It's past the point of no return, and they're heading for a nearly 20oC global temperature rise by the end of the century. The rise is not linear gradual, it has a marked acceleration which itself will accelerate. Most people will never see it because they'll all be dead.

https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/climate-nears-point-no-return-land-sea-temperatures-break-records-experts-2023-06-30/

On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>It's past the point of no return, and they're heading for a nearly 20oC global temperature rise by the end of the century. The rise is not linear gradual, it has a marked acceleration which itself will accelerate. Most people will never see it because they'll all be dead.
>
>https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/climate-nears-point-no-return-land-sea-temperatures-break-records-experts-2023-06-30/

Well, that may be so. But *if* the planet's warming at that rate and
the 3rd derivative seals our fate, it's important to keep in mind that
it's got *nothing* to do with CO2 and all those so-called "experts"
are - as usual - being paid to lie about it. Broadcast emissions are a
far more likely culprit if the truth be told.

On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 1:37:57 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >It's past the point of no return, and they're heading for a nearly 20oC global temperature rise by the end of the century. The rise is not linear gradual, it has a marked acceleration which itself will accelerate. Most people will never see it because they'll all be dead.
> >
> >https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/climate-nears-point-no-return-land-sea-temperatures-break-records-experts-2023-06-30/
> Well, that may be so. But *if* the planet's warming at that rate and
> the 3rd derivative seals our fate, it's important to keep in mind that
> it's got *nothing* to do with CO2 and all those so-called "experts"
> are - as usual - being paid to lie about it. Broadcast emissions are a
> far more likely culprit if the truth be told.

https://www.steampoweredfamily.com/the-greenhouse-effect-experiment/

On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 10:43:20 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 1:37:57?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
>> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >It's past the point of no return, and they're heading for a nearly 20oC global temperature rise by the end of the century. The rise is not linear gradual, it has a marked acceleration which itself will accelerate. Most people will never see it because they'll all be dead.
>> >
>> >https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/climate-nears-point-no-return-land-sea-temperatures-break-records-experts-2023-06-30/
>> Well, that may be so. But *if* the planet's warming at that rate and
>> the 3rd derivative seals our fate, it's important to keep in mind that
>> it's got *nothing* to do with CO2 and all those so-called "experts"
>> are - as usual - being paid to lie about it. Broadcast emissions are a
>> far more likely culprit if the truth be told.
>
>
>https://www.steampoweredfamily.com/the-greenhouse-effect-experiment/

You cannot be serious, surely. This is no "science experiment" and I'm
astonished that someone like you, who presumably has some sort of
scientfic background, would put contemptible BS like this up as
evidence for such baseless claims. You must have taken complete leave
of your senses, man.

On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 10:37:57 AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >It's past the point of no return, and they're heading for a nearly 20oC global temperature rise by the end of the century. The rise is not linear gradual, it has a marked acceleration which itself will accelerate. Most people will never see it because they'll all be dead.
> >
> >https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/climate-nears-point-no-return-land-sea-temperatures-break-records-experts-2023-06-30/
> Well, that may be so. But ...

This is a deadly danger, there's no importance to anything after 'may be so'.

>... *if* the planet's warming at that rate and
> the 3rd derivative seals our fate, it's important to keep in mind that
> it's got *nothing* to do with CO2 and all those so-called "experts"
> are - as usual - being paid to lie about it. Broadcast emissions are a
> far more likely culprit if the truth be told.

Experts who sign their formal publications can be called to account for
discrepancies; the above rant identifies no such persons, no publications,
and is simply a slur on a broad class of individuals; it's hate speech.

On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 14:36:01 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 10:37:57?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
>> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >It's past the point of no return, and they're heading for a nearly 20oC global temperature rise by the end of the century. The rise is not linear gradual, it has a marked acceleration which itself will accelerate. Most people will never see it because they'll all be dead.
>> >
>> >https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/climate-nears-point-no-return-land-sea-temperatures-break-records-experts-2023-06-30/
>> Well, that may be so. But ...
>
>This is a deadly danger, there's no importance to anything after 'may be so'.
>
>>... *if* the planet's warming at that rate and
>> the 3rd derivative seals our fate, it's important to keep in mind that
>> it's got *nothing* to do with CO2 and all those so-called "experts"
>> are - as usual - being paid to lie about it. Broadcast emissions are a
>> far more likely culprit if the truth be told.
>
>Experts who sign their formal publications can be called to account for
>discrepancies; the above rant identifies no such persons, no publications,
>and is simply a slur on a broad class of individuals; it's hate speech.

"Hate Speech" - any statement a Lefty disagrees with but can't
adequately repudiate.

On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 4:53:42 PM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 14:36:01 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 10:37:57?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:

> >>... it's important to keep in mind that
> >> it's got *nothing* to do with CO2 and all those so-called "experts"
> >> are - as usual - being paid to lie about it. Broadcast emissions are a
> >> far more likely culprit if the truth be told.
> >
> >Experts who sign their formal publications can be called to account for
> >discrepancies; the above rant identifies no such persons, no publications,
> >and is simply a slur on a broad class of individuals; it's hate speech.

> "Hate Speech" - any statement a Lefty disagrees with but can't
> adequately repudiate.

Yeah, maybe so. But, that's not MY reason; as I cited,
it was because of lack of content.

On 10/07/2023 9:53 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 14:36:01 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 10:37:57?AM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
>>> <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

>>> ... *if* the planet's warming at that rate and
>>> the 3rd derivative seals our fate, it's important to keep in mind that
>>> it's got *nothing* to do with CO2 and all those so-called "experts"
>>> are - as usual - being paid to lie about it. Broadcast emissions are a
>>> far more likely culprit if the truth be told.
>>
>> Experts who sign their formal publications can be called to account for
>> discrepancies; the above rant identifies no such persons, no publications,
>> and is simply a slur on a broad class of individuals; it's hate speech.
>
> "Hate Speech" - any statement a Lefty disagrees with but can't adequately repudiate.

It's not difficult to repudiate your nonsensical claims, but twits like
you are happy to ignore rational argument, so it's a waste of time to go
into detail.

For all practical purposes you are a dangerous lunatic, so we go to
trouble of pointing out that you should be ignored and leave it at that.

The left does try to be rational and the right is happier to go with
it's gut feelings, but there's nothing particularly Leftist in pointing
out gibbering idiocy for what it is.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney