Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, no wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.

Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney wrote
unread,
8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)



to
>"antiscience"
> fails at math and science:
>
> I want to fuck her corpse

You're really sick, Pluto!

>
> I want to fuck her corpse

You already said that.
>
> I want to fuck her corpse

You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
>
> wanting to fuck her corpse

> I want to fuck her corpse

> I want to fuck her corpse

Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.

Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
58
Job Offer
Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
11:22 PM

Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
, …
68
"Psychoceramics"
Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
11:13 PM


Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.

H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.

On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
>
> >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> >>
> >>"I am the purloined scum"
>
> --
>
> More anagrams:
>
> Archimedes Plutonium =
> SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
>
> ...enough?
>
> earle
> --
> __
> __/\_\
> /\_\/_/
> \/_/\_\ earle
> \/_/ jones
>

Stanford University, math dept.

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

> > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > Arthur B. McDonald
> > Francois Englert
> > Saul Perlmutter
> > Brian P. Schmidt
> > Adam G. Riess
> > Makoto Kobayashi
> > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > John C. Mather
> > George F. Smoot
> > Roy J. Glauber_
> > David J. Gross
> > Hugh David Politzer
> > Frank Wilczek
> > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > Jerome I. Friedman
> > Henry W. Kendall_
> > Richard E. Taylor_
> > Carlo Rubbia
> > Simon van der Meer_
> > William Alfred Fowler_
> > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > James Watson Cronin_
> > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > Steven Weinberg_
> > .
> > .
> > little fishes
> > .
> > .
> > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> >
> > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > .
> > .
> > Edward Witten
> > John Baez
> > Brian Greene
> > Lisa Randall
> > Alan H. Guth
> > Michael E. Brown
> > Konstantin Batygin
> > Ben Bullock
> > Larry Harson
> > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> >
> >
> > #2-1, 137th published book

> > #2-6, 177th published book
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> >
> > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> > #2-7, 178th published book
> >
> > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> >
> >
> > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> >
> > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #2-9, 161st published book
> >
> > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> >
> > Preface:
> > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> >
> > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> >
> > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > y z
> > | /
> > | /
> > |/______ x
> >
> > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> >
> > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> >
> > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> >
> > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> >
> > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Leopard tanks to Ukraine ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃ ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ I███████████████████]. ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...

Earle Jones thinks dishwashing machines are more important than Leopard tanks. But then Stanford Univ is living in a cave of sorts for none of Stanford University professors can admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse.

Earle Jones
Nov 18, 2020, 6:32:00 PM
*
Archie:

There is an opening for a potwasher at Hanover House on the Dartmouth campus. They are looking for someone with experience.

It comes along with email "@dartmouth.edu" which would make people think you know what your are talking about.

Are you interested?

earle
*

Kibo stalker >I want to fuck her corpse, Harvard's Dr.Hau, Lisa Randall, CIA Kate Heinzelman, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dorothy E Aronson, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Ruth Charney,

The much needed and vital Leopard tanks being delayed because of the fool village idiot in Canada wants to count them

███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
I███████████████████].
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...

Jan 21, 2023, 3:45:48 PM (24 hours ago)

Kibo Parry M on Harvard's Dr.Hau, Lisa Randall,CIA Kate Heinzelman,NSF Dr.Panchanathan On

Jan 21, 2023, 9:09:28 PM (18 hours ago)

Ben Bacarisse,Annalena Baerbock,Anja Karliczek,Karl-Henning Rehren,Ansgar Reiners,Metin Tolin, &
Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
unread,
3:27 PM (11 minutes ago)



to
STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

> [snip] ... Dan Christensen ...

[snip]

Time for another spanking, Archie Poo! When will you learn? Once again...

From his antics here at sci.math, it is obvious that AP has abandoned all hope of being recognized as a credible personality. He is a malicious internet troll who now wants only to mislead and confuse students. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives. Is it revenge for his endless string of personal failures in life? Who knows?

In AP's OWN WORDS here that, over the years, he has NEVER renounced or withdrawn:

"Negative numbers are the witches and hobgoblins of insane kook mathematicians. "
--Dec. 7, 2022

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.” (Actually 0.707)
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof

Leopard tanks to Ukraine ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃ ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ I███████████████████]. ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...

Earle Jones thinks dishwashing machines are more important than Leopard tanks. But then Stanford Univ is living in a cave of sorts for none of Stanford University professors can admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse.

Earle Jones
Nov 18, 2020, 6:32:00 PM
*
Archie:

There is an opening for a potwasher at Hanover House on the Dartmouth campus. They are looking for someone with experience.

It comes along with email "@dartmouth.edu" which would make people think you know what your are talking about.

Are you interested?

earle
*

Kibo stalker >I want to fuck her corpse, Harvard's Dr.Hau, Lisa Randall, CIA Kate Heinzelman, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dorothy E Aronson, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Ruth Charney,

The much needed and vital Leopard tanks being delayed because of the fool village idiot in Canada wants to count them

███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
I███████████████████].
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...

Jan 21, 2023, 3:45:48 PM (24 hours ago)

Kibo Parry M on Harvard's Dr.Hau, Lisa Randall,CIA Kate Heinzelman,NSF Dr.Panchanathan On

Jan 21, 2023, 9:09:28 PM (18 hours ago)

Ben Bacarisse,Annalena Baerbock,Anja Karliczek,Karl-Henning Rehren,Ansgar Reiners,Metin Tolin, &
Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
unread,
3:27 PM (11 minutes ago)



to
STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

> [snip] ... Dan Christensen ...

[snip]

Time for another spanking, Archie Poo! When will you learn? Once again...

From his antics here at sci.math, it is obvious that AP has abandoned all hope of being recognized as a credible personality. He is a malicious internet troll who now wants only to mislead and confuse students. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives. Is it revenge for his endless string of personal failures in life? Who knows?

In AP's OWN WORDS here that, over the years, he has NEVER renounced or withdrawn:

"Negative numbers are the witches and hobgoblins of insane kook mathematicians. "
--Dec. 7, 2022

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.” (Actually 0.707)
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof

AP writes: we need no download of the moron Dan Christensen with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. We need a download of Leopard tanks for Ukraine to defend itself.

No wonder it was Caltech that discovered the muon, never the Stanford University, too busy with anagrams, like Earle Jones who transfered from Ga. Tech because Stanford has a PhD program in anagrams.

AP realizes that Stanford University is embroiled in science scandal where the President Marc Tessier-Lavigne allowed corruption of science pictures to be published. So no wonder we have this endless hate spewing spam out of Stanford from the likes of Earle Jones starting way back in the mid 1990s, and Earle is another one of those engineers (so he says but none of his posts show any signs of science-- just ad hominem).

AP suspects that Earle Jones failed Stanford and was pushed out of Stanford in the late 1990s and has a different job, from that of anything dealing with Stanford. I say that because, when MIT realized Jed Decobert was making a pest of himself in sci.math, that MIT counseled Jed and the hate-flinging by Jed stopped.

From 1997 to this very day in 2023, the insane Earle Jones flings hate. So I suspect what happened is Jones was fired or kicked out of Stanford sometime in late 1990s, possibly even by Persis Drell. And that since he is no longer connected to Stanford Univ, no-one there can counsel him. Whereas the day Jed Decobert was counseled by MIT, his hate spew stopped that very day. Maybe they told him-- any more of this hate spew and you have your pink slip. For Earle, I am guessing they pink slipped him by late 1990s. Even though Earle likes to brag that he is from Stanford Univ. Yes, a failure of Stanford more likely, for what Stanford student or teacher spends time in making anagrams and hate spews them every month of every year for 25 years, like the insane Earle Jones.

> Douglas Osheroff make up wild proposals with amatrurish experiments to "prove" Mason Yearian stupid findings.

>
> What Stanford Univ call the "Truth of Mathematics" is Marc Tessier-Lavigne mixed-up version of the real truth.
>
> The fact is that Persis Drell do not know enough about mathematics, even with neuroscience degree, to begin to understand anything at all about the subject.
>
> Douglas Osheroff make up wild proposals with amatrurish experiments to "prove" Mason Yearian stupid findings.
>
> David Ritson, I hesitate to tell H. Alan Schwettman, this, but John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, are a floating turd in the punchbowl of life. Go back to Mecklenburg and raise sheep. They will understand Stanley Wojcicki.
>

On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
>
> > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > can be re-arranged to spell
> > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > and many other delightful phrases
> >
> > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > I am an idiot.
>
> *
> Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
>
> My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
>
> earle
> *

Stanford University, math dept.

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

CalTech math dept

Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,

President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
Caltech Physics Dept

Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin

On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
>
> >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> >>
> >>"I am the purloined scum"
>
> --
>
> More anagrams:
>
> Archimedes Plutonium =
> SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
>
> ...enough?
>
> earle
> --
> __
> __/\_\
> /\_\/_/
> \/_/\_\ earle
> \/_/ jones
>

Earle Jones, Stanford Univ threatening the life of AP. This 25 year nonstop stalker keeps demonizing AP, and one would think Stanford would have put a halt to it decades ago-- Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>
> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>
> Enjoy!
>
> earle
> *

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.

No wonder it was Caltech that discovered the muon, never Stanford University, too busy with anagrams, like Earle Jones who transfered from Ga.Tech (probably??) because Stanford has a PhD program in anagrams. Stanford must spend half of each day doing anagrams like people on buses or trains doing crossword puzzles. No wonder it was left up to Caltech to find the Muon, why Earle has a tough time with Ohm's law. Indicative of all science on Stanford campus.

AP realizes that Stanford University is embroiled in science scandal where the President Marc Tessier-Lavigne allowed corruption of science pictures to be published. So no wonder we have this endless hate spewing spam out of Stanford from the likes of Earle Jones starting way back in the mid 1990s, and Earle is another one of those engineers (so he says but none of his posts show any signs of science-- just ad hominem).

AP suspects that Earle Jones failed Stanford and was pushed out of Stanford in the late 1990s and has a different job, from that of anything dealing with Stanford. I say that because, when MIT realized Jed Decobert was making a pest of himself in sci.math, that MIT counseled Jed and the hate-flinging by Jed stopped.

From 1997 to this very day in 2023, the insane Earle Jones flings hate. So I suspect what happened is Jones was fired or kicked out of Stanford sometime in late 1990s, possibly even by Persis Drell. And that since he is no longer connected to Stanford Univ, no-one there can counsel him. Whereas the day Jed Decobert was counseled by MIT, his hate spew stopped that very day. Maybe they told him-- any more of this hate spew and you have your pink slip. For Earle, I am guessing they pink slipped him by late 1990s. Even though Earle likes to brag that he is from Stanford Univ. Yes, a failure of Stanford more likely, for what Stanford student or teacher spends time in making anagrams and hate spews them every month of every year for 25 years, like the insane Earle Jones.

> Douglas Osheroff make up wild proposals with amatrurish experiments to "prove" Mason Yearian stupid findings.

>
> What Stanford Univ call the "Truth of Mathematics" is Marc Tessier-Lavigne mixed-up version of the real truth.
>
> The fact is that Persis Drell do not know enough about mathematics, even with neuroscience degree, to begin to understand anything at all about the subject.
>
> Douglas Osheroff make up wild proposals with amatrurish experiments to "prove" Mason Yearian stupid findings.
>
> David Ritson, I hesitate to tell H. Alan Schwettman, this, but John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, are a floating turd in the punchbowl of life. Go back to Mecklenburg and raise sheep. They will understand Stanley Wojcicki.
>

On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
>
> > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > can be re-arranged to spell
> > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > and many other delightful phrases
> >
> > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > I am an idiot.
>
> *
> Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
>
> My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
>
> earle
> *

Stanford University, math dept.

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

CalTech math dept

Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,

President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
Caltech Physics Dept

Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
Konstantin Batygin

Earle Jones, Stanford Univ threatening the life of AP. This 25 year nonstop stalker keeps demonizing AP, and one would think Stanford would have put a halt to it decades ago-- Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu

President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
Provost: Persis Drell (physics)

Stanford physics dept.

Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
>
> Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
>
> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
>
> Enjoy!
>
> earle
> *

Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.

If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".

Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.

FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.

A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.

But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)



to
Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.

FromTheRafters,Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, no wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.

FromTheRafters
434
unread,
Who recognizes these true pioneers of dark numbers?
After serious thinking Chris M. Thomasson wrote : > On 1/23/2023 9:40 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
5:02 PM


> Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote
> unread,
> 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> >"antiscience"
> > fails at math and science:
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You're really sick, Pluto!
>
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You already said that.
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
>
> Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
>
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> 58
> Job Offer
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
> 11:22 PM
> 
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> , …
> 68
> "Psychoceramics"
> Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> 11:13 PM
> 
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
>
> H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
>
>
> On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> >
> > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > >>
> > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> >
> > --
> >
> > More anagrams:
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> >
> > ...enough?
> >
> > earle
> > --
> > __
> > __/\_\
> > /\_\/_/
> > \/_/\_\ earle
> > \/_/ jones
> >
>
>
>
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
>
>
>
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > .
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > >
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Edward Witten
> > > John Baez
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-1, 137th published book
> 
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > >
> > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > >
> > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > >
> > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > y z
> > > | /
> > > | /
> > > |/______ x
> > >
> > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > >
> > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > >
> > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > >
> > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > >
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Now when was the first moment that one could say-- "hey, we have a crazy wacko, out of Stanford here-- Earle Jones"???

Well, quite easily for back in 1990s we see a belching of posts from Earle Jones of anagrams.

So we have a so called acclaimed University-- Stanford University, yet a continual spew of anagrams, from Earle Jones who says he is a electrical engineer from Ga.Tech and Stanford, yet the fool has problems with Ohm's Law, and the fool constantly dabbles in anagrams.

So something is not right in this picture, that even a Grade School student reading sci.math or sci.physics would begin to question. And come to the same conclusions AP came in 1990s, that Earle Jones needs psychiatric treatment, starting with his penchant of anagrams.

Now when was the first moment that one could say-- "hey, we have a crazy wacko, out of Stanford here-- Earle Jones"???

Did Earle Jones, the Arsewipe of Stanford University, an adult in 1990s ever realize his hate spew was permanent? Did he realize his life we be likely defined by his hate spew? No, that sickfucks cannot realize the consequences of their bad behavior. And the Internet was brand new. But here it is some 30 years later, yet the sickfuck Earle Jones, still pouring out hate-spew with his "Psychoceramics" his "job offer" his ellipse nonsense. So AP must consider the idea that Stanford had fired Jones in the 1990s, and this firing caused Jones to be a hate-spewing arsewipe in sci.math and sci.physics..

Well, quite easily for back in 1990s we see a belching of posts from Earle Jones of anagrams.

So we have a so called acclaimed University-- Stanford University, yet a continual spew of anagrams, from Earle Jones who says he is a electrical engineer from Ga.Tech and Stanford, yet the fool has problems with Ohm's Law, and the fool constantly dabbles in anagrams.

So something is not right in this picture, that even a Grade School student reading sci.math or sci.physics would begin to question. And come to the same conclusions AP came in 1990s, that Earle Jones needs psychiatric treatment, starting with his penchant of anagrams.

Now when was the first moment that one could say-- "hey, we have a crazy wacko, out of Stanford here-- Earle Jones"???

Did Earle Jones, the Arsewipe of Stanford University, an adult in 1990s ever realize his hate spew was permanent? Did he realize his life we be likely defined by his hate spew? No, that sickfucks cannot realize the consequences of their bad behavior. And the Internet was brand new. But here it is some 30 years later, yet the sickfuck Earle Jones, still pouring out hate-spew with his "Psychoceramics" his "job offer" his ellipse nonsense. So AP must consider the idea that Stanford had fired Jones in the 1990s, and this firing caused Jones to be a hate-spewing arsewipe in sci.math and sci.physics..

Well, quite easily for back in 1990s we see a belching of posts from Earle Jones of anagrams.

So we have a so called acclaimed University-- Stanford University, yet a continual spew of anagrams, from Earle Jones who says he is a electrical engineer from Ga.Tech and Stanford, yet the fool has problems with Ohm's Law, and the fool constantly dabbles in anagrams.

So something is not right in this picture, that even a Grade School student reading sci.math or sci.physics would begin to question. And come to the same conclusions AP came in 1990s, that Earle Jones needs psychiatric treatment, starting with his penchant of anagrams.

If Caltech had not discovered the muon in the 1930s, I doubt that Stanford would have done it. Probably someone at Berkeley for Stanford in physics has proven to be a failure. We can see it in their president using fake photos in research reports. We can see it in Earle Jones spending more time on anagrams than improving his teaching.

No wonder it was Caltech that discovered the muon, never Stanford University, too busy with anagrams, like Earle Jones who transfered from Ga.Tech (probably??) because Stanford has a PhD program in anagrams. Stanford must spend half of each day doing anagrams like people on buses or trains doing crossword puzzles. No wonder it was left up to Caltech to find the Muon, why Earle has a tough time with Ohm's law. Indicative of all science on Stanford campus.
>
>
>
> AP realizes that Stanford University is embroiled in science scandal where the President Marc Tessier-Lavigne allowed corruption of science pictures to be published. So no wonder we have this endless hate spewing spam out of Stanford from the likes of Earle Jones starting way back in the mid 1990s, and Earle is another one of those engineers (so he says but none of his posts show any signs of science-- just ad hominem).
>
> AP suspects that Earle Jones failed Stanford and was pushed out of Stanford in the late 1990s and has a different job, from that of anything dealing with Stanford. I say that because, when MIT realized Jed Decobert was making a pest of himself in sci.math, that MIT counseled Jed and the hate-flinging by Jed stopped.
>
> From 1997 to this very day in 2023, the insane Earle Jones flings hate. So I suspect what happened is Jones was fired or kicked out of Stanford sometime in late 1990s, possibly even by Persis Drell. And that since he is no longer connected to Stanford Univ, no-one there can counsel him. Whereas the day Jed Decobert was counseled by MIT, his hate spew stopped that very day. Maybe they told him-- any more of this hate spew and you have your pink slip. For Earle, I am guessing they pink slipped him by late 1990s. Even though Earle likes to brag that he is from Stanford Univ. Yes, a failure of Stanford more likely, for what Stanford student or teacher spends time in making anagrams and hate spews them every month of every year for 25 years, like the insane Earle Jones.
>
> > Douglas Osheroff make up wild proposals with amatrurish experiments to "prove" Mason Yearian stupid findings.
>
> >
> > What Stanford Univ call the "Truth of Mathematics" is Marc Tessier-Lavigne mixed-up version of the real truth.
> >
> > The fact is that Persis Drell do not know enough about mathematics, even with neuroscience degree, to begin to understand anything at all about the subject.
> >
> > Douglas Osheroff make up wild proposals with amatrurish experiments to "prove" Mason Yearian stupid findings.
> >
> > David Ritson, I hesitate to tell H. Alan Schwettman, this, but John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, are a floating turd in the punchbowl of life. Go back to Mecklenburg and raise sheep. They will understand Stanley Wojcicki.
> >
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> CalTech math dept
>
> Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
>
> President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> Caltech Physics Dept
>
> Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> Konstantin Batygin
> 
> Earle Jones, Stanford Univ threatening the life of AP. This 25 year nonstop stalker keeps demonizing AP, and one would think Stanford would have put a halt to it decades ago-- Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > *
> > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
> >
> > Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
> >
> > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
> >
> > Enjoy!
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.
>
> If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".
>
> Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.
>
> FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.
>
> A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.
>
> But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.
> 
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.
>
> And is the reason why one of kibo Parry's second page hit in a Google Search talks about---
>
> What made the Internet bad 30 years ago still applies today --- Quartz
>
> ... Influencers, famous for nothing but their fame? Consider James "Kibo" Parry...
>
> AP writes: I did not read the full website as to what made it bad, but I suspect it is "stalkers". When you have a free access and freedom of speech, it tends to degenerate into "stalkers of an insane mind take over."
>
> AP writes: so, why not pull the plug on stalkers, especially Jones and Parry-- never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics, just attack after attack after attack is all these insane knuckleheads do.
>
> The MASTER in Dr. Who: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,,,, ha ha ha ha ha
>
> "Psychoceramics"
> 4 views
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM
> to sci.math
> 
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM
> to sci.math
> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> the mud.
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jun 11, 2021, 8:44:55 AM (2 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
> 0 views
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> unread,
> 8:35 AM (1 minute ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
>
> AP is currently working on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with a Geometry proof, the first valid proof of FTC, in fact. And working in sci.math..
>
> AP is currently working on TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College, in sci.physics, along with books on the drought in Western USA.
>
> Yet for 28 years of stalking by Kibo Parry Moroney and his many gang of stalkers-- Earle Jones, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, recently Ross.
>
> Attack attack each and every day for 28 years. Never a post on math in sci.math, never a post on physics in sci.physics, just a 28 year long demonization of AP, with the aim of kicking AP out of sci.math and sci.physics.
>
> Just yesterday Earle Jones titles a thread Psychoceramics on AP, and Kibo follows up with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass"
>
> So, I ask Stanford Univ-- where is this hatred by Earle Jones going? Certainly no contribution to sci.math or sci.physics, which leads me to believe the only clear direction is that Earle Jones does violence. Can Stanford or the FBI check to see if Earle Jones is violent, is he buying guns and ammunition, for he sure is not posting math to sci.math nor physics to sci.physics. Could he be violent on the Stanford campus?
>
> Same question-- and more so for Kibo Parry Moroney who spent 28 years of bad mouthing AP, and just yesterday raised the sceptre of "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". An event that occurred in the 1990s and here it is 2021. Kibo never does math in sci.math, never does physics in sci.physics. And where is all that hatred going? Is it going to where Kibo stocks up on guns and ammo. For Stalking behavior of 28 years nonstop is insanity, and insanity can lead to violence. FBI, can you please check up on Kibo Parry Moroney, for I certainly never want to see him show up on my backdoor.
>
> Google, what sort of definition do you have for ABUSE. I mean, is not stalking a person for 28 years nonstop, is that not abuse to the maximum? And can this stalking ever stop or will it end in Kibo Parry Moroney violence. When stalkers never get their way on victimizing other people, they end up committing violence on their victims.
>
> AP is doing Calculus and Physics and Weather Drought. Earle Jones is doing pyschoceramics in sci.math and Kibo Parry Moroney is doing 1990s "Dartmouth finally fired his ass" in sci.math on Jun 11, 2021.
>
> Google, Stanford, FBI, I can only see one direction of this ugly stalking-- Violence by these stalkers, perhaps on Stanford Univ, perhaps on AP.
>
>
> "Psychoceramics"
> 20 views
>
>
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM (8 hours ago)
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> 
> 
> Michael Moroney
>
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM (7 hours ago)
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
>
> 
> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> the mud.
>
> Archie (AP) has gone poetic
> 14 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> earle
>
> Mar 12, 2021, 10:48:35 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> *
> Looks like our Archimedes Plutonium (aka Archie, AP) had gone into the poetic/scriptual domain.
> This is a very good thing!
> Whatever gets him out of mathematics and science and into the poetry of the earth is a good thing.
>
> He may be able to achieve some fame and notoriety in this emotional world that he has never achieved in the field of science or mathematics. I know -- he has "published" a hundred or so "books" courtesy of the Amazon freebies.
>
> But I think his future is in the linguistic and poetic domain of our thinking. I realize that his first language is not English, but his command of our language is not bad at all.
>
> Keep it up, Archie! Tell us what your think about the domain of our existence. Have you read the book, "Sapiens" -- I recommend it strongly. It is a history of existence, beginning with the 'big bang' and ending yesterday.
>
> Read it!
>
> And avoid any urge to lecture on mathematics and science.
>
> Cheers!
>
> earle
> *
>
>
> Job Offer
> 305 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> Earle Jones
>
> Nov 18, 2020, 6:32:00 PM
> to
> *
> Archie:
>
> There is an opening for a potwasher at Hanover House on the Dartmouth campus. They are looking for someone with experience.
>
> It comes along with email "@dartmouth.edu" which would make people think you know what your are talking about.
>
> Are you interested?
>
> earle
> *
> Ohm's Law
> 48 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Jan 27, 2021, 12:40:18 AM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> Questions for Archie Poo:
>
> 1. What is Ohm's Law?
>
> 2. You are standing outside and it begins to rain.
> What do you do?
>
> earle
> *
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Jan 25, 2021, 6:22:03 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> On Mon Jan 25 14:24:05 2021 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > All of my college Teaching True Physics textbooks will follow that history of math form A= B*C*D with its secondary math form of x^2/A^2
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------
> > Table of Contents
> > ---------------------------
> >
> > 1) History of the volume of rectangular box V= L*W*H, and cube, earlier than 4,020 years ago, that starts physics.
> >
> > 2) Ancient Greek history of Atomic theory, magnetism and electricity.
> >
> > 3) Ancient Greek history of Magnetism and Electricity.
> >
> [...clipalot...]
>
> 150 books and you still don't know Ohm's law!
>
> earle
> *
>
> Important Discovery
> 31 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Dec 13, 2020, 7:27:55 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> *
> I am happy and honored to be able to report an important discovery.
> Mathematician and Physicist, Archimedes Plutonium, announced (on June 3, 2015) that, based on his research, the largest finite number is equal to 10^604.
> I want to report that I have found that this is in error: I have found a larger nujmber -- two in fact.
> My research has uncovered this number: 10^604 + 43 is larger than Plutonium's largest number.
> And then I discovered this:
> The number 10^605 is larger (by a factor of ten) than Plutonium's largest number.
> I believe that further research along the lines of my own work will yield more examples.
>
> Earle Jones
> *
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 11:30:20 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
>
> > *
> > Dan: Greetings!
> >
> > You know, and I know, that the so-called "new mathematics" of Archimedes Plutonium is a sad and dangerous set of publications (he now has about 20 "books" that can be downloaded at Amazon.) An unsophisticated mother who wants her kids to have a jump-start in mathematics could be persuaded by his off-base ramblings to present these wild ideas to their kids.
> >
> > That would be a tragedy.
> >
> > Do you think that we could propose to the editors at Amazon that they should somehow read the stuff that they are making available to the public? Do you think that Amazon even reviews the stuff that they sell? I would doubt it.
> >
> > Of all of APs books, I have only seen one review, and it was right to the point: Idiocy, a terrible book!
> >
> > AP is incapable of learning. He makes up his stuff on the fly and then proceeds to provide a "proof." It is obvious that he has no idea of the meaning of a mathematical proof. His pathetic "proof" that the ellipse is not a conic section is a third-grade half-ass attempt, with folding waxy magazine covers and dropping Mason-jar lids to"prove" his preconceived notions.
> >
> > He is clever and very creative. But totally misdirected and incapable of learning. Is it worth an attempt to make this known to Amazon and to suggest that they remove his trash mathematics?
> >
> > I am not a mathematics expert. I was a TA in the Math department at Georgia Tech and taught this stuff to freshmen. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Tech and an MS in EE from Stanford.
> >
> > It bothers me to see the useless ramblings of AP, as well as a few others (Gabriel, et al), receive publication on our NewsGroup and in the Amazon publication list.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 8, 1995 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <3r7klr$8...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, Archimedes Pl writes:
> >
> > >In article <D9tyE...@cwi.nl>
> > >d...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
> > >
> > >> You probably misunderstood. Most will have talked about "unit", not 1;
> > >> at least I did. A unit is a number that has an inverse. In the
> > 10-adics
> > >> all numbers except numbers that are multiples of 2 and 5 are units.
> > That
> > >> is why in the 10-adics only 2 and 5 are prime; units are not prime. In
> > the
> > >> "counting numbers" only 1 is a unit.
> > >
> > > I concur Dik.
> > > Say Dik, if I make the doubly infinites as vectors, wherein the
> > >leftward string is the direction and the rightward string the size
> > >(realizing that the size S is 0<S<1 ) in such a way that each of these
> > >vectors is the arctanh of a Ordered Real/Complex number?
> > >
> > =============
> >
> > To put the math in terms that even Dartmouth students will understand:
> >
> > CalTech 1
> > Dartmouth 0
> >
> > =============
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> 
> > We want our Internet back! Get rid of Spam.
> > See http://www.cauce.org
>
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson*, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> Earle Jones talks about Stanford Univ; and why they are physics failures with their proton-electron of 938 to 0.5MeV which no hydrogen atom can exist, for the true proton is 840MeV to 105MeV muon
> 1 post by 1 author 
>
>
>
> 
> me (Archimedes Plutonium change)
> 
>
>
> 7:44 PM (2 minutes ago)
>
>
>
> Earle Jones says he is from Stanford, but I find that hard to believe. But then again, perhaps why Stanford University fails in physics, as they failed with 2 OR 3 = 5, they failed with ellipse as a conic when it really is a cylinder section, they failed with ever a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and they failed bigtime with thinking the electron is 0.5MeV when actually the true electron inside of atoms is the muon.
>
> So, Earle Jones is a failure of science because all he can do is "ad hominem with his 25 year long nonstop attacks of AP". So, probably the reason Stanford is a failure like Jones, is because they spend all their time in anagrams rather than in the particle physics figuring out the true proton is 840 MeV with a muon stuck inside the proton doing the Faraday Law.
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson*, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> Stanford Univ physics dept.
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 11:30:20 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
>
> > *
> > Dan: Greetings!
> >
> > You know, and I know, that the so-called "new mathematics" of Archimedes Plutonium is a sad and dangerous set of publications (he now has about 20 "books" that can be downloaded at Amazon.) An unsophisticated mother who wants her kids to have a jump-start in mathematics could be persuaded by his off-base ramblings to present these wild ideas to their kids.
> >
> > That would be a tragedy.
> >
> > Do you think that we could propose to the editors at Amazon that they should somehow read the stuff that they are making available to the public? Do you think that Amazon even reviews the stuff that they sell? I would doubt it.
> >
> > Of all of APs books, I have only seen one review, and it was right to the point: Idiocy, a terrible book!
> >
> > AP is incapable of learning. He makes up his stuff on the fly and then proceeds to provide a "proof." It is obvious that he has no idea of the meaning of a mathematical proof. His pathetic "proof" that the ellipse is not a conic section is a third-grade half-ass attempt, with folding waxy magazine covers and dropping Mason-jar lids to"prove" his preconceived notions.
> >
> > He is clever and very creative. But totally misdirected and incapable of learning. Is it worth an attempt to make this known to Amazon and to suggest that they remove his trash mathematics?
> >
> > I am not a mathematics expert. I was a TA in the Math department at Georgia Tech and taught this stuff to freshmen. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Tech and an MS in EE from Stanford.
> >
> > It bothers me to see the useless ramblings of AP, as well as a few others (Gabriel, et al), receive publication on our NewsGroup and in the Amazon publication list.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 8, 1995 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <3r7klr$8...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, Archimedes Pl writes:
> >
> > >In article <D9tyE...@cwi.nl>
> > >d...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
> > >
> > >> You probably misunderstood. Most will have talked about "unit", not 1;
> > >> at least I did. A unit is a number that has an inverse. In the
> > 10-adics
> > >> all numbers except numbers that are multiples of 2 and 5 are units.
> > That
> > >> is why in the 10-adics only 2 and 5 are prime; units are not prime. In
> > the
> > >> "counting numbers" only 1 is a unit.
> > >
> > > I concur Dik.
> > > Say Dik, if I make the doubly infinites as vectors, wherein the
> > >leftward string is the direction and the rightward string the size
> > >(realizing that the size S is 0<S<1 ) in such a way that each of these
> > >vectors is the arctanh of a Ordered Real/Complex number?
> > >
> > =============
> >
> > To put the math in terms that even Dartmouth students will understand:
> >
> > CalTech 1
> > Dartmouth 0
> >
> > =============
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> 
> > We want our Internet back! Get rid of Spam.
> > See http://www.cauce.org
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson*, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 11:30:20 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
>
> > *
> > Dan: Greetings!
> >
> > You know, and I know, that the so-called "new mathematics" of Archimedes Plutonium is a sad and dangerous set of publications (he now has about 20 "books" that can be downloaded at Amazon.) An unsophisticated mother who wants her kids to have a jump-start in mathematics could be persuaded by his off-base ramblings to present these wild ideas to their kids.
> >
> > That would be a tragedy.
> >
> > Do you think that we could propose to the editors at Amazon that they should somehow read the stuff that they are making available to the public? Do you think that Amazon even reviews the stuff that they sell? I would doubt it.
> >
> > Of all of APs books, I have only seen one review, and it was right to the point: Idiocy, a terrible book!
> >
> > AP is incapable of learning. He makes up his stuff on the fly and then proceeds to provide a "proof." It is obvious that he has no idea of the meaning of a mathematical proof. His pathetic "proof" that the ellipse is not a conic section is a third-grade half-ass attempt, with folding waxy magazine covers and dropping Mason-jar lids to"prove" his preconceived notions.
> >
> > He is clever and very creative. But totally misdirected and incapable of learning. Is it worth an attempt to make this known to Amazon and to suggest that they remove his trash mathematics?
> >
> > I am not a mathematics expert. I was a TA in the Math department at Georgia Tech and taught this stuff to freshmen. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Tech and an MS in EE from Stanford.
> >
> > It bothers me to see the useless ramblings of AP, as well as a few others (Gabriel, et al), receive publication on our NewsGroup and in the Amazon publication list.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 8, 1995 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <3r7klr$8...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, Archimedes Pl writes:
> >
> > >In article <D9tyE...@cwi.nl>
> > >d...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
> > >
> > >> You probably misunderstood. Most will have talked about "unit", not 1;
> > >> at least I did. A unit is a number that has an inverse. In the
> > 10-adics
> > >> all numbers except numbers that are multiples of 2 and 5 are units.
> > That
> > >> is why in the 10-adics only 2 and 5 are prime; units are not prime. In
> > the
> > >> "counting numbers" only 1 is a unit.
> > >
> > > I concur Dik.
> > > Say Dik, if I make the doubly infinites as vectors, wherein the
> > >leftward string is the direction and the rightward string the size
> > >(realizing that the size S is 0<S<1 ) in such a way that each of these
> > >vectors is the arctanh of a Ordered Real/Complex number?
> > >
> > =============
> >
> > To put the math in terms that even Dartmouth students will understand:
> >
> > CalTech 1
> > Dartmouth 0
> >
> > =============
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> 
> > We want our Internet back! Get rid of Spam.
> > See http://www.cauce.org

Earle Jones waxing on the fact the Stanford Univ math professor failures cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, why, those fools cannot even admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse.

On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 12:01:46 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
>Re: sickfuck spammers Jim Burns,WM-- never a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus, and his mindless Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and geometry failure who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse

>is a mixed-up individual who attempts to build his own mathematics and physics status by downgrading others. He likes to list all of the members of a mathematics (or physics) department so he can judge and insult them efficiently. They are all poor and failures in their field. When a great mathematical newcomer comes along
>
> Some day, owing to his amazingly wide and wild thinking, he might come up with some truly useful finding. That would be the best of all worlds. But I amnot betting on that.
>
> Cheers!
>
> earle
> (BS Electrical Engineering, Georgia Tech, MS EE Stanford)

Earle, you forgot your only true credential-- Stanford Uni Arsewipe.

My 3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#12-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

If Caltech had not discovered the muon in the 1930s, I doubt that Stanford would have done it. Probably someone at Berkeley for Stanford in physics has proven to be a failure. We can see it in their president using fake photos in research reports. We can see it in Earle Jones spending more time on anagrams than improving his teaching.


No wonder it was Caltech that discovered the muon, never Stanford University, too busy with anagrams, like Earle Jones who transfered from Ga.Tech (probably??) because Stanford has a PhD program in anagrams. Stanford must spend half of each day doing anagrams like people on buses or trains doing crossword puzzles. No wonder it was left up to Caltech to find the Muon, why Earle has a tough time with Ohm's law. Indicative of all science on Stanford campus.
>
>
>
> AP realizes that Stanford University is embroiled in science scandal where the President Marc Tessier-Lavigne allowed corruption of science pictures to be published. So no wonder we have this endless hate spewing spam out of Stanford from the likes of Earle Jones starting way back in the mid 1990s, and Earle is another one of those engineers (so he says but none of his posts show any signs of science-- just ad hominem).
>
> AP suspects that Earle Jones failed Stanford and was pushed out of Stanford in the late 1990s and has a different job, from that of anything dealing with Stanford. I say that because, when MIT realized Jed Decobert was making a pest of himself in sci.math, that MIT counseled Jed and the hate-flinging by Jed stopped.
>
> From 1997 to this very day in 2023, the insane Earle Jones flings hate. So I suspect what happened is Jones was fired or kicked out of Stanford sometime in late 1990s, possibly even by Persis Drell. And that since he is no longer connected to Stanford Univ, no-one there can counsel him. Whereas the day Jed Decobert was counseled by MIT, his hate spew stopped that very day. Maybe they told him-- any more of this hate spew and you have your pink slip. For Earle, I am guessing they pink slipped him by late 1990s. Even though Earle likes to brag that he is from Stanford Univ. Yes, a failure of Stanford more likely, for what Stanford student or teacher spends time in making anagrams and hate spews them every month of every year for 25 years, like the insane Earle Jones.
>
> > Douglas Osheroff make up wild proposals with amatrurish experiments to "prove" Mason Yearian stupid findings.
>
> >
> > What Stanford Univ call the "Truth of Mathematics" is Marc Tessier-Lavigne mixed-up version of the real truth.
> >
> > The fact is that Persis Drell do not know enough about mathematics, even with neuroscience degree, to begin to understand anything at all about the subject.
> >
> > Douglas Osheroff make up wild proposals with amatrurish experiments to "prove" Mason Yearian stupid findings.
> >
> > David Ritson, I hesitate to tell H. Alan Schwettman, this, but John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, are a floating turd in the punchbowl of life. Go back to Mecklenburg and raise sheep. They will understand Stanley Wojcicki.
> >
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> CalTech math dept
>
> Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari
> Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris
> Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan
> Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov,
> Elena Mantovan, Yi NI,
>
> President Thomas F. Rosenbaum (physics)
> Caltech Physics Dept
>
> Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi
> Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips,
> John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel,
> Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown,
> Konstantin Batygin
> 
> Earle Jones, Stanford Univ threatening the life of AP. This 25 year nonstop stalker keeps demonizing AP, and one would think Stanford would have put a halt to it decades ago-- Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > *
> > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
> >
> > Our friend Archie (AP) has been famous for more years than we imagined! He is the first-mentioned example psychoceramicist -- see paragraph two.
> >
> > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~toby/writing/Guardian/ceramics.htm
> >
> > Enjoy!
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, not much different than Donald Trump stirring up the hatred to storm the Capital Building, and now we have Jones & Parry whipping up the hatred for 28 years to what? Violence on Stanford Univ or AP? Stalkers are too dumb to know, their endgame is violence especially as they recruit young ones to join their stalker hate team.
>
> If it is Stanford Univ or even Dartmouth College, would it be a first for those institutions? I mean, this is 2021, and Kibo Parry Moroney is still lost in 1990s with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". And then the Kibo Parry along with Jan Burse maps out a mapp to AP's home-- as to say-- like Donald Trump-- "down Pennsylvania Ave".
>
> Or like Earle Jones setting up psychoceramics all over Stanford Univ for what Earle? For target practice, Earle being such a oaf, not realizing his ratcheted hatred ends up in violence.
>
> FBI, Google, Stanford Univ, Dartmouth College, you have the power to stop this hatred ratcheting from these fools of 28 years of stalking AP, for if not stopped, I hate to see the end result of this 28 year long nonstop hatred of AP.
>
> A few years back, on my doorstep was a crowd of 3 college youngsters, laughing and giggling and knocking on the door. I know the mentality of young people out on a prank, and they wanted me to come out, but, knowing that fools like Parry and Jones have whipped up so much hatred in the last 28 years, that something told me, --- talk to them through the window pane, because in all likelihood, this crowd of 3 maybe a whipped up crowd like the hatemongers who stormed the Capitol under the Trump hatred. So, I kept asking the one, what was his name and what did he want, and never any direct answer, so I told the bunch, leave or I call the police.
>
> But, as Earle Jones psychoceramic hatred and Kibo Parry Moroney "fire his ass" continue to spew hatred in sci.math and sci.physics, someday, that hatred leads to Violence. Luckily, 28 years of nonstop Parry hatred has averted violence, but none of us are getting any younger and the continued Parry and Jones hate stirrings is more than likely to end up in a bad ending.
> 
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:30:05 AM (2 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Two insane stalkers of sci.math, Kibo for 28 years, terribly insane, and Jones on and off for 25 years. Both insane, for their game is hatred, never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics. Maybe both were failures in science, and this is how they repay society, by stalking hatred in newsgroups.
>
> And is the reason why one of kibo Parry's second page hit in a Google Search talks about---
>
> What made the Internet bad 30 years ago still applies today --- Quartz
>
> ... Influencers, famous for nothing but their fame? Consider James "Kibo" Parry...
>
> AP writes: I did not read the full website as to what made it bad, but I suspect it is "stalkers". When you have a free access and freedom of speech, it tends to degenerate into "stalkers of an insane mind take over."
>
> AP writes: so, why not pull the plug on stalkers, especially Jones and Parry-- never any math in sci.math, never any physics in sci.physics, just attack after attack after attack is all these insane knuckleheads do.
>
> The MASTER in Dr. Who: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,,,, ha ha ha ha ha
>
> "Psychoceramics"
> 4 views
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM
> to sci.math
> 
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM
> to sci.math
> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> the mud.
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Jun 11, 2021, 8:44:55 AM (2 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
> 0 views
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> unread,
> 8:35 AM (1 minute ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo Parry Moroney, is it heading for Violence on Stanford Univ or AP, for it only keeps escalating higher and higher. FBI, please make a gun check on Kibo and Earle Jones.
>
> AP is currently working on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with a Geometry proof, the first valid proof of FTC, in fact. And working in sci.math..
>
> AP is currently working on TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College, in sci.physics, along with books on the drought in Western USA.
>
> Yet for 28 years of stalking by Kibo Parry Moroney and his many gang of stalkers-- Earle Jones, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, recently Ross.
>
> Attack attack each and every day for 28 years. Never a post on math in sci.math, never a post on physics in sci.physics, just a 28 year long demonization of AP, with the aim of kicking AP out of sci.math and sci.physics.
>
> Just yesterday Earle Jones titles a thread Psychoceramics on AP, and Kibo follows up with "Dartmouth finally fired his ass"
>
> So, I ask Stanford Univ-- where is this hatred by Earle Jones going? Certainly no contribution to sci.math or sci.physics, which leads me to believe the only clear direction is that Earle Jones does violence. Can Stanford or the FBI check to see if Earle Jones is violent, is he buying guns and ammunition, for he sure is not posting math to sci.math nor physics to sci.physics. Could he be violent on the Stanford campus?
>
> Same question-- and more so for Kibo Parry Moroney who spent 28 years of bad mouthing AP, and just yesterday raised the sceptre of "Dartmouth finally fired his ass". An event that occurred in the 1990s and here it is 2021. Kibo never does math in sci.math, never does physics in sci.physics. And where is all that hatred going? Is it going to where Kibo stocks up on guns and ammo. For Stalking behavior of 28 years nonstop is insanity, and insanity can lead to violence. FBI, can you please check up on Kibo Parry Moroney, for I certainly never want to see him show up on my backdoor.
>
> Google, what sort of definition do you have for ABUSE. I mean, is not stalking a person for 28 years nonstop, is that not abuse to the maximum? And can this stalking ever stop or will it end in Kibo Parry Moroney violence. When stalkers never get their way on victimizing other people, they end up committing violence on their victims.
>
> AP is doing Calculus and Physics and Weather Drought. Earle Jones is doing pyschoceramics in sci.math and Kibo Parry Moroney is doing 1990s "Dartmouth finally fired his ass" in sci.math on Jun 11, 2021.
>
> Google, Stanford, FBI, I can only see one direction of this ugly stalking-- Violence by these stalkers, perhaps on Stanford Univ, perhaps on AP.
>
>
> "Psychoceramics"
> 20 views
>
>
> Skip to first unread message
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Jun 11, 2021, 12:00 AM (8 hours ago)
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> 
> 
> Michael Moroney
>
> Jun 11, 2021, 1:13 AM (7 hours ago)
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
>
> 
> ArchiePoo is the first "psychoceramic" I encountered on Usenet way back
> when. Back then Usenet was a very different place, with access limited
> to universities, certain large (mostly computer) corporations and
> government agencies. That's how ArchiePoo got access - he worked for
> Dartmouth College who had the advanced foresight to grant internet
> access to all of their students, faculty and staff, and Archie started
> spewing from there. After years of warnings ignored by Archie,
> Dartmouth finally fired his ass for dragging their reputation through
> the mud.
>
> Archie (AP) has gone poetic
> 14 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> earle
>
> Mar 12, 2021, 10:48:35 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> *
> Looks like our Archimedes Plutonium (aka Archie, AP) had gone into the poetic/scriptual domain.
> This is a very good thing!
> Whatever gets him out of mathematics and science and into the poetry of the earth is a good thing.
>
> He may be able to achieve some fame and notoriety in this emotional world that he has never achieved in the field of science or mathematics. I know -- he has "published" a hundred or so "books" courtesy of the Amazon freebies.
>
> But I think his future is in the linguistic and poetic domain of our thinking. I realize that his first language is not English, but his command of our language is not bad at all.
>
> Keep it up, Archie! Tell us what your think about the domain of our existence. Have you read the book, "Sapiens" -- I recommend it strongly. It is a history of existence, beginning with the 'big bang' and ending yesterday.
>
> Read it!
>
> And avoid any urge to lecture on mathematics and science.
>
> Cheers!
>
> earle
> *
>
>
> Job Offer
> 305 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> Earle Jones
>
> Nov 18, 2020, 6:32:00 PM
> to
> *
> Archie:
>
> There is an opening for a potwasher at Hanover House on the Dartmouth campus. They are looking for someone with experience.
>
> It comes along with email "@dartmouth.edu" which would make people think you know what your are talking about.
>
> Are you interested?
>
> earle
> *
> Ohm's Law
> 48 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Jan 27, 2021, 12:40:18 AM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> Questions for Archie Poo:
>
> 1. What is Ohm's Law?
>
> 2. You are standing outside and it begins to rain.
> What do you do?
>
> earle
> *
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Jan 25, 2021, 6:22:03 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> On Mon Jan 25 14:24:05 2021 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > All of my college Teaching True Physics textbooks will follow that history of math form A= B*C*D with its secondary math form of x^2/A^2
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------
> > Table of Contents
> > ---------------------------
> >
> > 1) History of the volume of rectangular box V= L*W*H, and cube, earlier than 4,020 years ago, that starts physics.
> >
> > 2) Ancient Greek history of Atomic theory, magnetism and electricity.
> >
> > 3) Ancient Greek history of Magnetism and Electricity.
> >
> [...clipalot...]
>
> 150 books and you still don't know Ohm's law!
>
> earle
> *
>
> Important Discovery
> 31 views
> Subscribe
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Earle Jones
>
> Dec 13, 2020, 7:27:55 PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
> to
> *
> I am happy and honored to be able to report an important discovery.
> Mathematician and Physicist, Archimedes Plutonium, announced (on June 3, 2015) that, based on his research, the largest finite number is equal to 10^604.
> I want to report that I have found that this is in error: I have found a larger nujmber -- two in fact.
> My research has uncovered this number: 10^604 + 43 is larger than Plutonium's largest number.
> And then I discovered this:
> The number 10^605 is larger (by a factor of ten) than Plutonium's largest number.
> I believe that further research along the lines of my own work will yield more examples.
>
> Earle Jones
> *
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 11:30:20 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
>
> > *
> > Dan: Greetings!
> >
> > You know, and I know, that the so-called "new mathematics" of Archimedes Plutonium is a sad and dangerous set of publications (he now has about 20 "books" that can be downloaded at Amazon.) An unsophisticated mother who wants her kids to have a jump-start in mathematics could be persuaded by his off-base ramblings to present these wild ideas to their kids.
> >
> > That would be a tragedy.
> >
> > Do you think that we could propose to the editors at Amazon that they should somehow read the stuff that they are making available to the public? Do you think that Amazon even reviews the stuff that they sell? I would doubt it.
> >
> > Of all of APs books, I have only seen one review, and it was right to the point: Idiocy, a terrible book!
> >
> > AP is incapable of learning. He makes up his stuff on the fly and then proceeds to provide a "proof." It is obvious that he has no idea of the meaning of a mathematical proof. His pathetic "proof" that the ellipse is not a conic section is a third-grade half-ass attempt, with folding waxy magazine covers and dropping Mason-jar lids to"prove" his preconceived notions.
> >
> > He is clever and very creative. But totally misdirected and incapable of learning. Is it worth an attempt to make this known to Amazon and to suggest that they remove his trash mathematics?
> >
> > I am not a mathematics expert. I was a TA in the Math department at Georgia Tech and taught this stuff to freshmen. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Tech and an MS in EE from Stanford.
> >
> > It bothers me to see the useless ramblings of AP, as well as a few others (Gabriel, et al), receive publication on our NewsGroup and in the Amazon publication list.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 8, 1995 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <3r7klr$8...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, Archimedes Pl writes:
> >
> > >In article <D9tyE...@cwi.nl>
> > >d...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
> > >
> > >> You probably misunderstood. Most will have talked about "unit", not 1;
> > >> at least I did. A unit is a number that has an inverse. In the
> > 10-adics
> > >> all numbers except numbers that are multiples of 2 and 5 are units.
> > That
> > >> is why in the 10-adics only 2 and 5 are prime; units are not prime. In
> > the
> > >> "counting numbers" only 1 is a unit.
> > >
> > > I concur Dik.
> > > Say Dik, if I make the doubly infinites as vectors, wherein the
> > >leftward string is the direction and the rightward string the size
> > >(realizing that the size S is 0<S<1 ) in such a way that each of these
> > >vectors is the arctanh of a Ordered Real/Complex number?
> > >
> > =============
> >
> > To put the math in terms that even Dartmouth students will understand:
> >
> > CalTech 1
> > Dartmouth 0
> >
> > =============
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> 
> > We want our Internet back! Get rid of Spam.
> > See http://www.cauce.org
>
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson*, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> Earle Jones talks about Stanford Univ; and why they are physics failures with their proton-electron of 938 to 0.5MeV which no hydrogen atom can exist, for the true proton is 840MeV to 105MeV muon
> 1 post by 1 author 
>
>
>
> 
> me (Archimedes Plutonium change)
> 
>
>
> 7:44 PM (2 minutes ago)
>
>
>
> Earle Jones says he is from Stanford, but I find that hard to believe. But then again, perhaps why Stanford University fails in physics, as they failed with 2 OR 3 = 5, they failed with ellipse as a conic when it really is a cylinder section, they failed with ever a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and they failed bigtime with thinking the electron is 0.5MeV when actually the true electron inside of atoms is the muon.
>
> So, Earle Jones is a failure of science because all he can do is "ad hominem with his 25 year long nonstop attacks of AP". So, probably the reason Stanford is a failure like Jones, is because they spend all their time in anagrams rather than in the particle physics figuring out the true proton is 840 MeV with a muon stuck inside the proton doing the Faraday Law.
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson*, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> Stanford Univ physics dept.
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 11:30:20 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
>
> > *
> > Dan: Greetings!
> >
> > You know, and I know, that the so-called "new mathematics" of Archimedes Plutonium is a sad and dangerous set of publications (he now has about 20 "books" that can be downloaded at Amazon.) An unsophisticated mother who wants her kids to have a jump-start in mathematics could be persuaded by his off-base ramblings to present these wild ideas to their kids.
> >
> > That would be a tragedy.
> >
> > Do you think that we could propose to the editors at Amazon that they should somehow read the stuff that they are making available to the public? Do you think that Amazon even reviews the stuff that they sell? I would doubt it.
> >
> > Of all of APs books, I have only seen one review, and it was right to the point: Idiocy, a terrible book!
> >
> > AP is incapable of learning. He makes up his stuff on the fly and then proceeds to provide a "proof." It is obvious that he has no idea of the meaning of a mathematical proof. His pathetic "proof" that the ellipse is not a conic section is a third-grade half-ass attempt, with folding waxy magazine covers and dropping Mason-jar lids to"prove" his preconceived notions.
> >
> > He is clever and very creative. But totally misdirected and incapable of learning. Is it worth an attempt to make this known to Amazon and to suggest that they remove his trash mathematics?
> >
> > I am not a mathematics expert. I was a TA in the Math department at Georgia Tech and taught this stuff to freshmen. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Tech and an MS in EE from Stanford.
> >
> > It bothers me to see the useless ramblings of AP, as well as a few others (Gabriel, et al), receive publication on our NewsGroup and in the Amazon publication list.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 8, 1995 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <3r7klr$8...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, Archimedes Pl writes:
> >
> > >In article <D9tyE...@cwi.nl>
> > >d...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
> > >
> > >> You probably misunderstood. Most will have talked about "unit", not 1;
> > >> at least I did. A unit is a number that has an inverse. In the
> > 10-adics
> > >> all numbers except numbers that are multiples of 2 and 5 are units.
> > That
> > >> is why in the 10-adics only 2 and 5 are prime; units are not prime. In
> > the
> > >> "counting numbers" only 1 is a unit.
> > >
> > > I concur Dik.
> > > Say Dik, if I make the doubly infinites as vectors, wherein the
> > >leftward string is the direction and the rightward string the size
> > >(realizing that the size S is 0<S<1 ) in such a way that each of these
> > >vectors is the arctanh of a Ordered Real/Complex number?
> > >
> > =============
> >
> > To put the math in terms that even Dartmouth students will understand:
> >
> > CalTech 1
> > Dartmouth 0
> >
> > =============
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> 
> > We want our Internet back! Get rid of Spam.
> > See http://www.cauce.org
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson*, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 at 11:30:20 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
>
> > *
> > Dan: Greetings!
> >
> > You know, and I know, that the so-called "new mathematics" of Archimedes Plutonium is a sad and dangerous set of publications (he now has about 20 "books" that can be downloaded at Amazon.) An unsophisticated mother who wants her kids to have a jump-start in mathematics could be persuaded by his off-base ramblings to present these wild ideas to their kids.
> >
> > That would be a tragedy.
> >
> > Do you think that we could propose to the editors at Amazon that they should somehow read the stuff that they are making available to the public? Do you think that Amazon even reviews the stuff that they sell? I would doubt it.
> >
> > Of all of APs books, I have only seen one review, and it was right to the point: Idiocy, a terrible book!
> >
> > AP is incapable of learning. He makes up his stuff on the fly and then proceeds to provide a "proof." It is obvious that he has no idea of the meaning of a mathematical proof. His pathetic "proof" that the ellipse is not a conic section is a third-grade half-ass attempt, with folding waxy magazine covers and dropping Mason-jar lids to"prove" his preconceived notions.
> >
> > He is clever and very creative. But totally misdirected and incapable of learning. Is it worth an attempt to make this known to Amazon and to suggest that they remove his trash mathematics?
> >
> > I am not a mathematics expert. I was a TA in the Math department at Georgia Tech and taught this stuff to freshmen. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Tech and an MS in EE from Stanford.
> >
> > It bothers me to see the useless ramblings of AP, as well as a few others (Gabriel, et al), receive publication on our NewsGroup and in the Amazon publication list.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 8, 1995 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <3r7klr$8...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, Archimedes Pl writes:
> >
> > >In article <D9tyE...@cwi.nl>
> > >d...@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter) writes:
> > >
> > >> You probably misunderstood. Most will have talked about "unit", not 1;
> > >> at least I did. A unit is a number that has an inverse. In the
> > 10-adics
> > >> all numbers except numbers that are multiples of 2 and 5 are units.
> > That
> > >> is why in the 10-adics only 2 and 5 are prime; units are not prime. In
> > the
> > >> "counting numbers" only 1 is a unit.
> > >
> > > I concur Dik.
> > > Say Dik, if I make the doubly infinites as vectors, wherein the
> > >leftward string is the direction and the rightward string the size
> > >(realizing that the size S is 0<S<1 ) in such a way that each of these
> > >vectors is the arctanh of a Ordered Real/Complex number?
> > >
> > =============
> >
> > To put the math in terms that even Dartmouth students will understand:
> >
> > CalTech 1
> > Dartmouth 0
> >
> > =============
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *
> 
> > We want our Internet back! Get rid of Spam.

2-Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, no wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.

Not even Earle's friends have respect for Earle Jones and his failure and inability to do math or science. Earle is that why you are banned from posting to sci.physics????

Dan Christensen
Dan Christensen profile

Re: Dr.Terence Tao along with Dr. Gene D.Block fired from UCLA for teaching propaganda -- truth is slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, yet UCLA continues their propaganda of ellipse as slant cut.
8:44 PM

Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
, …
Dan Christensen
57
Job Offer
Speaking of job offers, how did it go with your interview at QAnon? I hope you remembered to bring of
8:27 PM


> Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote
> unread,
> 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> >"antiscience"
> > fails at math and science:
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You're really sick, Pluto!
>
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You already said that.
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
>
> Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
>
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> 58
> Job Offer
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
> 11:22 PM
> 
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> , …
> 68
> "Psychoceramics"
> Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> 11:13 PM
> 
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
>
> H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
>
>
> On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> >
> > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > >>
> > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> >
> > --
> >
> > More anagrams:
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> >
> > ...enough?
> >
> > earle
> > --
> > __
> > __/\_\
> > /\_\/_/
> > \/_/\_\ earle
> > \/_/ jones
> >
>
>
>
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
>
>
>
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > .
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > >
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Edward Witten
> > > John Baez
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-1, 137th published book
> 
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > >
> > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > >
> > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > >
> > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > y z
> > > | /
> > > | /
> > > |/______ x
> > >
> > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > >
> > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > >
> > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > >
> > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > >
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

3-Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus??? Are they arsewipes also like Earle Jones just spending their time on anagrams?? Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, no wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.
>
> Not even Earle's friends have respect for Earle Jones and his failure and inability to do math or science. Earle is that why you are banned from posting to sci.physics????
>
> Dan Christensen
> Dan Christensen profile
>
> Re: Dr.Terence Tao along with Dr. Gene D.Block fired from UCLA for teaching propaganda -- truth is slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, yet UCLA continues their propaganda of ellipse as slant cut.
> 8:44 PM
> 
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> , …
> Dan Christensen
> 57
> Job Offer
> Speaking of job offers, how did it go with your interview at QAnon? I hope you remembered to bring of
> 8:27 PM
> 
> > Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> > Michael Moroney's profile photo
> > Michael Moroney wrote
> > unread,
> > 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > >"antiscience"
> > > fails at math and science:
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You're really sick, Pluto!
> >
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You already said that.
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > >
> > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> >
> > Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
> >
> > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > Earle Jones
> > 58
> > Job Offer
> > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H.. Alan Schwettman, John
> > 11:22 PM
> > 
> > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > Earle Jones
> > , …
> > 68
> > "Psychoceramics"
> > Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> > 11:13 PM
> > 
> >
> > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
> >
> > H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes.. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> >
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> > >
> > > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > >>
> > > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > > >>
> > > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > More anagrams:
> > >
> > > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> > >
> > > ...enough?
> > >
> > > earle
> > > --
> > > __
> > > __/\_\
> > > /\_\/_/
> > > \/_/\_\ earle
> > > \/_/ jones
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Stanford University, math dept.
> >
> > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> >
> >
> > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> >
> > Stanford physics dept.
> >
> > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > 
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > >
> > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > >
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > >
> > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > >
> > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > y z
> > > > | /
> > > > | /
> > > > |/______ x
> > > >
> > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies..
> > > >
> > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > >
> > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > >
> > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > >
> > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Earle Jones on Stanford Uni Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey

Earle Jones spends more time on doing anagrams than he does science, is that why Stanford Uni math and physics are too dumb to ask the question which is the Atom's real true electron-- muon inside a 840MeV proton torus or the 0.5MeV particle that AP proves is the Dirac magnetic monopole.

Why cannot anyone at Stanford Uni counsel the insane foolish idiot Earle Jones??

> > Not even Earle's friends have respect for Earle Jones and his failure and inability to do math or science. Earle is that why you are banned from posting to sci.physics????

On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 11:10:16 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> On Fri Jan 20 21:21:56 2023 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
> >
> > H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes.. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> >
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> > >
> > > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > >>
> > > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > > >>
> > > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> > >

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus??? Are they arsewipes also like Earle Jones just spending their time on anagrams?? Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, no wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.
> >
> > Not even Earle's friends have respect for Earle Jones and his failure and inability to do math or science. Earle is that why you are banned from posting to sci.physics????
> >
> > Dan Christensen
> > Dan Christensen profile
> >
> > Re: Dr.Terence Tao along with Dr. Gene D.Block fired from UCLA for teaching propaganda -- truth is slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, yet UCLA continues their propaganda of ellipse as slant cut.
> > 8:44 PM
> > 
> > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > Earle Jones
> > , …
> > Dan Christensen
> > 57
> > Job Offer
> > Speaking of job offers, how did it go with your interview at QAnon? I hope you remembered to bring of
> > 8:27 PM
> > 
> > > Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> > > Michael Moroney's profile photo
> > > Michael Moroney wrote
> > > unread,
> > > 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > to
> > > >"antiscience"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You're really sick, Pluto!
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You already said that.
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > >
> > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > >
> > > Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
> > >
> > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > Earle Jones
> > > 58
> > > Job Offer
> > > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
> > > 11:22 PM
> > > 
> > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > Earle Jones
> > > , …
> > > 68
> > > "Psychoceramics"
> > > Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> > > 11:13 PM
> > > 
> > >
> > > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
> > >
> > > H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > >
> > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > >
> > > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > > > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > More anagrams:
> > > >
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > > > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > > > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > > > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > > > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > > > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > > > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > > > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > > > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > > > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> > > >
> > > > ...enough?
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > --
> > > > __
> > > > __/\_\
> > > > /\_\/_/
> > > > \/_/\_\ earle
> > > > \/_/ jones
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Stanford University, math dept.
> > >
> > > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> > >
> > >
> > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > >
> > > Stanford physics dept.
> > >
> > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > little fishes
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > >
> > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > John Baez
> > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > 
> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > >
> > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > y z
> > > > > | /
> > > > > | /
> > > > > |/______ x
> > > > >
> > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > >
> > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > >
> > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Earle Jones question-- is the reason you and Stanford Uni. physics cannot understand New Ohm's law where Resistance is magnetic field times electric field, is you spend more time on anagrams and reading spam of WM and Dan Christensen

Dan Christensen
5 Re: 2-Dan Christensen on spanking Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher for their failure to admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the Ellipse. Dan the crazy insane Canadian is into fetishes with his illogic of 2 OR 1=3 with AND as subtraction.Is it Canadian winter
11:01 AM

WM's profile photo
WM
, …
Fritz Feldhase
25
unread,
[0, 1] contains more unit fractions than can be discerned.
On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 6:40:23 PM UTC+1, WM wrote: > If the cursor does not discern the
8:42 AM

cnto...@gmail.com's profile photo
cnto...@gmail.com
,
Y A
2 unread,
test bank for Essentials of Personal Financial Planning 1st Edition by Susan M. Tillery
8:35 AM

WM's profile photo
WM
, …
Timothy Golden
240
unread,
The testimony of unit fractions
On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 2:55:57 PM UTC-5, Jim Burns wrote: > On 2/9/2023 9:32 AM, Timothy
8:33 AM


Kibo Parry M. on>I want to fuck her corpse

AP writes: Kibo, is that a misspelling on your otherwise impeccable spelling of stalker posts. Should that not read "his corpse"?

On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse
On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???

On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"certifiably insane"
> fails at math and science:
> > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> "I want to fuck her corpse"
> Not again!
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
>
> wanting to fuck her corpse
>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>
> I want to fuck her corpse
>

The Tale of Archimedes Plutonium -- Chapter I
* Archimedes Plutonium has, on this NewGroup, identified roughly a thousand matheaticians that have
7:18 PM

James Kibo Parry's profile photo
James Kibo Parry
, …

19
By the way
Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall,
5:49 PM


AP writes: Kibo Parry were you and Earle Jones lovers at one time that both of you continue to stalk AP, as a team of stalkers and paid for it for 30 years now?????

AP writes: question Earle Jones, are you the most sickfuck at Stanford University campus of all sickfucks with your 25 year anagram stalking of AP????

On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
>
> >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> >>
> >>"I am the purloined scum"
>
> --
>
> More anagrams:
>
> Archimedes Plutonium =
> SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
>
> ...enough?
>
> earle
> --
> __
> __/\_\
> /\_\/_/
> \/_/\_\ earle
> \/_/ jones
>

Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall,

Augǝl
, …

31
Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
8:40 PM


Kibo Parry M. on>I want to fuck her corpse
>
> AP writes: Kibo, is that a misspelling on your otherwise impeccable spelling of stalker posts. Should that not read "his corpse"?
> On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
>
> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"certifiably insane"
> > fails at math and science:
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > Not again!
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> The Tale of Archimedes Plutonium -- Chapter I
> * Archimedes Plutonium has, on this NewGroup, identified roughly a thousand matheaticians that have
> 7:18 PM
> 
> James Kibo Parry's profile photo
> James Kibo Parry
> , …
>
> 19
> By the way
> Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall,
> 5:49 PM
> 
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry were you and Earle Jones lovers at one time that both of you continue to stalk AP, as a team of stalkers and paid for it for 30 years now?????
>
> AP writes: question Earle Jones, are you the most sickfuck at Stanford University campus of all sickfucks with your 25 year anagram stalking of AP????
> On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> >
> > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > >>
> > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> >
> > --
> >
> > More anagrams:
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> >
> > ...enough?
> >
> > earle
> > --
> > __
> > __/\_\
> > /\_\/_/
> > \/_/\_\ earle
> > \/_/ jones
> >

Earle Jones anagram?? of "Northstream 2 and 1" is this your anagram earle-- Arse 2 name 1
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, no wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.
>
>
> Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote
> unread,
> 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> >"antiscience"
> > fails at math and science:
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You're really sick, Pluto!
>
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You already said that.
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
>
> Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
>
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> 58
> Job Offer
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
> 11:22 PM
> 
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> , …
> 68
> "Psychoceramics"
> Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> 11:13 PM
> 
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
>
> H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
>
>
> On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> >
> > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > >>
> > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> >
> > --
> >
> > More anagrams:
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> >
> > ...enough?
> >
> > earle
> > --
> > __
> > __/\_\
> > /\_\/_/
> > \/_/\_\ earle
> > \/_/ jones
> >
>
>
>
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
>
>
>
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > .
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > >
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Edward Witten
> > > John Baez
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-1, 137th published book
> 
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > >
> > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > >
> > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > >
> > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > y z
> > > | /
> > > | /
> > > |/______ x
> > >
> > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > >
> > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > >
> > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > >
> > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > >
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, did Stanford Uni fire Earle Jones from Stanford in the mid to late 1990s explaining why that imp Earle Jones resorted to anagram, inflammatory anagrams of posters to sci.math and sci.physics?

No wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.
>
>
> Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote
> unread,
> 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> >"antiscience"
> > fails at math and science:
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You're really sick, Pluto!
>
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You already said that.
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
>
> Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
>
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> 58
> Job Offer
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
> 11:22 PM
> 
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> , …
> 68
> "Psychoceramics"
> Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> 11:13 PM
> 
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
>
> H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
>
>
> On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> >
> > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > >>
> > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> >
> > --
> >
> > More anagrams:
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> >
> > ...enough?
> >
> > earle
> > --
> > __
> > __/\_\
> > /\_\/_/
> > \/_/\_\ earle
> > \/_/ jones
> >
>
>
>
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
>
>
>
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > .
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > >
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Edward Witten
> > > John Baez
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-1, 137th published book
> 
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > >
> > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > >
> > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > >
> > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > y z
> > > | /
> > > | /
> > > |/______ x
> > >
> > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > >
> > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > >
> > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > >
> > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > >
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, did Stanford Uni fire Earle Jones from Stanford in the mid to late 1990s explaining why that imp Earle Jones resorted to anagram, inflammatory anagrams of posters to sci.math and sci.physics? For this is now 2023 and that insane Earle Jones is still nonstop attack posts. So, was he fired for that would explain his nonstop 25 years hate spew. For long ago I detected Earle is so stupid in science he does not even have a handle on Ohm's law. Perhaps Persis Drell, a Provost of Stanford Univ fired Earle Jones in mid 1990s, and Persis herself is a engineer.
>
>
> No wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.
> >
> >
> > Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> > Michael Moroney's profile photo
> > Michael Moroney wrote
> > unread,
> > 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > to
> > >"antiscience"
> > > fails at math and science:
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You're really sick, Pluto!
> >
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You already said that.
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > >
> > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> >
> > Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
> >
> > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > Earle Jones
> > 58
> > Job Offer
> > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H.. Alan Schwettman, John
> > 11:22 PM
> > 
> > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > Earle Jones
> > , …
> > 68
> > "Psychoceramics"
> > Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> > 11:13 PM
> > 
> >
> > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
> >
> > H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes.. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> >
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> > >
> > > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > >>
> > > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > > >>
> > > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > More anagrams:
> > >
> > > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> > >
> > > ...enough?
> > >
> > > earle
> > > --
> > > __
> > > __/\_\
> > > /\_\/_/
> > > \/_/\_\ earle
> > > \/_/ jones
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Stanford University, math dept.
> >
> > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> >
> >
> > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> >
> > Stanford physics dept.
> >
> > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > 
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > >
> > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > >
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > >
> > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > >
> > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > y z
> > > > | /
> > > > | /
> > > > |/______ x
> > > >
> > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies..
> > > >
> > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > >
> > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > >
> > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > >
> > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, did Stanford Uni fire Earle Jones from Stanford in the mid to late 1990s explaining why that imp Earle Jones resorted to anagram, inflammatory anagrams of posters to sci.math and sci.physics? For this is now 2023 and that insane Earle Jones is still nonstop attack posts. So, was he fired for that would explain his nonstop 25 years hate spew. For long ago I detected Earle is so stupid in science he does not even have a handle on Ohm's law. Perhaps Persis Drell, a Provost of Stanford Univ fired Earle Jones in mid 1990s, and Persis herself is a engineer.

Earle Jones, most of your posts from mid 1990s through 2023 has been hate spew, many with anagrams. Is it your intent to make sci.math be a gay pickup bar? And the reason for your hate spew stalks of AP, is to sort of show off to your gay friends-- provided you are gay yourself???

Are you gay? Earle Jones?? And is that why Kibo always comes to your defense and is that why you attack spew for 25 years.

Mostowski Collapse
62
DC Proof gay shit for brains only?
Turning sci.math into gay pickup bar-- Is Graham Cooper, Fritz Feldhase, William,Ben Bacarisse, WM
12:18 AM

Graham Cooper's profile photo
Graham Cooper
, …
William
24
unread,
Who really believes ------ EXIST(X) X>INFINITY ?
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 4:05:03 PM UTC+11, William wrote: > On Thursday, February 16, 2023
12:05 AM

Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
, …

32
RE: 2-Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games. Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither
12:05 AM

Augǝl's profile photo
Augǝl
, …
A 33
Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
12:03 AM

Graham Cooper's profile photo
Graham Cooper
,

3
****
2-Michelle K Livett,Andrew McCallum Martin,Jeffrey C McCallum,Roger P Rassool, never a admitting
Feb 16

zelos...@gmail.com's profile photo
zelos...@gmail.com
, …

19
Re: =The Dan Christensen let me suck your cock.
Is their aim--make sci.math a gay pickup bar-Fritz Feldhase,Dan Christensen,Graham Cooper,MitchR, Jan
Feb 16

Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
, …
Fritz Feldhase
10
unread,
Even and Odd Number Revisited: A formal set theoretic approach in DC Proof

> > No wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.
> > >
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> > > Michael Moroney's profile photo
> > > Michael Moroney wrote
> > > unread,
> > > 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > to
> > > >"antiscience"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You're really sick, Pluto!
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You already said that.
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > >
> > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > >
> > > Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
> > >
> > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > Earle Jones
> > > 58
> > > Job Offer
> > > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
> > > 11:22 PM
> > > 
> > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > Earle Jones
> > > , …
> > > 68
> > > "Psychoceramics"
> > > Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> > > 11:13 PM
> > > 
> > >
> > > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
> > >
> > > H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > >
> > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > >
> > > Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > > > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > More anagrams:
> > > >
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > > > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > > > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > > > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > > > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > > > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > > > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > > > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > > > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > > > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> > > >
> > > > ...enough?
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > --
> > > > __
> > > > __/\_\
> > > > /\_\/_/
> > > > \/_/\_\ earle
> > > > \/_/ jones
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Stanford University, math dept.
> > >
> > > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> > >
> > >
> > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > >
> > > Stanford physics dept.
> > >
> > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > little fishes
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > >
> > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > John Baez
> > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > 
> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > >
> > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > y z
> > > > > | /
> > > > > | /
> > > > > |/______ x
> > > > >
> > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > >
> > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > >
> > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Persis Drell, Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump was Earle Jones fired from Stanford, causing him to post hate spam from 1990s to present, especially foul anagrams???

Earle Jones
6:12 PM (4 hours ago)

On Tue Feb 7 00:43:06 2023 Volney wrote: > ?? of Math and ?? of Physics Archimedes "
Message has been deleted
Earle Jones's profile photo
Earle Jones
6:54 PM (3 hours ago)



to

I forgot to include this link to the Dartmough Alumni Magazine:

AP writes: does it include info on Earle Jones fired from Stanford and thus become a world class "sour-puss" or sour-puke

Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, no wonder they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse, too busy making anagrams all day long with Earle Jones.
>
>
> Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker keeps repeating--
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote
> unread,
> 8:35 PM (13 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> >"antiscience"
> > fails at math and science:
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You're really sick, Pluto!
>
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You already said that.
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
>
> Earle Jones, the arsewipe of Stanford University and shows us why Stanford is a failed school of science. The 25 year hate spew stalker is indicative of why the Stanford science professors are failures.
>
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> 58
> Job Offer
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science. H. Alan Schwettman, John
> 11:22 PM
> 
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> , …
> 68
> "Psychoceramics"
> Earle Jones on Kibo fucking corpses on Stanford Univ dishwasher or potwasher machines. Earle, is it
> 11:13 PM
> 
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a failed school of science.
>
> H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
> Earle Jones shows us why Stanford Univ is a sewer cesspool when it comes to science-- they spend half the day on hate-spew and making anagrams of those that do succeed in science.
>
>
> On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> >
> > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > >>
> > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > >>
> > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> >
> > --
> >
> > More anagrams:
> >
> > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> >
> > ...enough?
> >
> > earle
> > --
> > __
> > __/\_\
> > /\_\/_/
> > \/_/\_\ earle
> > \/_/ jones
> >
>
>
>
>
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
>
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
>
>
>
>
> > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > Francois Englert
> > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > Adam G. Riess
> > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > John C. Mather
> > > George F. Smoot
> > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > David J. Gross
> > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > Frank Wilczek
> > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > .
> > > .
> > > little fishes
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > >
> > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > .
> > > .
> > > Edward Witten
> > > John Baez
> > > Brian Greene
> > > Lisa Randall
> > > Alan H. Guth
> > > Michael E. Brown
> > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > Ben Bullock
> > > Larry Harson
> > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-1, 137th published book
> 
> > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > >
> > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > >
> > >
> > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > >
> > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > >
> > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface:
> > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > >
> > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > >
> > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > y z
> > > | /
> > > | /
> > > |/______ x
> > >
> > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > >
> > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > >
> > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > >
> > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > >
> > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

H. Alan Schwettman, Persis Drell, John Turneaure _did you fire_ Earle Jones in the 1990s, causing him to become this sci.math,sci.physics hate spewing nonstop spammer for the next 30 years and his foul anagrams??? I mean what instructor or engineer of Stanford would spend 30 years hate spewing Usenet with foul anagrams and raw hatred. Does Stanford Uni even have a psychiatric clinic to treat sickfucks like Earle Jones.

Earle Jones wrote to sci.math:
, …

5
The Tale of Archimedes Plutonium -- Chapter I
KiboParry V. on Earle Jones necrophilia, both men and women. Earle is that why you spent 25 years
Feb 16



> > Earle Jones, his cocksucker logo picture and his Stanford Uni. time spent on anagrams. No wonder the arsewipe Earle Jones along with Stanford Univ can never ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle. They are too busy with hate spew and anagrams.
> > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > *
> > > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
> > >
> > On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> > >
> > > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > >>
> > > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > > >>
> > > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > More anagrams:
> > >
> > > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> > >
> > > ...enough?
> > >
> > > earle
> > > --
> > > __
> > > __/\_\
> > > /\_\/_/
> > > \/_/\_\ earle
> > > \/_/ jones
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper,David John Sainsbury,Cambridge University ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> >
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> >
> > Stanford physics dept.
> >
> > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > >
> > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > >
> > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > >
> > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > >
> > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > >
> > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > >
> > > > Preface:
> > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > >
> > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > >
> > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > y z
> > > > | /
> > > > | /
> > > > |/______ x
> > > >
> > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies..
> > > >
> > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > >
> > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > >
> > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > >
> > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium

2- Alan Schwettman, Persis Drell, John Turneaure _did you fire_ Earle Jones in the 1990s, causing him to become this sci.math,sci.physics hate spewing nonstop spammer for the next 30 years and his foul anagrams??? I mean what instructor or engineer of Stanford would spend 30 years hate spewing Usenet with foul anagrams and raw hatred. Does Stanford Uni even have a psychiatric clinic to treat sickfucks like Earle Jones.
>

On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 7:06:41 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> I am sure you will come up with a reason to multiply by four. Here is a start: The nmber four is EXACTLY twice the size of the only even prime number.
>
> earle
> *

AP asks: did the students of Stanford Univ quickly figure out that Jones was a flake in science and engineering leading up to his firing if a firing had taken place????

> Earle Jones wrote to sci.math:
> , …
>
> 5
> The Tale of Archimedes Plutonium -- Chapter I
> KiboParry V. on Earle Jones necrophilia, both men and women. Earle is that why you spent 25 years
> Feb 16
> 
> 
>
>
> > > Earle Jones, his cocksucker logo picture and his Stanford Uni. time spent on anagrams. No wonder the arsewipe Earle Jones along with Stanford Univ can never ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle. They are too busy with hate spew and anagrams.
> > > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > *
> > > > Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester.)
> > > >
> > > On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> > > > sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> > > > ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"I am the purloined scum"
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > More anagrams:
> > > >
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium =
> > > > SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> > > > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> > > > RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> > > > IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> > > > POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> > > > HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> > > > LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> > > > MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> > > > MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
> > > >
> > > > ...enough?
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > --
> > > > __
> > > > __/\_\
> > > > /\_\/_/
> > > > \/_/\_\ earle
> > > > \/_/ jones
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper,David John Sainsbury,Cambridge University ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > >
> > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > >
> > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > >
> > > Stanford physics dept.
> > >
> > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian
> > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > little fishes
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > >
> > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > John Baez
> > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > >
> > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > >
> > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > y z
> > > > > | /
> > > > > | /
> > > > > |/______ x
> > > > >
> > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > >
> > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > >
> > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > Archimedes Plutonium