR, an exclusive OR and a inclusive OR. Never realizing a inclusive OR is a contradiction in terms-- both OR with AND together. For they have no logical marbles at all in their brains at UCLA University.

And the response by UCLA after reading AP's correction ever since 1994, the response by UCLA was for its faculty to sit back and relax and laugh at the goon squad of bad-mouthing creeps like Earle Jones of Stanford with his anagrams of AP, or MIT Gilbert Strang under a fake name of Port(something) along with Kibo Parry (Moroney) like Dan Christensen and Jan Burse and his gang of idiots with their 938 is 12% short of 945, attack attack attack of AP correcting logic, math and physics. Gene D. Block UCLA faculty want to continue to teach error filled bullshit for not just decades but centuries on..

OTHER MISTAKES that UCLA continues to teach with never a thought that they are wrong and need to correct their mistakes.

(2) By 2015, AP proved a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Yet UCLA math department never knew that calculus was geometry in the first place, and thus, never knew a geometry proof was required.

(3) By 2016, AP proved the slant cut in single right cone was a Oval, never the ellipse, which makes perfect commonsense, since a cone and oval have only 1 axis of symmetry, but an ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry.

(4) By 2016-2017, AP realized there had been a grand great mistake in physics for JJ Thomson in 1897 discovered a 0.5MeV particle, which he and the rest of the physics and chemistry community thought was the atom's electron. For it would not be until the 1930s that Caltech physicists would discover a particle that is 105MeV, the muon, and would truly be the atom's electron, while the 0.5MeV particle is now seen as the Dirac magnetic monopole. This changes all the physical sciences. But there is the dumbarse UCLA faculty, whose minds in science is so stupid, that not a single one of them can even ask or entertain the question,-- which is the true electron of atoms. For AP wrote several books on the idea that the muon is the true electron of atoms and is stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV doing the Faraday law between muon and proton. And this is why Sun and stars shine-- not from fusion, mind you, they shine because every proton in the Sun and stars is doing the Faraday law.

John Kennedy had a brain of logic. He saw that sputnik was up and USSR with first human in Space. Kennedy had logical brains, and proclaimed, before Decade is Out, USA will land on Moon and come home safely.

It is far far too much to ask of UCLA University, of Gene D. Block, of Terence Tao, to much to ask them to hold a conference and start that UCLA brain dead faculty, to START teaching AND truth table is TTTF, not TFFF, START teaching that slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, START teaching that calculus is geometry and requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not their mindless limit analysis hornswaggle, or, just simply ask the question-- which is the atom's true electron. No, UCLA is not a John Kennedy who had a logical mind, and saw things needed fixing and achievement. No UCLA by 1990s-2022 is mostly a intellectual cesspool of fools running around with their 2 OR 1 = 3, and their slant cut of cone is ellipse.

No, UCLA is a backwards shithead school, for when Kennedy says we will land on Moon and come home safely before 1970. UCLA in contrast says-- we send out a goon squad of hate mongers like Earle Jones and his logo picture, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Kibo Parry (Moron), Gilbert Strang undercover as Port--- and his gang of gay haters, and keep teaching falsehoods for the next thousand years. Isn't that right Gene D. Block and Terence Tao, keep on teaching bullshit, not the truth of science, keep teaching 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and slant cut in cone is ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and never a geometry proof of calculus, and worst of all-- no brain at UCLA, none at all, to ask if 0.5MeV or 105MeV is the Atom's true electron.

AP

👽 of Math and 👾 of Physics Archimedes "🖖 illogical 🖖" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 12:25:56 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Archimedes "village idiot" Plutonium fails at math and science:
>
> Far too difficult for UCLA to teach the truth about Logic, Math and Physics, than it was for the USA to send a spaceship to the Moon, land on Moon, and return the astronauts to Earth.
>
> The USSR in April 1961 sent the first human up into Space, in the Space Race, forcing President Kennedy to declare in May 1961 that the USA will send a human to the Moon and back before the "end of the decade". The Moon walk did occur in 1969.

That's because the NASA wizards of the time understood actual science
and math. They understood the ellipse was a conic section, because if
they didn't, the Apollo missions would have flown off into space or
crashed into the moon. That is, if they didn't just blow up on the
launchpad. The USSR understood correct math and science as well.
>
> UCLA has a tougher time of acknowledging that truth table of AND is TTTF, and not TFFF (UCLA teaches TFFF).

UCLA and NASA understood Boolean truth tables, because even the
primitive computers of the time understood AND is TFFF. Who knows what
unfortunate demise would have awaited the astronauts if they use
Plutonium illogic?

> For TTTF as AND yields addition, rather than subtraction.

Boolean truth tables are not addition nor subtraction at all!

> And that computers stop spitting out addition as OR, such as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.

Boolean logic only has 0 and 1 (really FALSE and TRUE). Such statements
like the above only make sense when using every binary bit of an integer
as a Boolean true/false value as well as the whole as an integer. (But
if you do, that is correct, ...0010 [2] OR (bitwise) .0001 [1] really is
..0011 [3]). As they say, even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a
while.

> Yet UCLA is much a brain dead school upon learning of these errors in AP posts of 1990s from posts to the Internet sci.math and sci.physics by Archimedes Plutonium,

UCLA doesn't give a fuck about any AP postings to the internet. Why
would they? Especially when they are so laughably wrong?

> UCLA still teaches the profoundly dumbarse logic of a mixed up AND with OR truth table.

Correct logic cannot be "dumbarse".

> In fact, so idiotic is UCLA in Logic, that the miserable professors there that teach logic have no qualm in thinking OR logic connector can have two different classes of OR, an exclusive OR and a inclusive OR. Never realizing a inclusive OR is a contradiction in terms-- both OR with AND together. For they have no logical marbles at all in their brains at UCLA University.

How bizarre. If I won the Powerball lottery jackpot OR if I won the
Megamillions lottery jackpot, I can buy a mansion and a yacht! What
happens if I won both? That is inclusive OR.
>
> And the response by UCLA after reading AP's correction ever since 1994,

AP, a nobody of math, doesn't get to "correct" anything. That is a good
thing, of course.

UCLA profs likely never even saw AP's incorrect posts. In the unlikely
event they did, they'd just laugh them off. Only some random students,
nearly all of whom no longer care about this obsolete backwater of
discussion groups, would have read any.

> the response by UCLA was for its faculty to sit back and relax and laugh at the goon squad of bad-mouthing creeps like Earle Jones of Stanford with his anagrams of AP, or MIT Gilbert Strang under a fake name of Port(something) along with Kibo Parry (Moroney) like Dan Christensen and Jan Burse and his gang of idiots with their 938 is 12% short of 945, attack attack attack of AP correcting logic, math and physics. Gene D. Block UCLA faculty want to continue to teach error filled bullshit for not just decades but centuries on.

The response to a post that they never saw, which isn't even on any
accepted path of math or science development, is obviously nothing.
>
> OTHER MISTAKES that UCLA continues to teach with never a thought that they are wrong and need to correct their mistakes.

Because there are no mistakes to correct. Babbling by AP is just
babbling, which is ignored.
>
> (2) By 2015, AP proved a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Yet UCLA math department never knew that calculus was geometry in the first place, and thus, never knew a geometry proof was required.

Yet AP never provided any "proof", just claims he has a proof.
>
> (3) By 2016, AP proved the slant cut in single right cone was a Oval, never the ellipse, which makes perfect commonsense, since a cone and oval have only 1 axis of symmetry, but an ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry.

Yet AP never provided any "proof" of that, or (more importantly)
disproved all the proofs to the contrary.
>
> (4) By 2016-2017, AP realized there had been a grand great mistake in physics for JJ Thomson in 1897 discovered a 0.5MeV particle,

There has never been a problem with the 511 kEv electron.

> which he and the rest of the physics and chemistry community thought was the atom's electron. For it would not be until the 1930s that Caltech physicists would discover a particle that is 105MeV, the muon,

which they knew was very unstable,

> and would truly be the atom's electron, while the 0.5MeV particle is now seen as the Dirac magnetic monopole.

Nobody "sees" anything like that. Except your own delusions.

> This changes all the physical sciences.

You can change nothing. You are a nobody in science. Nobodies of science
get to change nothing.

> But there is the dumbarse UCLA faculty, whose minds in science is so stupid, that not a single one of them can even ask or entertain the question,-- which is the true electron of atoms.

Because the answer has been obvious for 125 years! The 511 keV electron
discovered in 1897.

> For AP wrote several books on the idea that the muon is the true electron of atoms

Nobody cares how many garbage books anyone wrote. There are even more
garbage books on how the earth is 6000 years old, or is flat, or whatever.

> John Kennedy had a brain of logic. He saw that sputnik was up and USSR with first human in Space. Kennedy had logical brains, and proclaimed, before Decade is Out, USA will land on Moon and come home safely.

Good thing that no "Russian Robots" were able to destroy US math and
science back then!
>
> It is far far too much to ask of UCLA University, of Gene D. Block, of Terence Tao, to much to ask them to hold a conference and start that UCLA brain dead faculty, to START teaching AND truth table is TTTF, not TFFF, START teaching that slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, START teaching that calculus is geometry and requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus,

Why would they want to destroy math and science?

> No, UCLA is a backwards shithead school, for when Kennedy says we will land on Moon and come home safely before 1970. UCLA in contrast says-- we send out a goon squad of hate mongers like Earle Jones and his logo picture, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Kibo Parry (Moron), Gilbert Strang undercover as Port--- and his gang of gay haters, and keep teaching falsehoods for the next thousand years.

Sounds like paranoid schizophrenia to me. Seek mental help!

> Isn't that right Gene D. Block and Terence Tao, keep on teaching bullshit,

They teach math and science, not AP's bullshit!

> not the truth of science, keep teaching 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and slant cut in cone is ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and never a geometry proof of calculus, and worst of all-- no brain at UCLA, none at all, to ask if 0.5MeV or 105MeV is the Atom's true electron.

You are very confused. A nobody of math and science such as yourself has
no effect whatsoever what is taught at UCLA! They collaborate with other
mathematicians and scientists, not some nobody they never heard of in
Nowhere, SD.

Kibo Parry M on why Dr.Tao,UCLA, Gene D.Block are village idiot failures
On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 11:35:35 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"village idiot"
> 👽 of Math and 👾 of Physics
> fails at math and science:
Far too difficult for UCLA to teach the truth about Logic, Math and Physics, than it was for the USA to send a spaceship to the Moon, land on Moon, and return the astronauts to Earth.

The USSR in April 1961 sent the first human up into Space, in the Space Race, forcing President Kennedy to declare in May 1961 that the USA will send a human to the Moon and back before the "end of the decade". The Moon walk did occur in 1969.

UCLA has a tougher time of acknowledging that truth table of AND is TTTF, and not TFFF (UCLA teaches TFFF). For TTTF as AND yields addition, rather than subtraction. And that computers stop spitting out addition as OR, such as 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. For Boole and Jevons in late 1800s simply made the mistake of mixing up truth tables of AND with OR. Boole and Jevons were failures of logic for every one of their 4 main connectors are in error. Yet UCLA is much a brain dead school upon learning of these errors in AP posts of 1990s from posts to the Internet sci.math and sci.physics by Archimedes Plutonium, UCLA still teaches the profoundly dumbarse logic of a mixed up AND with OR truth table. In fact, so idiotic is UCLA in Logic, that the miserable professors there that teach logic have no qualm in thinking OR logic connector can have two different classes of OR, an exclusive OR and a inclusive OR. Never realizing a inclusive OR is a contradiction in terms-- both OR with AND together. For they have no logical marbles at all in their brains at UCLA University.

And the response by UCLA after reading AP's correction ever since 1994, the response by UCLA was for its faculty to sit back and relax and laugh at the goon squad of bad-mouthing creeps like Earle Jones of Stanford with his anagrams of AP, or MIT Gilbert Strang under a fake name of Port(something) along with Kibo Parry (Moroney) like Dan Christensen and Jan Burse and his gang of idiots with their 938 is 12% short of 945, attack attack attack of AP correcting logic, math and physics. Gene D. Block UCLA faculty want to continue to teach error filled bullshit for not just decades but centuries on..

OTHER MISTAKES that UCLA continues to teach with never a thought that they are wrong and need to correct their mistakes.

(2) By 2015, AP proved a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Yet UCLA math department never knew that calculus was geometry in the first place, and thus, never knew a geometry proof was required.

(3) By 2016, AP proved the slant cut in single right cone was a Oval, never the ellipse, which makes perfect commonsense, since a cone and oval have only 1 axis of symmetry, but an ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry.

(4) By 2016-2017, AP realized there had been a grand great mistake in physics for JJ Thomson in 1897 discovered a 0.5MeV particle, which he and the rest of the physics and chemistry community thought was the atom's electron. For it would not be until the 1930s that Caltech physicists would discover a particle that is 105MeV, the muon, and would truly be the atom's electron, while the 0.5MeV particle is now seen as the Dirac magnetic monopole. This changes all the physical sciences. But there is the dumbarse UCLA faculty, whose minds in science is so stupid, that not a single one of them can even ask or entertain the question,-- which is the true electron of atoms. For AP wrote several books on the idea that the muon is the true electron of atoms and is stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV doing the Faraday law between muon and proton. And this is why Sun and stars shine-- not from fusion, mind you, they shine because every proton in the Sun and stars is doing the Faraday law.

John Kennedy had a brain of logic. He saw that sputnik was up and USSR with first human in Space. Kennedy had logical brains, and proclaimed, before Decade is Out, USA will land on Moon and come home safely.

It is far far too much to ask of UCLA University, of Gene D. Block, of Terence Tao, to much to ask them to hold a conference and start that UCLA brain dead faculty, to START teaching AND truth table is TTTF, not TFFF, START teaching that slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, START teaching that calculus is geometry and requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not their mindless limit analysis hornswaggle, or, just simply ask the question-- which is the atom's true electron. No, UCLA is not a John Kennedy who had a logical mind, and saw things needed fixing and achievement. No UCLA by 1990s-2022 is mostly a intellectual cesspool of fools running around with their 2 OR 1 = 3, and their slant cut of cone is ellipse.

No, UCLA is a backwards shithead school, for when Kennedy says we will land on Moon and come home safely before 1970. UCLA in contrast says-- we send out a goon squad of hate mongers like Earle Jones and his logo picture, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Kibo Parry (Moron), Gilbert Strang undercover as Port--- and his gang of gay haters, and keep teaching falsehoods for the next thousand years. Isn't that right Gene D. Block and Terence Tao, keep on teaching bullshit, not the truth of science, keep teaching 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and slant cut in cone is ellipse when in reality it is a oval, and never a geometry proof of calculus, and worst of all-- no brain at UCLA, none at all, to ask if 0.5MeV or 105MeV is the Atom's true electron.

AP

On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 11:35:35 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

Take this bullshit failed ignorance to sci.logic, you do not deserve to post in sci.math.
On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 11:35:35 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote

Take this bullshit over to sci.logic, for you are a math failure-- Your AND connector is subtraction with 2 OR 1 = 3. You do not even know a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. You are a failure in geometry for your slant cut in cone is a ellipse when actually that is a oval. But worst of all-- you are so stupid in science you cannot even ask the question which is the atom's true electron-- 0.5MeV particle or the muon stuck inside a 840 MeV proton torus.

You do not deserve to post in sci.math with your failed ignorance of math.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#12-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

> Terence Tao 👽 of Math and Thomas Hales 👾 of Physics Andrew Wiles "🖖 illogical 🖖"
On Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 11:35:35 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: says Kibo Parry M the 30 year nonstop stalker

Re: bwr fml & Kibo Parry M on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, failures of Natural Logarithm with their disconnect of Natural Log defined as integral area of Y=1/t in interval 1 to x
by Michael Moroney Sep 21, 2021, 12:08:40 AM

Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
1:30 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM

Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
May 10, 2021 by Michael Moroney

Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM

Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM

Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM

Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views

Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM

Re: Drs. Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison of MIT are you as dumb as Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
By Michael Moroney 14 posts 94 views Jan 15, 2018, 12:07:24 AM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
By Michael Moroney 49 posts 519 views, 1/23/18

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
By Michael Moroney 49 posts 519 views updated 2:19 AM

Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
By Michael Moroney 55 posts 419 views updated 2:18 AM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
By Michael Moroney 24 posts 176 views updated 2:17 AM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
By Michael Moroney 39 posts 288 views updated 2:16 AM

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 32 posts 430 views updated 2:15 AM

Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
By Michael Moroney 28 posts 188 views updated 2:14 AM

Re: Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as McElroy & __@__.__ //never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV
by Michael Moroney Dec 28, 2017

Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM

Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 29 posts 307 views updated 2:13 AM

Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
3/4/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
by Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM

Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM

Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM

Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM

Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM

Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM

Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM

Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021

Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM

Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test
By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
1/23/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
10/28/17
By Michael Moroney

Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
8 posts by 2 authors
12/4/17
By Michael Moroney

Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
20 posts by 3 authors
By Michael Moroney

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
20 posts by 2 authors
4/9/18
By Michael Moroney

No wonder Dr.Tao is a failed mathematician who cannot see that |/\| planar cut simultaneously through cylinder and cone has to yield a Oval in cone, a ellipse in cylinder. Tao fails fails fails math, and no wonder the nitwit cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 6:19:00 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On 12/4/2022 5:52 PM, bwr fml wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 4, 2022 at 2:39:25 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >>> And here you can plainly see the side EC is smaller than CF, while a ellipse requires them to be equal
> >>> ......./\E
> >>> ...../ c.\
> >>> F / .......\
> >
> > If you are thinking your cone is symmetric around the z axis and the point c is on the z axis
> > then you claim that Ec is less than cF is true.
> > And that means absolutely nothing about whether the intersection of the cone and plane is an ellipse.
> >
> > The fundamental crank mistake you made a decade ago is thinking that the point c on the z axis
> > has ANYTHING to do with whether the intersection is an ellipse or not.
> >
> > As I clearly showed a couple of days ago, the algebra CLEARLY shows that your point c needs to be
> > exactly half way between the point E and the point F. Then the distances Ec and cF are equal.
> > BUT, far more important, all the widths of the intersection in that plane for any distance d to the left
> > and the distance d to the right of that point c are then precisely equal and that is the definition
> > of a plane of symmetry and the intersection is an ellipse.
> >
> > But you have screeched your false claim out your crank hole for long enough and you DESPERATELY
> > need to imagine that you are right and everyone else in the history of the world is wrong... that you
> > probably can't ever admit that you made this mistake and just keep screeching it.
> >
> > Go out in your yard and scream it loud and proud:
> > RETARDED, RETARDED, ARCHIE IS RETARDED
> > and keep crank screaming that until they call the cops on you.
> bwr is correct, Archie. Let's try again with your little diagram, fixed.
> >>> .......A
> >>> ....../.\E
> >>> ...../.C.\
> >>> ..../B....\
> >>> .../.......\
> >>> .F/....G....\
>
> You chose point C to be the intersection of line segment EF and the axis
> of the cone AG. As you say segment EC is smaller than CF. Not in
> dispute. But that doesn't show that the intersecting curve isn't
> symmetric around EF. C is not the center of EF. To see if the
> intersection figure is symmetric around EF, you obviously have to start
> at the center, the halfway point of EF. Here I called it B, and the
> length BE = length BF. Now you need to show that the curve is or is not
> symmetric around B. That the width at B+d is or is not = the width at
> B-d, as bwr stated. Not quite as simple.

AP comments: so look at the moron Moroney (Kibo Parry) being a spokesperson for failed Dr. Tao with his "move around axis of the cone-- say Kibo and Tao is there a witch flying around on a broomstick in that cone also???

On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 11:41:45 PM UTC-6, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> This is a little bit "scary pretty" to me:
>
> .....://.......youtu.be/.........usADIN,,,,,,,,i17cI

Will Chris Thomasson stalker of sci.math hack into Dr. Tao's computer if he opens that website.

Has Chris reduced himself to some impish elf trying to hack into peoples computers???