Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, no wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.

Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.

Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
58
Job Offer
Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
11:22 PM

Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
, …
68
"Psychoceramics"
Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
11:13 PM


Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.

H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.

On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
>
> >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> >>
> >>"I am the purloined scum"
>
> --
>
> More anagrams:
>
> Archimedes Plutonium =
> SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
>
> ...enough?
>
> earle
> --
> __
> __/\_\
> /\_\/_/
> \/_/\_\ earle
> \/_/ jones
>

Stanford University, math dept.

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

> > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > Arthur B. McDonald
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > John C. Mather
> > George F. Smoot
> > Roy J. Glauber_
> > David J. Gross
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > Jerome I. Friedman
> > Henry W. Kendall_
> > Richard E. Taylor_
> > Carlo Rubbia
> > Simon van der Meer_
> > William Alfred Fowler_
> > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > James Watson Cronin_
> > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg_
> > .
> > .
> > little fishes
> > .
> > .
> > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> >
> > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > .
> > .
> > Edward Witten
> > John Baez
> > Brian Greene
> > Lisa Randall
> > Alan H. Guth
> > Michael E. Brown
> > Konstantin Batygin
> > Ben Bullock
> > Larry Harson
> > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> >
> >
> > #2-1, 137th published book

> > #2-6, 177th published book
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> >
> > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> > #2-7, 178th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> >
> >
> > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> >
> > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #2-9, 161st published book
> >
> > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> >
> > Preface:
> > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> >
> > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> >
> > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > y z
> > | /
> > | /
> > |/______ x
> >
> > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> >
> > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> >
> > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> >
> > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> >
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > Archimedes Plutonium

☠️ of Math and ☠ of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>
> I want to fuck her corpse

You're sick, Pluto!

>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
You already said that.
>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
>
> wanting to fuck her corpse
>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
Can't you leave the poor dead queen alone???

On Saturday, 21 January 2023 at 11:02:00 UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote:
> ☠️ of Math and ☠ of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium
> certified crank Ludwig Pooman:
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You're sick, Pluto!
>
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> You already said that.
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> Can't you leave the poor dead queen alone???

Hilarious watching mentally ill MORONey, Earle Jones and Ludwig Poehlman engaged in "arguments".

MORONey and Earle Jones are a little less insane than (is such a thing possible? ) Ludwig Poehlman. Chuckle.

Kibo Parry M on Harvard's Dr.Hau, Lisa Randall,CIA Kate Heinzelman,NSF Dr.Panchanathan
On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 12:26:24 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Calling oneself "genius", especially without any evidence, is the #1
> flag for identifying a crackpot. REAL geniuses are almost always modest
> about their intelligence. Calling oneself "genius" must be the most
> extreme form of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

> You certainly do! The most glaring lie is calling yourself a genius,
> when you are a charter member of the Room Temperature IQ Society.

> Laughing at you is not "adoration". OK maybe family members may adore
> you as a relative, not for any other reason.

Kibo> I want to fuck her corpse>Harvard's Dr.Hau, Lisa Randall,Kate Heinzelman,Dr.Panchanathan
> Can Kibo Parry M be stopped?? > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > Kibo Parry M on Harvard's Dr. Hau, Dr.Lisa Randall,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart-- AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney???
>
>
> The 30 year long paid for nonstop stalker Kibo Parry Moron-ey (along with the psychology-sickfucks instructing him)
> 3-Can Kibo Parry M be stopped?? > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau, Dr.Lisa Randall, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart-- AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney???
>
> Back in September, AP was giving his condolences to the Queen--, and in steps Kibo & Zelos & Chris smear and Forgery AP.
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> Kibo Parry M. in his CIA disguise
> On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:39:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Putin's minion"
> > fails at math and science:
> >*still* lusting after the Queen's corpse?
> >
> > Are you upset that I haven't been paying enough attention to you? You
> > have been hoping for more punishment for attacking me? Or as Chris
> > states, it's time for your spanking?
> >
> > Are you frustrated that even after you try to make sci.math into a gay
> > pickup bar (complete with your dick pic) you still can't find a
> > replacement bedwarmer?
> >
>
>
> > > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> > >
> >
> > Why just yesterday's Kibo spam indicates he will go ahead
> > Michael Moroney threatens and writes:
> > Dec 21, 2022, 3:38:37 PM
> > to
> > ☠️ of Math and 🏴‍☠️ of Physics
> > > fails at math and science:
> > > Physicists
> >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 11:33:16 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"Pope Arky the Last"
> > > > Village Idiot"
> > > > Oh no! Don't go to town wearing only a tight shirt! At minimum, you'll
> > > > be arrested for not wearing pants!
> > >
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: World std open hate channel for 30 years of nonstop hate spew stalking, how much is the CIA responsible for this and how much the Dr. Panchanathan's NSF???
> > >
> > > Sometime in the 1990s world std in Boston was granted Federal money to set up what is known as a plug in of hate spew, under the name Michael Moroney, with Kibo Parry the main instigator of hate. Where all across the globe, people can dial in under "Michael Moroney" and spew hatred upon AP, without their name, directly showing. A massive amount of the hate spew posted each and every day from the Account of "Michael Moroney" is hate-spewing psychologists. How much of the hate-spew issued by the account "Michael Moroney" comes from the CIA is unknown to me. Recently the account of Moroney was limited to 1 post of hate spew per day against AP, but now it has ratcheted up to its prior-- almost unlimited hate spew to fill every AP thread as was the case from 1995 to 2022. The only solution to a hate spew account of Moroney is total unplug.
> > >
> > > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > Controversy
> > > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > > --- end quote ---
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > by
> > > Michael Moroney Jan 23, 2018, 10:24:48 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: bwr fml & Kibo Parry M on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, failures of Natural Logarithm with their disconnect of Natural Log defined as integral area of Y=1/t in interval 1 to x
> > > by Michael Moroney Sep 21, 2021, 12:08:40 AM
> > >
> > > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> > > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
> > > 1:30 AM
> > > by Michael Moroney
> > >
> > > Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> > > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > > by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM
> > >
> > > Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> > > May 10, 2021 by Michael Moroney
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > > By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM
> > >
> > > Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> > > By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > > By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM
>
> Re: 2-Dan Christensen on spanking Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher for their failure to admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the Ellipse. Dan the crazy insane Canadian is into fetishes with his illogic of 2 OR 1=3 with AND as subtraction.Is it Canadian winter
> by
> Horatio Cornholer 28Dec2022 4:20 PM
>
>
> > > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > > By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > > By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> > > By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> > >
> > > Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> > > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM
> > >
> > > Re: Drs. Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison of MIT are you as dumb as Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
> > > By Michael Moroney 14 posts 94 views Jan 15, 2018, 12:07:24 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > By Michael Moroney 49 posts 519 views, 1/23/18
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > By Michael Moroney 49 posts 519 views updated 2:19 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> > > By Michael Moroney 55 posts 419 views updated 2:18 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > > By Michael Moroney 24 posts 176 views updated 2:17 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > > By Michael Moroney 39 posts 288 views updated 2:16 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > > By Michael Moroney 32 posts 430 views updated 2:15 AM
> > >
> > > Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> > > By Michael Moroney 28 posts 188 views updated 2:14 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as McElroy & __@__.__ //never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV
> > > by Michael Moroney Dec 28, 2017
> > >
> > > Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
> > > by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM
> > >
> > > Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > > By Michael Moroney 29 posts 307 views updated 2:13 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > 3/4/18
> > > By Michael Moroney
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > by Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
> > > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
> > > by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
> > > by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM
> > >
> > > Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
> > > by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
> > > by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM
> > >
> > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> > > by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > > by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM
> > >
> > > Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
> > > by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
> > > By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021
> > >
> > > Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
> > > I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
> > > By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test
> > > By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > 1/23/18
> > > By Michael Moroney
> > >
> > > Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
> > > 10/28/17
> > > By Michael Moroney
> > >
> > > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> > > 8 posts by 2 authors
> > > 12/4/17
> > > By Michael Moroney
> > >
> > > Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > 20 posts by 3 authors
> > > By Michael Moroney
> > >
> > > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > > 20 posts by 2 authors
> > > 4/9/18
> > > By Michael Moroney
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
> > > By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
> > > 2:07 AM
> > > by Michael Moroney
> > >
> > > Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
> > > The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
> > > 1:52 AM
> > > by Michael Moroney
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> > > Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
> > > 1:37 AM
> > > by Michael Moroney
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> > > > > 1481 views
> > > > > by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > > Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
> > > > > By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
> > > > > by Budd Hakken
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears
> > > > > by Roger Davis
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> > > > > by Roger Davis
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
> > > > > by Irwin Houser
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
> > > > > Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
> > > > > 2:15 AM
> > > > > by Buck Futter
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > > > AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
> > > > > 2:07 AM
> > > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
> > > > > Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
> > > > > 2:02 AM
> > > > > by Bret Alva
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > > > How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
> > > > > 1:55 AM
> > > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
> > > > > The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
> > > > > 1:52 AM
> > > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
> > > > > Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
> > > > > 1:47 AM
> > > > > by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking
> > > > > By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> > > > > Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
> > > > > 1:37 AM
> > > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > > >
> > > > > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> > > > > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
> > > > > 1:30 AM
> > > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> > > > By Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > Controversy
> > > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > > --- end quote ---
> > >
> > > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
> > >
> > > Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> > > France Anne Cordova
> > > Subra Suresh
> > > Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> > > Rita R. Colwell
> > > Neal Francis Lane
> > > John Howard Gibbons 1993
> > >
> > > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> > > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > > > >
> > >
> > > AP no longer tolerates 30 year nonstop stalker shitheads like Kibo Parry M.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> >
> > Fred Jeffries replacing Andrew Wiles Oxford Uni math failure?? For at least Jeffries can ask the question which is slant cut of cone -- oval or ellipse, while all that Andrew Wiles can do in math is Run Wiles Hide Wiles
> >
> > > On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 5:59:58 PM UTC-6, FredJeffries wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 1:49:50 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:00:38 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > > > *
> > > > > > Several of you have questioned: Is the ellipse a conic section? The answer depends.
> > > > > > If you are Archimedes Plutonium, the answer is no. If you are one of the other 398,726 mahematicians living today, the answer is yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > earle
> > > > > > *
> > > > > The failed meathead Earle Jones, looks like you have 398,726 subtract 1, as it appears Fred Jeffries below in this thread is starting to question the second axis of symmetry in the slant cut of cone.
> > > > > On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 5:41:05 PM UTC-6, FredJeffries wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:23:18 PM UTC-8, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Disney did a nice animation on it:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > http ----------
> > > > > > But it also fails to show how to find the second axis of symmetry
> >
> > So where is Andrew Wiles failure of math propose where the missing 2nd axis is hiding?? Is it running and hiding along with the math failure Andrew Wiles??
> >
> > 1--Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
> > >
> > > Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
> > > Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.
> > >
> > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sap-heads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > >
> > >
> > > Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> > >
> > > 3rd published book
> > >
> > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > •
> > > •
> > >
> > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > >
> > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > > #12-2, 11th published book
> > >
> > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > Preface:
> > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > >
> > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof..
> > >
> > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> 
> > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)